Blood Res 2020; 55(3):
Published online September 30, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020219
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : Paramjit Kaur, M.D.
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Government Medical College, Sector 32, Chandigarh 160030, India
E-mail: paramjit.gp71@yahoo.com
This is an Open Access article distributed unAcute myeloid leukemia, New FDA approvalsder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background
The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of the beta thalassemia trait (BTT) and differentiate it from iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) among blood donors.
Methods
A total of 1,000 samples from blood donors were subjected to complete hemogram with red blood cell indices. Further, Mentzer index (MI) was calculated for samples with mean corpuscular volume (MCV) below 80 fL and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) below 27 pg. Samples with Mentzer index <12 were subjected to naked-eye single-tube red cell osmotic fragility test (NESTROFT) followed by hemoglobin electrophoresis in positive cases. Serum ferritin was assessed in NESTROFT-negative cases.
Results
The prevalence of BTT among blood donors was 3.7% and that of microcytosis among donors was 8.6%. The prevalence of BTT among microcytic donors was 41.8% while that among those with IDA was 11.6%. A value of MI <13 was highly sensitive in the diagnosis of BTT. MI >13 was found to have both high specificity and high sensitivity for diagnosing IDA.
Conclusion
A moderately high prevalence of BTT was observed among blood donors. Presently, no screening program is mandatory for screening of BTT among blood donors. Indices like MCV, MCH, and Mentzer Index were thus found to be effective to screen for BTT and IDA among blood donors, and NESTROFT was a cost-effective mass screening method to differentiate BTT and IDA.
Keywords Beta thalassemia trait, Blood donors, Mentzer index, NESTROFT, Iron deficiency anemia
Blood Res 2020; 55(3): 169-174
Published online September 30, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.2020219
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Amanpreet Sundh1, Paramjit Kaur2, Anshu Palta3, Gagandeep Kaur2
Department of Transfusion Medicine, 1All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 2Government Medical College and Hospital, 3Department of Pathology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
Correspondence to:Paramjit Kaur, M.D.
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Government Medical College, Sector 32, Chandigarh 160030, India
E-mail: paramjit.gp71@yahoo.com
This is an Open Access article distributed unAcute myeloid leukemia, New FDA approvalsder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background
The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of the beta thalassemia trait (BTT) and differentiate it from iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) among blood donors.
Methods
A total of 1,000 samples from blood donors were subjected to complete hemogram with red blood cell indices. Further, Mentzer index (MI) was calculated for samples with mean corpuscular volume (MCV) below 80 fL and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) below 27 pg. Samples with Mentzer index <12 were subjected to naked-eye single-tube red cell osmotic fragility test (NESTROFT) followed by hemoglobin electrophoresis in positive cases. Serum ferritin was assessed in NESTROFT-negative cases.
Results
The prevalence of BTT among blood donors was 3.7% and that of microcytosis among donors was 8.6%. The prevalence of BTT among microcytic donors was 41.8% while that among those with IDA was 11.6%. A value of MI <13 was highly sensitive in the diagnosis of BTT. MI >13 was found to have both high specificity and high sensitivity for diagnosing IDA.
Conclusion
A moderately high prevalence of BTT was observed among blood donors. Presently, no screening program is mandatory for screening of BTT among blood donors. Indices like MCV, MCH, and Mentzer Index were thus found to be effective to screen for BTT and IDA among blood donors, and NESTROFT was a cost-effective mass screening method to differentiate BTT and IDA.
Keywords: Beta thalassemia trait, Blood donors, Mentzer index, NESTROFT, Iron deficiency anemia
Table 1 . Prevalence of BTT among blood donors..
Prevalence of BTT (%) | ||
---|---|---|
Overall | 3.7 | |
Voluntary donors | 2.48 | ˂0.01 |
Replacement donors | 13.04 | |
Accepted donors | 1.6 | ˂0.01 |
Deferred donors | 37.2 | |
Males | 3.38 | ˃0.05 |
Females | 7.23 | |
18–30 yr | 4.3 | ˃0.01 |
30–40 yr | 0.6 | |
Urban background | 2.8 | ˃0.05 |
Rural background | 4.8 | |
Consanguinity | 64.2 | ˂0.01 |
No consanguinity | 2.83 |
Abbreviation: BTT, beta thalassemia trait..
