SitemapContact Us
닫기
Search
Advanced Search +
닫기
Quick links
Most Cited Most Read Ahead of Print Archives Go to E-submission

Review Article

Split Viewer

Blood Res 2023; 58(S1):

Published online April 30, 2023

https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2023023

© The Korean Society of Hematology

Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome

Hyewon Lee

Author Info. +

Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Center for Hematologic Malignancy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea

Correspondence to : Hyewon Lee, M.D., Ph.D.
Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Center for Hematologic Malignancy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Korea
E-mail: hwlee@ncc.re.kr

Received: January 26, 2023; Revised: April 16, 2023; Accepted: April 17, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Go to

Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are a distinct disease entity of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with heterogenous clinical features and prognosis. MF mainly involves skin and usually shows an indolent and favorable clinical course. In patients with advanced-stage disease, extracutaneous involvement including lymph nodes, viscera, and blood, or large cell transformation may be observed. SS is a leukemic form of advanced-stage MF, characterized by generalized erythroderma. Early-stage MF can be treated with skin-directed therapy. However, patients with refractory or advanced-stage disease are associated with severe symptoms or poor prognosis, requiring systemic therapy. Recent progress in understanding the pathogenesis of MF/SS has contributed to advances in the management of these rare diseases. This review aims to describe the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment strategy of MF/SS, focusing on the recent updates in the management of these diseases.

Keywords Mycosis fungoides, Sézary syndrome, Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, Diagnosis, Prognosis, Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Go to

Primary cutaneous lymphoma (PCL) refers to a group of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes with unique characteristics, which specifically involve the skin at diagnosis [1]. Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), the disease entity of T-cell derived PCLs, accounts for 70–85% of PCLs, whereas B-cells predominate in other NHLs [2, 3]. A consensus classification of cutaneous lymphomas was established by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005 [4] and then updated in 2018 [5]. Recently, the classification was further refined by the WHO and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) [6, 7].

CTCL is a rare disease, making up 4% of all NHLs [8]. In the United States, the incidence is 6.4–7.7 per million persons, according to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database [9, 10]. Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are the most common subtypes, together comprising two thirds of CTCLs [4]. Both MF and SS have a male predominance, with a 2:1 ratio versus females. The median age at diagnosis is 55 years, with the incidence increasing with age. However, MF/SS can occur in younger individuals and even in children [11]. While the prognostic impact of age is not clear, ethnic differences have been reported, with a higher incidence in Blacks and non-Hispanics (11.5), followed by Hispanics (7.9) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (7.1) [12, 13]. A recent study showed that MF in Black patients is associated with a female predominance, younger age, and a worse prognosis [12, 13]. The incidence of CTCL in Korea is low, with an age-adjusted rate of 1.3 per million persons in 2012, based on the Korean National Cancer Incidence Database (KNCIDB) [14]. The estimated 5-year survival rate in all registered patients, between 2008 and 2012 was 87.7%, with a trend of a worse outcome according to age.

MF first presents in the skin, but in its advanced stage it can also involve the lymph nodes, other organs, or blood. Typical skin lesions are patches and plaques with various morphologic and pathologic findings. SS is a distinctive disease category defined by erythroderma and neoplastic T-cells typically involving the blood [4, 5]. It is regarded as a leukemic form of MF, with refractory symptoms and a poor prognosis.

Although some studies have suggested an association of MF or SS with environmental exposure to radiation and chemicals and with infections, especially Human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) [15-17], the causes of these two diseases are unclear. MF and SS are sporadic, but a few cases of familial MF/SS have been described, thus implicating genetic alterations in the development of MF/SS [18-20]. Accumulated knowledge on the cell of origin, genetic landscape, and immunologic changes has led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of MF/SS and provided new insights into potential therapeutic targets [21-24]. Here we review the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment strategy of MF and SS, focusing on the recent advances in the management of MF/SS.

CLINICAL MANIFESTATION

Go to

The majority of patients with MF suffer from persistent, slowly progressive skin lesions. The most common and exhausting symptom is pruritus, occurring in over two-thirds of MF patients and significantly affecting their quality of life [25, 26], due to its association with insomnia, anxiety, and depression. Accordingly, skin-directed treatment is main approach to the management of early-stage MF.

