RESEARCH

Split Viewer

Blood Res (2024) 59:27

Published online August 8, 2024

https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-024-00024-8

© The Korean Society of Hematology

Clinical data on treatment regimen and use of medication among patients with hemophilia B in Korea

Young Shil Park1, Ji Kyoung Park2, Jeong A Park3, Hee Jo Baek4, Jae Hee Lee5, Chur Woo You6, Chuhl Joo Lyu7 and Eun Jin Choi8*

1 Department of Pediatrics, Kyunghee University Hospital at Gandong, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2 Department of Pediatrics, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
3 Department of Pediatrics, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
4 Department of Pediatrics, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
5 Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
6 Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
7 Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
8 Department of Pediatrics, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to : *Correspondence:
Eun Jin Choi
ejchoi2@cu.ac.kr

Received: January 26, 2024; Accepted: June 21, 2024

Background To investigate the clinical treatment status, such as treatment regimen, bleeding events, and drug dose, in patients with hemophilia B in South Korea.
Methods In this retrospective chart review, data of patients with hemophilia B from eight university hospitals were collected. Demographic and clinical data, treatment data, such as regimen and number of injections, dose of factor IX concentrate, and bleeding data were reviewed. Descriptive analyses were performed with annual data for 2019, 2020, and 2021, as well as the three years consecutively.
Results The medical records of 150 patients with hemophilia B between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, were collected. Among these, 72 (48.0%) were severe, 47 (31.3%) were moderate, and 28 (18.7%) were mild. The results showed approximately two times more patients receiving prophylaxis as those receiving on-demand therapy, with 66.1% of patients receiving prophylaxis in 2019, 64.9% in 2020, and 72.1% in 2021. Annualized bleeding rates were 2.2% (± 3.1) in 2019, 1.8% (± 3.0) in 2020, and 1.8% (± 2.9) in 2021 among patients receiving prophylaxis. For the doses of factor IX concentrate, patients receiving prophylaxis received an average of 41.6 (± 11.9) IU/Kg/Injection in 2019, 45.7 (± 12.9) IU/Kg/Injection in 2020, and 60.1 (± 24.0) IU/Kg/Injection in 2021.
Conclusions Clinically, prophylaxis is more prevalent than reported. Based on insights gained from current clinical evidence, it is expected that the unmet medical needs of patients can be identified, and physicians can evaluate the status of patients and actively manage hemophilia B using more effective treatment strategies.


Keywords: Hemophilia B, Clinical data, Prophylaxis, Treatment regimen

Article

RESEARCH

Blood Res 2024; 59():

Published online August 8, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-024-00024-8

Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.

Clinical data on treatment regimen and use of medication among patients with hemophilia B in Korea

Young Shil Park1, Ji Kyoung Park2, Jeong A Park3, Hee Jo Baek4, Jae Hee Lee5, Chur Woo You6, Chuhl Joo Lyu7 and Eun Jin Choi8*

1 Department of Pediatrics, Kyunghee University Hospital at Gandong, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2 Department of Pediatrics, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
3 Department of Pediatrics, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
4 Department of Pediatrics, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
5 Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
6 Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
7 Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
8 Department of Pediatrics, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to:*Correspondence:
Eun Jin Choi
ejchoi2@cu.ac.kr

Received: January 26, 2024; Accepted: June 21, 2024

Abstract

Background To investigate the clinical treatment status, such as treatment regimen, bleeding events, and drug dose, in patients with hemophilia B in South Korea.
Methods In this retrospective chart review, data of patients with hemophilia B from eight university hospitals were collected. Demographic and clinical data, treatment data, such as regimen and number of injections, dose of factor IX concentrate, and bleeding data were reviewed. Descriptive analyses were performed with annual data for 2019, 2020, and 2021, as well as the three years consecutively.
Results The medical records of 150 patients with hemophilia B between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, were collected. Among these, 72 (48.0%) were severe, 47 (31.3%) were moderate, and 28 (18.7%) were mild. The results showed approximately two times more patients receiving prophylaxis as those receiving on-demand therapy, with 66.1% of patients receiving prophylaxis in 2019, 64.9% in 2020, and 72.1% in 2021. Annualized bleeding rates were 2.2% (± 3.1) in 2019, 1.8% (± 3.0) in 2020, and 1.8% (± 2.9) in 2021 among patients receiving prophylaxis. For the doses of factor IX concentrate, patients receiving prophylaxis received an average of 41.6 (± 11.9) IU/Kg/Injection in 2019, 45.7 (± 12.9) IU/Kg/Injection in 2020, and 60.1 (± 24.0) IU/Kg/Injection in 2021.
Conclusions Clinically, prophylaxis is more prevalent than reported. Based on insights gained from current clinical evidence, it is expected that the unmet medical needs of patients can be identified, and physicians can evaluate the status of patients and actively manage hemophilia B using more effective treatment strategies.

