Blood Res 2021; 56(S1):
Published online April 30, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2020323
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : Dae-Young Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 260 Gonghang-daero, Gangseo-gu, Seoul 07804, Korea
E-mail: drdani@ewha.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a syndrome of defective apoptosis, a disruption of the regulatory pathway that terminates immune and inflammatory responses. Fever, cytopenia, splenomegaly, and/or hemophagocytosis are typical findings of this syndrome. HLH can be induced by genetic disorders (familial) or secondary causes. Familial HLH is rare, while secondary causes in adults include infection, autoimmunity, and malignancy. HLH in adults tends to be confused with or misdiagnosed as sepsis, mainly due to similar clinical manifestations and laboratory findings, which make it difficult to diagnose HLH rapidly and adopt immunosuppressive agents and/or chemotherapy adequately. Treatment of pediatric HLH using HLH-2004 or multi-agent chemotherapy can be applied in adult patients, although the dose and type of drug need to be adjusted. It is highly recommended that allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation should be used in patients who become reactivated or are refractory to the initial treatment as soon as possible to improve survival. Future clinical trials are warranted to determine more suitable treatments for adult patients with HLH.
Keywords Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic syndrome
Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a group of diseases belonging to histiocytosis syndrome [1]. It manifests as high fever and pancytopenia, resulting in the enlargement of organs such as the liver/spleen, as well as liver dysfunction. It causes a severe inflammatory reaction in the whole body. It is not a disease but rather a consequence of an ineffective immune response [2]. Many patients have low blood pressure, which does not respond to a booster. Thus, treatments such as the administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents are often provided, as it is considered to be an infection accompanied by sepsis. The condition is sometimes diagnosed at a late stage. HLH was previously thought to occur mainly in children, with an incidence rate of 1 per 800,000 per year, with geographic variation [3]. Although the incidence rate in adults is not known exactly, it is thought that many unexplained severely ill adult patients with multiple organ failure and high fever may have had HLH [4]. This literature review focuses on the diagnosis and management of patients with secondary HLH.
It is difficult to define one characteristic symptom that is common to patients with HLH. However, many patients are admitted to the hospital due to high fever (>38.5°C). This is one of the symptoms that must appear during the preclinical process of HLH. A relatively typical pattern is that a patient with cytopenia and fever has an enlarged spleen. In patients with such findings, HLH is suspected and diagnostic procedures should promptly proceed.
The liver and spleen are the organs most frequently involved in HLH [3]. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or bilirubin levels are elevated. This is often associated with unexplained fulminant hepatitis or liver failure. In particular, liver involvement could lead to ascites, sinusoidal obstruction, and encephalo-pathy. These findings are often mistaken for severe hepatitis with increased AST/ALT and bilirubin levels [5].
In addition to the liver or spleen, the lungs, intestines, kidneys, and skin are the frequently involved organs. Respiratory distress syndrome and renal failure are common manifestations [6, 7]. Some patients may have neurological abnormalities such as decreased consciousness, convulsions, cranial nerve abnormalities, and ataxia from the beginning, suggesting that HLH invaded the central nervous system. In such cases, the prognosis is extremely poor [8, 9].
These abnormal findings usually occur simultaneously or continuously within a few days to weeks, and hematologic findings of cytopenia in the bone marrow or organs are observed. Eventually, it causes malfunction of systemic organs such as the liver and kidneys. Due to bleeding, infection, loss of consciousness, and refractory hypotension, many patients die. Some outbreaks have recently been reported in adults. Some of these cases have progressed slowly over several months and then improved briefly with the administration of immunosuppressants, but as mentioned above, if the outbreak is adequately diagnosed and not treated, the mortality rate reaches 100%.
The main pathogenesis of HLH can be briefly be summarized as follows. It can be defined as a condition involving sustained immune/inflammatory reaction, a so-called “cytokine storm.” The immune mechanism is activated by various factors such as infection, autoimmunity, or malignancies. When these trigger factors are resolved, the immune system must be inactivated to restore it to its normal state. In some cases, inactivation cannot be achieved due to an abnormality in the cell signaling pathway. Consequently, a vicious cycle of activation is repeated; this excessively stimulates immune cells that then invade normal tissues, causing organ failure, and that secrete a large amount of cytokines: interferon gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, and macrophage-colony-stimulating factor. These induce a severe inflammatory reaction, leading to abnormal homeostasis [10]. These inflammatory cytokines contribute to the clinical features of HLH, such as myelosuppression, lymphadenopathy, fever, and organ dysfunction [11]. Various immunological abnormalities have been observed in HLH. Defective function of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and NK cells is the main abnormality [2, 12, 13]. CD8+ T cells secrete IFN-γ, which activates macrophages (Fig. 1) [14, 15].
Genetic abnormalities known to be related to the onset of primary HLH are shown in Table 1 [16-20].
Table 1 Gene mutations associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.
Disease | Genetic mutations |
---|---|
FHL1 | Unknown (9q21.3–2) |
FHL2 | |
FHL3 | |
FHL4 | |
FHL5 |
Abbreviation: FHL, familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.
HLH is broadly divided into primary (familial) and acquired (secondary). Primary HLH more typically affects children. It is inherited and is characterized by mutations in a gene encoding a protein that forms part of the signaling system involved in the inactivation of the immune system. Acquired HLH, in contrast, is the main cause of adult HLH, and various infections such as viruses/bacteria/fungi/parasites, autoimmune diseases, and malignant tumors are the triggers [24]. Malignancy-associated HLH is more common in adults, and it has been reported that clinical manifestations of HLH occur in approximately 1% of all malignancies [25]. Malignant tumor types that commonly cause HLH are lymphoma and NK/T cell lymphoma. The latter is particularly related to the Epstein‒Barr virus (EBV) and can develop a clinical pattern similar to that of HLH. In addition, the occurrence of HLH has been reported in various blood diseases such as multiple myeloma, acute leukemia, and chronic leukemia [26-28], and it can also occur with some solid cancers.
