Korean J Hematol 2010; 45(1):
Published online March 31, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2010.45.1.36
© The Korean Society of Hematology
1Department of Hematology/Oncology, Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
2Genome Research Center for Hematopoietic Diseases, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.
3Department of Hematology/Oncology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Correspondence to : Correspondence to Hyeoung-Joon Kim, M.D., Ph.D. Hematology/Oncology Clinics, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 160 Ilsim-ri, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun-gun 519-809, Korea. Tel: +82-61-379-7637, Fax: +82-61-379-7628, hjoonk@chonnam.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene and fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 gene-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations are the most frequent mutations in patients with cytogenetically normal (CN)-AML. We analyzed the prognostic impact of these mutations and their interactions in adults with CN-AML.
The incidence of
Adult patients with CN-AML carrying isolated
Keywords
AML is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disease. Three cytogenetically defined risk groups (favorable, intermediate, and adverse) are used to design risk-adapted treatment protocols for patients with AML. However, about 35-50% of the successfully karyotyped patients lack clonal chromosomal aberrations [1], and the prognostic implications have not been clearly established for cytogenetically normal (CN)-AML [2]. Therefore, it is important to develop a molecular-level genetic approach for discriminating between prognostically different subsets of CN-AML.
In the recent years, CN-AML has been identified as a heterogeneous disease with mutations of the nucleophosmin (
The
Several studies have attempted to identify the interactions between these frequent mutations and their prognostic implications for patients with CN-AML. On the basis of these reports, the recently updated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines [15] recommend that isolated
Diagnostic bone marrow (BM) samples from 121 adult patients with CN-AML (age≤60 years) who had received at least one cycle of intensive induction chemotherapy were analyzed retrospectively for the presence of
All enrolled patients received intensive remission induction therapy consisting of 3 days of idarubicin (IDA) at 12 mg/m2/day and 7 days of cytarabine at 100 mg/m2/day or
Genomic DNA was extracted from the diagnostic BM samples, such as cryopreserved mononuclear cells, by using a DNA blood minikit (QIAamp; Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
For
For
The response to initial therapy was evaluated after induction or after salvage chemotherapy. The definition of CR followed the recommended criteria [19]. Relapse was defined as the reappearance of blasts post-CR in the peripheral blood or BM. Relapse-free survival (RFS) endpoints, measured from the date of documented CR, included relapse, patient death from any cause, and alive in CR at last follow-up (censored). The overall survival (OS) endpoints, measured from the date of diagnosis, were death from any cause and alive at last follow-up (censored) [19]. RFS before transplantation and OS before transplantation were also assessed to eliminate confounding bias and were defined as the time without relapse, death, or transplantation from the date of CR and the time from diagnosis to death or transplantation, respectively.
For between-group comparisons, Fisher's exact test (categorical data) and the Mann-hitney U test (continuous data) were used. Categorical data were compared among three groups defined by the
The median age of the 57 male and 64 female patients was 44 years (range, 15-60 years). All patients received intensive remission induction chemotherapy. Fifty-three (43.8%) and five (4.1%) of the patients underwent alloSCT and autoSCT, respectively. The median follow-up time was 11.8 months (range, 0.6-86.1 months).
Among the patients, 65 (53.7%) had
To follow the current NCCN guidelines, we categorized the patients into three groups:
Of the 121 patients, 93 (76.9%) achieved CR. Among these, 19 patients failed to achieve CR after the first round of induction chemotherapy and therefore received reinduction chemotherapy (Table 3). There was no difference in the remission rate to induction chemotherapy between the patients with and those without
In the subgroup analysis, the overall RFS was significantly longer among the patients who underwent alloSCT than among the nontransplant patients (
According to the multivariate analysis for the overall RFS,
In agreement with the previous reports, our study showed that the
We also conducted further analysis for the overall RFS following alloSCT compared with chemotherapy alone as a consolidation therapy. In the isolated
The multivariate analysis for the overall RFS and OS also identified the combination of
We evaluated the prevalence and prognostic impact of
According to previous studies, patients with CN-AML carrying
On the other hand, we demonstrated that the
For CN-AML, the proper risk-stratified postremission therapy has not yet been determined. Previous studies on young adult patients with CN-AML have reported a 4-year DFS of 48.5% with alloSCT [22] and 5-year DFS of 28-41% with repeated courses of HDAC consolidation [23, 24]. Hence, transplant-based options generally afford a lesser risk of relapse and higher DFS as consolidation for the patients. However, this benefit is accompanied by a treatment-related mortality of 15-25% [25]. To balance the treatment-related toxicity and risk of relapse, it is crucial to define distinct clinical and molecular subtypes that influence the prognosis of CN-AML.
