Korean J Hematol 2010; 45(2):
Published online June 30, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2010.45.2.90
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Department of Internal Medicine and Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, USA.
Correspondence to : Correspondence to Robert T. Means, Jr., M.D. Department of Internal Medicine, J525 Kentucky Clinic, 740 South Limestone, Lexington KY 40536-0284, USA. Tel: +1-859-257-5116, Fax: +1-859-257-8364, robert.means@uky.edu
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Polycythemia vera (PV) was first described nearly 120 years ago. In the subsequent century, the clinical syndrome of PV, its natural history, its treatment, and many critical pathogenetic features of the disease were characterized. The discovery of the Janus-associated kinase - 2 mutation
Keywords Polycythemia vera,
Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by an absolute erythrocytosis not driven by erythropoietin (Epo), i.e., a primary polycythemia. It is distinguished from other primary polycythemias by the involvement of other hematopoietic cell lineages [1]. Like other myeloproliferative neoplasms, PV is associated with increased risks of evolution to leukemia and of thrombosis [2]; like other polycythemia syndromes, many of its signs and symptoms result from increased blood viscosity [1].
Credit for the first description of PV is generally given to Henri Vaquez, who in 1892 reported a patient with a polycythemia syndrome not due to cardiopulmonary disease [3]. He later proposed that erythrocytosis could be divided into two syndromes: absolute erythrocytosis or polycythemia, resulting from an increased red cell mass; and relative erythrocytosis, resulting from a reduction in plasma volume without increased red cell mass [4]. In 1903, William Osler recognized that several polycythemia cases reported in the literature or encountered in his extensive consulting practice represented a single clinical syndrome not previously delineated, and published a description of this syndrome [5]. The Viennese physician Wilhelm Türk subsequently recognized that PV was not solely as disease of the erythron but involved other hematopoietic lineages [6], and the basic clinical features of PV were largely defined by the time Osler wrote a second, shorter review of PV in 1908 [7]. The history of the early definition of PV has been reviewed in more detail elsewhere [8].
From its initial descriptions until the last few years, the diagnosis of PV has been made by criteria that were based upon clinical and clinical laboratory findings. In 1966, the U.S. National Cancer Institute funded the Polycythemia Vera Study Group (PVSG) to carry out randomized prospective trials in PV with the goal of defining the best treatment modality [9]. One of the requirements for developing a credible clinical trials program was the establishment of specific criteria for the diagnosis of PV. The subsequent PVSG diagnostic criteria (Table 1) were the basis for all PV diagnostic schema for 40 years [10].
The PVSG criteria essentially reflect the need to establish three features to make the diagnosis of PV. First, the patient must have actual polycythemia and not relative polycythemia (M1). Second, it must be shown that the patient does not have secondary polycythemia (most commonly due to hypoxemia) (M2). Finally, evidence of a myeloproliferative neoplasm needed to be demonstrated (M3 or two minor criteria). The PVSG study criteria are based on clinical or clinical laboratory parameters, other than the requirement for demonstration of an increased red cell mass by nuclear medicine methods. Pathologic parameters (such as bone marrow morphology) were not part of the system, and of course molecular diagnostic parameters were not available in 1966.
Subsequent developments in research on the pathogenesis of PV have been incorporated into the basic PVSC criteria structure as alternatives or supplements to an original criterion. For example, studies of the coefficient of variation in red cell mass studies has led to the proposal that a red cell mass greater than 125% of predicted value for the local laboratory is a more accurate definition than the specific red cell mass values included in the original criteria [11]. The development of reliable and clinically applicable assays for Epo has led to these assays being suggested as a more conclusive method to rule out secondary polycythemia [12, 13]. Alternative major or minor criteria for evidence of a myeloproliferative neoplasm include splenomegaly only apparent on radiologic studies [11], demonstration of erythroid colony formation in vitro without added Epo (endogenous erythroid colonies, or EEC) [14], increased expression of the platelet receptor Mpl [15], or of gene
In 2005, Kralovics and colleagues reported the results of an analysis of the Janus-associated kinase 2 (
Over the next five years, studies of
In addition to its role in clinical PV, the identification of
As noted above,
As discussed earlier,
However, the 2008 modification of the WHO diagnostic criteria for PV [43] (Table 3) departed substantially from the underlying concepts of the PVSG criteria. The first major criterion (A1) remains the demonstration of an increased red cell mass, but employs a widely, though not universally [44], accepted criterion based on hemoglobin concentration. The diagnosis of PV is then made by the finding of two additional criteria. This requirement can be met by demonstrating any two of the following: a low serum Epo concentration, a characteristic bone marrow morphology, the presence of EEC, or
The discovery of the
Korean J Hematol 2010; 45(2): 90-94
Published online June 30, 2010 https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2010.45.2.90
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Robert T. Means Jr*
Department of Internal Medicine and Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, USA.