Table 2 . Prevalence and type of anemia among microcytic blood donors..
Microcytic donors | 86 | Hb>12.5 g/dL | 45 (52.4%) | Normal | 30 |
BTT | 15 | ||||
Hb<12.5 g/dL | 41 (47.6%) | BTT | 21 | ||
IDA | 10 | ||||
Both | 1 | ||||
None | 9 |
Abbreviations: BTT, beta thalassemia trait; IDA, iron-deficiency anemia..
Table 3 . Association of different MI values with type of anemia..
BTT | IDA | Others | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MI<12 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 23 |
MI 12–14 | 14 | 1 | 4 | 19 |
MI>14 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 11 |
Total | 37 | 11 | 5 | 53 |
Abbreviations: BTT, beta thalassemia trait; IDA, iron-deficiency anemia; MI, Mentzer index..
Table 4 . Comparison of hematological parameters in donors with BTT and non-BTT..
Parameter | BTT (N=37) | Non-BTT (N=963) | |
---|---|---|---|
Hb (g/dL) | 12.3±0.57 | 13.9±1.07 | <0.0001 |
MCV (fL) | 70.4±2.84 | 87.4±6.13 | <0.0001 |
MCH (pg) | 23.7±2.43 | 29.7±1.65 | <0.0001 |
MCHC (%) | 30.2±0.81 | 32.1±1.48 | <0.0001 |
TLC (×103/mL) | 6.26±1.86 | 6.12±1.77 | 0.6376 |
RBC (×106/mL) | 5.89±0.34 | 4.68±0.47 | <0.0001 |
PCV (%) | 38.9±2.02 | 42.1±3.28 | <0.0001 |
RDWc (%) | 14.6±0.66 | 14.5±0.43 | 0.1756 |
Platelets (×103/mL) | 223±54.2 | 250±67.4 | 0.163 |
Abbreviations: BTT, beta thalassemia trait; Hb, hemoglobin; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; PCV, packed cell colume; RBC, red blood cell; RDWc, red cell distribution width; TLC, total leucocyte count..
Table 5 . Comparison of hematological parameters in donors with BTT and IDA..
Parameter | BTT (N=37) | IDA (N=11) | |
---|---|---|---|
Hb (g/dL) | 12.3±0.57 | 11.5±0.56 | <0.001 |
MCV (fL) | 70.4±2.84 | 76.4±1.44 | <0.0001 |
MCH (pg) | 23.7±2.43 | 27.4±1.12 | <0.0001 |
MCHC (%) | 30.2±0.81 | 31.2±1.67 | 0.0085 |
TLC (×103/mL) | 6.26±1.86 | 5.90±1.94 | 0.5794 |
RBC (106/mL) | 5.89±0.34 | 4.60±0.53 | <0.0001 |
PCV (%) | 38.9±2.02 | 35.1±1.72 | <0.0001 |
RDWc (%) | 14.6±0.66 | 16.1±1.36 | <0.0001 |
Platelets (×103/mL) | 223±54.2 | 192±19.1 | 0.07 |
MI | 11.4±0.75 | 17.0±2.05 | <0.0001 |
S. ferritin (ng/mL) | 150±73.8 (N=14) | 12.9±1.13 | <0.0001 |
Abbreviations: BTT, beta thalassemia trait; Hb, hemoglobin; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MI, Mentzer index; PCV, packed cell colume; RBC, red blood cell; RDWc, red cell distribution width; S. ferritin, serum ferritin; TLC, total leucocyte count..
Moslem Taheri Soodejani, Ali Akbar Haghdoost, Abbas Sedaghat, Mohammad Reza Baneshi, Farzaneh Zolala
Blood Res 2019; 54(4): 269-273Negin Shokrgozar, and Habib Allah Golafshan
Blood Res 2019; 54(1): 10-16Gunjan Mahajan, Sunita Sharma, Jagdish Chandra, and Anita Nangia
Blood Res 2017; 52(3): 212-217