Blood Res 2022; 57(3):
Published online September 30, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2022.2022057
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : Hend Nabil Ellithy, M.D.
Clinical Hematology Unit-Internal Medicine Department, Kasr Al Ainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo 4240310, Egypt
E-mail: hend.allithy@kasraliny.edu.eg
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background
The pathophysiology underlying primary adult immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) has not yet been identified. However, many mechanisms affect the immune system, causing defective tolerance to self-platelets and megakaryocytes. Cluster of differentiation 40 (CD40) contributes to both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses.
Methods
This case‒control study was conducted to detect rs4810485G>T and rs1883832C>T polymorphisms of CD40 in Egyptian patients with persistent/chronic ITP to clarify their possible association with chronic disease evolution. This study included 50 patients with persistent/chronic ITP and 50 healthy controls. Genotyping was performed using the polymerase chain reaction‒restriction fragment length polymorphism technique.
Results
Genotyping of rs1883832 and rs4810485 revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. However, combined gene polymorphism genotyping showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01).
Conclusion
Our results indicate a strong association between the combined polymorphism of both genes and susceptibility to developing ITP among adult Egyptian patients. Targeting this pathway using novel therapeutic approaches is promising.
Keywords CD40, rs1883832, rs4810485, Polymorphism, Chronic ITP
Blood Res 2022; 57(3): 229-234
Published online September 30, 2022 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2022.2022057
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Hend Nabil Ellithy1, Sherif Mohamed Yousry2, Asmaa Abdel-Aal2, Lelian Tawadros2, Nouran Momen2
1Clinical Hematology Unit-Internal Medicine Department, 2Clinical and Chemical Pathology Department, Kasr Al Ainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Correspondence to:Hend Nabil Ellithy, M.D.
Clinical Hematology Unit-Internal Medicine Department, Kasr Al Ainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo 4240310, Egypt
E-mail: hend.allithy@kasraliny.edu.eg
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background
The pathophysiology underlying primary adult immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) has not yet been identified. However, many mechanisms affect the immune system, causing defective tolerance to self-platelets and megakaryocytes. Cluster of differentiation 40 (CD40) contributes to both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses.
Methods
This case‒control study was conducted to detect rs4810485G>T and rs1883832C>T polymorphisms of CD40 in Egyptian patients with persistent/chronic ITP to clarify their possible association with chronic disease evolution. This study included 50 patients with persistent/chronic ITP and 50 healthy controls. Genotyping was performed using the polymerase chain reaction‒restriction fragment length polymorphism technique.
Results
Genotyping of rs1883832 and rs4810485 revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. However, combined gene polymorphism genotyping showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01).
Conclusion
Our results indicate a strong association between the combined polymorphism of both genes and susceptibility to developing ITP among adult Egyptian patients. Targeting this pathway using novel therapeutic approaches is promising.
Keywords: CD40, rs1883832, rs4810485, Polymorphism, Chronic ITP
Table 1 . Clinical and laboratory data of 50 patients with ITP..
Variable | Value (N=50) |
---|---|
Sex, N (%) | |
Male | 5 (10%) |
Female | 45 (90%) |
Age at sampling, years | |
Mean±SD, range | 30.6±11.12 (14–60) |
Platelets at sampling ×109/L, N (%) | |
Platelet count <20×109/L | 36 (72%) |
Platelet count >20×109/L | 14 (28%) |
Bleeding tendency at time of initial diagnosis, N (%) | |
No bleeding | 0 (0%) |
Skin bleeding | 43 (86%) |
Mucosal bleeding | 31 (62%) |
GIT or GUT bleeding | 40 (80%) |
Disease state at sampling, N (%) | |
Activity | 50 (100%) |
Remission | 0 (0%) |
Disease severity at sampling, N (%) | |
Bleeder | 4 (8%) |
Non-bleeder | 46 (92%) |
Treatment regimen, N (%) | |
No treatment (under observation) | 0 (0%) |
Corticosteroids (alone or in combination) | 50 (100%) |
Azathioprine (in different combinations) | 30 (60%) |
TPO-RA | 4 (8%) |
Splenectomy | 0 (0%) |
Treatment response, N (%) | |
Complete response | 35 (70%) |
Response | 14 (28%) |
No response | 1 (2%) |
Refractory | 0 (0%) |
Table 2 . Comparison between patients with persistent/chronic ITP and the control group regarding combined gene polymorphism..
Item | ITP group (N=50) | Control group (N=50) | |
---|---|---|---|
Combined rs1883832 (C>T) and rs4810485 (G>T) gene polymorphism | |||
CC-GG | 4 (8%) | 0 (0%) | <0.001a) |
TT-TT | 22 (44%) | 14 (28%) | |
CT-GT | 24 (48%) | 8 (16%) | |
TT-GG | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
CC-GT | 0 (0%) | 2 (4%) | |
TT-GT | 0 (0%) | 6 (12%) | |
CC-TT | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
CT-TT | 0 (0%) | 16 (32%) | |
CT-GG | 0 (0%) | 2 (4%) |
a)
Table 3 . Comparison between completely responsive, responsive, and nonresponsive patients with ITP regarding rs4810485 (G>T) and rs1883832 (C>T) gene polymorphisms..
Item | Completely responsive | Responsive | Nonresponsive | |
---|---|---|---|---|
rs4810485 (G>T) gene polymorphism, N (%) | ||||
rs4810485 gene polymorphism, N (%) | ||||
Wild GG genotype | 3 (75%) | 1 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 0.439 |
Heterozygous GT genotype | 15 (62.5%) | 9 (37.5) | 0 (0%) | |
Homozygous TT genotype | 17 (77.3%) | 4 (18.2%) | 1 (4.5%) | |
G allele | 21 (55.3%) | 11 (73.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.230 |
T allele | 49 (94.2%) | 17 (94.4%) | 2 (100%) | 0.941 |
rs1883832 (C>T) gene polymorphism, N (%) | ||||
gene polymorphism, N (%) | ||||
Wild CC genotype | 3 (75%) | 1 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 0.439 |
Heterozygous CT genotype | 15 (62.5%) | 9 (37.5) | 0 (0%) | |
Homozygous TT genotype | 17 (77.3%) | 4 (18.2%) | 1 (4.5%) | |
C allele | 21 (55.3%) | 11 (73.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.230 |
T allele | 49 (94.2%) | 17 (94.4%) | 2 (100%) | 0.941 |
Saadet Akarsu, Feyzullah Necati Arslan, Deniz Erol
Blood Res 2022; 57(3): 223-228Mohammad Masoud Eslami, Ramazan Rezaei, Sara Abdollahi, Afshin Davari, Mohammad Ahmadvand
Blood Res 2021; 56(1): 17-25Saurabh Shukla, Anil Kumar Tripathi, Shailendra Prasad Verma, Nidhi Awasthi
Blood Res 2020; 55(4): 193-199