While primary HLH is rare in adults, it has been reported that genetic abnormalities such as
Since HLH is a prevalent disease in children, many studies related to the diagnosis and treatment of this condition are based on pediatric patients. For this reason, the diagnostic criteria and treatments for adults are adopted from those for children. In 1991, the “Histiocyte Society” suggested five diagnostic criteria—“fever/splenomegaly/cytopenia/hypertriglyceridemia or hypofibrinogenemia/hemophagocytosis,” but the symptoms of patients appear sequentially, rather than simultaneously. In many cases, the diagnosis was difficult due to the ambiguity of the application of the diagnostic criteria at the beginning of the disease. New standard diagnostic criteria were proposed in 2004 by Henter
Table 2 Diagnostic criteria of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: HLH-2004.
Diagnosis will be established if one of either (1) or (2) is fulfilled |
---|
(1) Molecular diagnosis consistent with HLH |
(2) Diagnostic criteria for HLH fulfilled (5 out of the 8 criteria shown below) |
① Fever ≥38.5°C for ≥7 days |
② Splenomegaly ≥3 finger breadth below the left subcostal margin |
③ Cytopenias affecting ≥2 of 3 lineages in peripheral blood |
Hemoglobin <9 g/L |
Platelets <100×109/L |
Absolute neutrophil count <1.0×109/L |
④ Hypertriglyceridemia and/or hypofibrinogenemia |
Fasting triglycerides ≥265 mg/dL, Fibrinogen ≤1.5 g/L |
⑤ Hemophagocytosis in the bone marrow or spleen or lymph node |
⑥ Low or absent NK cell activity (according to the local laboratory reference) |
⑦ Ferritin ≥500 μg/L |
⑧ Soluble CD25 (sIL-2 receptor) ≥2,400 U/mL |
Abbreviations: HLH, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; NK, natural killer; sIL-2, soluble interleukin-2.
In practice, adult HLH patients are often diagnosed in one of the following situations. First, hemophagocytosis was confirmed in the bone marrow examination performed while finding the cause of unknown fever. Second, hemophagocytosis was confirmed in the process of liver biopsy for unexplained liver failure. A high level of serum ferritin administered accidentally in a situation can be suspected as one of the manifestations of HLH.
NK cell activity is a measure of the degree of target cell destruction by culturing NK cells isolated from the patient's blood and target cells (K562 cell line) together, based on flow cytometry. It is a test that requires blood from a non-affected person for use as the control. The normal value has been reported as 11.8–31.9% in Korea [36]. This is a very specific test for the diagnosis of HLH, but it is limited in that it can be performed only in some institutions in Korea. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) levels have been included in the diagnostic criteria and reflect the prognosis [37]. Even though it is a useful test, it is not conducted in Korea.
Serum ferritin is also included in the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria because this test has the advantages of having a rapid turnaround time and being easy to perform, unlike the aforementioned special tests. A study of children [38] reported that the sensitivity/specificity of HLH diagnosis was 90%/96%, respectively, when the serum ferritin level exceeded 10,000 μg/L. However, in adults, unlike children, serum ferritin is often elevated in conditions unrelated to HLH. If the serum ferritin level is high, HLH may be suspected, but the diagnosis is not confirmed. According to a recent report [39], of 113 adults with a serum ferritin level of exceeding 50,000 μg/L, only 19 were actually diagnosed with HLH, and their median serum ferritin level was 99,000 μg/L. In cases of hepatocyte damage, infection, hematologic cancer, rheumatic disease, and hemolytic anemia, serum ferritin levels were similar to or rather lower than the median value of the measured values.
As such, the test results included in the diagnostic criteria for HLH in themselves are not specific for HLH. In addition, depending on how these findings are interpreted, patients with severe infections and other diseases are often suspected of having HLH, although they do not match the typical clinical manifestations of HLH. Therefore, when diagnosing HLH, it is important that an experienced hematologist judges the clinical aspects, rather than basing it on the diagnostic criteria alone, and a treatment decision should be made by considering the benefits and drawbacks of performing HLH-related treatment.
HLH is often mistaken for infection with severe sepsis, and its diagnosis is often delayed. In contrast, when a patient with a serious infection of uncertain cause is suspected of having HLH and this is confirmed based on the diagnostic criteria, a rapid diagnosis can be made within 3–5 days. Thus, diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical features and several test results; thus, its application is likely to be ambiguous. As a result, it is very difficult to diagnose HLH if it is not suspected; however, there are contradicting aspects that may cause an error of misdiagnosing another disease as HLH. To compensate for this, NK cell activity and gene mutation tests can be performed complementarily, but in reality, accurate differential diagnosis may be very difficult because the number of institutions that can be tested is limited and it takes considerable time to report the results [40]. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) may occur in patients with rheumatic disease and has clinical features very similar to those of HLH; thus, it is currently considered to be HLH caused by rheumatic disease [41].
As a factor that can explain the difference between the various clinical manifestations, including the differences in the clinical manifestations of HLH in adults and children, as mentioned above, evidence suggests that the patterns of genetic variation are different. Pediatric HLH, adult HLH, MAS, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) have different thresholds for activating the immune system, depending on the type and degree of polymorphism or mutation of various genes that are ultimately associated with the activation/deactivation of the immune system. One model explains that clinical aspects differ according to the problem (Fig. 2).
Hemophagocytosis is one of the diagnostic criteria for HLH, and because of its name, it is often misunderstood as being the same as that of HLH. However, hemophagocytosis is a non-specific phenomenon that can also appear in other diseases such as infection, tumor, and rheumatism, whereas HLH can be diagnosed in the absence of hemophagocytosis [42]. Therefore, in the diagnosis of HLH, it is more important for an experienced clinician to identify the disease by synthesizing clinical manifestations and test results rather than basing it on the presence of hemophagocytosis.
First, immunosuppressants are administered to suppress the overactivation of the immune system, which is the main pathogenesis of HLH, to prevent various side effects caused by cytokines secreted from immune cells. However, in this process, the frequency of various opportunistic infections increases, which increases treatment-related mortality. Thus, the administration of prophylactic antibiotic, antifungal, and antiviral agents is also important. If control is not achieved with such immunosuppressive treatment alone, administration of a cytotoxic anticancer drug capable of removing excessively proliferated T cells and NK cells should be attempted [43].