Correspondence to: Correspondence to Robert T. Means, Jr., M.D. Department of Internal Medicine, J525 Kentucky Clinic, 740 South Limestone, Lexington KY 40536-0284, USA. Tel: +1-859-257-5116, Fax: +1-859-257-8364, robert.means@uky.edu
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Polycythemia vera (PV) was first described nearly 120 years ago. In the subsequent century, the clinical syndrome of PV, its natural history, its treatment, and many critical pathogenetic features of the disease were characterized. The discovery of the Janus-associated kinase - 2 mutation
Keywords: Polycythemia vera,
Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by an absolute erythrocytosis not driven by erythropoietin (Epo), i.e., a primary polycythemia. It is distinguished from other primary polycythemias by the involvement of other hematopoietic cell lineages [1]. Like other myeloproliferative neoplasms, PV is associated with increased risks of evolution to leukemia and of thrombosis [2]; like other polycythemia syndromes, many of its signs and symptoms result from increased blood viscosity [1].
Credit for the first description of PV is generally given to Henri Vaquez, who in 1892 reported a patient with a polycythemia syndrome not due to cardiopulmonary disease [3]. He later proposed that erythrocytosis could be divided into two syndromes: absolute erythrocytosis or polycythemia, resulting from an increased red cell mass; and relative erythrocytosis, resulting from a reduction in plasma volume without increased red cell mass [4]. In 1903, William Osler recognized that several polycythemia cases reported in the literature or encountered in his extensive consulting practice represented a single clinical syndrome not previously delineated, and published a description of this syndrome [5]. The Viennese physician Wilhelm Türk subsequently recognized that PV was not solely as disease of the erythron but involved other hematopoietic lineages [6], and the basic clinical features of PV were largely defined by the time Osler wrote a second, shorter review of PV in 1908 [7]. The history of the early definition of PV has been reviewed in more detail elsewhere [8].
From its initial descriptions until the last few years, the diagnosis of PV has been made by criteria that were based upon clinical and clinical laboratory findings. In 1966, the U.S. National Cancer Institute funded the Polycythemia Vera Study Group (PVSG) to carry out randomized prospective trials in PV with the goal of defining the best treatment modality [9]. One of the requirements for developing a credible clinical trials program was the establishment of specific criteria for the diagnosis of PV. The subsequent PVSG diagnostic criteria (Table 1) were the basis for all PV diagnostic schema for 40 years [10].
The PVSG criteria essentially reflect the need to establish three features to make the diagnosis of PV. First, the patient must have actual polycythemia and not relative polycythemia (M1). Second, it must be shown that the patient does not have secondary polycythemia (most commonly due to hypoxemia) (M2). Finally, evidence of a myeloproliferative neoplasm needed to be demonstrated (M3 or two minor criteria). The PVSG study criteria are based on clinical or clinical laboratory parameters, other than the requirement for demonstration of an increased red cell mass by nuclear medicine methods. Pathologic parameters (such as bone marrow morphology) were not part of the system, and of course molecular diagnostic parameters were not available in 1966.
Subsequent developments in research on the pathogenesis of PV have been incorporated into the basic PVSC criteria structure as alternatives or supplements to an original criterion. For example, studies of the coefficient of variation in red cell mass studies has led to the proposal that a red cell mass greater than 125% of predicted value for the local laboratory is a more accurate definition than the specific red cell mass values included in the original criteria [11]. The development of reliable and clinically applicable assays for Epo has led to these assays being suggested as a more conclusive method to rule out secondary polycythemia [12, 13]. Alternative major or minor criteria for evidence of a myeloproliferative neoplasm include splenomegaly only apparent on radiologic studies [11], demonstration of erythroid colony formation in vitro without added Epo (endogenous erythroid colonies, or EEC) [14], increased expression of the platelet receptor Mpl [15], or of gene
In 2005, Kralovics and colleagues reported the results of an analysis of the Janus-associated kinase 2 (
Over the next five years, studies of
In addition to its role in clinical PV, the identification of
As noted above,
As discussed earlier,
However, the 2008 modification of the WHO diagnostic criteria for PV [43] (Table 3) departed substantially from the underlying concepts of the PVSG criteria. The first major criterion (A1) remains the demonstration of an increased red cell mass, but employs a widely, though not universally [44], accepted criterion based on hemoglobin concentration. The diagnosis of PV is then made by the finding of two additional criteria. This requirement can be met by demonstrating any two of the following: a low serum Epo concentration, a characteristic bone marrow morphology, the presence of EEC, or
The discovery of the
Table 1 . Diagnostic criteria of the polycythemia vera study group (PVSG)..
Table 2 . 2001 World Health Organization criteria for the diagnosis of polycythemia vera major criteria..
Table 3 . 2008 World Health Organization criteria for the diagnosis of polycythemia vera..
Sung-Eun Lee
Blood Res 2021; 56(S1): S26-S33Young‑Uk Cho
Blood Res 2024; 59():Hyun Jung Lee
Blood Res 2023; 58(S1): S96-S108