Blood Res 2020; 55(S1):
Published online July 31, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.S003
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : Hee-Je Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea
E-mail: cumckim@catholic.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed unAcute myeloid leukemia, New FDA approvalsder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Despite expanding knowledge in the molecular landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an increasing understanding of leukemogenic pathways, little has changed in the treatment of AML in the last 40 years. Since introduction in the 1970s, combination chemotherapy consisting of anthracycline and cytarabine has been the mainstay of treatment, with major therapeutic advances based on improving supportive care rather than the introduction of novel therapeutics. Over the last decades, there have been extensive efforts to identify specific target mutations or pathways with the aim of improving clinical outcomes. Finally, after a prolonged wait, we are witnessing the next wave of AML treatment, characterized by a more “precise” and “personalized” understanding of the unique molecular or genetic mapping of individual patients. This new trend has since been further facilitated, with four new FDA approvals granted in 2017 in AML therapeutics. Currently, a total of eight targeted agents have been approved since 2017 (as of Jan. 2020). In this review, we will briefly discuss these newer agents in the context of their indication and the basis of their approval.
Keywords Acute myeloid leukemia, New FDA approvals
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a devasting disease, which rapidly becomes fatal if left untreated. Anthracycline and cytarabine-based combination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment since its introduction in the 1970s [1, 2].
Recent advances in genomic technologies have identified that AML is a heterogeneous group of diseases, and the long-term prognosis of AML is significantly different and largely dependent on its own cytogenetics and molecular aberrations [3, 4]. Consequently, there have been substantial changes in the classification and prognostication of AML over the last few decades [5, 6], which are now predicated on identifying genetic features of the individual disease. Concurrently, efforts to discover potential molecular targets have been ongoing.
At the 2017 American Society of Hematology meeting, it was announced that 2017 was a landmark year for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies for AML, as the U.S. FDA had approved four new therapeutic options for the disease (midostaurin, enasidenib, CPX-351, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin). Subsequently, four additional drugs (gilteritinib, ivosidenib, venetoclax, and glasdegib) have received U.S. FDA approval for AML [7]. Surprisingly, these advances have occurred only during the recent few years, and we are undoubtedly facing an “innovative era” in the treatment of AML.
In this review, we will focus on the recently approved new targeted agents for the treatment of AML.
Recently approved drugs for AML and their indication by disease status are listed in Table 1.
Table 1 New agents for AML with recent U.S. FDA approval.
Molecular target | Indication (setting) | Representative trials | OS benefit | FDA approval | In Korea (Jan. 2020) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New | Rel/ref | ||||||
Midostaurin | FLT3 ITD/TKD | O (combia)) | Phase 3 RATIFY | Yes | Apr. 2017 | Available | |
Gilteritinib | FLT3 ITD/TKD | O (single) | Phase 3 ADMIRAL | Yes | Nov. 2018 | Not available | |
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) | CD33+ | O (combi or single) | O (combi or single) | Phase 3 ALFA-0701 | No (but benefit in EFS) | Jul. 2017 | Available (via KOEDC) |
Phase 3 AML-19 | Yes | ||||||
Phase 2 MyloFrance-1 | NA | ||||||
CPX-351 | t-AML | O | Phase 3 (NCT01696084) | Yes | Aug. 2017 | Not available | |
AML-MRC | |||||||
Enasidenib | IDH2 | O (single) | Phase 1/2 study (NCT01915498) | NA | Aug. 2017 | Not available | |
Ivosidenib | IDH1 | O (single) | Phase 1 dose-escalation/dose-expansion study (NCT02074839) | NA | Jul. 2018 | Not available | |
Venetoclax | BCL2 | O (combib)) | Phase 1 dose-escalation study (NCT02203773) | NA | Nov. 2018 | Available | |
Phase 1/2 study (NCT02287233) | NA | ||||||
Glasdegib | Hedgehog signaling pathway | O (combic)) | Phase 2 (NCT01546038) | Yes | Nov. 2018 | Not available |
a)Midostaurin in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine induction and cytarabine consolidation.
b)Hypomethylating agents (HMA) such as decitabine or azacitidine with venetoclax (400 mg); low dose Ara-C (LDAC) with venetoclax (600 mg).
c)Glasdegib and LDAC.
Abbreviations: BCL2, B-cell lymphoma 2; EFS, event-free survival; FLT3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; ITD, internal tandem duplication; KOEDC, Korea Orphan & Essential Drug Center; NA, not assessable; OS, overall survival; rel/Ref, relapsed or refractory; t-AML, therapy-related AML; AML-MRC, AML with myelodysplasia related changes; TKD, tyrosine kinase domain.
