Korean J Hematol 2006; 41(1):
Published online March 30, 2006
https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2006.41.1.36
© The Korean Society of Hematology
엄기성, 민창기, 이석, 김유진, 김성용, 조석구, 이종욱, 민우성, 김춘추
가톨릭 대학교 줄기세포 이식센터
Background:
Double autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) seems to be superior to a single ASCT, at least in the patients who did not achieve a 90% response after the first transplant. An allogeneic SCT with a dose-reduced conditioning regimen after ASCT and as part of the initial therapy, might be a feasible and highly effective approach. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic factors that are associated with the outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients who had received a second transplant.
Methods:
From April 1996 to December 2004, 38 MM patients, who had previously received high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) with autologous stem cell support, underwent a second transplant. Following the 1st ASCT, 24 patients received a second ASCT and 14 received a tandem reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation (RIST) from their HLA-matched siblings.
Results:
The 3-year estimated PFS and overall survival (OS) from the time of the first ASCT were 25.2% and 77.6%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 26 months (95% CI, 23∼29) and 60 months (95% CI, 44∼76), respectively. The disease status (a CR vs. PR or less) at the second transplant was be the most powerful factor for improving the PFS (P=0.001, hazard ratio 5.8, 95% CI 2.1∼16.1).
Conclusion:
Patients whose disease is sensitive to chemotherapy and who obtain a CR after a single transplantation might benefit the most from a second transplant.
Keywords Multiple myeloma, Tandem stem cell transplantation, Reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation, Autologous stem cell transplantation
Korean J Hematol 2006; 41(1): 36-40
Published online March 30, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2006.41.1.36
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
엄기성, 민창기, 이석, 김유진, 김성용, 조석구, 이종욱, 민우성, 김춘추
가톨릭 대학교 줄기세포 이식센터
Ki Seong Eom, Chang Ki Min, Seok Lee, Yoo Jin Kim, Sung Yong Kim, Seok Goo Cho, Jong Wook Lee, Woo Sung Min, Chun Choo Kim
Catholic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Center, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Background:
Double autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) seems to be superior to a single ASCT, at least in the patients who did not achieve a 90% response after the first transplant. An allogeneic SCT with a dose-reduced conditioning regimen after ASCT and as part of the initial therapy, might be a feasible and highly effective approach. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic factors that are associated with the outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients who had received a second transplant.
Methods:
From April 1996 to December 2004, 38 MM patients, who had previously received high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) with autologous stem cell support, underwent a second transplant. Following the 1st ASCT, 24 patients received a second ASCT and 14 received a tandem reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation (RIST) from their HLA-matched siblings.
Results:
The 3-year estimated PFS and overall survival (OS) from the time of the first ASCT were 25.2% and 77.6%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 26 months (95% CI, 23∼29) and 60 months (95% CI, 44∼76), respectively. The disease status (a CR vs. PR or less) at the second transplant was be the most powerful factor for improving the PFS (P=0.001, hazard ratio 5.8, 95% CI 2.1∼16.1).
Conclusion:
Patients whose disease is sensitive to chemotherapy and who obtain a CR after a single transplantation might benefit the most from a second transplant.
Keywords: Multiple myeloma, Tandem stem cell transplantation, Reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation, Autologous stem cell transplantation
Ja Min Byun, Jayoun Lee, Sang-Jin Shin, Minjoo Kang, Sung-Soo Yoon, and Youngil Koh
Blood Res 2018; 53(2): 105-109Chang-Ki Min, Sung-Eun Lee, Seung-Ah Yahng, Byung-Sik Cho, Ki-Seong Eom, Yoo-Jin Kim, Hee-Je Kim, Seok Lee, Seok-Goo Cho, Dong-Wook Kim, Jong-Wook Lee, Woo-Sung Min, and Chong-Won Park
Blood Res 2013; 48(3): 198-205Haerim Chung, Hyunsoo Cho
Blood Res 2023; 58(4): 166-172