Keywords: Hemophilia B, Clinical data, Prophylaxis, Treatment regimen

Table 1 . Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants, 2019–2021 (N = 150).

Variables Allpatients
n%
Sex
Female32.0
Male14798.0
Age (years)a
Mean (SD)28.8(19.3)
Median23
Min1
Max86
Age Group
< 12 years3322.0
> = 12 to < 20 years2919.3
> = 20 to < 40 years4731.3
> = 40 to < 60 years2919.3
> = 60 years128.0
Blood Types (Category)
O2517.0
Non-O (A, B, and AB)7248.0
UK5335.0
Weight (Kg, at the most recent visit)
N146
Mean (SD)62.3(24.8)
Median64.3
Min10.0
Max120.0
Medical status (allows duplication)
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome0
Chronic bronchitis2
Chronic hepatitis B2
Chronic hepatitis C / Hepatitis C7
Hepatitis C RNA negative (-)5
Not reported RNA results2
Diabetes mellitus0
Hemophilic arthropathy3
Hypertension0
Osteonecrosis9
Experience of life-threatening bleeding (baseline history)
Intracranial Hemorrhage42.7
Intra-abdominal Hemorrhage42.7
Severity of Hemophilia B (N = 150)
Mild2818.7
Moderate4731.3
Severe7248.0
NR32.0

NR not reported, UK Unknown.

a Age was calculated as of 01 September, 2022.


Table 2 . Annualized bleeding rates (ABR) and drug dose among patients receiving prophylaxis.

Mean(SD)MedianMinMax
ABR
2019 (n = 38)Total2.23.11.0012.0
Mild (n = 1)4.0----
Moderate (n = 10)0.91.00.503.0
Severe (n = 27)2.63.51.0012.0
2020 (n = 45)Total1.83.01.0014.0
Mild (n = 3)1.311.003.0
Moderate (n = 12)0.60.9003.0
Severe (n = 30)2.43.41.0014.0
2021 (n = 45)Total1.82.91.0013.0
Mild (n = 2)3.53.53.507.0
Moderate (n = 12)1.53.00.5011.0
Severe (n = 31)1.72.81.0013.0
Dosea (IU/Kg/1 injection)
2019Total (n = 38)41.611.941.522.485.9
2020Total (n = 39)45.712.943.118.479.8
2021Total (n = 37)60.124.052.132.2128.9

a Only patients who were receiving the standard half-life (SHL) agents in each year was analyzed.


Table 3 . Annualized bleeding rates (ABR) and drug dose among patients receiving on-demand treatment.

Mean(SD)MedianMinMax
ABR
2019 (n = 19)Total2.23.21.0014.0
Mild (n = 5)0.80.41.001
Moderate (n = 7)2.64.71.0014.0
Severe (n = 7)2.82.02.007.0
2020 (n = 26)Total1.93.01.0014.0
Mild (n = 10)0.90.71.002.0
Moderate (n = 9)2.34.21.0014.0
Severe (n = 7)2.93.02.0010.0
2021 (n = 19)Total1.81.81.008.0
Mild (n = 4)0.80.41.001.0
Moderate (n = 7)2.32.51.008.0
Severe (n = 8)2.01.11.504
Dosea (IU/Kg/1 injection)
2019Total (n = 19)41.016.137.715.977.8
2020Total (n = 26)55.643.646.823.4228.2
2021Total (n = 19)55.323.547.731.0134.2

a Only patients who were receiving the standard half-life (SHL) agents in each year was analyzed.


Table 4 . Dose among patients receiving prophylaxis during three consecutive years (n = 24).

Mean(SD)MedianMinMax
ABR
3-year averagea2.0(3.1)0.7013
20192.3(3.5)1.0012
20202.3(3.3)1.0014
20211.5(3.0)0.0013
Dose (IU/Kg/1 injection)
201941.8(9.3)41.523.064.2
202044.5(8.5)44.826.057.7
202162.9(28.2)51.532.2128.9

a Average of 3-year average ABR per patient.


Blood Res
Volume 59 2024

Supplementary File

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in BR

Blood Research

pISSN 2287-979X
eISSN 2288-0011
qr-code Download