Blood Res (2025) 60:7
Published online January 23, 2025
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-025-00057-7
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : Hyoung Jin Kang
kanghj@snu.ac.kr
Purpose This study compared the outcomes of haploidentical-related donor (HRD) and umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies.
Methods Data on patients who underwent HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n = 41) and UCB HSCT (n = 24) after targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning with intensive pharmacokinetic monitoring between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.
Results The median follow-up durations in the HRD and UCB groups were 7.0 and 10.9 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II–IV and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the HRD group demonstrated significantly lower rates of acute GVHD grades III–IV (4.9% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.009) and non-relapse mortality (2.6% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001) but a higher relapse incidence (32.1% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.004) than the UCB group. The 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 65.8% and 54.2% (p = 0.204) and 78.0% and 65.7% (p = 0.142) for the HRD and UCB groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified disease status as a significant risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.24; p = 0.016). Additionally, UCB HSCT exhibited a trend toward worse event-free survival compared to HRD HSCT (hazard ratio, 2.63; p = 0.05).
Conclusions These findings indicate that HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide provides promising outcomes compared to UCB HSCT in pediatric patients, with a trend toward improved survival over a long-term follow-up period exceeding a median of 7 years. Thus, HRD HSCT may be a valuable option for pediatric patients without human leukocyte antigen-matched donors.
Keywords Haploidentical, Post-transplant cyclophosphamide, Cord blood, Children, Hematologic malignancy
Blood Res 2025; 60():
Published online January 23, 2025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-025-00057-7
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Kyung Taek Hong1, Bo Kyung Kim1, Hong Yul An1, Jung Yoon Choi1, Sang Hoon Song2, Kyung‑Sang Yu3, In‑Jin Jang3 and Hyoung Jin Kang1,4*
1 Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4 Wide River Institute of Immunology, Seoul National University, Hongcheon, Republic of Korea.
Correspondence to:Hyoung Jin Kang
kanghj@snu.ac.kr
Purpose This study compared the outcomes of haploidentical-related donor (HRD) and umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies.
Methods Data on patients who underwent HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n = 41) and UCB HSCT (n = 24) after targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning with intensive pharmacokinetic monitoring between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.
Results The median follow-up durations in the HRD and UCB groups were 7.0 and 10.9 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II–IV and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the HRD group demonstrated significantly lower rates of acute GVHD grades III–IV (4.9% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.009) and non-relapse mortality (2.6% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001) but a higher relapse incidence (32.1% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.004) than the UCB group. The 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 65.8% and 54.2% (p = 0.204) and 78.0% and 65.7% (p = 0.142) for the HRD and UCB groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified disease status as a significant risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.24; p = 0.016). Additionally, UCB HSCT exhibited a trend toward worse event-free survival compared to HRD HSCT (hazard ratio, 2.63; p = 0.05).
Conclusions These findings indicate that HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide provides promising outcomes compared to UCB HSCT in pediatric patients, with a trend toward improved survival over a long-term follow-up period exceeding a median of 7 years. Thus, HRD HSCT may be a valuable option for pediatric patients without human leukocyte antigen-matched donors.
Keywords: Haploidentical, Post-transplant cyclophosphamide, Cord blood, Children, Hematologic malignancy
Patient characteristics.
UCB (n = 24). | HRD (n = 41). | p-value. | |
---|---|---|---|
Median age, years (IQR). | 2.4 (1.4–6.1). | 11.3 (5.8–14.2). | 0.004. |
Sex, No. (%). | 0.05. | ||
Male. | 8 (33.3%). | 24 (58.5%). | |
Female. | 16 (66.7%). | 17 (41.5%). | |
Median BSA, m2 (IQR). | 0.55 (0.48–0.80). | 1.11 (0.67–1.54). | < 0.001. |
Median body weight, kg (IQR). | 12.23 (9.8–21.1). | 31.2 (15.7–50.6). | < 0.001. |
Diagnosis, No. (%). | 0.271. | ||
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. | 10 (41.7%). | 16 (39.0%). | |
Acute myeloid leukemia. | 10 (41.7%). | 14 (34.1%). | |
Myelodysplastic syndromea. | 0 (0.0%). | 3 (7.3%). | |
Malignant lymphoma. | 0 (0.0%). | 6 (14.6%). | |
Othersb. | 4 (12.5%). | 2 (4.9%). | |
Conditioning regimen. | < 0.001. | ||
Bu + Flu. | 8 (33.3%). | 0 (0.0%). | |
Bu + Flu + VP. | 14 (58.3%). | 0 (0.0%). | |
Bu + Mel + (Flu or Cy). | 2 (8.3%). | 0 (0.0%). | |
Bu + Flu + Cy. | 0 (0.0%). | 41 (100.0%). | |
Status. | 0.993. | ||
CR1. | 17 (70.8%). | 29 (70.7%). | |
≥ CR2 or persistence. | 7 (29.2%). | 12 (29.3%). | |
Infused busulfan AUC, mg x h/L (IQR). | 73.7 (72.0–75.2). | 74.5 (74.0–76.0). | 0.074. |
Median follow-up years (IQR). | 10.9 (0.4–14.1). | 7.0 (4.4–8.7). | 0.318. |
UCB umbilical cord blood; HRD haploidentical related donor; IQR interquartile range; BSA body surface area; Bu busulfan; Flu fludarabine; VP etoposide; Mel melphalan; Cy cyclophosphamide; CR complete remission; AUC area under the curve.