Immunosuppressant effects are usually achieved by administering cyclosporine and dexamethasone. In addition to the general role of corticosteroids in improving inflammation, suppressing the secretion of cytokines, and killing lymphocytes, dexamethasone is preferred because of its ability to penetrate the central nervous system better than other steroids. As a cytotoxic anticancer agent, etoposide-based therapy or CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisolone) therapy, which is applied for lymphoma, is sometimes used. In the case of central nervous system involvement, intrathecal methotrexate injection is used.
The most widely used therapy based on etoposide is the HLH-2004 therapy, which was used in a multicenter clinical study in children; it is a modified/complementary therapy built on the results of the HLH-94 therapy [34, 44]. The prospective clinical study HLH-2004 was performed in children by applying this standard, and although this treatment is widely used to date, efforts have been made to revise it due to some uncertainties [45]. Of the 249 pediatric patients treated with the HLH-94 therapy, 124 (50%) received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and a 3-year survival rate of 55% was reported.
Etoposide is a key drug in the treatment of HLH, and in a retrospective study of pediatric patients with HLH associated with EBV infection, the administration of etoposide within 4 weeks had a significantly higher 4-year survival rate than the administration without etoposide (90.4% vs. 56.5%,
In addition to such immuno-chemotherapy, it is essential to perform allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell treatment (HSCT) when the disease is refractory to the initial treatment or is reactivated, or when primary HLH is diagnosed. After allogeneic HSCT, the long-term survival rate is approximately 22–59% [22, 46-48]. Factors influencing transplant-related prognosis are the inducing factors for HLH, involvement of the central nervous system, disease status at the time of transplantation [49], and donor type. The type of pre-transplantation treatment [50] and whether pre-dose treatment was performed [51, 52] are factors influencing transplant-related prognosis.
In case of disease that is refractory to treatment or reactivates, there is still no effective salvage therapy that can be performed before proceeding to allogeneic HSCT, even though the combination of antithymocyte globulin and steroids has been suggested [53]. Additionally, the results of trials of rituximab [54] and infliximab [55] have been reported in case studies. Recent studies have reported that ruxolitinib could be an effective and safe therapeutic option in refractory/relapsed HLH [56, 57].
As mentioned above, adult HLH in the pattern of triggering factors, and acquired HLH, such as by tumor, infection, and rheumatism, is more frequent than primary HLH, and tumors account for a significant number of these cases [3, 58]. There is no established therapy for adult HLH, and most treatments are shared with that for children, or complex chemotherapy used for lymphoma is applied. Reported treatment outcomes in adult HLH are shown in Table 3 [59-64]. Most of these are retrospective studies, and there have been no large-scale prospective studies to date.
Table 3 Results of studies on the treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adult patients.
Authors | Characteristics | N | Cause | Treatment | Outcome | Etc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Imashuku | Early vs. delayed etoposide | 20 | EBV-HLH | Etoposide (within 4 weeks) | Survivor: 5/7 vs. 1/13 | 2.5-yr OS: |
85 vs. 10% | ||||||
Tseng | Non-infectious vs. Infectious | 96 | Non-infection: 66 | Observational study | Mortality: 70% vs. 47% | |
Infectious: 30 | ||||||
Buyse | HLH at ICU | 56 | Tumor: 43 | Etoposide: 45 | Mortality: 29/56 | MAHS |
Non-viral: 13 | Corticosteroid: 31 | Aggressive supportive care | ||||
Viral: 10 | IVIG: 3 | |||||
Park | HLH with hemophagocytosis | 23 | EBV: 16 | HLH-94 or 2004: 13 | Long-term survivor: 6/23 (26%) | 4 survivors received alloHCT |
Idiopathic: 6 | Immunosuppressive therapy: 9 | |||||
Hepatitis A: 1 | ||||||
Yoon | Non malignancy associated HLH | 126 | EEBV, infection, autoimmune | HLH-94 81 (64.3%) | CR: 64.3% | 8-week treatment response is a predictor for survival |
Shin | CHOP-based Tx | 17 | CHOP | CR: 41.2% | 2-year OS rate: 43.9% | |
PR: 17.6% |
Abbreviations: CHOP, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisolone; CR, complete remission; EBV, EpsteinBarr virus; HLH, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; ICU, intensive care unit; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; MAHS, malignancy-associated hemophagocytic syndrome; OS, overall survival; PR, partial remission.
It has not been evaluated whether it is appropriate to administer the same dose in elderly adults with low tolerance of the drug as that administered in children. As reported in small studies conducted in Korea, poor treatment outcomes in adult HLH are mainly due to the progression of multiple organ failure related to delayed diagnosis, leading to an irreversible state and frequent complications such as infection during treatment. To improve treatment outcomes in adults, rapid treatment initiation following early diagnosis [61, 65], modification of drug types and doses in consideration of disease severity and tolerability [37, 66-68], and biotechnology for predicting prognosis are required.
According to a report by Park
Treatment for HLH caused by infections, such as EBV, and triggers other than idiopathic HLH remains unclear. In HLH-2004, a multicenter prospective study conducted in children, the inclusion criteria were limited to EBV/congenital/idiopathic HLH, while the exclusion criterion was HLH related to rheumatism/tumor. For rheumatism-related HLH, according to some experts’ opinions, chemotherapy including etoposide will not be helpful, and thus, a careful approach is required [69]. Patients with lymphoma who have tumor-related HLH can be expected to respond, but the duration of response is short and the recurrence rate is high, according to a study from Korea [70].
Prospective studies are needed for the development of markers [61, 71, 72] and the development of treatments focusing on intensive infection prevention. In particular, rheumatism- or tumor-related HLH is regarded as a separate disease group, and individualized prospective studies according to the characteristics of the disease are required.
As mentioned above, it may be very difficult to distinguish between SIRS, MAS, etc., and HLH, and it may be time-consuming to obtain an accurate differential diagnosis. To improve the prognosis of HLH, clinical suspicion and early diagnosis using HLH-2004 criteria is essential. If the diagnostic criteria are met, rapid administration of immuno-chemotherapy is important. However, if a severe infection is mistaken for HLH, then the administration of such a treatment can lead to serious consequences. Care should be taken against prematurely administering immune-chemotherapy without sufficiently excluding the possibility of other diseases. It is necessary to discriminate these diseases sufficiently by means of the tests presented in Table 4. When the patient's condition deteriorates rapidly, there is not enough time to exclude the possibility of other diseases, and when administration of immune-chemotherapy is considered, the risk–benefit should be considered cautiously and the administration should be initiated by carefully judging whether it will be helpful to the patient.