The skin lesions in MF are heterogenous, varying in size and shape. They initially present as localized or generalized patches, plaques, and/or papules, with possible progression to tumor formation and generalized erythroderma (Fig. 1A–C, G). Patches/plaques/papules extending over a body surface area of <10% (T1) are seen in 30%, and more generalized manifestations (T2) in 35% of MF patients. A dome-shaped solid tumor ≥1 cm in diameter develops in 20% and erythroderma in 15% of patients, especially those with advanced disease [27]. Hypo/hyperpigmentation, alopecia, erosions, bullous lesions, and dry scaling are common accompanying findings. More than 30% of MF patients suffer from alopecia, which varies in its extent from patchy to generalized and in some patients is irreversible [28].

Fig. 1. Clinical manifestation and pathologic findings. Patchy (A), plaque (B), and tumor-type (C) skin lesions in a patient with advanced stage mycosis fungoides. PET scan showed FDG-uptake on large extent plaque and tumor stage lesions and axillary lymph nodes (D). Histology of plaque-type MF lesion with epidermotropic infiltration of lymphocytes, in which clonality of TCR gene rearrangement was confirmed (E). Higher resolution of E, representing grouped aggregation of large lymphocytes in the epidermis, forming early form of Pautrier’s micro-abscess (F). Generalized erythroderma in a patient with Sézary syndrome (G). Atypical lymphocyte with cerebriform nuclei, so called ‘Sézary cell’, was observed on peripheral blood smear (H).

The term Sézary syndrome originated with the 1938 publication of a landmark case series that identified lymphocytosis with typical grooved, cerebriform nuclei in patients with MF [29]. SS is a distinctive leukemic involvement of CTCL, characterized by generalized erythroderma but also sharing clinical and pathologic features with MF, as well as the same diagnostic approach and staging system [30]. However, SS is associated with more severe symptoms, a more unfavorable response to treatment, and worse survival than is MF. The skin lesions in SS are generally diffuse, rather than the progression from patches to plaques to tumors that occurs in MF. Lymphadenopathy and pruritus are frequent features of the disease.

The lymph nodes are the most common extracutaneous site and are involved in 30% of MF/SS patients [31]. Bone marrow involvement is rare, but peripheral blood involvement exclusively correlates with the extent of the skin lesions. Other extracutaneous lesions are rare but may develop in the lungs, spleen, liver, gut, and central nervous system, especially in patients with generalized erythroderma including those with SS [1, 32, 33].

MF/SS is also associated with impaired cellular/humoral immunity and an increased risk of opportunistic infections [34]. A higher risk of secondary malignancies, such as other types of lymphoma, has also been reported [35, 36].

DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH

Go to

The initial diagnostic work-up for MF should consist of a comprehensive physical exam, laboratory tests, including a complete blood cell count, routine chemistry including lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), and histologic confirmation. During the physical exam, the size, location, and degree of involved skin surface area should be recorded. To detect changes in skin lesions, standardized photographs are encouraged at baseline and at each subsequent assessment. Obtaining a representative skin biopsy is the most important step in the diagnostic work-up. Imaging studies such as computed tomography (CT) and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans are required to evaluate extracutaneous disease (Fig. 1D). A bone marrow examination is not mandatory but is highly recommended.

The diagnosis of early-stage MF is challenging because the skin manifestations and biopsy findings may be misinterpreted as nonspecific and reactive changes. Many patients will have had other dermatologic presentations, such as nonspecific dermatitis, poikiloderma, or erythroderma and symptoms for years to decades before receiving a definitive diagnosis of MF [11, 27, 37]. For those patients, the clinical course should raise suspicion of MF even if the skin biopsy is non-diagnostic. Multiple skin biopsies, each consisting of at least 4-mm punch biopsy over the most indurated area are recommended. Topical treatment should be stopped for >2 weeks before the skin biopsy. The ISCL suggested diagnostic algorithm for early MF as shown in Table 1 [38].

Table 1 Diagnostic algorithm for early Mycosis Fungoides [38].

CriteriaScoring system
Clinical2 points for basic criteria and two additional criteria
1 point for basic criteria and one additional criterion
Basic
Persistent and/or progressive patches/thin plaques
Additional
1. Non-sun-exposed location
2. Size/shape variation
3. Poikiloderma
Histopathologic2 points for basic criteria and two additional criteria
1 point for basic criteria and one additional criterion
Basic
Superficial lymphoid infiltrate
Additional
1. Epidermotropism without spongiosis
2. Lymphoid atypiaa)
Molecular biologic1 point for clonality
1. Clonal T cell receptor gene rearrangement
Immunopathologic1 point for one or more criteria
1. <50% CD2+, CD3+, and/or CD5+ T cells
2. <10% CD7 T cells
3. Epidermal/dermal discordance of CD2, CD3, CD5, or CD7b)

a)Lymphoid atypia is defined as cells with enlarged hyperchromatic nuclei and irregular or cerebriform nuclear contours. b)T cell antigen deficiency confined to the epidermis.

