Original Article

Split Viewer

Blood Res 2021; 56(4):

Published online December 31, 2021

https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2021016

© The Korean Society of Hematology

Mutation analysis and characterisation of F9 gene in haemophilia- B population of India

Sujayendra Kulkarni1,2, Rajat Hegde4, Smita Hegde4, Suyamindra S. Kulkarni4, Suresh Hanagvadi5, Kusal K. Das6, Sanjeev Kolagi3, Pramod B. Gai4, Rudragouda Bulagouda1

1Human Genetics Laboratory, Department of Anatomy, Shri B.M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, 2Division of Human Genetics (Central Research Lab), 3Department of Anatomy, S. Nijaliangappa Medical College, HSK Hospital and Research Center, Bagalkot, 4Karnataka Institute for DNA Research (KIDNAR), Dharwad, 5Department of Pathology, J. J. M. Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, 6Laboratory of Vascular Physiology and Medicine, Department of Physiology, Shri B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, India

Correspondence to : Rudragouda Bulagouda, M.D.
Human Genetics Laboratory, Department of Anatomy, Shri B.M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura 586101, India
E-mail: drravisb2012@gmail.com

Received: January 22, 2021; Revised: August 18, 2021; Accepted: August 25, 2021

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background
Hemophilia B (HB) is an X-linked bleeding disorder resulting from coagulation factor IX defects. Over 3,000 pathogenic, HB-associated mutations in the F9 gene have been identified. We aimed to investigate the role of F9 variants in 150 HB patients using sequencing technology.
Methods
F9 gene sequences were amplified from peripheral blood-derived DNA and sequenced on an Applied Biosystems (ABI) 3500 Sanger sequencing platform. Functional and structural predictions of mutant FIX were analyzed.
Results
Among 150 HB patients, 102 (68%), 30 (20%), and 18 (12%) suffered from severe, moderate, and mild HB, respectively. Genetic analysis identified 16 mutations, including 3 novel mutations. Nine mutations (7 missense and 2 stop-gain) were found to be pathogenic. Only 3 mutations (c.127C>T, c.470G>A, and c.1070G>A) were associated with different severities. While 2 mutations were associated with mild HB cases (c.304C>T and c.580A>G), 2 (c.195G>A and c.1385A>G) and 3 mutations (c.223C>T, c.1187G>A, and c.1232G>A) resulted in moderate and severe disease, respectively. Additionally, 1 mutation each was associated with mild-moderate (c.*1110A>G) and mild-severe HB disease (c.197A>T), 4 mutations were associated with moderate-severe HB cases (c.314A>G, c.198A>T, c.676C>T, and c.1094C>A). FIX concentrations were lower in the mutated group (5.5±2.5% vs. 8.0±2.5%). Novel p.E66D and p.S365 mutations were predicted to be pathogenic based on changes in FIX structure and function.
Conclusion
Novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) largely contributed to the pathogenesis of HB. Our study strongly suggests that population-based genetic screening will be particularly helpful to identify risk prediction and carrier detection tools for Indian HB patients.

Keywords Hemophilia B, F9 gene, Stop-gain mutation, Missense mutation, India

Article

Original Article

Blood Res 2021; 56(4): 252-258

Published online December 31, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2021016

Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.

Mutation analysis and characterisation of F9 gene in haemophilia- B population of India

Sujayendra Kulkarni1,2, Rajat Hegde4, Smita Hegde4, Suyamindra S. Kulkarni4, Suresh Hanagvadi5, Kusal K. Das6, Sanjeev Kolagi3, Pramod B. Gai4, Rudragouda Bulagouda1

1Human Genetics Laboratory, Department of Anatomy, Shri B.M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, 2Division of Human Genetics (Central Research Lab), 3Department of Anatomy, S. Nijaliangappa Medical College, HSK Hospital and Research Center, Bagalkot, 4Karnataka Institute for DNA Research (KIDNAR), Dharwad, 5Department of Pathology, J. J. M. Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, 6Laboratory of Vascular Physiology and Medicine, Department of Physiology, Shri B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, India

Correspondence to:Rudragouda Bulagouda, M.D.
Human Genetics Laboratory, Department of Anatomy, Shri B.M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura 586101, India
E-mail: drravisb2012@gmail.com

