Blood Res 2023; 58(1):
Published online March 31, 2023
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022247
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : Aishwarya Ravindran, M.D., Division of Laboratory Medicine-Hematopathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham 35249-7331, USA, E-mail: aravindran@uabmc.edu
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
An elderly male without significant past medical history presented with cervical lymphadenopathy. Labs showed anemia (Hb 7.6 g/dL) and elevated WBC count (16×109/L) with neutrophilia. Limited core biopsy revealed partial nodal involvement by an overtly malignant proliferation with marked anaplasia including multinucleated forms (A, B) and appeared to display a somewhat cohesive pattern of growth suggestive of an epithelioid neoplasm. Flow cytometry showed no immunophenotypic evidence of lymphoma. The primary differential diagnosis based on these findings included a poorly-differentiated carcinoma versus melanoma, however, immunostains for keratin, Melan A and SOX10 were negative. CD45 was only performed subsequently due to receipt of the case for hematopathologist evaluation given the lymphadenopathy. Surprisingly, the anaplastic tumor cells (A ×40; B ×200; C ×400) were diffusely CD45-positive; subsequent immunostains revealed positivity for CD20 (D ×200), MUM1 (E ×200), BCL6, CD30 (subset, F ×200), BCL2, and MYC, diagnostic of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with anaplastic morphology (non-germinal center B-cell phenotype, double expressor-MYC+/BCL2+). The tumor was negative for CD10, ALK, cyclin D1, and EBV. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was negative for
Blood Res 2023; 58(1): 1-1
Published online March 31, 2023 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022247
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Priyadharshini Sivasubramaniam1, Aishwarya Ravindran2
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, 2Division of Laboratory Medicine-Hematopathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
Correspondence to:Aishwarya Ravindran, M.D., Division of Laboratory Medicine-Hematopathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham 35249-7331, USA, E-mail: aravindran@uabmc.edu
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
An elderly male without significant past medical history presented with cervical lymphadenopathy. Labs showed anemia (Hb 7.6 g/dL) and elevated WBC count (16×109/L) with neutrophilia. Limited core biopsy revealed partial nodal involvement by an overtly malignant proliferation with marked anaplasia including multinucleated forms (A, B) and appeared to display a somewhat cohesive pattern of growth suggestive of an epithelioid neoplasm. Flow cytometry showed no immunophenotypic evidence of lymphoma. The primary differential diagnosis based on these findings included a poorly-differentiated carcinoma versus melanoma, however, immunostains for keratin, Melan A and SOX10 were negative. CD45 was only performed subsequently due to receipt of the case for hematopathologist evaluation given the lymphadenopathy. Surprisingly, the anaplastic tumor cells (A ×40; B ×200; C ×400) were diffusely CD45-positive; subsequent immunostains revealed positivity for CD20 (D ×200), MUM1 (E ×200), BCL6, CD30 (subset, F ×200), BCL2, and MYC, diagnostic of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with anaplastic morphology (non-germinal center B-cell phenotype, double expressor-MYC+/BCL2+). The tumor was negative for CD10, ALK, cyclin D1, and EBV. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was negative for