Table 4 Diagnostic workup to differentiate hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis from other diseases.
Differential diagnosis | Tests |
---|---|
Malignancy | Bone marrow aspiration/biopsy |
Neck/chest/abdominopelvic computed tomography | |
Tumor markers | |
Infection | Cytomegalovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, parvovirus |
Hepatitis A, B, C virus | |
Human immunodeficiency virus | |
Immunoglobulin E | |
Parasite-specific antibody | |
Rheumatic disorder | Fluorescence anti-nuclear antibodyanti-double-strand DNA |
C3/C4 | |
Erythrocyte sediment rate | |
Lupus anticoagulant |
The factors that can predict the prognosis of HLH have not been clearly established. However, if the disease underlying HLH is a tumor, it is worse than when HLH is related to infection, rheumatism, or is congenital [73, 74]. Although the diagnostic value of serum ferritin for HLH is low, the degree of decrease in ferritin at the beginning of treatment has been reported to be associated with treatment-dependent prognosis [71]. Additionally, it has been reported that the higher the sIL-2R levels are, the worse is the prognosis [37]. In Korea, it has been reported that serum fibrinogen, along with serum ferritin, is related to prognosis [61]. Moreover, a previous study reported that the period from diagnosis to the administration of etoposide is associated with prognosis [75].
To improve the prognosis of HLH, it is important to suspect HLH at an early stage, diagnose it, and promptly administer immunotherapy. If there are symptoms such as fever/cytopenia/hepatic or splenic enlargement, HLH should be suspected. Serum triglycerides, fibrinogen, ferritin, etc. can be evaluated to confirm whether the diagnostic criteria are satisfied and that at least three or four of the eight criteria are satisfied. It is necessary to conduct a bone marrow examination and a biopsy of the involved organs promptly to assess the presence of hemophagocytosis and to exclude lymphomas. Moreover, it is necessary to evaluate NK cell activity and sIL-2R early, until the results are confirmed. In addition, tests to rule out infection and rheumatic diseases need to be conducted promptly. The association with Epstein–Barr virus needs to be established. If HLH is strongly suspected clinically, then it is very important to administer immuno-chemotherapy that includes etoposide before the disease progresses to serious organ failure.
It is believed that many of the diseases manifesting as pancytopenia and organ failure with high fever of unknown cause may be HLH. HLH is a phenomenon in which the process of inactivation of the immune system that has been activated by stimulation is impaired; overactive immune cells invade organs, and hypersecretion of cytokines result in organ failure. In adults, it has secondary causes such as infection, tumor, and rheumatism. Genetic alterations causing HLH, such as abnormalities of genes related to the inactivation of immune cells, have been discovered in adults. For the diagnosis and treatment of adult HLH, the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria are used and treatment includes immuno-oncology chemotherapy, such as etoposide, and allogeneic HSCT. Appropriate diagnostic criteria and treatments for adult patients should be identified in the future.
Compared to children, the prognosis of adult HLH is poor. This is because HLH is often not initially suspected, and treatment is frequently initiated after irreversible organ damage has occurred. Moreover, reactivation occurs in many patients in the absence of effective rescue therapy. To improve the prognosis of adult HLH, it is necessary to develop a treatment model that can predict the treatment response and prognosis, facilitating customized treatment according to the disease severity. Moreover, it is necessary to minimize the time to diagnosis and treatment. Lastly, effective salvage therapy should be ascertained. It would be important to identify the high-risk patients and, if possible, to perform allogeneic HSCT early while maintaining remission.
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Blood Res 2021; 56(S1): S17-S25
Published online April 30, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2021.2020323
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Yu Ri Kim1, Dae-Young Kim2
1Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 2Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to:Dae-Young Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 260 Gonghang-daero, Gangseo-gu, Seoul 07804, Korea
E-mail: drdani@ewha.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a syndrome of defective apoptosis, a disruption of the regulatory pathway that terminates immune and inflammatory responses. Fever, cytopenia, splenomegaly, and/or hemophagocytosis are typical findings of this syndrome. HLH can be induced by genetic disorders (familial) or secondary causes. Familial HLH is rare, while secondary causes in adults include infection, autoimmunity, and malignancy. HLH in adults tends to be confused with or misdiagnosed as sepsis, mainly due to similar clinical manifestations and laboratory findings, which make it difficult to diagnose HLH rapidly and adopt immunosuppressive agents and/or chemotherapy adequately. Treatment of pediatric HLH using HLH-2004 or multi-agent chemotherapy can be applied in adult patients, although the dose and type of drug need to be adjusted. It is highly recommended that allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation should be used in patients who become reactivated or are refractory to the initial treatment as soon as possible to improve survival. Future clinical trials are warranted to determine more suitable treatments for adult patients with HLH.
Keywords: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic syndrome
Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a group of diseases belonging to histiocytosis syndrome [1]. It manifests as high fever and pancytopenia, resulting in the enlargement of organs such as the liver/spleen, as well as liver dysfunction. It causes a severe inflammatory reaction in the whole body. It is not a disease but rather a consequence of an ineffective immune response [2]. Many patients have low blood pressure, which does not respond to a booster. Thus, treatments such as the administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents are often provided, as it is considered to be an infection accompanied by sepsis. The condition is sometimes diagnosed at a late stage. HLH was previously thought to occur mainly in children, with an incidence rate of 1 per 800,000 per year, with geographic variation [3]. Although the incidence rate in adults is not known exactly, it is thought that many unexplained severely ill adult patients with multiple organ failure and high fever may have had HLH [4]. This literature review focuses on the diagnosis and management of patients with secondary HLH.
It is difficult to define one characteristic symptom that is common to patients with HLH. However, many patients are admitted to the hospital due to high fever (>38.5°C). This is one of the symptoms that must appear during the preclinical process of HLH. A relatively typical pattern is that a patient with cytopenia and fever has an enlarged spleen. In patients with such findings, HLH is suspected and diagnostic procedures should promptly proceed.