In April 2017, midostaurin was approved for treatment of naïve
Gilteritinib, for use as a single agent, was approved for relapsed or refractory (R/R)
In July 2017, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine or as a single agent, was approved in adults for the treatment of newly diagnosed
In August 2017, CPX-351 was approved for newly diagnosed therapy-related AML (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC). CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation that delivers a 5:1 fixed-molar ratio of daunorubicin and cytarabine [26, 27]. The approval was based on results of a phase 3 clinical trial in 309 patients with either t-AML or AML-MRC, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of CPX-351 compared to conventional cytarabine and daunorubicin induction [28]. In this study, CPX-351 demonstrated an improvement in OS, with a median OS of 9.56 months for the CPX-351 arm versus 5.95 months for the conventional chemotherapy arm. Although the trial was conducted only in patients aged 60 to 75 years, the FDA approved CPX-351 for use in all adults with no age restrictions.
Enasidenib, for use as a single agent, was approved by the FDA in August 2017 for R/R AML with the isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (
Venetoclax, in combination with azacitidine or decitabine or low dose cytarabine, received accelerated FDA approval in Nov 2018 for newly diagnosed AML (age 75≥yr or “unfit” patients). Venetoclax is an orally active, and potent small molecule inhibitor targeting B-cell lymphoma 2 (
Glasdegib, in combination with LDAC, was approved by the FDA in November 2018 for the frontline treatment of elderly (>75 yr) or unfit patients. Glasdegib is an oral inhibitor of the hedgehog signaling pathway [44, 45]. Recently, the aberrant activation of the hedgehog signaling pathway has been implicated in the maintenance and development of several malignancies including AML [46]. Glasdegib received FDA approval based on a phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter study (NCT01546038), in which 88 and 44 patients (older than 75 yr or older than 55 yr with significant comorbidities) were randomized to glasdegib/LDAC and LDAC, respectively [47]. The results demonstrated that glasdegib/LDAC was superior to LDAC alone, indicating better survival (the median OS of 8.3 mo vs. 4.9 mo,
Over the years, there has been a gradual paradigm shift from traditional medicine to personalized or precision medicine owing to the explosive growth in available genetic data [48]. Traditional or conventional medicine is characterized by empirical and mechanism-based treatments, targeting an entire population. On the contrary, precision medicine targets an individual patient based on the understanding of the unique molecular mechanisms of the patient [48, 49].
In the field of AML, there has been the growing understanding and discovery of leukemogenic pathways in the past years, and an innovative approach to AML treatment has “long” been expected. However, in the last 40 years, little has changed in the treatment of AML. Moreover, the majority of therapeutic advances in AML are associated with improved supportive care rather than the introduction of novel therapeutics.
Fortunately, with the introduction of numerous novel agents, we are now witnessing a new era in AML treatment [7]. Notably, 2017 was a memorable year in the history of AML treatment, marking the success of biomedical research efforts over the last several decades. The one of future challenges will be to incorporate and use these new therapeutics where they have the greatest impact – use alone or combine targeted agents with each other or with conventional chemotherapy [50].
Lastly, in Korea, we still have a long way to go, with limited access to these novel agents in clinical practice. Although these are not all-around, I hope that these new FDA approvals are no longer ‘a pie in the sky’ for Korean patients as well in a near future.
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Blood Res 2020; 55(S1): S14-S18
Published online July 31, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2020.S003
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Silvia Park1,2, Byung Sik Cho1,2, Hee-Je Kim1,2
1Department of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, 2Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to:Hee-Je Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea
E-mail: cumckim@catholic.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed unAcute myeloid leukemia, New FDA approvalsder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Despite expanding knowledge in the molecular landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and an increasing understanding of leukemogenic pathways, little has changed in the treatment of AML in the last 40 years. Since introduction in the 1970s, combination chemotherapy consisting of anthracycline and cytarabine has been the mainstay of treatment, with major therapeutic advances based on improving supportive care rather than the introduction of novel therapeutics. Over the last decades, there have been extensive efforts to identify specific target mutations or pathways with the aim of improving clinical outcomes. Finally, after a prolonged wait, we are witnessing the next wave of AML treatment, characterized by a more “precise” and “personalized” understanding of the unique molecular or genetic mapping of individual patients. This new trend has since been further facilitated, with four new FDA approvals granted in 2017 in AML therapeutics. Currently, a total of eight targeted agents have been approved since 2017 (as of Jan. 2020). In this review, we will briefly discuss these newer agents in the context of their indication and the basis of their approval.
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia, New FDA approvals
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a devasting disease, which rapidly becomes fatal if left untreated. Anthracycline and cytarabine-based combination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment since its introduction in the 1970s [1, 2].
