Blood Res 2013; 48(3):
Published online September 25, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2013.48.3.185
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Correspondence to : Correspondence to Hyun-Sook Chi, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-4502, Fax: +82-2-478-0884, hschi@amc.seoul.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Therapy-related AML (t-AML) occurs as a late complication of chemotherapy administered to treat a prior disorder. Prognostic factors affecting the clinical outcome in t-AML have not yet been clearly defined; therefore, we evaluated these factors in this study.
Forty-eight patients diagnosed with t-AML within the past 10 years were enrolled, and their chemotherapy regimens categorized into 4 groups: alkylating agents (AK) only, topoisomerase II inhibitors (TI) and AK, TI only, and others. The prognostic factors affecting clinical outcome were evaluated.
Five (10.4%), 21 (43.8%), 9 (18.8%), and 13 (27.0%) patients were treated with AK only, AK and TI, TI only, and others, respectively. Patients with an AML M3 phenotype showed significantly longer overall survival (OS; 55.1 vs. 14.3 months,
Only the AML M3 phenotype was identified as having a good prognosis, and this might suggest that it exhibits unique clinical features in t-AML patients. Moreover, our findings indicated that karyotype was the strongest prognostic indicator and predicted a poor prognosis for t-AML patients with a complex karyotype.
Keywords Prognosis, Therapy, Related, AML
Blood Res 2013; 48(3): 185-192
Published online September 25, 2013 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2013.48.3.185
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Sang Hyuk Park, Hyun-Sook Chi*, Young-Uk Cho, Seongsoo Jang, and Chan-Jeoung Park
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Correspondence to: Correspondence to Hyun-Sook Chi, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-4502, Fax: +82-2-478-0884, hschi@amc.seoul.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Therapy-related AML (t-AML) occurs as a late complication of chemotherapy administered to treat a prior disorder. Prognostic factors affecting the clinical outcome in t-AML have not yet been clearly defined; therefore, we evaluated these factors in this study.
Forty-eight patients diagnosed with t-AML within the past 10 years were enrolled, and their chemotherapy regimens categorized into 4 groups: alkylating agents (AK) only, topoisomerase II inhibitors (TI) and AK, TI only, and others. The prognostic factors affecting clinical outcome were evaluated.
Five (10.4%), 21 (43.8%), 9 (18.8%), and 13 (27.0%) patients were treated with AK only, AK and TI, TI only, and others, respectively. Patients with an AML M3 phenotype showed significantly longer overall survival (OS; 55.1 vs. 14.3 months,
Only the AML M3 phenotype was identified as having a good prognosis, and this might suggest that it exhibits unique clinical features in t-AML patients. Moreover, our findings indicated that karyotype was the strongest prognostic indicator and predicted a poor prognosis for t-AML patients with a complex karyotype.
Keywords: Prognosis, Therapy, Related, AML
The overall survival
The overall survival
The overall survival
The overall survival
Table 1 . Distribution of primary neoplastic disorders in enrolled patients..
a)Other disorders include (1 patient each): esophageal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, malignant germinoma, medulloblastoma, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, thyroid cancer, Ewing's sarcoma, high grade ependymoma, and renal cell carcinoma..
Table 2 . Comparison of clinical presentation with respect to chemotherapeutic regimen..
Abbreviations: AK, alkylating agent; TI, topoisomerase II inhibitor; FAB, French-American-British; PLT, platelet; BM, bone marrow;
Table 3 . Comparison of overall and disease free survival..
a)The median value of BM blast percentage (61.1%, N=48) was used as a cutoff for the determination of the 2 groups. b)Comparison of the overall and disease free survival was constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and P values were obtained from a log-rank test..
Abbreviations: AK, alkylating agent; TI, topoisomerase II inhibitor; FAB, French-American-British; BM, bone marrow; Ch, chromosome; SCT, stem cell transplantation; CI, confidence interval..
Table 4 . Multivariate analysis of overall and disease free survival..
a)The hazard ratio for the allogeneic SCT,
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; BM, bone marrow; SCT, stem cell transplantation;
Sang Hyuk Park, Hyun-Sook Chi, Sook-Kyung Min, Young-Uk Cho, Seongsoo Jang, Chan-Jeoung Park, Jung-Hee Lee, Je-Hwan Lee, Kyoo-Hyung Lee, Ho-Joon Im, and Jong-Jin Seo
Korean J Hematol 2011; 46(2): 88-95Young‑Uk Cho
Blood Res 2024; 59():Naree Warnnissorn, Nonglak Kanitsap, Pimjai Niparuck, Paisarn Boonsakan, Prapasri Kulalert, Wasithep Limvorapitak, Lantarima Bhoopat, Supawee Saengboon, Chinnawut Suriyonplengsaeng, Pichika Chantrathammachart, Teeraya Puavilai and Suporn Chuncharunee
Blood Res 2024; 59():
The overall survival
The overall survival
The overall survival
The overall survival