A total of 4 points is required for the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides based on any combination of points from the clinical, histopathologic, molecular biologic, and immunopathologic criteria.

The characteristic histopathologic finding in a patch/plaque MF is an epidermotropic infiltration of neoplastic T cells (Fig. 1E, F). In early-stage, small cerebriform lymphocytes are observed in epidermis along the basal layer. When the disease progresses, denser band-like infiltration occurs, sometimes forming Pautrier’s micro-abscess, which are aggregates of tumor cells in the epidermis. It is not common, but they are specific for MF/SS. In tumor-stage, dense monomorphic infiltration of neoplastic lymphocytes involves the full thickness of dermis in nodular or diffuse pattern. In advanced stage MF and SS with blood involvement, lymphocytosis with typical grooved, cerebriform nuclei, so called Sézary cells, can be observed on peripheral blood smear (Fig. 1H).

There are some clinicopathologic variants of MF. Folliculotropic MF has a tropism for the epithelium of hair follicles, which often involves face and neck. Its manifestation includes a grouped papule, cysts, comedones, localized alopecia, and pseudo-tumors. Superficial form of this variant shows favorable survival similar to classic MF, however, a deep variant is associated with aggressive disease course and poor prognosis [39, 40]. Pagetoid reticulosis is a localized form with strong epidermotropism, generally involving distal areas of extremities [5]. It is usually indolent and can be treated with local radiation. Granulomatous slack skin is another rare variant of MF, which develops redundant skin slowly but progressively, typically in axillary and inguinal area. Histopathology of this variant shows dense infiltration of lymphocytes with granulomatous features and infiltration of atypical lymphocytes into the superficial layers with a variable distribution into the epidermis [5].

In MF/SS, malignant T-cells are predominantly CD4+, with a high CD4/CD8 ratio, and the aberrant loss of other pan-T-cell antigens, including CD2, CD3, CD5, and CD7. Immunohistochemical staining of biopsy specimens and flow cytometry of the peripheral blood can be facilitate the detection of clonal T-cells allowing a presumptive diagnosis of MF/SS. For SS, in addition to the morphological evaluation, multicolor flow cytometry is useful to detect Sézary cells, which are generally CD3+, CD4+ and CD8- [41]. The aberrant loss of other T-cell antigens, including CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7 and CD26, is a common finding, similar to the neoplastic cells found in MF [42-44]. The loss of CD7 or CD26 is sensitive and highly specific for SS [45].

Clonal gene rearrangement of the T-cell receptor (TCR) can be detected by PCR-based methods in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues [46]. Its sensitivity is high, but it should be cautiously interpreted because it may not be specific for malignancy, as it is also detected in older adults and in patients with benign diseases. The presence of identical T-cell clones in multiple sites is considered as specific for MF/SS [47], but cases of MF without a detectable T-cell clone have also been reported [48]. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a highly sensitive and specific approach to assessing the clonality of T cells in MF/SS [49, 50]. It will be helpful to make a diagnosis of MF, however, NGS also cannot discriminate T-cell clonality in early-stage MF from reactive lymphocytes completely [51]. The clonality of neoplastic T-cells can also be confirmed by flow cytometric analysis for TCR-β chain variable region family members (TCR-Vβ), in addition to PCR-based analysis. An altered ratio of two segments (C1 and C3) in TCR-β chain constant region is a useful biomarker of α/β T-cell clonality [52, 53].

In endemic areas, assays aimed at the detection of HTLV-I virus should be performed to aid in the differential diagnosis. In patients with extracutaneous lesions, such as in the lymph nodes, tissue should be obtained from those sites as well. Lymph node involvement is assessed according to the Lugano classification [54].

STAGING AND RISK ASSESSMENT

Go to

The revised tumor, node, metastasis, and blood (TNMB) staging system was established for the staging of MF/SS and includes several revisions to the original TNM staging system [30, 54, 55]. It is based on findings in the skin (T1–T4), lymph nodes (N0–N3), viscera (M0–M1), and blood (B0–B2) as shown in Table 2. A recent update by the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL), the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium (USCLC), and the EORTC includes the role of clonality testing in the determination of blood involvement and staging. Bone marrow involvement was also defined and added to the visceral staging. For clonality assessment, PCR-based detection of a TCR-γ/β gene rearrangement and NGS are recommended.

