Blood Res 2023; 58(1):
Published online March 31, 2023
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022218
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : Deog-Yeon Jo, M.D., Ph.D.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Korea
E-mail: deogyeon@cnu.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background
Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) has not been investigated in Korean patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm.
Methods
This study analyzed the prevalence at diagnosis and clinical features of AVWS in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), prefibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF), or overt PMF (PMF) diagnosed between January 2019 and December 2021 at Chungam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. AVWS was defined as below the lower reference limit (56%) of ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo).
Results
Sixty-four consecutive patients (36 with ET, 17 with PV, 6 with pre-PMF, and 5 with PMF; 30 men and 34 women) with a median age of 67 years (range, 18‒87 yr) were followed for a median of 25.1 months (range, 2.6‒46.4 mo). AVWS was detected in 20 (31.3%) patients at diagnosis and was most frequent in ET patients (41.4%), followed by patients with pre-PMF (33.3%) and PV (17.6%) patients. VWF:RCo was negatively correlated with the platelet count (r=0.937; P=0.002). Only one episode of minor bleeding occurred in a patient with ET and AVWS. Younger age (<50 yr) [odds ratio (OR), 7.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27‒39.48; P=0.026] and thrombocytosis (>600×109/L) (OR, 13.70; 95% CI, 1.35‒138.17; P=0.026) were independent risk factors for developing AVWS.
Conclusion
AVWS based on VWF:RCo was common in patients with ET and pre-PMF, but less common in patients with PV in the Korean population. Clinically significant bleeding is rare in these patients.
Keywords: Myeloproliferative neoplasm, Essential thrombocythemia, Polycythemia vera, Primary myelofibrosis, Acquired von Willebrand syndrome
Blood Res 2023; 58(1): 42-50
Published online March 31, 2023 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022218
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Ik-Chan Song, Sora Kang, Myung-Won Lee, Hyewon Ryu, Hyo-Jin Lee, Hwan-Jung Yun, Deog-Yeon Jo
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
Correspondence to:Deog-Yeon Jo, M.D., Ph.D.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Korea
E-mail: deogyeon@cnu.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background
Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) has not been investigated in Korean patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm.
Methods
This study analyzed the prevalence at diagnosis and clinical features of AVWS in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), prefibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF), or overt PMF (PMF) diagnosed between January 2019 and December 2021 at Chungam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. AVWS was defined as below the lower reference limit (56%) of ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo).
Results
Sixty-four consecutive patients (36 with ET, 17 with PV, 6 with pre-PMF, and 5 with PMF; 30 men and 34 women) with a median age of 67 years (range, 18‒87 yr) were followed for a median of 25.1 months (range, 2.6‒46.4 mo). AVWS was detected in 20 (31.3%) patients at diagnosis and was most frequent in ET patients (41.4%), followed by patients with pre-PMF (33.3%) and PV (17.6%) patients. VWF:RCo was negatively correlated with the platelet count (r=0.937; P=0.002). Only one episode of minor bleeding occurred in a patient with ET and AVWS. Younger age (<50 yr) [odds ratio (OR), 7.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27‒39.48; P=0.026] and thrombocytosis (>600×109/L) (OR, 13.70; 95% CI, 1.35‒138.17; P=0.026) were independent risk factors for developing AVWS.
Conclusion
AVWS based on VWF:RCo was common in patients with ET and pre-PMF, but less common in patients with PV in the Korean population. Clinically significant bleeding is rare in these patients.
Keywords: Myeloproliferative neoplasm, Essential thrombocythemia, Polycythemia vera, Primary myelofibrosis, Acquired von Willebrand syndrome
Table 1 . Patient characteristics (N=64)..