Received: January 22, 2021; Revised: August 18, 2021; Accepted: August 25, 2021

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background
Hemophilia B (HB) is an X-linked bleeding disorder resulting from coagulation factor IX defects. Over 3,000 pathogenic, HB-associated mutations in the F9 gene have been identified. We aimed to investigate the role of F9 variants in 150 HB patients using sequencing technology.
Methods
F9 gene sequences were amplified from peripheral blood-derived DNA and sequenced on an Applied Biosystems (ABI) 3500 Sanger sequencing platform. Functional and structural predictions of mutant FIX were analyzed.
Results
Among 150 HB patients, 102 (68%), 30 (20%), and 18 (12%) suffered from severe, moderate, and mild HB, respectively. Genetic analysis identified 16 mutations, including 3 novel mutations. Nine mutations (7 missense and 2 stop-gain) were found to be pathogenic. Only 3 mutations (c.127C>T, c.470G>A, and c.1070G>A) were associated with different severities. While 2 mutations were associated with mild HB cases (c.304C>T and c.580A>G), 2 (c.195G>A and c.1385A>G) and 3 mutations (c.223C>T, c.1187G>A, and c.1232G>A) resulted in moderate and severe disease, respectively. Additionally, 1 mutation each was associated with mild-moderate (c.*1110A>G) and mild-severe HB disease (c.197A>T), 4 mutations were associated with moderate-severe HB cases (c.314A>G, c.198A>T, c.676C>T, and c.1094C>A). FIX concentrations were lower in the mutated group (5.5±2.5% vs. 8.0±2.5%). Novel p.E66D and p.S365 mutations were predicted to be pathogenic based on changes in FIX structure and function.
Conclusion
Novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) largely contributed to the pathogenesis of HB. Our study strongly suggests that population-based genetic screening will be particularly helpful to identify risk prediction and carrier detection tools for Indian HB patients.

Keywords: Hemophilia B, F9 gene, Stop-gain mutation, Missense mutation, India

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Graphical representation of the distribution of the mutations within the Factor 9 (F9) gene.
Blood Research 2021; 56: 252-258https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2021016

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Multiple sequence analysis of the Factor IX (FIX) protein. The arrow indicates the position of the p.E66D mutation.
Blood Research 2021; 56: 252-258https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2021016

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Segments of a 3D model of wild type (upper left panel) and mutant (p.E66D; upper right panel) Factor IX. A superimposed 3D model of wild type (red) and mutant (p.S365*; blue) Factor IX are shown in the lower panel.
Blood Research 2021; 56: 252-258https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2021016

Table 1 . Clinicopathological characteristics of the study population..

Clinicopathological parametersDisease severity
SevereModerateMild
(Factor IX <1%), N=102 (68%)(Factor IX 1–5%), N=30 (20%)(Factor IX >5%), N=18 (12%)
Mean factor IX levels (%)0.6±0.22.5±1.38.0±2.6
Family history of bleeding (N)80107
Mean age of onset (yr)2.0±1.07.5±2.810.0±3.5
Mutation frequency (within group)48% (49/102)86.7% (26/30)83.3% (15/18)
Inhibitor-positive (N)23114
Inhibitor-negative (N)791914
Hemoglobin concentrationNormalNormalNormal
Platelet countNormalNormalNormal
Prothrombin timeNormalNormalNormal
Activated partial thromboplastin timeHighHighHigh
Bleeding sites
Joints55 (54%)19 (63.3%)12 (66.7%)
Gum17 (16.7%)6 (20%)4 (22.2%)
Muscle13 (12.7%)1 (3.3%)2 (11.1%)
Epistaxis7 (6.9%)4 (13.3%)0
Petechiae10 (9.8%)00

Table 2 . List of mutations recorded in the F9 genes of our study cohort..

Mutation typeNucleotide changecDNA positionAmino acid changeExonStatusFrequency, N (%)
Missenseg.11313C>Tc.127C>Tp.R43W2Reported (rs1603264205)9 (6.0%)
Missenseg.11381G>Ac.195G>Ap.M65I2Reported (rs763568424)1 (0.66%)
Missenseg.11383A>Tc.197A>Tp.E66V2Reported (CM940423)3 (2.0%)
Missenseg.11384A>Tc.198A>Tp.E66D2Not reported12 (8.0%)
Stop-gaing.11409 C>Tc.223C>Tp.R75a)2Reported (rs137852227)2 (1.33%)
Missenseg.15369 T>Cc.304C>Tp.C102R4Reported (CM960574)2 (1.33%)
Missenseg.22664 T>Cc.314A>Gp.G143R5Reported (CM940499)4 (2.66%)
Missenseg.22706 G>Ac.470G>Ap.C157Y5Reported (rs1367198680)17 (11.33%)
Missenseg.25386 A>Gc.580A>Gp.T194A6Reported (rs6048)3 (2.0%)
Missenseg.25482C>Tc.676C>Tp.R226W6Reported (rs137852240)6 (4.0%)
Missenseg.36020 G>Ac.1070G>Ap.G357E8Reported (rs137852275)8 (5.33%)
Stop-gaing.36044C>Ac.1094C>Ap.S365a)8Not reported15 (10.0%)
Missenseg.36137G>Ac.1187G>Ap.C396Y8Reported (rs137852273)1 (0.66%)
Missenseg.36182 G>Ac.1232G>Ap.S411N8Reported (rs137852276)3 (2.0%)
Synonymousg.36335 A>Gc.1385A>Gp.Ter462=8Reported (rs561793582)1 (0.66%)
3’ UTRg.37446A>Gc.*1110A>G………8Not reported3 (2.0%)

a)NG_007994.1, NM_000133.4, and NP_000124.1 reference sequences wereused for genomic DNA variant nomenclature, coding region variant nomenclature, and protein variant nomenclature, respectively. All nomenclatures were made according to Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) guidelines..