Table 2 Mycosis Fungoides Cooperative Group TNMB classification of cutaneous T cell lymphoma [55].

Skin (T)
T0Absence of clinically suspicious lesions
T1Patches, plaques, papules <10% BSA
T1aPatch only lesions
T1bPlaque/papule+/- patch lesions
T2Patches, plaques, papules ≥10% BSA
T2aPatch only lesions
T2bPlaque/papule+/- patch lesions
T3One or more tumors ≥1 cm diameter
T4Confluence of erythema covering ≥80% BSA
Node (N)
N0No clinically abnormal lymph nodes; biopsy not required
N1Clinically abnormal lymph nodes; pathology Dutch grade 1 or NCI LN 0-2
N1aClone negative or equivocal
N1bClone positive and identical to skin
N2Clinically abnormal lymph nodes; pathology Dutch grade 2 or NCI LN 3
N2aClone negative or equivocal
N2bClone positive and identical to skin
N3Clinically abnormal lymph nodes; pathology Dutch grade 3-4 or NCI LN 4
N3aClone negative or equivocal
N3bClone positive and identical to skin
NxClinically abnormal peripheral or central lymph node but no pathologic determination of representative lymph nodes. Other surrogate means of determining involvement may be determined by Tri-Society consensus
Visceral (M)
M0No visceral involvement
M1Visceral involvement
M1aBM only involvement; clone positive and identical to skin, clone negative or indeterminate
M1bNon-BM visceral involvement; clone positive and identical to skin, clone negative or indeterminate
MxVisceral involvement is neither confirmed nor refuted by available pathologic or imaging assessment
Blood (B)
B0No significant blood involvement: ≤5% of Sézary cells. For clinical trials, B0 may also be defined as <250/μL Sézary cells; CD4+CD26- or CD4+CD7- cells or CD4+CD26- and CD4+CD7- cells <15 % by flow cytometry
B0aClone negative or equivocal
B0bClone positive and identical to skin
B1Low blood tumor burden: does not meet the criteria of B0 or B2
B1aClone negative
B1bClone positive
B2High blood tumor burden: positive clone plus one of the following: ≥1,000/μL Sézary cells; CD4/CD8 ≥10; CD4+CD7- cells ≥40%; or CD4+CD26- cells ≥30%. For clinical trials, B2 may also be defined as >1,000/μL CD4+CD26- or CD4+CD7- cells.


As discussed above, SS is a unique form of advanced MF, defined by the presence of generalized erythroderma (T4) and of >1,000/μL Sézary cells in the peripheral blood (B2). Staging is based on the findings in the lymph nodes and/or visceral involvement and ranges from stage IVA1 to stage IVB. MF is diagnosed in patients with lymph node and/or visceral lesion but no B2 blood involvement.

Survival outcomes according to the staging system are shown in Table 3 [56]. Stage I–IIA is considered representative of early- or limited-stage disease. In these patients, overall survival (OS) is prolonged, measured in decades. In fact, the survival of patients with stage IA disease is comparable to that of the age-matched healthy population [27, 37]. Late- or advanced-stage diseases, defined as stage IIB or higher, are associated with a worse outcome; the median survival is <5 years. In patients with stage IVB disease, the median OS is 1.4 years, and 5-year survival is only 18% [56]. A recent meta-analysis reported a similar OS [57], as improvements resulting from new treatment approaches have yet to be included in survival analyses.

Table 3 Clinical staging and prognosis of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome [56].

Clinical stageTNMB classificationMedian OS (yr)
IAT1N0M0B0 or B135.5
IBT2N0M0B0 or B121.5
IIAT1 or T2N1 or N2M0B0 or B115.8
IIBT3N0 to N2M0B0 or B14.7
IIIAT4N0 to N2M0B04.7
IIIBT4N0 to N2M0B13.4
IVA1T1 to T4N0 to N2M0B23.8
IVA2T1 to T4N3M0B0 to B22.1
IVBT1 to T4N0 to N3M1B0 to B21.4


For a specific variant, considering its unique clinical course with relatively better prognosis, an alternative staging system for folliculotropic MF has been proposed [39, 58].

Clinical prognostic indices for early- and advanced-stage diseases have been investigated. For early-stage disease, the cutaneous lymphoma international prognostic index (CLIPi) has been widely used. Adverse prognostic factors include age (>60), sex (male), type of skin lesion (plaques or folliculotropic), and nodal stage (N1/Nx) [59]. The 10-year OS is 90.3% for low-risk disease (0–1 factors) and 48.9% for high-risk disease (3–5 factors).

