RESEARCH

Split Viewer

Blood Res (2025) 60:7

Published online January 23, 2025

https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-025-00057-7

© The Korean Society of Hematology

Comparing haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and umbilical cord blood transplantation using targeted busulfan in children and adolescents with hematologic malignancies

Kyung Taek Hong1, Bo Kyung Kim1, Hong Yul An1, Jung Yoon Choi1, Sang Hoon Song2, Kyung‑Sang Yu3, In‑Jin Jang3 and Hyoung Jin Kang1,4*

1 Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4 Wide River Institute of Immunology, Seoul National University, Hongcheon, Republic of Korea.

Correspondence to : Hyoung Jin Kang
kanghj@snu.ac.kr

Received: November 26, 2024; Accepted: January 10, 2025

Abstract

Purpose This study compared the outcomes of haploidentical-related donor (HRD) and umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies.
Methods Data on patients who underwent HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n = 41) and UCB HSCT (n = 24) after targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning with intensive pharmacokinetic monitoring between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.
Results The median follow-up durations in the HRD and UCB groups were 7.0 and 10.9 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II–IV and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the HRD group demonstrated significantly lower rates of acute GVHD grades III–IV (4.9% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.009) and non-relapse mortality (2.6% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001) but a higher relapse incidence (32.1% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.004) than the UCB group. The 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 65.8% and 54.2% (p = 0.204) and 78.0% and 65.7% (p = 0.142) for the HRD and UCB groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified disease status as a significant risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.24; p = 0.016). Additionally, UCB HSCT exhibited a trend toward worse event-free survival compared to HRD HSCT (hazard ratio, 2.63; p = 0.05).
Conclusions These findings indicate that HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide provides promising outcomes compared to UCB HSCT in pediatric patients, with a trend toward improved survival over a long-term follow-up period exceeding a median of 7 years. Thus, HRD HSCT may be a valuable option for pediatric patients without human leukocyte antigen-matched donors.

Keywords Haploidentical, Post-transplant cyclophosphamide, Cord blood, Children, Hematologic malignancy

Article

RESEARCH

Blood Res 2025; 60():

Published online January 23, 2025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-025-00057-7

Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.

Comparing haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and umbilical cord blood transplantation using targeted busulfan in children and adolescents with hematologic malignancies

Kyung Taek Hong1, Bo Kyung Kim1, Hong Yul An1, Jung Yoon Choi1, Sang Hoon Song2, Kyung‑Sang Yu3, In‑Jin Jang3 and Hyoung Jin Kang1,4*

1 Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4 Wide River Institute of Immunology, Seoul National University, Hongcheon, Republic of Korea.

Correspondence to:Hyoung Jin Kang
kanghj@snu.ac.kr

Received: November 26, 2024; Accepted: January 10, 2025

Abstract

Purpose This study compared the outcomes of haploidentical-related donor (HRD) and umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies.
Methods Data on patients who underwent HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n = 41) and UCB HSCT (n = 24) after targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning with intensive pharmacokinetic monitoring between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.
Results The median follow-up durations in the HRD and UCB groups were 7.0 and 10.9 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II–IV and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the HRD group demonstrated significantly lower rates of acute GVHD grades III–IV (4.9% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.009) and non-relapse mortality (2.6% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001) but a higher relapse incidence (32.1% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.004) than the UCB group. The 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 65.8% and 54.2% (p = 0.204) and 78.0% and 65.7% (p = 0.142) for the HRD and UCB groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified disease status as a significant risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.24; p = 0.016). Additionally, UCB HSCT exhibited a trend toward worse event-free survival compared to HRD HSCT (hazard ratio, 2.63; p = 0.05).
Conclusions These findings indicate that HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide provides promising outcomes compared to UCB HSCT in pediatric patients, with a trend toward improved survival over a long-term follow-up period exceeding a median of 7 years. Thus, HRD HSCT may be a valuable option for pediatric patients without human leukocyte antigen-matched donors.

Keywords: Haploidentical, Post-transplant cyclophosphamide, Cord blood, Children, Hematologic malignancy

Fig 1.

Figure 1.A Significantly faster neutrophil engraftment in the HRD group compared with the UCB group (median times to neutrophil engraftment: 15 days [range, 13–21] vs. 14 days [range, 12–40], p = 0.036). B Platelet engraftment was also faster in the HRD group (median 26 days vs. 46 days, p < 0.001)

Fig 2.

Figure 2.A The cumulative incidence rates of acute GVHD grades II–IV were 41.5% in the HRD group versus 54.2% in the UCB group (p = 0.589), and B grades III–IV were 4.9% in the HRD group versus 29.2% in the UCB group (p = 0.009). C Additionally, the relapse incidence was significantly higher in the HRD group compared with the UCB group (p = 0.004). D However, the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 34.2% in the UCB group, while it was only 2.6% in the HRD group (p < 0.001)

Fig 3.

Figure 3.The 5-year EFS rates for the HRD and UCB groups were 65.8% and 54.2%, (p = 0.204) (A), while the OS rates were 78.0% and 65.7% (p = 0.142) (B), respectively

Patient characteristics.

