Original Article

Split Viewer

Blood Res 2021; 56(3):

Published online September 30, 2021

https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2021069

© The Korean Society of Hematology

New cut-off point for D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism during pregnancy

Somayeh Sadeghi, Marjan Golshani, Bahareh Safaeian

Department of Internal Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Correspondence to : Bahareh Safaeian, M.D.
Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezar Jerib street, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran
E-mail: b_s_508@yahoo.com

Received: April 7, 2021; Revised: May 23, 2021; Accepted: July 8, 2021

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background
Considering that pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the leading causes of mortality among pregnant women and that the D-dimer level in pregnancy can be highly fluctuating, a new and reliable D-dimer reference value is essential to identifying PE in this group of patients. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic effect of D-dimer testing in pregnant women with suspected PE.
Methods
This study recruited 100 women with confirmed pregnancy or six weeks after delivery or abortion with suspected PE symptoms. Wells criteria, D-dimer values, and pregnancy trimesters were recorded. Definitive PE results were obtained using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) or pulmonary ventilation/perfusion scans.
Results
D-dimer cut-off point in PE diagnosis was higher than 1,447 µg/L [sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 63.04%; area under the curve (AUC)=0.735; P =0.003]. In addition, the combination of Wells criteria with the D-dimer test indicated that the cut-off points of D-dimer in PE likely and unlikely women were 1,962 and 1,447 µg/L, respectively, and had acceptable and significant diagnostic value in PE detection. In addition, the diagnostic value of D-dimer in pregnancy trimesters was not found to be significant (P >0.05).
Conclusion
The new cut-off points of 1,447 and 1,962 µg/L were determined for D-dimer in pregnant women with likely and unlikely PE, respectively. Moreover, the new cut-off points in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy were 1,701 µg/L and 1,451 µg/L, respectively, which indicated no statistically acceptable diagnostic value.

Keywords D-dimer, Pregnancy, Pulmonary embolism, Clinical decision ruleD-dimer, Pregnancy, Pulmonary embolism, Clinical decision rule

Article

Original Article

Blood Res 2021; 56(3): 150-155

Published online September 30, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2021069

Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.

New cut-off point for D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism during pregnancy

Somayeh Sadeghi, Marjan Golshani, Bahareh Safaeian

Department of Internal Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Correspondence to:Bahareh Safaeian, M.D.
Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezar Jerib street, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran
E-mail: b_s_508@yahoo.com

Received: April 7, 2021; Revised: May 23, 2021; Accepted: July 8, 2021

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background
Considering that pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the leading causes of mortality among pregnant women and that the D-dimer level in pregnancy can be highly fluctuating, a new and reliable D-dimer reference value is essential to identifying PE in this group of patients. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic effect of D-dimer testing in pregnant women with suspected PE.
Methods
This study recruited 100 women with confirmed pregnancy or six weeks after delivery or abortion with suspected PE symptoms. Wells criteria, D-dimer values, and pregnancy trimesters were recorded. Definitive PE results were obtained using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) or pulmonary ventilation/perfusion scans.
Results
D-dimer cut-off point in PE diagnosis was higher than 1,447 µg/L [sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 63.04%; area under the curve (AUC)=0.735; P =0.003]. In addition, the combination of Wells criteria with the D-dimer test indicated that the cut-off points of D-dimer in PE likely and unlikely women were 1,962 and 1,447 µg/L, respectively, and had acceptable and significant diagnostic value in PE detection. In addition, the diagnostic value of D-dimer in pregnancy trimesters was not found to be significant (P >0.05).
Conclusion
The new cut-off points of 1,447 and 1,962 µg/L were determined for D-dimer in pregnant women with likely and unlikely PE, respectively. Moreover, the new cut-off points in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy were 1,701 µg/L and 1,451 µg/L, respectively, which indicated no statistically acceptable diagnostic value.

Keywords: D-dimer, Pregnancy, Pulmonary embolism, Clinical decision ruleD-dimer, Pregnancy, Pulmonary embolism, Clinical decision rule

Fig 1.

Figure 1.The box plot of D-dimer level presented according to the pregnancy trimesters for patients with and without PE.
Blood Research 2021; 56: 150-155https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2021069

Fig 2.

Figure 2.ROC curve for PE detection using the D-dimer level.
Blood Research 2021; 56: 150-155https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2021069

Table 1 . Baseline characteristics and the score of Wells criteria..

Characteristicsa)Total (N=100)PE (N=8)Non-PE (N=92)P
Age, year30.38±6.6732.57±7.4830.21±6.620.369
Gestational age, week30.20±7.5525.33±16.0230.58±6.550.461
1st trimester5 (5%)2 (25%)3 (3.3%)0.015
2nd trimester16 (16%)0 (0%)16 (17.4%)
3rd trimester79 (79%)6 (75%)73 (79.3%)
Twin infants1 (1%)1 (12.5%)0 (0%)0.080
Preeclampsia4 (4%)0 (0%)4 (4.3%)0.547
Hormone therapy3 (3%)0 (0%)3 (3.3%)0.604
Fever11 (11%)3 (37.5%)8 (8.7%)0.041
Chest pain32 (32%)2 (25%)30 (32.6%)0658
D-dimer, mg/Lb)1,325.50 (186.0–9,547.0)2,110.0 (785–9,547)1,274.50 (186–7,977)0.029
Wells score3.60±0.944.44±1.973.53±0.760.008
PE likely according to Wells criteria36 (36%)5 (62.5%)31 (33.7)0.104
The Wells criteria
Symptoms of DVTc)2 (2%)2 (25%)0 (0%)0.006
PE is the most likely diagnosis100 (100%)8 (100%)92 (100%)-
Tachycardia32 (32%)3 (37.5%)29 (31.5%)0.708
Immobilization/surgery2 (2%)0 (0%)2 (2.2%)0.674
Previous DVT/PE0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)-
Hemoptysis3 (3%)1 (12.5%)2 (2.2%)0.223
Active malignancy0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)-

a)Data is presented as mean±SD or N (%). b)Data is presented as median (minimum, maximum). c)Venous ultrasound positive for DVT..

Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism..


Table 2 . Specification of the diagnostic value of the Wells criteria and D-Dimer level for PE detection..

VariablesClinical probability of PEa)Cut-offSen.Spec.PPVNPVAUCP
Wells scoreTotal375.0035.879.294.30.5570.497
D-dimer, mg/LTotal1,44787.5063.0417.198.30.7350.003
PE unlikely (N=67)1,44783.3365.5719.297.60.7300.019
PE likely (N=33)1,96299.0078.1222.299.00.781<0.001

a)Based on Wells score..

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; NPV, negative predictive value; PE, pulmonary embolism; PPV, positive predictive value; Sen., sensitivity; Spec., specificity..


Table 3 . Specification of the diagnostic value of D-dimer level for PE detection considering the pregnancy trimester..

D-dimer, mg/LPE/non-PEMean5th centileMedian95th centileCut-offSen.Spec.P
1st trimester2/31,017.60242.00592.001,678.001,701.0100.0100.00.083
2nd trimester0/161,925.31523.001,348.002,653.00----
3rd trimester6/731,716.67337.001,327.005,189.001,451.083.3360.270.189

1st trimester gestational weeks <15 weeks. 2nd trimester gestational weeks 15-27 weeks. 3rd trimester gestational weeks >27 weeks..

Abbreviations: PE, pulmonary embolism; Sen., sensitivity; Spec., specificity..


Blood Res
Volume 59 2024

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in BR

Blood Research

pISSN 2287-979X
eISSN 2288-0011
qr-code Download