For advanced-stage disease, the Cutaneous Lymphoma International Consortium (CLIC) suggested prognostic index, which included age >60 years, stage IV, elevated LDH level, and large cell transformation (LCT) as independent prognostic factors associated with worse survival outcomes [60]. The presence of large cells, which is frequently CD30+, may be seen in patient with MF/SS. LCT, increased large cell count >25% of the infiltrated lymphocytes, may occur in advanced-stage MF/SS and is associated with an adverse prognosis [61-64]. The 5-year OS is 68% in low-risk patients (0–1 factors) and 28% in high-risk patients (3–4 factors).

In addition, molecular biomarkers have been widely studied for the heterogenous MF/SS. Gene expression analysis showed 17 genes including IL2RA, CCR4, STAT5A, and TOX were associated with risk of disease progression in MF/SS and could distinguish MF from SS [65]. Later validation study showed that T-plastin and Twist are useful for the differential diagnosis of SS/MF from reactive changes and KIR3DL2 was associated with short response duration [66]. Several microRNAs, such as miR-223, miR-214, miR-486, and miR155, have been reported that their expression was prognostic, but it should be validated further [67-70]. Recent advances in technical analysis, high-throughput and more detailed analysis have been enabled; constitutive activation of oncogenic signaling pathway such as JAK-STAT signaling, altered cell cycle regulation, and epigenetic remodeling [71]. Mutations in genes involving T-cell activation, apoptosis, NF-kB signaling, and DNA repair, and frequent copy number variations in driver mutations have been demonstrated [22]. These findings enabled to understand the pathogenesis of MF/SS better and gave new insights into new therapeutic strategy as well as precise diagnosis and risk assessment. Detailed list of suggested biomarkers for MF/SS are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

TREATMENT OF MF/SS

Go to

Treatment of early-stage MF

Early-stage (IA-IIA) MF is an indolent disease that primarily involves the skin. Treatment is focused on skin-directed therapies rather than systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy, given the excellent survival outcomes of these patients. The main therapeutic goal for early-stage MF is the relief of symptoms (pruritus, pain, abnormal sensation, and cosmetic restoration). Less toxic but nonetheless effective treatments should be chosen to reduce the risk of disease progression. Thus, treatment should be determined according to disease extent, age, comorbidity, treatment availability, and safety profiles.

Skin-directed therapies include topical corticosteroids, retinoids, mechlorethamine, and imiquimod, localized radiation, total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT), and phototherapy with the latter consisting of narrow band ultraviolet B (NBUVB) and psoralen with ultraviolet A (PUVA) (Fig. 2). Systemic therapies including oral bexarotene, interferon, immunomodulating agents, monoclonal antibodies, and targeted agents, can be used in patients with refractory disease and extensive symptoms. In this setting, drugs with a better safety profile are generally preferred, such as oral bexarotene and low-dose methotrexate.

Fig. 2. Therapeutic options for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome based on the stage of disease.

The most common first-line therapy is topical corticosteroids, such as clobetasol propionate. Its efficacy was established based on retrospective reports of an overall response rate (ORR) of 95% for stage IA/IB disease and minimal toxicity [72, 73]. Topical mechlorethamine (0.02% gel) was evaluated in a phase II trial for stage IA-IIA MF, in which an ORR of 58.5% and a complete response rate (CRR) of 13.8% with some contact dermatitis and irritation were reported [74].

For refractory or persistent skin lesions, bexarotene (retinoic acid, 1% gel) can be used; its ORR in prospective trials ranged from 44 to 63% [75]. Topical bexarotene and other retinoids may cause excessive skin irritation when applied over large areas and are thus appropriate only for stage IA disease.

Topical toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists induce the production of cytokines, such as interferons, leading to anti-tumor immunity [76]. Studies of imiquimod, a TLR7 agonist, reported an ORR of 80% and a CRR of 45% [76, 77]. Fatigue and flu-like symptoms were reported as side effects but were rare. Clinical improvement and a reduction of neoplastic cells were also demonstrated for the TLR7/8 agonist resiquimod [78].

Generally, a topical corticosteroid, mechlorethamine, or phototherapy is recommended as the initial treatment. However, for patients with very severe symptoms and generalized, thick plaques, TSEBT will likely be more effective. In patients with disease relapse or failure to respond to one skin-directed therapy, another topical therapy or a combined strategy should be considered before systemic therapy is provided.

