Blood Res 2021; 56(2):
Published online June 30, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2021028
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : Joon Ho Moon, M.D., Ph.D.
Deok-Hwan Yang, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 41944, Korea (J.H.M.)
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, School of Medicine, Chonnam National University, 322 Seoyang-ro, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun 58128, Korea (D.H.Y.)
E-mail: J.H.M., jhmoon@knu.ac.kr D.H.Y., drydh1685@hotmail.com
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background
We analyzed cell-free serum Epstein‒Barr virus (EBV) DNA to identify its prognostic role in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with lymphoma between January 2014 and July 2020. Patients were enrolled according to the following criteria: i) pathologically confirmed lymphomas according to the World Health Organization criteria, ii) age over 18 years, iii) serum EBV DNA measurement using polymerase chain reaction prior to first-line therapy, and iv) receipt of curative standard chemotherapy. In total, 263 patients met these criteria and were included in this study.
Results
Serum EBV DNA was detected in 79 patients (30.0%). Patients with positive serum EBV tended to be older (P =0.090), and the proportion of T-cell lineage lymphomas was higher than that of B-cell lymphomas (P =0.003). EBV positivity was significantly associated with more advanced disease based on the Ann Arbor staging system (P =0.008) and the International Prognostic Index (P =0.009). EBV positivity was also associated with higher disease relapse (P =0.038) and death rates (P =0.005). EBV-positive lymphomas further showed inferior long-term survival outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.053) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.014). In the subgroup analyses, serum EBV positivity was a significant prognostic factor for patients with B-cell lineage lymphomas in terms of PFS (P =0.003) and OS (P=0.033).
Conclusion
We demonstrated that cell-free serum EBV DNA status at the time of diagnosis has potential as a prognostic biomarker for patients with newly diagnosed malignant lymphomas.
Keywords Epstein‒Barr virus, Lymphoma, Prognosis, Biomarker
Blood Res 2021; 56(2): 65-71
Published online June 30, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2021028
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Dong Won Baek1, Jung Min Lee1, Juhyung Kim1, Hee Jeong Cho1, Sang Kyun Sohn1, Ji Yeon Ham2, Soon Hee Chang2, Joon Ho Moon1, Deok-Hwan Yang3
Departments of 1Hematology/Oncology 2Laboratory Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 3Department of Hematology/Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, School of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Hwasun, Korea
Correspondence to:Joon Ho Moon, M.D., Ph.D.
Deok-Hwan Yang, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 41944, Korea (J.H.M.)
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, School of Medicine, Chonnam National University, 322 Seoyang-ro, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun 58128, Korea (D.H.Y.)
E-mail: J.H.M., jhmoon@knu.ac.kr D.H.Y., drydh1685@hotmail.com
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background
We analyzed cell-free serum Epstein‒Barr virus (EBV) DNA to identify its prognostic role in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with lymphoma between January 2014 and July 2020. Patients were enrolled according to the following criteria: i) pathologically confirmed lymphomas according to the World Health Organization criteria, ii) age over 18 years, iii) serum EBV DNA measurement using polymerase chain reaction prior to first-line therapy, and iv) receipt of curative standard chemotherapy. In total, 263 patients met these criteria and were included in this study.
Results
Serum EBV DNA was detected in 79 patients (30.0%). Patients with positive serum EBV tended to be older (P =0.090), and the proportion of T-cell lineage lymphomas was higher than that of B-cell lymphomas (P =0.003). EBV positivity was significantly associated with more advanced disease based on the Ann Arbor staging system (P =0.008) and the International Prognostic Index (P =0.009). EBV positivity was also associated with higher disease relapse (P =0.038) and death rates (P =0.005). EBV-positive lymphomas further showed inferior long-term survival outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.053) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.014). In the subgroup analyses, serum EBV positivity was a significant prognostic factor for patients with B-cell lineage lymphomas in terms of PFS (P =0.003) and OS (P=0.033).
Conclusion
We demonstrated that cell-free serum EBV DNA status at the time of diagnosis has potential as a prognostic biomarker for patients with newly diagnosed malignant lymphomas.
Keywords: Epstein‒Barr virus, Lymphoma, Prognosis, Biomarker
Table 1 . Patient characteristics..
Variables | N (%) |
---|---|
N | 263 |
Age, median years (range) | 62 (18–87) |
Sex | |
Male | 141 (53.6) |
Female | 122 (46.4) |
Diagnosis | |
Hodgkin lymphoma | 11 (4.2) |
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | 179 (68.1) |
Follicular lymphoma | 13 (4.9) |
Mantle cell lymphoma | 8 (3.0) |
NK/T-cell lymphoma | 14 (5.3) |
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma | 19 (7.2) |
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma | 13 (4.9) |
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma | 6 (2.3) |
Ann Arbor staging | |
I | 41 (15.6) |
II | 62 (23.6) |
III | 74 (28.1) |
IV | 86 (32.7) |
Prognostic risk groupa) | |
Low risk | 97 (36.9) |
Low-intermediate risk | 71 (27.0) |
High-intermediate risk | 62 (23.6) |
High risk | 33 (12.5) |
Positive serum EBV DNA | 79 (30.0) |
Relapse/refractory | 67 (25.5) |
Death | 65 (24.7) |
a)The International Prognostic Index (IPI) was used for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The International Prognostic Score (IPS) was adjusted for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, and IPS 0 and 1 were classified as low risk, 2 as low-intermediate, 3 as high-intermediate, and ≥4 as high-risk group in this analysis..