The liver and spleen are the organs most frequently involved in HLH [3]. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or bilirubin levels are elevated. This is often associated with unexplained fulminant hepatitis or liver failure. In particular, liver involvement could lead to ascites, sinusoidal obstruction, and encephalo-pathy. These findings are often mistaken for severe hepatitis with increased AST/ALT and bilirubin levels [5].
In addition to the liver or spleen, the lungs, intestines, kidneys, and skin are the frequently involved organs. Respiratory distress syndrome and renal failure are common manifestations [6, 7]. Some patients may have neurological abnormalities such as decreased consciousness, convulsions, cranial nerve abnormalities, and ataxia from the beginning, suggesting that HLH invaded the central nervous system. In such cases, the prognosis is extremely poor [8, 9].
These abnormal findings usually occur simultaneously or continuously within a few days to weeks, and hematologic findings of cytopenia in the bone marrow or organs are observed. Eventually, it causes malfunction of systemic organs such as the liver and kidneys. Due to bleeding, infection, loss of consciousness, and refractory hypotension, many patients die. Some outbreaks have recently been reported in adults. Some of these cases have progressed slowly over several months and then improved briefly with the administration of immunosuppressants, but as mentioned above, if the outbreak is adequately diagnosed and not treated, the mortality rate reaches 100%.
The main pathogenesis of HLH can be briefly be summarized as follows. It can be defined as a condition involving sustained immune/inflammatory reaction, a so-called “cytokine storm.” The immune mechanism is activated by various factors such as infection, autoimmunity, or malignancies. When these trigger factors are resolved, the immune system must be inactivated to restore it to its normal state. In some cases, inactivation cannot be achieved due to an abnormality in the cell signaling pathway. Consequently, a vicious cycle of activation is repeated; this excessively stimulates immune cells that then invade normal tissues, causing organ failure, and that secrete a large amount of cytokines: interferon gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, and macrophage-colony-stimulating factor. These induce a severe inflammatory reaction, leading to abnormal homeostasis [10]. These inflammatory cytokines contribute to the clinical features of HLH, such as myelosuppression, lymphadenopathy, fever, and organ dysfunction [11]. Various immunological abnormalities have been observed in HLH. Defective function of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and NK cells is the main abnormality [2, 12, 13]. CD8+ T cells secrete IFN-γ, which activates macrophages (Fig. 1) [14, 15].
Genetic abnormalities known to be related to the onset of primary HLH are shown in Table 1 [16-20].
Table 1 . Gene mutations associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis..
Disease | Genetic mutations |
---|---|
FHL1 | Unknown (9q21.3–2) |
FHL2 | |
FHL3 | |
FHL4 | |
FHL5 |
Abbreviation: FHL, familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis..
HLH is broadly divided into primary (familial) and acquired (secondary). Primary HLH more typically affects children. It is inherited and is characterized by mutations in a gene encoding a protein that forms part of the signaling system involved in the inactivation of the immune system. Acquired HLH, in contrast, is the main cause of adult HLH, and various infections such as viruses/bacteria/fungi/parasites, autoimmune diseases, and malignant tumors are the triggers [24]. Malignancy-associated HLH is more common in adults, and it has been reported that clinical manifestations of HLH occur in approximately 1% of all malignancies [25]. Malignant tumor types that commonly cause HLH are lymphoma and NK/T cell lymphoma. The latter is particularly related to the Epstein‒Barr virus (EBV) and can develop a clinical pattern similar to that of HLH. In addition, the occurrence of HLH has been reported in various blood diseases such as multiple myeloma, acute leukemia, and chronic leukemia [26-28], and it can also occur with some solid cancers.
While primary HLH is rare in adults, it has been reported that genetic abnormalities such as
Since HLH is a prevalent disease in children, many studies related to the diagnosis and treatment of this condition are based on pediatric patients. For this reason, the diagnostic criteria and treatments for adults are adopted from those for children. In 1991, the “Histiocyte Society” suggested five diagnostic criteria—“fever/splenomegaly/cytopenia/hypertriglyceridemia or hypofibrinogenemia/hemophagocytosis,” but the symptoms of patients appear sequentially, rather than simultaneously. In many cases, the diagnosis was difficult due to the ambiguity of the application of the diagnostic criteria at the beginning of the disease. New standard diagnostic criteria were proposed in 2004 by Henter
Table 2 . Diagnostic criteria of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: HLH-2004..
Diagnosis will be established if one of either (1) or (2) is fulfilled |
---|
(1) Molecular diagnosis consistent with HLH |
(2) Diagnostic criteria for HLH fulfilled (5 out of the 8 criteria shown below) |
① Fever ≥38.5°C for ≥7 days |
② Splenomegaly ≥3 finger breadth below the left subcostal margin |
③ Cytopenias affecting ≥2 of 3 lineages in peripheral blood |
Hemoglobin <9 g/L |
Platelets <100×109/L |
Absolute neutrophil count <1.0×109/L |
④ Hypertriglyceridemia and/or hypofibrinogenemia |
Fasting triglycerides ≥265 mg/dL, Fibrinogen ≤1.5 g/L |
⑤ Hemophagocytosis in the bone marrow or spleen or lymph node |
⑥ Low or absent NK cell activity (according to the local laboratory reference) |
⑦ Ferritin ≥500 μg/L |
⑧ Soluble CD25 (sIL-2 receptor) ≥2,400 U/mL |
Abbreviations: HLH, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; NK, natural killer; sIL-2, soluble interleukin-2..
In practice, adult HLH patients are often diagnosed in one of the following situations. First, hemophagocytosis was confirmed in the bone marrow examination performed while finding the cause of unknown fever. Second, hemophagocytosis was confirmed in the process of liver biopsy for unexplained liver failure. A high level of serum ferritin administered accidentally in a situation can be suspected as one of the manifestations of HLH.