It was previously reported that event-free survival (EFS) and DFS are better in patients with NPMc+/
In our three-group analysis, the isolated
In contrast, the isolated
In the
In summary, adult patients (≤60 years) with CN-AML carrying isolated
Kaplan-Meier analysis of CN-AML according to the
RFS analysis of the alloSCT patients versus the chemotherapy-alone patients according to the
Kaplan-Meier analysis of CN-AML for RFS and OS according to the combined
RFS analysis of the alloSCT patients versus the chemotherapy-alone patients according to the combined
Table 1 Patient characteristics according to the
The values represent either the number (percentage) or the median (range).
Abbreviations:
Table 2 Patient characteristics according to the
The values represent either the number (percentage) or the median (range).
Abbreviations:
Table 3 Treatment outcomes according to the
The values represent either the number (percentage) or the mean±SD.
a)Patients achieved CR after one course of remission induction chemotherapy, b)Patients achieved CR regardless of induction chemotherapy, c)One patient was missing due to follow-up loss.
Abbreviations:
Table 4 Multivariable analysis for outcome according to the
Abbreviations:
Table 5 Treatment outcomes according to the
The values represent either the number (percentage) or the mean±SD.
a)Patients achieved CR after one course of remission induction chemotherapy, b)Patients achieved CR regardless of induction chemotherapy, c)One patient was missing due to follow-up loss.
Abbreviations:
Korean J Hematol 2010; 45(1): 36-45
Published online March 31, 2010 https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2010.45.1.36
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Yeo-Kyeoung Kim1, Hee-Nam Kim2, Se Ryeon Lee3, Jae-Sook Ahn1, Deok-Hwan Yang1, Je-Jung Lee1, Il-Kwon Lee2, Myung-Geun Shin4, and Hyeoung-Joon Kim1,2*
1Department of Hematology/Oncology, Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
2Genome Research Center for Hematopoietic Diseases, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.
3Department of Hematology/Oncology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Correspondence to: Correspondence to Hyeoung-Joon Kim, M.D., Ph.D. Hematology/Oncology Clinics, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 160 Ilsim-ri, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun-gun 519-809, Korea. Tel: +82-61-379-7637, Fax: +82-61-379-7628, hjoonk@chonnam.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene and fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 gene-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations are the most frequent mutations in patients with cytogenetically normal (CN)-AML. We analyzed the prognostic impact of these mutations and their interactions in adults with CN-AML.
The incidence of
Adult patients with CN-AML carrying isolated
Keywords:
AML is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disease. Three cytogenetically defined risk groups (favorable, intermediate, and adverse) are used to design risk-adapted treatment protocols for patients with AML. However, about 35-50% of the successfully karyotyped patients lack clonal chromosomal aberrations [1], and the prognostic implications have not been clearly established for cytogenetically normal (CN)-AML [2]. Therefore, it is important to develop a molecular-level genetic approach for discriminating between prognostically different subsets of CN-AML.
In the recent years, CN-AML has been identified as a heterogeneous disease with mutations of the nucleophosmin (
The
Several studies have attempted to identify the interactions between these frequent mutations and their prognostic implications for patients with CN-AML. On the basis of these reports, the recently updated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines [15] recommend that isolated
Diagnostic bone marrow (BM) samples from 121 adult patients with CN-AML (age≤60 years) who had received at least one cycle of intensive induction chemotherapy were analyzed retrospectively for the presence of
All enrolled patients received intensive remission induction therapy consisting of 3 days of idarubicin (IDA) at 12 mg/m2/day and 7 days of cytarabine at 100 mg/m2/day or
Genomic DNA was extracted from the diagnostic BM samples, such as cryopreserved mononuclear cells, by using a DNA blood minikit (QIAamp; Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
For
For
The response to initial therapy was evaluated after induction or after salvage chemotherapy. The definition of CR followed the recommended criteria [19]. Relapse was defined as the reappearance of blasts post-CR in the peripheral blood or BM. Relapse-free survival (RFS) endpoints, measured from the date of documented CR, included relapse, patient death from any cause, and alive in CR at last follow-up (censored). The overall survival (OS) endpoints, measured from the date of diagnosis, were death from any cause and alive at last follow-up (censored) [19]. RFS before transplantation and OS before transplantation were also assessed to eliminate confounding bias and were defined as the time without relapse, death, or transplantation from the date of CR and the time from diagnosis to death or transplantation, respectively.