ET (N=36) | PV (N=17) | pre-PMF (N=6) | PMF (N=5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 65 (18–84) | 72 (17–86) | 60.5 (34–87) | 77 (42–86) |
Female, N (%) | 20 (55.6) | 10 (58.8) | 3 (50.0) | 1 (20.0) |
Palpable splenomegaly, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 24 (66.7) | 15 (88.2) | 6 (100) | 5 (100) |
Laboratory findings | ||||
WBC, ×109/L | 10.9±4.7 | 14.6±4.6a) | 15.9±3.3a) | 12.9±9.0 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 0.7±0.6 | 0.6±0.3 | 0.6±0.3 | 1.4±1.2a) |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 14.0±1.4 | 17.9±2.5a) | 12.7±2.5 | 10.7±1.7a) |
Platelet, ×109/L | 870.3±314.0 | 614.2±381.3a) | 909.5±369.4 | 868.4±420.8 |
Platelet, ×109/L, N (%) | ||||
450–599 | 4 (11.1) | 2 (11.8) | 1 (16.7) | 4 (80.0) |
600–999 | 26 (72.2) | 6 (35.3) | 4 (66.7) | 0 (0.0) |
1,000–1,449 | 4 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
≥1,500 | 2 (5.6) | 2 (11.8) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.3±0.4 | 1.5±0.4 | 2.0±0.9a) | 1.9±0.3a) |
Driver gene mutation, N (%) | ||||
30 (83.3) | 17 (100) | 4 (66.7) | 3 (60.0) | |
3 (8.3) | - | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) | |
1 (2.8) | - | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
26.3±11.1 | 63.6±19.9a) | 47.6±19.4a) | 50.5±37.0a) | |
IPSET, N (%) | ||||
Low | 9 (25.0) | - | - | - |
Intermediate | 12 (33.3) | - | - | - |
High | 15 (41.7) | - | - | - |
IPSS, N (%) | ||||
Low | - | - | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Intermediate-1 | - | - | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Intemediate-2 | - | - | 1 (16.7) | 3 (60.0) |
High | - | - | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) |
Comorbidity, N (%) | ||||
Hypertension | 15 (41.7) | 13 (76.5) | 1 (16.7) | 3 (60.0) |
Diabetes mellitus | 4 (11.1) | 6 (35.3) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Chronic kidney disease | 6 (16.7) | 7 (41.2) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (40.0) |
Smoking | 7 (19.4) | 3 (17.6) | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Dyslipidemia | 5 (13.9) | 3 (17.6) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Treatments, N (%) | ||||
Cytoreductive treatment | ||||
Hydroxyurea | 23 (63.9) | 17 (88.2) | 6 (66.7) | 4 (80.0) |
Anagrelide | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Aspirin | 33 (91.7) | 17 (100) | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 6 (16.7) | 3 (17.6) | 3 (33.3) | 3 (60.0) |
FU (yr), median (range) | 1.8 (0.1–3.9) | 2.5 (1.1–3.8) | 1.3 (0.2–2.9) | 2.5 (1.3–3.1) |
a)
Abbreviations: ET, essential thrombocythemia; FU, follow-up; IPSET, International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; pre-PMF, prefibrotic/early myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency..
Table 2 . Prevalence of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (N=64)..
ET (N=36) | PV (N=17) | pre-PMF (N=6) | PMF (N=5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
VWF:RCo <56%, N (%) | 15 (41.7) | 3 (17.6) | 2 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) |
VWF:Rco <30%, N (%) | 3 (8.3) | 3 (17.6) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) |
Abbreviations: ET, essential thrombocythemia; pre-PMF, prefibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera; VWF:Rco, von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity..
Table 3 . Clinical features of patients with essential thrombocythemia, according to von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (N=36)..
≥56% (N=21) | <56% (N=15) | ≥30% (N=33) | <30% (N=3) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 65 (40–84) | 56 (18–83) | 0.035 | 65 (18–84) | 69 (56–72) | 0.560 |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 13 (61.9) | 11 (73.3) | 0.473 | 23 (69.7) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
Laboratory findings | ||||||
WBC, ×109/L | 10.5±3.2 | 11.5±6.4 | 0.527 | 11.0±4.8 | 10.0±2.5 | 0.718 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 0.7±0.4 | 0.7±0.3 | 0.971 | 0.7±0.6 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.562 |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 14.0±1.5 | 13.9±1.5 | 0.821 | 14.0±1.2 | 13.2±0.8 | 0.406 |
Platelet, ×109/L | 813.7±170.7 | 949.7±440.0 | 0.205 | 837.8±228.8 | 1,228.3±824.8 | 0.037 |
Platelet ≥600×109/L, N (%) | 18 (85.7) | 14 (93.3) | 0.473 | 29 (87.9) | 3 (100) | 0.522 |
Platelet ≥1,000×109/L, N (%) | 3 (14.3) | 3 (20.0) | 0.650 | 5 (15.2) | 1 (33.3) | 0.418 |
Platelet ≥1,500×109/L, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (13.2) | 0.085 | 1 (3.0) | 1 (33.3) | 0.028 |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.4±0.4 | 1.2±0.3 | 0.141 | 1.3±0.4 | 1.5±0.4 | 0.488 |
PT, sec | 12.1±1.0 | 11.5±0.9 | 0.057 | 11.9±0.9 | 11.0±1.6 | 0.139 |
aPTT, sec | 35.6±3.8 | 35.8±3.6 | 0.829 | 35.9±3.6 | 32.9±3.7 | 0.168 |
Driver gene mutation, N (%) | ||||||
19 (90.5) | 12 (80.0) | 0.370 | 29 (87.9) | 2 (66.7) | 0.309 | |
7 (33.3%) | 3 (20.0%) | 0.379 | 9 (27.3) | 1 (33.3) | 0.825 | |
1 (4.8) | 2 (13.3) | 0.625 | 2 (6.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.249 | |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 4 (19.0) | 2 (13.3) | 0.650 | 6 (18.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.418 |
Bleeding, N (%) | ||||||
Major bleeding | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
Minor bleeding | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.230 | 1 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.760 |
Overall | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.230 | 1 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.760 |
Normalization of VWF:RCo after cytoreduction, N (%)c) | - | 11/11 (100) | - | - | - | - |
Time to normalization of VWF:RCo (wk), median (range) | - | 8 (2–18) | - | - | - | - |
a)Data presented as mean±SD were analyzed using Student t-test for pared samples; data presented as percentages were analyzed using the Chi-square test. b)Thrombosis occurred before, at the time of, and after diagnosis. c)Platelet counts were 556.5±171.8×109/L at the time of initial normalization of VWF:RCo..