Phototherapy (UVB or PUVA), alone or in combination with other agents, is another effective skin-directed therapy. Either UVB or PUVA is indicated in patients with stage IA-IIA MF [79], but thick plaques or folliculotropic MF may be more responsive to PUVA because of its superior skin penetration. PUVA is also the first choice in patients of color, including Asians. A consensus guideline for phototherapy was published by the USCLC [80].

For localized MF refractory to topical agents, local radiation may be considered, especially in patients with a single skin lesion. In patients with widely distributed lesions, TSEBT using low-dose radiation may be effective [81].

Treatment of advanced-stage disease

The goal of therapy in patients with advanced-stage disease is not only symptom relief and long-term disease control but also the prolongation of survival. The treatment modality should be chosen based on the goals of therapy at different time points during the disease course (Fig. 2). For long-term disease control, agents without cumulative toxicities or immunosuppression are a good choice whereas the treatment of life-threatening disease requires curative but more toxic therapies.

For patients with localized skin involvement, skin-directed therapies can be applied with or without systemic therapy. In those with extensive skin involvement or visceral involvement, systemic therapy is required. TSEBT in combination with systemic therapy is preferred for generalized diseases, however, its use in patients with erythroderma may be contraindicated because of the risk of severe desquamation [81].

Systemic therapy ranges from immunomodulatory drugs (bexarotene, interferon, and low-dose methotrexate) to targeted agents, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors (vorinostat and romidepsin), monoclonal antibodies (alemtuzumab), antibody-drug conjugates (brentuximab vedotin and mogamulizumab), immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab), and other investigational drugs. Data on commonly used systemic therapies are provided in Table 4. Most traditional agents have been used based on the results of phase II or retrospective studies; consequently, their true efficacies are often unclear. Novel agents targeting the unique biology of MF/SS have been recently introduced. Their superior efficacy over historical systemic therapies has been demonstrated in randomized phase III trials. With increasing therapeutic options, the decision regarding the optical treatment approach has become more complicated.

Table 4 Systemic therapies for refractory or advanced-stage mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.

ReferenceAgentsPhasePrior Txa)NOutcomesComments
Duvic et al. 2001 [82]BexaroteneII/III256ORR 45% (CRR 2%)Pancreatitis, hypertriglyceridemia, thyroid dysfunction
Zinzani et al. 2000 [103]GemcitabineII344ORR 70.5% (CRR 11.5%)Myelosuppression, elevated hepatic enzyme
Dummer et al. 2012 [102]Peg-L-doxorubicinII249ORR 40.8% (CR 6.1%)Myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity
Duvic et al. 2007 [93]VorinostatII533ORR 24.2% (CRR 0%)Fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, thrombocytopenia, abnormal echocardiogram
Whittaker et al. 2010 [96]RomidepsinII496ORR 38% (CR 5%)IB-IVA
GI disturbances, asthenic conditions, ECG changes
Prince et al. 2017 [99] (ALCANZA)Brentuximab vedotin vs. MTX or bexaroteneIII, RCT3131ORR4 50% vs. 10%CD30+ (≥10%) MF (SS excluded)
PFS 16.1 vs. 3.5 MPeripheral neuropathy in 66% (9% Gr3), discontinuation in 14%
Kim et al. 2018 [94] (MAVORIC)Mogamulizumab vs. vorinostatIII, RCT186ORR 28% vs. 5% (68% in blood)Stage IB-IVB MF/SS (LCT excluded)
Infusion related reaction, thrombocytopenia, drug eruption, discontinuation in 7%
Khodadoust et al. 2020 [101]PembrolizumabII424ORR 38% (CRR 8%)IIB-IV
Cutaneous flare reaction (without discontinuation)

a)Prior Tx means median number of lines of previous therapy.

Abbreviations: CRR, complete response rate; MTX, methotrexate; ORR, overall response rate.

For MF and SS, the response to treatment should be assessed based on overall skin, nodal, visceral, and blood responses. In early clinical trials and retrospective reports, response criteria and outcome endpoints were not uniformly defined. In 2011 and 2022, the ISCL/USCLC/EORTC published consensus recommendations for clinical end points for MF/SS (Supplementary Table 2) [54, 55].

The systemic use of bexarotene, an oral retinoid-X receptor-selective retinoic acid, was first approved by the FDA in 1999, prior to the development of the topical agent. In a multicenter phase II/III trial, patients who received 300 mg bexarotene/m2/day had an ORR 0f 45% [82]. Common toxicities included hypertriglyceridemia, pancreatitis, and hypothyroidism and were dose dependent. Treatment for >6 months without adjuvant therapy, until disease progression if the drug is well-tolerated, is recommended [83].