aTwo with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome, and one with myelodysplastic syndrome, with excess blasts in the HRD group.
bTwo with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, one with mixed-phenotype acute leukemia, one with malignant histiocytosis in the UCB group, and two with mixed-phenotype acute leukemia in the HRD group.
Multivariate analysis of EFS and OS rates in the HRD and UCB groups (N = 65).
5-year EFS. | 5-year OS. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Univariate. | Multivariate. | Univariate. | Multivariate. | |||||
Probability ± SE. | p-value. | HR (95% CI). | p-value. | Probability ± SE. | p-value. | HR (95% CI). | p-value. | |
HSCT type. | 0.204. | 0.05. | 0.142. | 0.113. | ||||
HRD (n = 41). | 65.8 ± 7.4%. | 1. | 78.0 ± 6.5%. | 1. | ||||
CBT (n = 24). | 54.2 ± 10.2%. | 2.63 (1.00–6.93). | 65.7 ± 9.9%. | 2.17 (0.83–5.65). | ||||
Sex. | 0.468. | 0.75. | ||||||
Male (n = 32). | 65.6 ± 8.4%. | 74.4 ± 7.8%. | ||||||
Female (n = 33). | 57.6 ± 8.6%. | 72.4 ± 7.8%. | ||||||
Age at HSCT (years). | 0.232. | 0.224. | 0.742. | |||||
2–10 (n = 27). | 51.9 ± 9.6%. | 1. | 69.1 ± 9.1%. | |||||
< 2 (n = 15). | 80.0 ± 10.3%. | 0.30 (0.08–1.18). | 0.084. | 80.0 ± 10.3%. | ||||
> 10 (n = 23). | 60.6 ± 10.3%. | 0.82 (0.30–2.27). | 0.702. | 73.9 ± 9.2%. | ||||
Disease status. | 0.009. | 0.104. | 0.053. | 0.016. | ||||
CR1 (n = 46). | 71.7 ± 6.6%. | 1. | 84.4 ± 5.4%. | 1. | ||||
≥ CR2 (n = 19). | 36.8 ± 11.1%. | 2.24 (0.85–5.94). | 63.2 ± 11.1%. | 3.24 (1.25–8.43). | ||||
Diagnosis. | 0.241. | 0.187. | 0.723. | |||||
ALL (n = 26). | 65.4 ± 9.3%. | 1. | 76.9 ± 8.3%. | |||||
AML (n = 24). | 54.2 ± 10.2%. | 2.07 (0.77–5.60). | 0.151. | 69.5 ± 9.7%. | ||||
Malignant lymphoma (n = 6). | 83.3 ± 15.2%. | 0.49 (0.06–4.04). | 0.507. | 83.3 ± 15.2. | ||||
Myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 4). | 25.0 ± 21.7%. | 0.73 (0.08–6.30). | 0.771. | 50.0 ± 25.0%. | ||||
Others (n = 5). | 80.0 ± 17.9%. | 3.81 (0.85–17.53). | 0.086. | 80.0 ± 17.9%. |
ALL acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML acute myeloid leukemia; AUC area under the curve; CI confidence interval; CR complete remission; EFS event-free survival; HR hazard ratio; HRD haploidentical related donor; HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; OS overall survival; SE standard error; UCB umbilical cord blood.
Wonjin Jang, Suejung Jo, Jae Won Yoo, Seongkoo Kim, Jae Wook Lee, Pil-Sang Jang, Nack-Gyun Chung, Bin Cho
Blood Res 2022; 57(4): 256-263Woojung Jeon, Young Kwon Koh, Sunghan Kang, Hyery Kim, Kyung-Nam Koh, Ho Joon Im
Blood Res 2022; 57(1): 41-50Ezzatollah Fathi, Zohreh Sanaat, Raheleh Farahzadi
Blood Res 2019; 54(3): 165-174