Original Article

Split Viewer

Blood Res 2020; 55(3):

Published online September 30, 2020

https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020137

© The Korean Society of Hematology

KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in plasma cell myeloma at a single Korean institute

Yonggoo Kim1,2, Sung-Soo Park3, Chang-Ki Min3, Gun Dong Lee2, Jungok Son2, Sung Jin Jo1, Eunhee Han1,2, Kyungja Han1, Myungshin Kim1,2

1Department of Laboratory Medicine, 2Catholic Genetic Laboratory Center, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, 3Department of Hematology, Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hematology Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to : Myungshin Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea
E-mail: microkim@catholic.ac.kr

Received: June 15, 2020; Revised: August 30, 2020; Accepted: September 15, 2020

This is an Open Access article distributed unAcute myeloid leukemia, New FDA approvalsder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background
Plasma cell myeloma (PCM) is a genetically heterogeneous disease. The genetic spectrum of PCM has been expanded to mutations such as KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF genes in the RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway. In this study, we have evaluated the frequency of these mutations and their significance, including baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes.
Methods
We explored 50 patients who were newly diagnosed with PCM between 2009 and 2012 at a single Korean institute. Clinical and laboratory parameters were gathered through careful review of medical records. Mutation analysis was carried out using DNA from the bone marrow at the time of diagnosis. Pyrosequencing was performed to detect KRAS G12V, KRAS G13D, and NRAS G61R. BRAF V600E was analyzed by allele-specific real- time PCR. Comparison of clinical and laboratory parameters was carried out according to those mutations.
Results
We identified 14 patients (28%) with activating mutations in the RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway (RAS/RAF mutations): KRAS (N=3), NRAS (N=4), BRAF (N=7), and both KRAS and BRAF (N=1). RAS/RAF mutations were more frequently observed in patients with complex karyotypes and showed poorer progression free survival (PFS). Specifically, the BRAF V600E mutation had a significantly negative impact on median PFS.
Conclusion
We first showed the frequency of RAS/RAF mutations in Korean patients with PCM. Screening of these mutations could be considered as a routine clinical test at the time of diagnosis and follow-up due to their influence on clinical outcome, as well as its potential as a therapeutic target.

Keywords KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, Plasma cell myeloma

Article

Original Article

Blood Res 2020; 55(3): 159-168

Published online September 30, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020137

Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.

KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in plasma cell myeloma at a single Korean institute

Yonggoo Kim1,2, Sung-Soo Park3, Chang-Ki Min3, Gun Dong Lee2, Jungok Son2, Sung Jin Jo1, Eunhee Han1,2, Kyungja Han1, Myungshin Kim1,2

1Department of Laboratory Medicine, 2Catholic Genetic Laboratory Center, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, 3Department of Hematology, Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hematology Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to:Myungshin Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea
E-mail: microkim@catholic.ac.kr

Received: June 15, 2020; Revised: August 30, 2020; Accepted: September 15, 2020

This is an Open Access article distributed unAcute myeloid leukemia, New FDA approvalsder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background
Plasma cell myeloma (PCM) is a genetically heterogeneous disease. The genetic spectrum of PCM has been expanded to mutations such as KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF genes in the RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway. In this study, we have evaluated the frequency of these mutations and their significance, including baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes.
Methods
We explored 50 patients who were newly diagnosed with PCM between 2009 and 2012 at a single Korean institute. Clinical and laboratory parameters were gathered through careful review of medical records. Mutation analysis was carried out using DNA from the bone marrow at the time of diagnosis. Pyrosequencing was performed to detect KRAS G12V, KRAS G13D, and NRAS G61R. BRAF V600E was analyzed by allele-specific real- time PCR. Comparison of clinical and laboratory parameters was carried out according to those mutations.
Results
We identified 14 patients (28%) with activating mutations in the RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway (RAS/RAF mutations): KRAS (N=3), NRAS (N=4), BRAF (N=7), and both KRAS and BRAF (N=1). RAS/RAF mutations were more frequently observed in patients with complex karyotypes and showed poorer progression free survival (PFS). Specifically, the BRAF V600E mutation had a significantly negative impact on median PFS.
Conclusion
We first showed the frequency of RAS/RAF mutations in Korean patients with PCM. Screening of these mutations could be considered as a routine clinical test at the time of diagnosis and follow-up due to their influence on clinical outcome, as well as its potential as a therapeutic target.

Keywords: KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, Plasma cell myeloma

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Overview of the genetic abnormalities identified in 50 plasma cell myeloma patients.
Blood Research 2020; 55: 159-168https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020137

Fig 2.

Figure 2.linical outcomes of patients with any KRAS, NRAS, and/or BRAF mutation [RAS/RAF(+)] or without mutations [RAS/RAF(-)] (A, B). Comparison between subgroups; BRAF V600E (+) vs. BRAF V600E (-) (C) and RAS (+) vs. RAS (-) (D).
Blood Research 2020; 55: 159-168https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020137

Table 1 . Baseline characteristics of the patients..