Interferon α-2b or γ-1b is another immunomodulatory agent used in the treatment of MF/SS. An ORR of 50–70% and a CRR of 20–30% have been reported [84, 85]. In patients with early-stage disease, interferon can be a second-line option, and in those with advanced-stage disease, including tumor-stage lesions, a first-line option. Interferon can also be successfully combined with other skin-directed therapies, such as PUVA, bexarotene, and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) [86], a type of phototherapy in which psoralen exposure precedes extracorporeal circulation. Psoralen binds to DNA after UVA radiation and leads to apoptosis of lymphocytes as well as an enhanced host immune response induced by monocyte activation and dendritic cell differentiation [87, 88]. Following a landmark report of a response in 73% of patients, ECP has become a first line treatment for advanced-stage MF and SS [89]. A favorable response around rate of 60% and a durable response of >8 years in patients with a complete response have been reported [90, 91]. The median time to response is 6 months, but the long-term use of ECP may be associated iron deficiency. ECP can also be combined with other therapies.

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have an established safety profile, and their potential efficacy has been demonstrated in phase I studies for T-cell lymphomas, including some CTCLs [92]. A phase II trial for vorinostat showed an acceptable and durable response (ORR of 30% for a median 185 days in patients with advanced-stage disease) [93]. However, in the MAVORIC trial, vorinostat was inferior to mogamulizumab [94]. Romidepsin, evaluated in phase II trials, resulted in an ORR of 38% that was durable for >1 year in advanced-stage disease [95, 96]. With maintenance at a lower dosing schedule, responders achieved a durable response of 7–34 (median 15) months [97]. For both HDAC inhibitors, QT prolongation and cardiac toxicity are potential complications and should be monitored regularly [98].

Based on the phase III ALCANZA and MAVORIC trials, both BV and mogamulizumab were approved by the FDA, for patients with relapsed or refractory disease [94, 99]. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and mogamulizumab are novel agents that have been evaluated in randomized phase III trials. In the ALCANZA trial, the efficacy and safety of BV compared with physician’s choice of therapy (methotrexate or bexarotene) were investigated [99]. The ORR4 (lasting at least 4 mo) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 50% and 16.1 months in the BV group vs. 10% and 3.5 months in the control group. After 1 year, 34.5% of patients in the BV group but 86.6% of those in the control group required next-line treatment. The efficacy of BV was observed at any level of CD30 expression and was independent of the presence of LCT. Mogamulizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody for the chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) that enhances antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and inhibits Treg-mediated immune suppression, leading to anti-tumor activity against MF/SS. In the above-mentioned MAVORIC trial, a randomized phase III study, mogamulizumab was tested for its efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory CTCL and resulted in a better ORR and PFS than achieved in patients treated with vorinostat (28% vs. 5% and 7.7 vs. 3.1 mo) [94]. A favorable response in the blood compartment, frequently involved in SS, was evidenced by an ORR of 68%. The side effects of mogamulizumab included drug eruptions, which were mostly tolerable and not a cause of drug discontinuation.

Clinical features may guide the choice of a systemic therapy in patients with specific disease phenotypes. Romidepsin or mogamulizumab may be beneficial for patients with a high blood burden. The reported response rate in the blood compartment was 54% and 68%, respectively [94-96]. The median response duration in the subgroup of mogamulizumab treated patients with a blood response was 26 months. There is as yet no evidence of the efficacy of BV in the blood compartment, such that SS patients were excluded from the ALCANZA trial. Because patients with generalized erythroderma frequently have blood involvement, a similar strategy may be followed. For lymph node involvement, romidepsin, pralatrexate and BV are effective, as shown in clinical trials that included patients with CTCL and peripheral T-cell lymphoma. In the ALCANZA study, the extracutaneous response rate at 4 months was 46% in the BV-treated group vs. 9% in the control group [99]. However, in the MAVORIC trial, the nodal response rate to mogamulizumab was 17% [94]. LCT is a significant adverse factor in MF/SS patients and should be considered in the selection of systemic therapy. Although CCR4 is commonly expressed in transformed cells, mogamulizumab failed to show activity in patients with LCT in early-phase trials [100]. Thus, in the phase III MAVORIC trial, patients with LCT were excluded [94].

The feasible activity of immunomodulatory agents against MF/SS and the observation of high PD-L1 expression in some CTCLs have raised interest in immune checkpoint inhibitors. In a phase II trial of pembrolizumab [101], the ORR was 38%. However, the role of checkpoint inhibitors in the management of MF/SS has yet to be fully investigated.