Table 3 . Genotypic and phenotypic associations of the mutations recorded in the study population..

Mutation typecDNA positionPatients Factor IX (IX) concentration level (%)Age of onsetInhibitor-positive (N)Inhibitor-negative (N)Clinical significance
mMS
Missensec.127C>T0304026.5, 8.0, 10 (m)
2.0, 2.3. 1.8, 2.0 (M)
0.8, 0.5 (S)
10, 12, 8 (m)
7, 6, 9, 9 (M)
1, 1.5 (S)
2 (m)
2 (M)
-
1 (m)
2 (M)
2 (S)
Pathogenic
Missensec.195G>A0001003.0 (M)7.5 (M)1 (M)-Likely pathogenic
Missensec.197A>T0200016.0, 9.0 (m)
0.3 (S)
13, 11 (m)
1 (S)
-2 (m)
1 (S)
Likely benign
Missensec.198A>T0004071.5, 2.0. 2.5, 2.0 (M)
0.8, 0.5, 0.1, 0.6, 0.6, <0.01, 0.01 (S)
6, 7, 7, 8 (M)
1, 2, 1, 1.5, 2, 2, 1.6 (S)
4 (M)
4 (S)
-
3 (S)
Pathogenic
Stop-gainc.223C>T000002<0.01, <0.01 (S)1, 1 (S)1 (S)1 (S)Pathogenic
Missensec.304C>T02000012.0, 10.0 (m)13, 10 (m)2 (m)-Likely pathogenic
Missensec.314A>G0001032.0 (M)
0.2, 0.1, 0.01 (S)
8 (M)
1, 2, 1 (S)
-1 (M)
3 (S)
Pathogenic
Missensec.470G>A0305095.0, 7.5, 10.3 (m)
2.0, 3.5, 2.5, 1.8, 4.0 (M)
0.8, 0.5, 0.01, 0.2, <0.01, <0.01, 0.4, 0.2, <0.01 (S)
6.5, 10, 11 (m)
5, 7, 7, 9, 7 (M)
1, 2, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2 (S)
3 (m)
1 (M)
2 (S)
-
4 (M)
7 (S)
Pathogenic
Missensec.580A>G03000010.7, 9.0, 9.0 (m)10, 8, 8 (m)-3 (m)Likely benign
Missensec.676C>T0001054.0 (M)
0.5, 0.1, <0.01, 0.01, <0.01 (S)
5.5 (M)
3, 1, 2, 2, 1 (S)
1 (M)
1 (S)
-
3 (S)
Pathogenic
Missensec.1070G>A0103046.5 (m)
2.0, 3.8, 2.5 (M)
0.01, 0.1, <0.01, <0.01 (S)
12 (m)
6, 7, 7 (M)
2, 2, 2, 1 (S)
-
2 (M)
2 (S)
1 (m)
1 (M)
1 (S)
Pathogenic
Stop-gainc.1094C>A0003122.6, 3.5, 1.8 (M)
0.01, 0.01, 0.1, 0.2, <0.01, <0.01, 0.1, 0.01, <0.01, 0.01, <0.01, <0.01 (S)
7, 7, 6 (M)
1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 1.5, 3, 2, 2, 2.5, 1 (S)
-
10 (S)
3 (M)
2 (S)
Pathogenic
Missensec.1187G>A0000010.6 (S)2 (S)-1 (S)Benign
Missensec.1232G>A0000030.6, 0.3, 0.1 (S)2, 1, 1.5 (S)1 (S)2 (S)Pathogenic
Synonymousc.1385A>G0001004.0 (M)10 (M)1 (M)-Benign
3’ UTRc.*1110A>G01030012.0 (m)
5.0, 4.0, 3.8 (M)
13 (m)
7, 7.5, 9 (M)
1 (m)
1 (M)
-
2 (M)
-

Abbreviations: m, mild; M, moderate; S, severe..


Table 4 . Pathogenicity predictions of the p.E66D mutation..

MutationPROVEANa)SNAP2b)PolyPhen2c)PHD-SNPd)SNP&GOe)PANTHER
E66DDeleterious
Score: -2.540
Effect
Score: 37
Probably damaging
Score: 0.999
Disease
Score: 4
Disease
Probability: 0.705
Probably damaging

a)PROVEAN: “Deleterious” if the prediction score was ≤2.5, “Neutral” if the prediction score was ≥2.5. b)NAP2: “Neutral” if the score ranged from 0 to -100. “Effect” if the score was between 0 and 100. c)PolyPhen2: “Probably damaging” is the most disease-causing ability, with a score near 1. “Possibly damaging” signifies less disease-causing ability with a score of 0.5–0.8. “Benign”, which does not alter protein function, with a score closer to 0. d)PHD-SNP: if the probability is >0.5, mutation is predicted as “Disease” and if less than <0.5, mutation is predicted to be “Neutral”. e)SNP & GO: Probability of >0.5 is predicted to be a disease-causing nsSNP..


Blood Res
Volume 59 2024

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in BR

Blood Research

pISSN 2287-979X
eISSN 2288-0011
qr-code Download