CharacteristicsTotal (N=50)
Age years, median (range)66 (31–82)
Gender, male, N (%)27 (54%)
Type of myeloma, N (%)
Ig G25 (50%)
Ig A10 (20%)
Ig M1 (2%)
Ig D3 (6%)
Light chain disease11 (22%)
Clonality of Light chain, N (%)
kappa33 (66%)
Lambda17 (34%)
Extramedullary disease
Yes, N (%)8 (16%)
No, N (%)42 (84%)
Lactate dehydrogenase
>Upper limit of normal19 (38%)
Normal31 (62%)
Median renal function (creatinine clearance) before transplant, mL/min, (range)58.8 (5.73–110.8)
>60, N (%)24 (48%)
≥30 to <60, N (%)16 (32%)
<30, N (%)10 (20%)
ISS stage at diagnosis
I, N (%)6 (12%)
II, N (%)16 (32%)
III, N (%)26 (52%)
Unknown, N (%)2 (4%)
Frontline treatment
Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisolone with transplant11 (22%)
Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisolone without transplant36 (72%)
Others with transplant3 (6%)
Eligibility of autologous stem cell transplantation
Eligible, N (%)14 (28%)
Not-eligible, N (%)36 (72%)
Best response of frontline treatment
CR or better23 (46%)
VGPR13 (26%)
PR13 (26%)
SD1 (2%)
Median PFS of frontline treatment, months, median (95% CI)23.5 (16.5–25.6)
Median OS, months, median (95% CI)105.7 (63.7-not available)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; OS, Overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; VGPR, very good partial response..


Table 2 . Characteristics of patients with any KRAS, NRAS, and/or BRAF mutations..

CharacteristicsRAS/RAF(+) (N=14)RAS/RAF(-) (N=36)
Age years, median (range)69 (64–82)66 (32–80)
Gender, male, N (%)9 (64%)18 (50%)
Cytogenetics
Abnormal1219
Complex (≥3)1013
ISS stage at diagnosis
I, N (%)0 (0%)6 (17%)
II, N (%)5 (36%)11 (31%)
III, N (%)9 (64%)17 (47%)
Unknown, N (%)2 (6%)
Frontline treatment
Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisolone with transplant2 (14%)9 (25%)
Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisolone without transplant12 (86%)24 (67%)
Others with transplant0 (0%)3 (8%)
Best response of frontline treatment
CR or better5 (36%)18 (50%)
VGPR4 (29%)9 (25%)
PR5 (36%)8 (22%)
SD0 (0%)1 (3%)

Abbreviations: CR, complete response; PR, partial response; RAS/RAF(+), presence of any KRAS, NRAS and/or BRAF mutation; RAS/RAF(-), absence of KRAS, NRAS or BRAF mutations; SD, stable disease; VGPR, very good partial response..


Table 3 . Univariable and multivariable analysis for progression-free survival..

Variables (N=50)NUnivariate analysisMultivariable analysis


Median PFS, mo (95% CI)PHazard ratio (95% CI)P
Patient age (yr)0.837-
<661923.9 (15.4–51.3)-
≥663118.9 (12.6–29)-
Sex0.496-
Male2723.9 (15.4–31.4)-
Female2318.9 (12.6–24.9)-
Type of myeloma0.605-
IgG2524.2 (15.4–49.3)-
Non-IgG2518.9 (12.6–24.9)-
Type of light chain0.649-
Kappa3318.9 (15.4–25.5)-
Lambda1724.6 (8.5–51.3)-
Lactate dehydrogenase0.373-
>Upper limit of normal3123.9 (16.3–31.4)-
Normal1922.2 (8.5–26)-
ISS stage at diagnosis0.826-
I or II2224.2 (18.2–31.4)-
III2616.5 (8.8–51.3)-
Unknown2-
Cytogenetic status0.536-
Standard risk2623.9 (16.3–31.2)-
High risk1323.5 (8.5–51.3)-
Unknown11-
Extramedullary disease0.925-
Present825.1 (6–52.8)-
None4222.2 (14.8-25.6)-
Transplant eligibility0.601-
No3618.9 (12.6–24.9)-
Yes1426.5 (15.4–51.3)-
BRAF V600E mutation0.040.623
No4323.9 (16.5–31.2)1
Yes718.2 (1.8–24.2)1.32 (0.44–3.98)
RAS/RAF mutation0.0150.018
No3624.0 (16.5–49.3)1
Yes1418.2 (3.6–24.2)2.28 (1.15–4.5)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; PFS, progression free survival; RAS/RAF, any of KRAS, NRAS and/or BRAF mutations..


Blood Res
Volume 59 2024

Supplementary File

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in BR

Blood Research

pISSN 2287-979X
eISSN 2288-0011
qr-code Download