NK cell activity is a measure of the degree of target cell destruction by culturing NK cells isolated from the patient's blood and target cells (K562 cell line) together, based on flow cytometry. It is a test that requires blood from a non-affected person for use as the control. The normal value has been reported as 11.8–31.9% in Korea [36]. This is a very specific test for the diagnosis of HLH, but it is limited in that it can be performed only in some institutions in Korea. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) levels have been included in the diagnostic criteria and reflect the prognosis [37]. Even though it is a useful test, it is not conducted in Korea.
Serum ferritin is also included in the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria because this test has the advantages of having a rapid turnaround time and being easy to perform, unlike the aforementioned special tests. A study of children [38] reported that the sensitivity/specificity of HLH diagnosis was 90%/96%, respectively, when the serum ferritin level exceeded 10,000 μg/L. However, in adults, unlike children, serum ferritin is often elevated in conditions unrelated to HLH. If the serum ferritin level is high, HLH may be suspected, but the diagnosis is not confirmed. According to a recent report [39], of 113 adults with a serum ferritin level of exceeding 50,000 μg/L, only 19 were actually diagnosed with HLH, and their median serum ferritin level was 99,000 μg/L. In cases of hepatocyte damage, infection, hematologic cancer, rheumatic disease, and hemolytic anemia, serum ferritin levels were similar to or rather lower than the median value of the measured values.
As such, the test results included in the diagnostic criteria for HLH in themselves are not specific for HLH. In addition, depending on how these findings are interpreted, patients with severe infections and other diseases are often suspected of having HLH, although they do not match the typical clinical manifestations of HLH. Therefore, when diagnosing HLH, it is important that an experienced hematologist judges the clinical aspects, rather than basing it on the diagnostic criteria alone, and a treatment decision should be made by considering the benefits and drawbacks of performing HLH-related treatment.
HLH is often mistaken for infection with severe sepsis, and its diagnosis is often delayed. In contrast, when a patient with a serious infection of uncertain cause is suspected of having HLH and this is confirmed based on the diagnostic criteria, a rapid diagnosis can be made within 3–5 days. Thus, diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical features and several test results; thus, its application is likely to be ambiguous. As a result, it is very difficult to diagnose HLH if it is not suspected; however, there are contradicting aspects that may cause an error of misdiagnosing another disease as HLH. To compensate for this, NK cell activity and gene mutation tests can be performed complementarily, but in reality, accurate differential diagnosis may be very difficult because the number of institutions that can be tested is limited and it takes considerable time to report the results [40]. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) may occur in patients with rheumatic disease and has clinical features very similar to those of HLH; thus, it is currently considered to be HLH caused by rheumatic disease [41].
As a factor that can explain the difference between the various clinical manifestations, including the differences in the clinical manifestations of HLH in adults and children, as mentioned above, evidence suggests that the patterns of genetic variation are different. Pediatric HLH, adult HLH, MAS, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) have different thresholds for activating the immune system, depending on the type and degree of polymorphism or mutation of various genes that are ultimately associated with the activation/deactivation of the immune system. One model explains that clinical aspects differ according to the problem (Fig. 2).
Hemophagocytosis is one of the diagnostic criteria for HLH, and because of its name, it is often misunderstood as being the same as that of HLH. However, hemophagocytosis is a non-specific phenomenon that can also appear in other diseases such as infection, tumor, and rheumatism, whereas HLH can be diagnosed in the absence of hemophagocytosis [42]. Therefore, in the diagnosis of HLH, it is more important for an experienced clinician to identify the disease by synthesizing clinical manifestations and test results rather than basing it on the presence of hemophagocytosis.
First, immunosuppressants are administered to suppress the overactivation of the immune system, which is the main pathogenesis of HLH, to prevent various side effects caused by cytokines secreted from immune cells. However, in this process, the frequency of various opportunistic infections increases, which increases treatment-related mortality. Thus, the administration of prophylactic antibiotic, antifungal, and antiviral agents is also important. If control is not achieved with such immunosuppressive treatment alone, administration of a cytotoxic anticancer drug capable of removing excessively proliferated T cells and NK cells should be attempted [43].
Immunosuppressant effects are usually achieved by administering cyclosporine and dexamethasone. In addition to the general role of corticosteroids in improving inflammation, suppressing the secretion of cytokines, and killing lymphocytes, dexamethasone is preferred because of its ability to penetrate the central nervous system better than other steroids. As a cytotoxic anticancer agent, etoposide-based therapy or CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisolone) therapy, which is applied for lymphoma, is sometimes used. In the case of central nervous system involvement, intrathecal methotrexate injection is used.
The most widely used therapy based on etoposide is the HLH-2004 therapy, which was used in a multicenter clinical study in children; it is a modified/complementary therapy built on the results of the HLH-94 therapy [34, 44]. The prospective clinical study HLH-2004 was performed in children by applying this standard, and although this treatment is widely used to date, efforts have been made to revise it due to some uncertainties [45]. Of the 249 pediatric patients treated with the HLH-94 therapy, 124 (50%) received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and a 3-year survival rate of 55% was reported.
Etoposide is a key drug in the treatment of HLH, and in a retrospective study of pediatric patients with HLH associated with EBV infection, the administration of etoposide within 4 weeks had a significantly higher 4-year survival rate than the administration without etoposide (90.4% vs. 56.5%,
In addition to such immuno-chemotherapy, it is essential to perform allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell treatment (HSCT) when the disease is refractory to the initial treatment or is reactivated, or when primary HLH is diagnosed. After allogeneic HSCT, the long-term survival rate is approximately 22–59% [22, 46-48]. Factors influencing transplant-related prognosis are the inducing factors for HLH, involvement of the central nervous system, disease status at the time of transplantation [49], and donor type. The type of pre-transplantation treatment [50] and whether pre-dose treatment was performed [51, 52] are factors influencing transplant-related prognosis.
In case of disease that is refractory to treatment or reactivates, there is still no effective salvage therapy that can be performed before proceeding to allogeneic HSCT, even though the combination of antithymocyte globulin and steroids has been suggested [53]. Additionally, the results of trials of rituximab [54] and infliximab [55] have been reported in case studies. Recent studies have reported that ruxolitinib could be an effective and safe therapeutic option in refractory/relapsed HLH [56, 57].