Abbreviations: EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; NK/T, natural killer T..
Table 2 . Proportion of positive serum EBV according to the lymphoma subtype and clinical outcomes of serum EBV-positive patients..
Diagnosis | Total patients (N=263) | EBV positive (N=79) | CR/PR (%) | Relapse/refractory (%) | Death (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hodgkin lymphoma | 11 | 4 (36.3) | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) |
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | 179 | 42 (23.5) | 40 (95.2) | 11 (26.2) | 12 (28.6) |
Follicular lymphoma | 13 | 3 (23.1) | 3 (100) | 2 (66.7) | 2 (66.7) |
Mantle cell lymphoma | 8 | 5 (62.5) | 5 (100) | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) |
NK/T-cell lymphoma | 14 | 8 (57.1) | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | 2 (25.0) |
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma | 19 | 9 (47.4) | 8 (88.9) | 3 (33.3) | 4 (44.4) |
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma | 13 | 7 (53.8) | 6 (85.7) | 3 (42.9) | 5 (71.4) |
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma | 6 | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 1 (100) | 1 (100) |
Abbreviations: CR/PR, complete response/partial response; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; NK/T, natural killer T-cell..
Table 3 . Clinicopathological characteristics according to serum EBV positivity..
Variables | EBV-negative (%) | EBV-positive (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
N | 184 | 79 | |
Age, median years (range) | 59.6 (19–81) | 62.5 (18–87) | 0.090 |
Sex | 0.176 | ||
Male | 97 (52.7) | 44 (55.7) | |
Female | 87 (47.3) | 35 (44.3) | |
Diagnosis | 0.003 | ||
B cell lineage lymphomas | 157 (85.3) | 54 (68.4) | |
T-cell lineage lymphomas | 27 (14.7) | 25 (31.6) | |
Ann Arbor staging | 0.008 | ||
I | 32 (17.4) | 9 (11.4) | |
II | 52 (28.3) | 10 (12.7) | |
III | 44 (23.9) | 30 (38.0) | |
IV | 56 (30.4) | 30 (38.0) | |
Prognostic risk groupa) | 0.005 | ||
Low risk | 79 (42.9) | 18 (22.8) | |
Low-intermediate risk | 40 (21.7) | 31 (39.2) | |
High-intermediate risk | 44 (23.9) | 18 (22.8) | |
High risk | 21 (11.4) | 12 (15.2) | |
Relapse/refractory | 39 (21.2) | 27 (34.2) | 0.038 |
Death | 36 (19.6) | 29 (36.7) | 0.005 |
a)The International Prognostic Index (IPI) was used for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The International Prognostic Score (IPS) was adjusted for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, and IPS 0 and 1 were classified as low risk, 2 as low-intermediate, 3 as high-intermediate, and ≥4 as high-risk group in this analysis..
Abbreviation: EBV, Epstein–Barr virus..
Table 4 . Factors affecting long-term clinical outcomes..
Univariate | Multivariate | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||
(A) Factors affecting progression-free survival | |||||||
Age>70 vs. ≤70 | 1.144 | 0.714–1.835 | 0.574 | ||||
Male vs. female | 0.902 | 0.589–1.383 | 0.636 | ||||
B-cell vs. T-cell | 0.528 | 0.326–0.853 | 0.009 | 0.503 | 0.318–0.795 | 0.003 | |
Ann Arbor staging | |||||||
III, IV vs. I, II | 0.984 | 0.525–1.843 | 0.958 | ||||
Prognostic risk group | |||||||
High-intermediate, high vs. Low, low-intermediate | 3.018 | 1.699–5.358 | <0.001 | 3.083 | 2.022–4.699 | <0.001 | |
EBV positive vs. negative | 1.354 | 1.102–1.723 | 0.045 | 1.211 | 1.097–1.582 | 0.048 | |
(B) Factors affecting the OS | |||||||
Age>70 vs. ≤70 | 1.033 | 0.593–1.799 | 0.909 | ||||
Male vs. Female | 0.953 | 0.575–1.578 | 0.851 | ||||
B-cell vs. T-cell | 0.618 | 0.350–1.092 | 0.097 | 0.624 | 0.358–1.087 | 0.096 | |
Ann Arbor staging | |||||||
III, IV vs. I, II | 0.987 | 0.441–2.209 | 0.975 | ||||
Prognostic risk group | |||||||
High-intermediate, high vs. Low, low-intermediate | 4.389 | 2.157–8.929 | <0.001 | 4.352 | 2.612–7.252 | <0.001 | |
EBV positive vs. negative | 1.647 | 0.990–2.738 | 0.054 | 1.643 | 0.108–2.705 | 0.050 |
Dong Won Baek, Hee Jeong Cho, Jae Heung Bae, Sang Kyun Sohn, Joon Ho Moon
Blood Res 2020; 55(2): 99-106Mahsa Eskandari, Saba Manoochehrabadi, Hossein Pashaiefar, Mohammad Ali Zaimy, Mohammad Ahmadvand
Blood Res 2019; 54(2): 114-119Yongchel Ahn, Heui June Ahn, Dok Hyun Yoon, Jung Yong Hong, Changhoon Yoo, Shin Kim, Jooryung Huh, and Cheolwon Suh
Blood Res 2017; 52(4): 285-292