Original Article

Split Viewer

Blood Res 2017; 52(2):

Published online June 22, 2017

https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2017.52.2.112

© The Korean Society of Hematology

Evaluation of a new flow cytometry based method for detection of BCR-ABL1 fusion protein in chronic myeloid leukemia

Swati Dasgupta1, Ujjal K Ray2, Arpita Ghosh Mitra4, Deboshree M. Bhattacharyya1, Ashis Mukhopadhyay3, Priyabrata Das1, Sudeshna Gangopadhyay1, Sudip Roy4, and Soma Mukhopadhyay1

1Department of Molecular Biology and Hematology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.

2Department of Pathology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.

3Department of Hemato-Oncology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.

4Department of HLA & Molecular Lab, Medica Superspeciality Hospital, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence to : Soma Mukhopadhyay, Ph.D. Department of Molecular Biology and Hematology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, 16 A Park Lane, Kolkata 700016, India. s.amukhopadhyay@gmail.com

Received: September 27, 2016; Revised: November 17, 2016; Accepted: January 6, 2017

Abstract

Background

Philadelphia chromosome, a hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), plays a key role in disease pathogenesis. It reflects a balanced reciprocal translocation between long arms of chromosomes 9 and 22 involving BCR and ABL1 genes, respectively. An accurate and reliable detection of BCR-ABL fusion gene is necessary for the diagnosis and monitoring of CML. Previously, many technologies, most of which are laborious and time consuming, have been developed to detect BCR-ABL chimeric gene or chromosome.

Methods

A new flow cytometric immunobead assay was used for detection of BCR-ABL fusion proteins and applicability, sensitivity, reliability, efficacy and rapidity of this method was evaluated.

Results

From February 2009 to January 2014, a total 648 CML patients were investigated for the status of BCR-ABL1 protein. Among them, 83 patients were enrolled for comparative study of BCR-ABL1 positivity by three routinely used procedures like karyotyping, and quantitative real time PCR (RT-PCR) as well as immunobead flow cytometry assay. BCR-ABL protein analysis was found consistent, more sensitive (17% greater sensitivity) and reliable than the conventional cytogenetics, as flow cytometry showed 95% concordance rate to RT-PCR.

Conclusion

BCR-ABL fusion protein assay using a new flow cytometric immunobead might be useful in the diagnosis and monitoring CML patients.

Keywords Chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1, Philadelphia chromosome, Flow cytometry

Article

Original Article

Blood Res 2017; 52(2): 112-118

Published online June 22, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2017.52.2.112

Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.

Evaluation of a new flow cytometry based method for detection of BCR-ABL1 fusion protein in chronic myeloid leukemia

Swati Dasgupta1, Ujjal K Ray2, Arpita Ghosh Mitra4, Deboshree M. Bhattacharyya1, Ashis Mukhopadhyay3, Priyabrata Das1, Sudeshna Gangopadhyay1, Sudip Roy4, and Soma Mukhopadhyay1

1Department of Molecular Biology and Hematology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.

2Department of Pathology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.

3Department of Hemato-Oncology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.

4Department of HLA & Molecular Lab, Medica Superspeciality Hospital, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence to:Soma Mukhopadhyay, Ph.D. Department of Molecular Biology and Hematology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, 16 A Park Lane, Kolkata 700016, India. s.amukhopadhyay@gmail.com

Received: September 27, 2016; Revised: November 17, 2016; Accepted: January 6, 2017

Abstract

Background

Philadelphia chromosome, a hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), plays a key role in disease pathogenesis. It reflects a balanced reciprocal translocation between long arms of chromosomes 9 and 22 involving BCR and ABL1 genes, respectively. An accurate and reliable detection of BCR-ABL fusion gene is necessary for the diagnosis and monitoring of CML. Previously, many technologies, most of which are laborious and time consuming, have been developed to detect BCR-ABL chimeric gene or chromosome.

Methods

A new flow cytometric immunobead assay was used for detection of BCR-ABL fusion proteins and applicability, sensitivity, reliability, efficacy and rapidity of this method was evaluated.

Results

From February 2009 to January 2014, a total 648 CML patients were investigated for the status of BCR-ABL1 protein. Among them, 83 patients were enrolled for comparative study of BCR-ABL1 positivity by three routinely used procedures like karyotyping, and quantitative real time PCR (RT-PCR) as well as immunobead flow cytometry assay. BCR-ABL protein analysis was found consistent, more sensitive (17% greater sensitivity) and reliable than the conventional cytogenetics, as flow cytometry showed 95% concordance rate to RT-PCR.

Conclusion

BCR-ABL fusion protein assay using a new flow cytometric immunobead might be useful in the diagnosis and monitoring CML patients.

Keywords: Chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1, Philadelphia chromosome, Flow cytometry

Table 1 . Specific primer sequences for detection of BCR-ABL1 RQ-PCR..


Table 2 . MFI values of all CML patients (N=648)..


Table 3 . Comparison of BCR-ABL1 status results using karyotyping, flow cytometry and RQ-PCR..


Table 4 . Variable transcripts in 83 CML patients detected by nested RT-PCR..


Table 5 . Comparison of mean MFI values in different response groups using karyotyping..

a)Ph positive metaphase cells are absent. b)Presence of Ph positive metaphase cells. c)Presence of Ph positive metaphase cells 36–65%. d)Presence of Ph positive metaphase cells..


Table 6 . Comparison of mean MFI values in different response groups using RQ-PCR (N=68)..

a)No transcript has been detected. b)BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of different transcripts : 0.005–0.01%. c)BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of different transcripts ≤0.1%. d)BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of different transcripts >0.1%..


Table 7 . Comparison between flow cytometry and karyotyping against RQ-PCR..


Blood Res
Volume 59 2024

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in BR

Blood Research

pISSN 2287-979X
eISSN 2288-0011
qr-code Download