As mentioned above, adult HLH in the pattern of triggering factors, and acquired HLH, such as by tumor, infection, and rheumatism, is more frequent than primary HLH, and tumors account for a significant number of these cases [3, 58]. There is no established therapy for adult HLH, and most treatments are shared with that for children, or complex chemotherapy used for lymphoma is applied. Reported treatment outcomes in adult HLH are shown in Table 3 [59-64]. Most of these are retrospective studies, and there have been no large-scale prospective studies to date.
Table 3 . Results of studies on the treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adult patients..
Authors | Characteristics | N | Cause | Treatment | Outcome | Etc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Imashuku | Early vs. delayed etoposide | 20 | EBV-HLH | Etoposide (within 4 weeks) | Survivor: 5/7 vs. 1/13 | 2.5-yr OS: |
85 vs. 10% | ||||||
Tseng | Non-infectious vs. Infectious | 96 | Non-infection: 66 | Observational study | Mortality: 70% vs. 47% | |
Infectious: 30 | ||||||
Buyse | HLH at ICU | 56 | Tumor: 43 | Etoposide: 45 | Mortality: 29/56 | MAHS |
Non-viral: 13 | Corticosteroid: 31 | Aggressive supportive care | ||||
Viral: 10 | IVIG: 3 | |||||
Park | HLH with hemophagocytosis | 23 | EBV: 16 | HLH-94 or 2004: 13 | Long-term survivor: 6/23 (26%) | 4 survivors received alloHCT |
Idiopathic: 6 | Immunosuppressive therapy: 9 | |||||
Hepatitis A: 1 | ||||||
Yoon | Non malignancy associated HLH | 126 | EEBV, infection, autoimmune | HLH-94 81 (64.3%) | CR: 64.3% | 8-week treatment response is a predictor for survival |
Shin | CHOP-based Tx | 17 | CHOP | CR: 41.2% | 2-year OS rate: 43.9% | |
PR: 17.6% |
Abbreviations: CHOP, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisolone; CR, complete remission; EBV, EpsteinBarr virus; HLH, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; ICU, intensive care unit; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; MAHS, malignancy-associated hemophagocytic syndrome; OS, overall survival; PR, partial remission..
It has not been evaluated whether it is appropriate to administer the same dose in elderly adults with low tolerance of the drug as that administered in children. As reported in small studies conducted in Korea, poor treatment outcomes in adult HLH are mainly due to the progression of multiple organ failure related to delayed diagnosis, leading to an irreversible state and frequent complications such as infection during treatment. To improve treatment outcomes in adults, rapid treatment initiation following early diagnosis [61, 65], modification of drug types and doses in consideration of disease severity and tolerability [37, 66-68], and biotechnology for predicting prognosis are required.
According to a report by Park
Treatment for HLH caused by infections, such as EBV, and triggers other than idiopathic HLH remains unclear. In HLH-2004, a multicenter prospective study conducted in children, the inclusion criteria were limited to EBV/congenital/idiopathic HLH, while the exclusion criterion was HLH related to rheumatism/tumor. For rheumatism-related HLH, according to some experts’ opinions, chemotherapy including etoposide will not be helpful, and thus, a careful approach is required [69]. Patients with lymphoma who have tumor-related HLH can be expected to respond, but the duration of response is short and the recurrence rate is high, according to a study from Korea [70].
Prospective studies are needed for the development of markers [61, 71, 72] and the development of treatments focusing on intensive infection prevention. In particular, rheumatism- or tumor-related HLH is regarded as a separate disease group, and individualized prospective studies according to the characteristics of the disease are required.
As mentioned above, it may be very difficult to distinguish between SIRS, MAS, etc., and HLH, and it may be time-consuming to obtain an accurate differential diagnosis. To improve the prognosis of HLH, clinical suspicion and early diagnosis using HLH-2004 criteria is essential. If the diagnostic criteria are met, rapid administration of immuno-chemotherapy is important. However, if a severe infection is mistaken for HLH, then the administration of such a treatment can lead to serious consequences. Care should be taken against prematurely administering immune-chemotherapy without sufficiently excluding the possibility of other diseases. It is necessary to discriminate these diseases sufficiently by means of the tests presented in Table 4. When the patient's condition deteriorates rapidly, there is not enough time to exclude the possibility of other diseases, and when administration of immune-chemotherapy is considered, the risk–benefit should be considered cautiously and the administration should be initiated by carefully judging whether it will be helpful to the patient.
Table 4 . Diagnostic workup to differentiate hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis from other diseases..
Differential diagnosis | Tests |
---|---|
Malignancy | Bone marrow aspiration/biopsy |
Neck/chest/abdominopelvic computed tomography | |
Tumor markers | |
Infection | Cytomegalovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, parvovirus |
Hepatitis A, B, C virus | |
Human immunodeficiency virus | |
Immunoglobulin E | |
Parasite-specific antibody | |
Rheumatic disorder | Fluorescence anti-nuclear antibodyanti-double-strand DNA |
C3/C4 | |
Erythrocyte sediment rate | |
Lupus anticoagulant |
The factors that can predict the prognosis of HLH have not been clearly established. However, if the disease underlying HLH is a tumor, it is worse than when HLH is related to infection, rheumatism, or is congenital [73, 74]. Although the diagnostic value of serum ferritin for HLH is low, the degree of decrease in ferritin at the beginning of treatment has been reported to be associated with treatment-dependent prognosis [71]. Additionally, it has been reported that the higher the sIL-2R levels are, the worse is the prognosis [37]. In Korea, it has been reported that serum fibrinogen, along with serum ferritin, is related to prognosis [61]. Moreover, a previous study reported that the period from diagnosis to the administration of etoposide is associated with prognosis [75].
To improve the prognosis of HLH, it is important to suspect HLH at an early stage, diagnose it, and promptly administer immunotherapy. If there are symptoms such as fever/cytopenia/hepatic or splenic enlargement, HLH should be suspected. Serum triglycerides, fibrinogen, ferritin, etc. can be evaluated to confirm whether the diagnostic criteria are satisfied and that at least three or four of the eight criteria are satisfied. It is necessary to conduct a bone marrow examination and a biopsy of the involved organs promptly to assess the presence of hemophagocytosis and to exclude lymphomas. Moreover, it is necessary to evaluate NK cell activity and sIL-2R early, until the results are confirmed. In addition, tests to rule out infection and rheumatic diseases need to be conducted promptly. The association with Epstein–Barr virus needs to be established. If HLH is strongly suspected clinically, then it is very important to administer immuno-chemotherapy that includes etoposide before the disease progresses to serious organ failure.