For between-group comparisons, Fisher's exact test (categorical data) and the Mann-hitney U test (continuous data) were used. Categorical data were compared among three groups defined by the
The median age of the 57 male and 64 female patients was 44 years (range, 15-60 years). All patients received intensive remission induction chemotherapy. Fifty-three (43.8%) and five (4.1%) of the patients underwent alloSCT and autoSCT, respectively. The median follow-up time was 11.8 months (range, 0.6-86.1 months).
Among the patients, 65 (53.7%) had
To follow the current NCCN guidelines, we categorized the patients into three groups:
Of the 121 patients, 93 (76.9%) achieved CR. Among these, 19 patients failed to achieve CR after the first round of induction chemotherapy and therefore received reinduction chemotherapy (Table 3). There was no difference in the remission rate to induction chemotherapy between the patients with and those without
In the subgroup analysis, the overall RFS was significantly longer among the patients who underwent alloSCT than among the nontransplant patients (
According to the multivariate analysis for the overall RFS,
In agreement with the previous reports, our study showed that the
We also conducted further analysis for the overall RFS following alloSCT compared with chemotherapy alone as a consolidation therapy. In the isolated
The multivariate analysis for the overall RFS and OS also identified the combination of
We evaluated the prevalence and prognostic impact of
According to previous studies, patients with CN-AML carrying
On the other hand, we demonstrated that the
For CN-AML, the proper risk-stratified postremission therapy has not yet been determined. Previous studies on young adult patients with CN-AML have reported a 4-year DFS of 48.5% with alloSCT [22] and 5-year DFS of 28-41% with repeated courses of HDAC consolidation [23, 24]. Hence, transplant-based options generally afford a lesser risk of relapse and higher DFS as consolidation for the patients. However, this benefit is accompanied by a treatment-related mortality of 15-25% [25]. To balance the treatment-related toxicity and risk of relapse, it is crucial to define distinct clinical and molecular subtypes that influence the prognosis of CN-AML.
It was previously reported that event-free survival (EFS) and DFS are better in patients with NPMc+/
In our three-group analysis, the isolated
In contrast, the isolated
In the
In summary, adult patients (≤60 years) with CN-AML carrying isolated
Kaplan-Meier analysis of CN-AML according to the
RFS analysis of the alloSCT patients versus the chemotherapy-alone patients according to the
Kaplan-Meier analysis of CN-AML for RFS and OS according to the combined
RFS analysis of the alloSCT patients versus the chemotherapy-alone patients according to the combined
Table 1 . Patient characteristics according to the
The values represent either the number (percentage) or the median (range)..
Abbreviations:
Table 2 . Patient characteristics according to the
The values represent either the number (percentage) or the median (range)..
Abbreviations:
Table 3 . Treatment outcomes according to the
The values represent either the number (percentage) or the mean±SD..
a)Patients achieved CR after one course of remission induction chemotherapy, b)Patients achieved CR regardless of induction chemotherapy, c)One patient was missing due to follow-up loss..
Abbreviations:
Table 4 . Multivariable analysis for outcome according to the
Abbreviations:
Table 5 . Treatment outcomes according to the
The values represent either the number (percentage) or the mean±SD..
a)Patients achieved CR after one course of remission induction chemotherapy, b)Patients achieved CR regardless of induction chemotherapy, c)One patient was missing due to follow-up loss..
Abbreviations:
Ja Young Lee, Young Don Joo, Seung Hwan Oh, Jeong Hwan Shin, Hye Ran Kim, Sang Min Lee, Jeong Nyeo Lee
Korean J Hematol 2009; 44(2): 74-81Sang Ho Kim, Yeo Kyeoung Kim, Il, Kwon Lee, Deog Yeon Jo, Jong Ho Won, Jae Yong Kwak, Chang Yeol Yim, Moo Rim Park, Deok Hwan Yang, Sang Hee Cho, Je Jung Lee, Ik Joo Chung, Hyeoung Joon Kim
Korean J Hematol 2007; 42(3): 250-257Sahar Jalilivand, Maryam Nabigol, Mehdi Bakhtiyaridovvombaygi and Ahmad Gharehbaghian
Blood Res 2024; 59():
Kaplan-Meier analysis of CN-AML according to the
RFS analysis of the alloSCT patients versus the chemotherapy-alone patients according to the
Kaplan-Meier analysis of CN-AML for RFS and OS according to the combined
RFS analysis of the alloSCT patients versus the chemotherapy-alone patients according to the combined