UCB (n = 24).

HRD (n = 41).

p-value.

Median age, years (IQR).

2.4 (1.4–6.1).

11.3 (5.8–14.2).

0.004.

Sex, No. (%).

0.05.

 Male.

8 (33.3%).

24 (58.5%).

 Female.

16 (66.7%).

17 (41.5%).

Median BSA, m2 (IQR).

0.55 (0.48–0.80).

1.11 (0.67–1.54).

 < 0.001.

Median body weight, kg (IQR).

12.23 (9.8–21.1).

31.2 (15.7–50.6).

 < 0.001.

Diagnosis, No. (%).

0.271.

 Acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

10 (41.7%).

16 (39.0%).

 Acute myeloid leukemia.

10 (41.7%).

14 (34.1%).

 Myelodysplastic syndromea.

0 (0.0%).

3 (7.3%).

 Malignant lymphoma.

0 (0.0%).

6 (14.6%).

 Othersb.

4 (12.5%).

2 (4.9%).

Conditioning regimen.

 < 0.001.

 Bu + Flu.

8 (33.3%).

0 (0.0%).

 Bu + Flu + VP.

14 (58.3%).

0 (0.0%).

 Bu + Mel + (Flu or Cy).

2 (8.3%).

0 (0.0%).

 Bu + Flu + Cy.

0 (0.0%).

41 (100.0%).

Status.

0.993.

 CR1.

17 (70.8%).

29 (70.7%).

 ≥ CR2 or persistence.

7 (29.2%).

12 (29.3%).

Infused busulfan AUC, mg x h/L (IQR).

73.7 (72.0–75.2).

74.5 (74.0–76.0).

0.074.

Median follow-up years (IQR).

10.9 (0.4–14.1).

7.0 (4.4–8.7).

0.318.

UCB umbilical cord blood; HRD haploidentical related donor; IQR interquartile range; BSA body surface area; Bu busulfan; Flu fludarabine; VP etoposide; Mel melphalan; Cy cyclophosphamide; CR complete remission; AUC area under the curve.

aTwo with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome, and one with myelodysplastic syndrome, with excess blasts in the HRD group.

bTwo with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, one with mixed-phenotype acute leukemia, one with malignant histiocytosis in the UCB group, and two with mixed-phenotype acute leukemia in the HRD group.


Multivariate analysis of EFS and OS rates in the HRD and UCB groups (N = 65).

5-year EFS.

5-year OS.

Univariate.

Multivariate.

Univariate.

Multivariate.

Probability ± SE.

p-value.

HR (95% CI).

p-value.

Probability ± SE.

p-value.

HR (95% CI).

p-value.

HSCT type.

0.204.

0.05.

0.142.

0.113.

 HRD (n = 41).

65.8 ± 7.4%.

1.

78.0 ± 6.5%.

1.

 CBT (n = 24).

54.2 ± 10.2%.

2.63 (1.00–6.93).

65.7 ± 9.9%.

2.17 (0.83–5.65).

Sex.

0.468.

0.75.

 Male (n = 32).

65.6 ± 8.4%.

74.4 ± 7.8%.

 Female (n = 33).

57.6 ± 8.6%.

72.4 ± 7.8%.

Age at HSCT (years).

0.232.

0.224.

0.742.

 2–10 (n = 27).

51.9 ± 9.6%.

1.

69.1 ± 9.1%.

 < 2 (n = 15).

80.0 ± 10.3%.

0.30 (0.08–1.18).

0.084.

80.0 ± 10.3%.

 > 10 (n = 23).

60.6 ± 10.3%.

0.82 (0.30–2.27).

0.702.

73.9 ± 9.2%.

Disease status.

0.009.

0.104.

0.053.

0.016.

 CR1 (n = 46).

71.7 ± 6.6%.

1.

84.4 ± 5.4%.

1.

 ≥ CR2 (n = 19).

36.8 ± 11.1%.

2.24 (0.85–5.94).

63.2 ± 11.1%.

3.24 (1.25–8.43).

Diagnosis.

0.241.

0.187.

0.723.

 ALL (n = 26).

65.4 ± 9.3%.

1.

76.9 ± 8.3%.

 AML (n = 24).

54.2 ± 10.2%.

2.07 (0.77–5.60).

0.151.

69.5 ± 9.7%.

 Malignant lymphoma (n = 6).

83.3 ± 15.2%.

0.49 (0.06–4.04).

0.507.

83.3 ± 15.2.

 Myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 4).

25.0 ± 21.7%.

0.73 (0.08–6.30).

0.771.

50.0 ± 25.0%.

 Others (n = 5).

80.0 ± 17.9%.

3.81 (0.85–17.53).

0.086.

80.0 ± 17.9%.

ALL acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML acute myeloid leukemia; AUC area under the curve; CI confidence interval; CR complete remission; EFS event-free survival; HR hazard ratio; HRD haploidentical related donor; HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; OS overall survival; SE standard error; UCB umbilical cord blood.


Blood Res
Volume 60 2025

Supplementary File

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in BR

Blood Research

pISSN 2287-979X
eISSN 2288-0011
qr-code Download