It is believed that many of the diseases manifesting as pancytopenia and organ failure with high fever of unknown cause may be HLH. HLH is a phenomenon in which the process of inactivation of the immune system that has been activated by stimulation is impaired; overactive immune cells invade organs, and hypersecretion of cytokines result in organ failure. In adults, it has secondary causes such as infection, tumor, and rheumatism. Genetic alterations causing HLH, such as abnormalities of genes related to the inactivation of immune cells, have been discovered in adults. For the diagnosis and treatment of adult HLH, the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria are used and treatment includes immuno-oncology chemotherapy, such as etoposide, and allogeneic HSCT. Appropriate diagnostic criteria and treatments for adult patients should be identified in the future.
Compared to children, the prognosis of adult HLH is poor. This is because HLH is often not initially suspected, and treatment is frequently initiated after irreversible organ damage has occurred. Moreover, reactivation occurs in many patients in the absence of effective rescue therapy. To improve the prognosis of adult HLH, it is necessary to develop a treatment model that can predict the treatment response and prognosis, facilitating customized treatment according to the disease severity. Moreover, it is necessary to minimize the time to diagnosis and treatment. Lastly, effective salvage therapy should be ascertained. It would be important to identify the high-risk patients and, if possible, to perform allogeneic HSCT early while maintaining remission.
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Table 1 . Gene mutations associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis..
Disease | Genetic mutations |
---|---|
FHL1 | Unknown (9q21.3–2) |
FHL2 | |
FHL3 | |
FHL4 | |
FHL5 |
Abbreviation: FHL, familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis..
Table 2 . Diagnostic criteria of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: HLH-2004..
Diagnosis will be established if one of either (1) or (2) is fulfilled |
---|
(1) Molecular diagnosis consistent with HLH |
(2) Diagnostic criteria for HLH fulfilled (5 out of the 8 criteria shown below) |
① Fever ≥38.5°C for ≥7 days |
② Splenomegaly ≥3 finger breadth below the left subcostal margin |
③ Cytopenias affecting ≥2 of 3 lineages in peripheral blood |
Hemoglobin <9 g/L |
Platelets <100×109/L |
Absolute neutrophil count <1.0×109/L |
④ Hypertriglyceridemia and/or hypofibrinogenemia |
Fasting triglycerides ≥265 mg/dL, Fibrinogen ≤1.5 g/L |
⑤ Hemophagocytosis in the bone marrow or spleen or lymph node |
⑥ Low or absent NK cell activity (according to the local laboratory reference) |
⑦ Ferritin ≥500 μg/L |
⑧ Soluble CD25 (sIL-2 receptor) ≥2,400 U/mL |
Abbreviations: HLH, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; NK, natural killer; sIL-2, soluble interleukin-2..
Table 3 . Results of studies on the treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adult patients..
Authors | Characteristics | N | Cause | Treatment | Outcome | Etc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Imashuku | Early vs. delayed etoposide | 20 | EBV-HLH | Etoposide (within 4 weeks) | Survivor: 5/7 vs. 1/13 | 2.5-yr OS: |
85 vs. 10% | ||||||
Tseng | Non-infectious vs. Infectious | 96 | Non-infection: 66 | Observational study | Mortality: 70% vs. 47% | |
Infectious: 30 | ||||||
Buyse | HLH at ICU | 56 | Tumor: 43 | Etoposide: 45 | Mortality: 29/56 | MAHS |
Non-viral: 13 | Corticosteroid: 31 | Aggressive supportive care | ||||
Viral: 10 | IVIG: 3 | |||||
Park | HLH with hemophagocytosis | 23 | EBV: 16 | HLH-94 or 2004: 13 | Long-term survivor: 6/23 (26%) | 4 survivors received alloHCT |
Idiopathic: 6 | Immunosuppressive therapy: 9 | |||||
Hepatitis A: 1 | ||||||
Yoon | Non malignancy associated HLH | 126 | EEBV, infection, autoimmune | HLH-94 81 (64.3%) | CR: 64.3% | 8-week treatment response is a predictor for survival |
Shin | CHOP-based Tx | 17 | CHOP | CR: 41.2% | 2-year OS rate: 43.9% | |
PR: 17.6% |
Abbreviations: CHOP, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisolone; CR, complete remission; EBV, EpsteinBarr virus; HLH, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; ICU, intensive care unit; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; MAHS, malignancy-associated hemophagocytic syndrome; OS, overall survival; PR, partial remission..
Table 4 . Diagnostic workup to differentiate hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis from other diseases..
Differential diagnosis | Tests |
---|---|
Malignancy | Bone marrow aspiration/biopsy |
Neck/chest/abdominopelvic computed tomography | |
Tumor markers | |
Infection | Cytomegalovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, parvovirus |
Hepatitis A, B, C virus | |
Human immunodeficiency virus | |
Immunoglobulin E | |
Parasite-specific antibody | |
Rheumatic disorder | Fluorescence anti-nuclear antibodyanti-double-strand DNA |
C3/C4 | |
Erythrocyte sediment rate | |
Lupus anticoagulant |
Young Sang Byoun, Byeong Bae Park, Sung Heon Song, Soo Yuck Park, Seong Min Chung, Ji Sun Lee, Sun Min Kim, Yeon Jae Kim, Ju Hyun Lee, Ji Won Ryu, Jung Hye Choi, Young Yiul Lee, In Soon Kim
Korean J Hematol 2009; 44(4): 325-329Jin Kyung Suh, Young Kwon Koh, Sung Han Kang, Hyery Kim, Eun Seok Choi, Kyung-Nam Koh, Ho Joon Im
Blood Res 2022; 57(2): 152-157Goni Lee, Seung Eun Lee, Kyung-Ha Ryu, and Eun Sun Yoo
Blood Res 2013; 48(4): 258-265