Original Article

Split Viewer

Blood Res 2020; 55(3):

Published online September 30, 2020

https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020219

© The Korean Society of Hematology

Utility of screening tools to differentiate beta thalassemia trait and iron-deficiency anemia - do they serve a purpose in blood donors?

Amanpreet Sundh1, Paramjit Kaur2, Anshu Palta3, Gagandeep Kaur2

Department of Transfusion Medicine, 1All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 2Government Medical College and Hospital, 3Department of Pathology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence to : Paramjit Kaur, M.D.
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Government Medical College, Sector 32, Chandigarh 160030, India
E-mail: paramjit.gp71@yahoo.com

Received: August 26, 2020; Revised: September 4, 2020; Accepted: September 15, 2020

This is an Open Access article distributed unAcute myeloid leukemia, New FDA approvalsder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background
The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of the beta thalassemia trait (BTT) and differentiate it from iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) among blood donors.
Methods
A total of 1,000 samples from blood donors were subjected to complete hemogram with red blood cell indices. Further, Mentzer index (MI) was calculated for samples with mean corpuscular volume (MCV) below 80 fL and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) below 27 pg. Samples with Mentzer index <12 were subjected to naked-eye single-tube red cell osmotic fragility test (NESTROFT) followed by hemoglobin electrophoresis in positive cases. Serum ferritin was assessed in NESTROFT-negative cases.
Results
The prevalence of BTT among blood donors was 3.7% and that of microcytosis among donors was 8.6%. The prevalence of BTT among microcytic donors was 41.8% while that among those with IDA was 11.6%. A value of MI <13 was highly sensitive in the diagnosis of BTT. MI >13 was found to have both high specificity and high sensitivity for diagnosing IDA.
Conclusion
A moderately high prevalence of BTT was observed among blood donors. Presently, no screening program is mandatory for screening of BTT among blood donors. Indices like MCV, MCH, and Mentzer Index were thus found to be effective to screen for BTT and IDA among blood donors, and NESTROFT was a cost-effective mass screening method to differentiate BTT and IDA.

Keywords Beta thalassemia trait, Blood donors, Mentzer index, NESTROFT, Iron deficiency anemia

Article

Original Article

Blood Res 2020; 55(3): 169-174

Published online September 30, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020219

Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.

Utility of screening tools to differentiate beta thalassemia trait and iron-deficiency anemia - do they serve a purpose in blood donors?

Amanpreet Sundh1, Paramjit Kaur2, Anshu Palta3, Gagandeep Kaur2

Department of Transfusion Medicine, 1All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 2Government Medical College and Hospital, 3Department of Pathology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence to:Paramjit Kaur, M.D.
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Government Medical College, Sector 32, Chandigarh 160030, India
E-mail: paramjit.gp71@yahoo.com

Received: August 26, 2020; Revised: September 4, 2020; Accepted: September 15, 2020

This is an Open Access article distributed unAcute myeloid leukemia, New FDA approvalsder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background
The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of the beta thalassemia trait (BTT) and differentiate it from iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) among blood donors.
Methods
A total of 1,000 samples from blood donors were subjected to complete hemogram with red blood cell indices. Further, Mentzer index (MI) was calculated for samples with mean corpuscular volume (MCV) below 80 fL and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) below 27 pg. Samples with Mentzer index <12 were subjected to naked-eye single-tube red cell osmotic fragility test (NESTROFT) followed by hemoglobin electrophoresis in positive cases. Serum ferritin was assessed in NESTROFT-negative cases.
Results
The prevalence of BTT among blood donors was 3.7% and that of microcytosis among donors was 8.6%. The prevalence of BTT among microcytic donors was 41.8% while that among those with IDA was 11.6%. A value of MI <13 was highly sensitive in the diagnosis of BTT. MI >13 was found to have both high specificity and high sensitivity for diagnosing IDA.
Conclusion
A moderately high prevalence of BTT was observed among blood donors. Presently, no screening program is mandatory for screening of BTT among blood donors. Indices like MCV, MCH, and Mentzer Index were thus found to be effective to screen for BTT and IDA among blood donors, and NESTROFT was a cost-effective mass screening method to differentiate BTT and IDA.

