Blood Res 2017; 52(2):
Published online June 22, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2017.52.2.112
© The Korean Society of Hematology
1Department of Molecular Biology and Hematology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.
2Department of Pathology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.
3Department of Hemato-Oncology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.
4Department of HLA & Molecular Lab, Medica Superspeciality Hospital, West Bengal, India.
Correspondence to : Soma Mukhopadhyay, Ph.D. Department of Molecular Biology and Hematology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, 16 A Park Lane, Kolkata 700016, India. s.amukhopadhyay@gmail.com
Philadelphia chromosome, a hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), plays a key role in disease pathogenesis. It reflects a balanced reciprocal translocation between long arms of chromosomes 9 and 22 involving
A new flow cytometric immunobead assay was used for detection of BCR-ABL fusion proteins and applicability, sensitivity, reliability, efficacy and rapidity of this method was evaluated.
From February 2009 to January 2014, a total 648 CML patients were investigated for the status of BCR-ABL1 protein. Among them, 83 patients were enrolled for comparative study of
BCR-ABL fusion protein assay using a new flow cytometric immunobead might be useful in the diagnosis and monitoring CML patients.
Keywords Chronic myeloid leukemia,
Blood Res 2017; 52(2): 112-118
Published online June 22, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2017.52.2.112
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Swati Dasgupta1, Ujjal K Ray2, Arpita Ghosh Mitra4, Deboshree M. Bhattacharyya1, Ashis Mukhopadhyay3, Priyabrata Das1, Sudeshna Gangopadhyay1, Sudip Roy4, and Soma Mukhopadhyay1
1Department of Molecular Biology and Hematology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.
2Department of Pathology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.
3Department of Hemato-Oncology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, West Bengal, India.
4Department of HLA & Molecular Lab, Medica Superspeciality Hospital, West Bengal, India.
Correspondence to:Soma Mukhopadhyay, Ph.D. Department of Molecular Biology and Hematology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, 16 A Park Lane, Kolkata 700016, India. s.amukhopadhyay@gmail.com
Philadelphia chromosome, a hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), plays a key role in disease pathogenesis. It reflects a balanced reciprocal translocation between long arms of chromosomes 9 and 22 involving
A new flow cytometric immunobead assay was used for detection of BCR-ABL fusion proteins and applicability, sensitivity, reliability, efficacy and rapidity of this method was evaluated.
From February 2009 to January 2014, a total 648 CML patients were investigated for the status of BCR-ABL1 protein. Among them, 83 patients were enrolled for comparative study of
BCR-ABL fusion protein assay using a new flow cytometric immunobead might be useful in the diagnosis and monitoring CML patients.
Keywords: Chronic myeloid leukemia,
Table 1 . Specific primer sequences for detection of
Table 2 . MFI values of all CML patients (N=648)..
Table 3 . Comparison of BCR-ABL1 status results using karyotyping, flow cytometry and RQ-PCR..
Table 4 . Variable transcripts in 83 CML patients detected by nested RT-PCR..
Table 5 . Comparison of mean MFI values in different response groups using karyotyping..
a)Ph positive metaphase cells are absent. b)Presence of Ph positive metaphase cells. c)Presence of Ph positive metaphase cells 36–65%. d)Presence of Ph positive metaphase cells..
Table 6 . Comparison of mean MFI values in different response groups using RQ-PCR (N=68)..
a)No transcript has been detected. b)BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of different transcripts : 0.005–0.01%. c)BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of different transcripts ≤0.1%. d)BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of different transcripts >0.1%..
Table 7 . Comparison between flow cytometry and karyotyping against RQ-PCR..
Muhammad Ammar Samad, Eman Mahboob, Hussain Mansoor
Blood Res 2022; 57(2): 95-100Young Jae Byun, Byeong-Bae Park, Eun Sung Lee, Kyung Soo Choi, and Dae Sung Lee
Blood Res 2014; 49(2): 127-129Hye Won Lee and Ja Young Lee
Blood Res 2024; 59():