Abbreviations: aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PT, prothrombin time; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency; VWF:RCo, von Willabrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity..
Table 4 . Clinical features of patients with polycythemia vera according to von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (N=17)..
≥30% (N=14) | <30% (N=3) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 73.5 (44–86) | 61 (55–72) | 0.377 |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 13 (92.9) | 2 (66.7) | 0.201 |
Laboratory findings | |||
WBC, ×109/L | 15.2±5.0 | 16.6±2.7 | 0.656 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 00.6±0.2 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.075 |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 17.9±2.6 | 17.7±2.6 | 0.879 |
Platelet, ×109/L | 510.0±206.7 | 1,120.7±671.7 | 0.009 |
Platelet >600×109/L, N (%) | 5 (35.7) | 3 (100) | 0.043 |
Platelet >1,000×109/L, N (%) | 1 (7.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
Platelet >1,500×109/L, N (%) | 1 (7.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.5±0.5 | 1.6±0.1 | 0.728 |
14 (100) | 3 (100) | - | |
2 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0.661 | |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 3 (21.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0.377 |
Bleeding, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
Normalization of VWF:RCo after cytoreduction, N (%)c) | - | 3 (100) | - |
a)Data presented as mean±SD were analyzed using Student t-test for pared samples; data presented as percentages were analyzed using the Chi-square test. b)Thrombosis occurred before, at the time of, and after diagnosis. c)Platelet counts were 444.0±194.6×109/L at the time of initial normalization of VWF:RCo..
Abbreviations: LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency; VWF:RCo; von Willabrand factor, ristocetin cofactor activity..
Table 5 . Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors for developing acquired von Willebrand syndrome at diagnosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (N=64)..
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||||
Age <50 yr | 4.29 | 1.05–17.45 | 0.042 | 7.08 | 1.27–39.48 | 0.026 | |
Male | 0.73 | 0.73–2.81 | 0.651 | - | - | - | |
ET | 3.29 | 1.02–10.62 | 0.047 | 2.94 | 0.76–11.36 | 0.117 | |
IPSET higha) | 0.28 | 0.05–1.62 | 0.155 | - | - | - | |
R-IPSET-T higha) | 0.47 | 0.03–8.60 | 0.603 | - | - | - | |
WBC >11.0×109/L | 0.89 | 0.23–3.42 | 0.864 | - | - | - | |
Monocyte >1.0×109/L | 0.30 | 0.03–3.04 | 0.310 | - | - | - | |
Platelet >600×109/L | 8.87 | 1.07–73.03 | 0.043 | 13.70 | 1.35–138.17 | 0.026 | |
Platelet >800×109/L | 1.23 | 0.45–3.79 | 0.631 | - | - | - | |
Platelet >1,000×109/L | 1.58 | 0.39–6.38 | 0.518 | - | - | - | |
LDH >1.5×UNL | 1.25 | 0.30–5.23 | 0.760 | - | - | - | |
Serum ferritin | 0.99 | 0.98–1.00 | 0.201 | - | - | - | |
Positive | 0.90 | 0.20–4.01 | 0.884 | - | - | - | |
0.67 | 0.19–2.40 | 0.535 | - | - | - | ||
0.43 | 0.08–2.22 | 0.314 | - | - | - | ||
Positive | 1.52 | 0.23–9.88 | 0.662 | - | - | - | |
Chronic kidney disease | 1.83 | 0.68–5.83 | 0.306 | - | - | - | |
Diabetes mellitus | 1.23 | 0.30–4.28 | 0.863 | - | - | - | |
Hypertension | 0.56 | 0.19–1.63 | 0.283 | - | - | - | |
Smoking | 0.60 | 0.15–2.47 | 0.479 | - | - | - | |
Dyslipidemia | 0.93 | 0.22–4.05 | 0.926 | - | - | - | |
Volumetric splenomegaly | 0.77 | 0.22–2.70 | 0.684 | - | - | - | |
Thrombosis before or at diagnosis | 0.65 | 0.10–4.14 | 0.652 | - | - | - |
a)Among ET patients..
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ET, essential thrombocythemia; IPSET, International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; OR, odds ratio; R-IPSET-T, revised IPSET-thrombosis; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency..
Ik-Chan Song, Sang Hoon Yeon, Myung-Won Lee, Hyewon Ryu, Hyo-Jin Lee, Hwan-Jung Yun, Seon Young Kim, Deog-Yeon Jo
Blood Res 2022; 57(1): 59-68Myeong-Won Lee, Hyewon Ryu, Yoon-Seok Choi, Ik-Chan Song, Hyo-Jin Lee, Hwan-Jung Yun, Byung Joo Sun, Jin-Ok Jeong, Deog-Yeon Jo
Blood Res 2020; 55(2): 77-84Seug Yun Yoon, Jong-Ho Won
Blood Res 2023; 58(S1): S83-S89