Keywords: Beta thalassemia trait, Blood donors, Mentzer index, NESTROFT, Iron deficiency anemia

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Flow chart for defining of BTT and IDA and the number of cases in the study. Samples with normal serum ferritin and distinct HbA2 band on electrophoresis were defined as having BTT. Samples with serum ferritin below 15 ng/mL were defined as having IDA [10]. Abbreviations: BTT, beta thalassemia trait; IDA, iron-deficiency anemia; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume.
Blood Research 2020; 55: 169-174https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020219

Table 1 . Prevalence of BTT among blood donors..

Prevalence of BTT (%)P
Overall3.7
Voluntary donors2.48˂0.01
Replacement donors13.04
Accepted donors1.6˂0.01
Deferred donors37.2
Males3.38˃0.05
Females7.23
18–30 yr4.3˃0.01
30–40 yr0.6
Urban background2.8˃0.05
Rural background4.8
Consanguinity64.2˂0.01
No consanguinity2.83

Abbreviation: BTT, beta thalassemia trait..


Table 2 . Prevalence and type of anemia among microcytic blood donors..

Microcytic donors86Hb>12.5 g/dL45 (52.4%)Normal30
BTT15
Hb<12.5 g/dL41 (47.6%)BTT21
IDA10
Both1
None9

Abbreviations: BTT, beta thalassemia trait; IDA, iron-deficiency anemia..


Table 3 . Association of different MI values with type of anemia..

BTTIDAOthersTotal
MI<12230023
MI 12–14141419
MI>14010111
Total3711553

Abbreviations: BTT, beta thalassemia trait; IDA, iron-deficiency anemia; MI, Mentzer index..


Table 4 . Comparison of hematological parameters in donors with BTT and non-BTT..

ParameterBTT (N=37)Non-BTT (N=963)P
Hb (g/dL)12.3±0.5713.9±1.07<0.0001
MCV (fL)70.4±2.8487.4±6.13<0.0001
MCH (pg)23.7±2.4329.7±1.65<0.0001
MCHC (%)30.2±0.8132.1±1.48<0.0001
TLC (×103/mL)6.26±1.866.12±1.770.6376
RBC (×106/mL)5.89±0.344.68±0.47<0.0001
PCV (%)38.9±2.0242.1±3.28<0.0001
RDWc (%)14.6±0.6614.5±0.430.1756
Platelets (×103/mL)223±54.2250±67.40.163

Abbreviations: BTT, beta thalassemia trait; Hb, hemoglobin; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; PCV, packed cell colume; RBC, red blood cell; RDWc, red cell distribution width; TLC, total leucocyte count..


Table 5 . Comparison of hematological parameters in donors with BTT and IDA..

ParameterBTT (N=37)IDA (N=11)P
Hb (g/dL)12.3±0.5711.5±0.56<0.001
MCV (fL)70.4±2.8476.4±1.44<0.0001
MCH (pg)23.7±2.4327.4±1.12<0.0001
MCHC (%)30.2±0.8131.2±1.670.0085
TLC (×103/mL)6.26±1.865.90±1.940.5794
RBC (106/mL)5.89±0.344.60±0.53<0.0001
PCV (%)38.9±2.0235.1±1.72<0.0001
RDWc (%)14.6±0.6616.1±1.36<0.0001
Platelets (×103/mL)223±54.2192±19.10.07
MI11.4±0.7517.0±2.05<0.0001
S. ferritin (ng/mL)150±73.8 (N=14)12.9±1.13<0.0001

Abbreviations: BTT, beta thalassemia trait; Hb, hemoglobin; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MI, Mentzer index; PCV, packed cell colume; RBC, red blood cell; RDWc, red cell distribution width; S. ferritin, serum ferritin; TLC, total leucocyte count..


Blood Res
Volume 59 2024

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in BR

Blood Research

pISSN 2287-979X
eISSN 2288-0011
qr-code Download