Blood Res 2023; 58(S1):
Published online April 30, 2023
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2023012
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : Sung-Eun Lee, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Hematology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea
E-mail: lee86@catholic.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Myelofibrosis (MF) includes primary MF, post-essential thrombocythemia MF, and post-polycythemia vera MF. MF is a progressive myeloid neoplasm characterized by ineffective clonal hematopoiesis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, a reactive bone marrow environment resulting in reticulin deposition and fibrosis, and a propensity for leukemia transformation. The identification of driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, and MPL has contributed to a better understanding of disease pathogenesis and has led to the development of MF-specific therapies, such as JAK2 inhibitors. Despite the fact that ruxolitinib and fedratinib have been clinically developed and approved, their use is limited due to adverse effects such as anemia and thrombocytopenia. Recently, pacritinib has been approved for a group of thrombocytopenic patients with significant unmet clinical needs. In symptomatic and anemic patients with prior JAK inhibitor exposure, momelotinib was superior to danazol in preventing exacerbation of anemia and in controlling MF-associated signs and symptoms, such as spleen size. Although the development of JAK inhibitors is remarkable, modifying the natural course of the disease remains a priority. Therefore, many novel treatments are currently under clinical development. Agents targeting bromodomain and extra-terminal protein, anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL, and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase delta have been studied in combination with JAK inhibitors. These combinations have been employed in both the frontline and “add-on” approaches. In addition, several agents are being studied as monotherapies for ruxolitinib-resistant or -ineligible patients. We reviewed several new MF treatments in the advanced stages of clinical development and treatment options for cytopenic patients.
Keywords Myelofibrosis, JAK2 inhibitors, Cytopenia, Novel therapy
Blood Res 2023; 58(S1): S13-S19
Published online April 30, 2023 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2023012
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Sung-Eun Lee
Department of Hematology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to:Sung-Eun Lee, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Hematology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea
E-mail: lee86@catholic.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Myelofibrosis (MF) includes primary MF, post-essential thrombocythemia MF, and post-polycythemia vera MF. MF is a progressive myeloid neoplasm characterized by ineffective clonal hematopoiesis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, a reactive bone marrow environment resulting in reticulin deposition and fibrosis, and a propensity for leukemia transformation. The identification of driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, and MPL has contributed to a better understanding of disease pathogenesis and has led to the development of MF-specific therapies, such as JAK2 inhibitors. Despite the fact that ruxolitinib and fedratinib have been clinically developed and approved, their use is limited due to adverse effects such as anemia and thrombocytopenia. Recently, pacritinib has been approved for a group of thrombocytopenic patients with significant unmet clinical needs. In symptomatic and anemic patients with prior JAK inhibitor exposure, momelotinib was superior to danazol in preventing exacerbation of anemia and in controlling MF-associated signs and symptoms, such as spleen size. Although the development of JAK inhibitors is remarkable, modifying the natural course of the disease remains a priority. Therefore, many novel treatments are currently under clinical development. Agents targeting bromodomain and extra-terminal protein, anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL, and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase delta have been studied in combination with JAK inhibitors. These combinations have been employed in both the frontline and “add-on” approaches. In addition, several agents are being studied as monotherapies for ruxolitinib-resistant or -ineligible patients. We reviewed several new MF treatments in the advanced stages of clinical development and treatment options for cytopenic patients.
Keywords: Myelofibrosis, JAK2 inhibitors, Cytopenia, Novel therapy
Table 1 . Combination treatments with ruxolitinib being studied in clinical trials..
Agent (class) | Drug class | Phase (NCT number) | Official title |
---|---|---|---|
CPI-0610 | BET inhibitor | 2 (NCT02158858) | A phase 1/2 Study of CPI-0610, a small molecule inhibitor of BET proteins: phase 1 (in patients with hematological malignancies) and phase 2 (dose expansion of CPI-0610 with and without ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis) |
3 (NCT04603495) | A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-control study of pelabresib (CPI-0610) and ruxolitinib vs. placebo and ruxolitinib in JAKi treatment naive MF patients (MANIFEST-2) | ||
Navitoclax | BCL-2/BCL-xL antagonist | 2 (NCT03222609) | A phase 2 open-label study evaluating tolerability and efficacy of navitoclax alone or in combination with ruxolitinib in subjects with myelofibrosis (REFINE) |
3 (NCT04472598) | A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of navitoclax in combination with ruxolitinib vs. ruxolitinib in subjects with myelofibrosis (TRANSFORM-1) | ||
3 (NCT04468984) | A randomized, open-label, phase 3 study evaluating efficacy and safety of navitoclax in combination with ruxolitinib vs. best available therapy in subjects with relapsed/refractory myelofibrosis (TRANSFORM-2) | ||
Parsaclisib | PI3Kδ inhibitor | 2 (NCT02718300) | A phase 2 study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of INCB050465 in combination with ruxolitinib in subjects with myelofibrosis |
3 (NCT04551066) | A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the combination of PI3Kδ inhibitor parsaclisib and ruxolitinib in participants with myelofibrosis (LIMBER-313) | ||
3 (NCT04551053) | A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the PI3Kδ inhibitor parsaclisib plus ruxolitinibin participants with myelofibrosis who have suboptimal response to ruxolitinib (LIMBER-304) |
Junshik Hong
Blood Res 2023; 58(S1): S37-S45Dong Hyun Kim, Jeongmin Seo, Dong-Yeop Shin, Youngil Koh, Junshik Hong, Inho Kim, Sung-Soo Yoon, Ja Min Byun
Blood Res 2022; 57(4): 264-271Sung-Eun Lee
Blood Res 2021; 56(S1): S26-S33