Recent advances in genomic technologies have identified that AML is a heterogeneous group of diseases, and the long-term prognosis of AML is significantly different and largely dependent on its own cytogenetics and molecular aberrations [3, 4]. Consequently, there have been substantial changes in the classification and prognostication of AML over the last few decades [5, 6], which are now predicated on identifying genetic features of the individual disease. Concurrently, efforts to discover potential molecular targets have been ongoing.
At the 2017 American Society of Hematology meeting, it was announced that 2017 was a landmark year for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies for AML, as the U.S. FDA had approved four new therapeutic options for the disease (midostaurin, enasidenib, CPX-351, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin). Subsequently, four additional drugs (gilteritinib, ivosidenib, venetoclax, and glasdegib) have received U.S. FDA approval for AML [7]. Surprisingly, these advances have occurred only during the recent few years, and we are undoubtedly facing an “innovative era” in the treatment of AML.
In this review, we will focus on the recently approved new targeted agents for the treatment of AML.
Recently approved drugs for AML and their indication by disease status are listed in Table 1.
Table 1 . New agents for AML with recent U.S. FDA approval..
Molecular target | Indication (setting) | Representative trials | OS benefit | FDA approval | In Korea (Jan. 2020) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New | Rel/ref | ||||||
Midostaurin | FLT3 ITD/TKD | O (combia)) | Phase 3 RATIFY | Yes | Apr. 2017 | Available | |
Gilteritinib | FLT3 ITD/TKD | O (single) | Phase 3 ADMIRAL | Yes | Nov. 2018 | Not available | |
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) | CD33+ | O (combi or single) | O (combi or single) | Phase 3 ALFA-0701 | No (but benefit in EFS) | Jul. 2017 | Available (via KOEDC) |
Phase 3 AML-19 | Yes | ||||||
Phase 2 MyloFrance-1 | NA | ||||||
CPX-351 | t-AML | O | Phase 3 (NCT01696084) | Yes | Aug. 2017 | Not available | |
AML-MRC | |||||||
Enasidenib | IDH2 | O (single) | Phase 1/2 study (NCT01915498) | NA | Aug. 2017 | Not available | |
Ivosidenib | IDH1 | O (single) | Phase 1 dose-escalation/dose-expansion study (NCT02074839) | NA | Jul. 2018 | Not available | |
Venetoclax | BCL2 | O (combib)) | Phase 1 dose-escalation study (NCT02203773) | NA | Nov. 2018 | Available | |
Phase 1/2 study (NCT02287233) | NA | ||||||
Glasdegib | Hedgehog signaling pathway | O (combic)) | Phase 2 (NCT01546038) | Yes | Nov. 2018 | Not available |
a)Midostaurin in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine induction and cytarabine consolidation..
b)Hypomethylating agents (HMA) such as decitabine or azacitidine with venetoclax (400 mg); low dose Ara-C (LDAC) with venetoclax (600 mg)..
c)Glasdegib and LDAC..
Abbreviations: BCL2, B-cell lymphoma 2; EFS, event-free survival; FLT3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; ITD, internal tandem duplication; KOEDC, Korea Orphan & Essential Drug Center; NA, not assessable; OS, overall survival; rel/Ref, relapsed or refractory; t-AML, therapy-related AML; AML-MRC, AML with myelodysplasia related changes; TKD, tyrosine kinase domain..
In April 2017, midostaurin was approved for treatment of naïve
Gilteritinib, for use as a single agent, was approved for relapsed or refractory (R/R)
In July 2017, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine or as a single agent, was approved in adults for the treatment of newly diagnosed
In August 2017, CPX-351 was approved for newly diagnosed therapy-related AML (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC). CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation that delivers a 5:1 fixed-molar ratio of daunorubicin and cytarabine [26, 27]. The approval was based on results of a phase 3 clinical trial in 309 patients with either t-AML or AML-MRC, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of CPX-351 compared to conventional cytarabine and daunorubicin induction [28]. In this study, CPX-351 demonstrated an improvement in OS, with a median OS of 9.56 months for the CPX-351 arm versus 5.95 months for the conventional chemotherapy arm. Although the trial was conducted only in patients aged 60 to 75 years, the FDA approved CPX-351 for use in all adults with no age restrictions.
