Blood Res (2024) 59:25
Published online August 2, 2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-024-00029-3
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : *Correspondence:
Ho‑Young Yhim
yhimhy@jbnu.ac.kr
© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) significantly impacts morbidity and mortality. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants over the past decade has revolutionized VTE treatment in patients with active cancer, offering potential advantages over traditional therapies. However, uncertainties persist regarding the optimal selection and dosage of anticoagulants, particularly in patients with specific risk factors for bleeding, such as certain cancer types (e.g., upper gastrointestinal cancer, genitourinary cancer, primary or metastatic brain tumor, and hematologic malignancies) and specific patient characteristics (e.g., renal dysfunction and thrombocytopenia). Recent data on the thrombotic risk associated with low thrombotic burden VTE, such as subsegmental pulmonary embolism and isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, underscore the need for updated management strategies in daily clinical practice. This review aims to explore these issues and highlight the evolving landscape of cancer-associated VTE management.
Keywords Anticoagulation, Cancer, Venous thromboembolism
Blood Res 2024; 59():
Published online August 2, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-024-00029-3
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Ho‑Young Yhim1*
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, 20 Geonji‑Ro, Deokjin‑Gu, Jeonju 54907, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to:*Correspondence:
Ho‑Young Yhim
yhimhy@jbnu.ac.kr
© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) significantly impacts morbidity and mortality. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants over the past decade has revolutionized VTE treatment in patients with active cancer, offering potential advantages over traditional therapies. However, uncertainties persist regarding the optimal selection and dosage of anticoagulants, particularly in patients with specific risk factors for bleeding, such as certain cancer types (e.g., upper gastrointestinal cancer, genitourinary cancer, primary or metastatic brain tumor, and hematologic malignancies) and specific patient characteristics (e.g., renal dysfunction and thrombocytopenia). Recent data on the thrombotic risk associated with low thrombotic burden VTE, such as subsegmental pulmonary embolism and isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, underscore the need for updated management strategies in daily clinical practice. This review aims to explore these issues and highlight the evolving landscape of cancer-associated VTE management.
Keywords: Anticoagulation, Cancer, Venous thromboembolism
Ho-Young Yhim
Blood Res 2022; 57(S1): S44-S48Jeong Suk Koh and Ik‑Chan Song
Blood Res 2024; 59():Junshik Hong, Seo-Yeon Ahn, Yoo Jin Lee, Ji Hyun Lee, Jung Woo Han, Kyoung Ha Kim, Ho-Young Yhim, Seung-Hyun Nam, Hee-Jin Kim, Jaewoo Song, Sung-Hyun Kim, Soo-Mee Bang, Jin Seok Kim, Yeung-Chul Mun, Sung Hwa Bae, Hyun Kyung Kim, Seongsoo Jang, Rojin Park, Hyoung Soo Choi, Inho Kim, Doyeun Oh; on behalf of the Korean Society of Hematology Thrombosis and Hemostasis Working Party
Blood Res 2021; 56(1): 6-16