Enasidenib, for use as a single agent, was approved by the FDA in August 2017 for R/R AML with the isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (
Venetoclax, in combination with azacitidine or decitabine or low dose cytarabine, received accelerated FDA approval in Nov 2018 for newly diagnosed AML (age 75≥yr or “unfit” patients). Venetoclax is an orally active, and potent small molecule inhibitor targeting B-cell lymphoma 2 (
Glasdegib, in combination with LDAC, was approved by the FDA in November 2018 for the frontline treatment of elderly (>75 yr) or unfit patients. Glasdegib is an oral inhibitor of the hedgehog signaling pathway [44, 45]. Recently, the aberrant activation of the hedgehog signaling pathway has been implicated in the maintenance and development of several malignancies including AML [46]. Glasdegib received FDA approval based on a phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter study (NCT01546038), in which 88 and 44 patients (older than 75 yr or older than 55 yr with significant comorbidities) were randomized to glasdegib/LDAC and LDAC, respectively [47]. The results demonstrated that glasdegib/LDAC was superior to LDAC alone, indicating better survival (the median OS of 8.3 mo vs. 4.9 mo,
Over the years, there has been a gradual paradigm shift from traditional medicine to personalized or precision medicine owing to the explosive growth in available genetic data [48]. Traditional or conventional medicine is characterized by empirical and mechanism-based treatments, targeting an entire population. On the contrary, precision medicine targets an individual patient based on the understanding of the unique molecular mechanisms of the patient [48, 49].
In the field of AML, there has been the growing understanding and discovery of leukemogenic pathways in the past years, and an innovative approach to AML treatment has “long” been expected. However, in the last 40 years, little has changed in the treatment of AML. Moreover, the majority of therapeutic advances in AML are associated with improved supportive care rather than the introduction of novel therapeutics.
Fortunately, with the introduction of numerous novel agents, we are now witnessing a new era in AML treatment [7]. Notably, 2017 was a memorable year in the history of AML treatment, marking the success of biomedical research efforts over the last several decades. The one of future challenges will be to incorporate and use these new therapeutics where they have the greatest impact – use alone or combine targeted agents with each other or with conventional chemotherapy [50].
Lastly, in Korea, we still have a long way to go, with limited access to these novel agents in clinical practice. Although these are not all-around, I hope that these new FDA approvals are no longer ‘a pie in the sky’ for Korean patients as well in a near future.
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Table 1 . New agents for AML with recent U.S. FDA approval..
Molecular target | Indication (setting) | Representative trials | OS benefit | FDA approval | In Korea (Jan. 2020) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New | Rel/ref | ||||||
Midostaurin | FLT3 ITD/TKD | O (combia)) | Phase 3 RATIFY | Yes | Apr. 2017 | Available | |
Gilteritinib | FLT3 ITD/TKD | O (single) | Phase 3 ADMIRAL | Yes | Nov. 2018 | Not available | |
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) | CD33+ | O (combi or single) | O (combi or single) | Phase 3 ALFA-0701 | No (but benefit in EFS) | Jul. 2017 | Available (via KOEDC) |
Phase 3 AML-19 | Yes | ||||||
Phase 2 MyloFrance-1 | NA | ||||||
CPX-351 | t-AML | O | Phase 3 (NCT01696084) | Yes | Aug. 2017 | Not available | |
AML-MRC | |||||||
Enasidenib | IDH2 | O (single) | Phase 1/2 study (NCT01915498) | NA | Aug. 2017 | Not available | |
Ivosidenib | IDH1 | O (single) | Phase 1 dose-escalation/dose-expansion study (NCT02074839) | NA | Jul. 2018 | Not available | |
Venetoclax | BCL2 | O (combib)) | Phase 1 dose-escalation study (NCT02203773) | NA | Nov. 2018 | Available | |
Phase 1/2 study (NCT02287233) | NA | ||||||
Glasdegib | Hedgehog signaling pathway | O (combic)) | Phase 2 (NCT01546038) | Yes | Nov. 2018 | Not available |
a)Midostaurin in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine induction and cytarabine consolidation..
b)Hypomethylating agents (HMA) such as decitabine or azacitidine with venetoclax (400 mg); low dose Ara-C (LDAC) with venetoclax (600 mg)..
c)Glasdegib and LDAC..
Abbreviations: BCL2, B-cell lymphoma 2; EFS, event-free survival; FLT3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; ITD, internal tandem duplication; KOEDC, Korea Orphan & Essential Drug Center; NA, not assessable; OS, overall survival; rel/Ref, relapsed or refractory; t-AML, therapy-related AML; AML-MRC, AML with myelodysplasia related changes; TKD, tyrosine kinase domain..
Hee Sue Park
Blood Res 2024; 59():Saba Manoochehrabadi, Morteza Talebi, Hossein Pashaiefar, Soudeh Ghafouri‑Fard, Mohammad Vaezi, Mir Davood Omrani and Mohammad Ahmadvand
Blood Res 2024; 59():Jung Hwan Lee, Hee Young Ju, Ju Kyung Hyun, So Jin Kim, Hee Won Cho, Jae Kyung Lee, Ji Won Lee, Ki Woong Sung, Keon Hee Yoo
Blood Res 2023; 58(4): 181-186