For refractory and aggressive disease, cytotoxic chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin, can be considered for disease control [102, 103]. Patients with very aggressive disease and thus with a reduced survival, such as those with LCT or B2 disease, will require curative agents that provide a rapid and strong response. The treatment strategy developed for aggressive T-cell lymphomas may be effective.

Despite the introduction of novel agents, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the only curative modality in patients with advanced-stage MF/SS, although the data are thus far limited. Based on registry data, the 5-year PFS and OS were 17% and 32% with a 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 19% [104]. Similar results were reported in a systematic review and meta-analysis, in which the relapse rate was 47% and the NRM 19% [105]. Earlier transplantation in patients with CR1/CR2 or in those with relapse after a maximum of three systemic therapies were associated with a better outcome [106]; however, the optimal timing of allogeneic SCT is unclear yet. High-risk patients with an expected survival of <5 years may be a candidate for allogeneic SCT. As a bridging therapy, BV can be used without increasing pre- and post-transplant toxicities [107]. However, mogamulizumab should be considered cautiously because of its association with severe acute graft-versus-host disease as well as a report of treatment-related/non-relapse mortality in a study of other types of lymphoma [108].

CONCLUSION

Go to

MF/SS is a rare but distinct disease entity that is highly heterogenous with respect to its clinical features and prognosis. Recent progress in understanding the pathogenesis of MF/SS has contributed to advances in the diagnosis, staging, and risk assessment of MF/SS as well as to the development of novel therapies. However, with accumulating data obtained from studies of novel drugs, decisions regarding the optimal form of therapy and its timing are becoming increasingly complex. The efficacy and safety of combination therapies should be investigated further. Well-designed clinical trials are warranted and the participation of patients in those trials is encouraged.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Go to

I appreciate Dr. Weon Seo Park, Dr. Hyo Eun Shim, Dr. Jong Heon Jung, and Dr. Hyeon-Seok Eom at National Cancer Center, Korea, for providing clinicopathological photographs and their insightful comments on this article.

REFERENCES

Go to
  1. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood 2016;127:2375-90.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Jawed SI, Myskowski PL, Horwitz S, Moskowitz A, Querfeld C. Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome): part I. Diagnosis: clinical and histopathologic features and new molecular and biologic markers. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;70:205, e1-16; quiz 221-2.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Korgavkar K, Xiong M, Weinstock M. Changing incidence trends of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. JAMA Dermatol 2013;149:1295-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Willemze R, Jaffe ES, Burg G, et al. WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood 2005;105:3768-85.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Willemze R, Cerroni L, Kempf W, et al. The 2018 update of the WHO-EORTC classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas. Blood 2019;133:1703-14.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Alaggio R, Amador C, Anagnostopoulos I, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: lymphoid neoplasms. Leukemia 2022;36:1720-48.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Campo E, Jaffe ES, Cook JR, et al. The International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms: a report from the Clinical Advisory Committee. Blood 2022;140:1229-53.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Sant M, Allemani C, Tereanu C, et al. Incidence of hematologic malignancies in Europe by morphologic subtype: results of the HAEMACARE project. Blood 2010;116:3724-34.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Criscione VD, Weinstock MA. Incidence of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in the United States, 1973-2002. Arch Dermatol 2007;143:854-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Bradford PT, Devesa SS, Anderson WF, Toro JR. Cutaneous lymphoma incidence patterns in the United States: a population- based study of 3884 cases. Blood 2009;113:5064-73.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Jung JM, Lim DJ, Won CH, Chang SE, Lee MW, Lee WJ. Mycosis fungoides in children and adolescents: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol 2021;157:431-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Johnson WT, Kartan S, Sokol K, Nikbakht N, Porcu P. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of black patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a subgroup analysis of the phase III MAVORIC trial. Leuk Lymphoma 2021;62:1877-83.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Geller S, Lebowitz E, Pulitzer MP, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in African American and black patients with mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome: retrospective analysis of 157 patients from a referral cancer center. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;83:430-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Lee H, Park HJ, Park EH, et al. Nationwide statistical analysis of lymphoid malignancies in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 2018;50:222-38.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Whittemore AS, Holly EA, Lee IM, et al. Mycosis fungoides in relation to environmental exposures and immune response: a case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:1560-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Hall WW, Liu CR, Schneewind O, et al. Deleted HTLV-I provirus in blood and cutaneous lesions of patients with mycosis fungoides. Science 1991;253:317-20.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Ghosh SK, Abrams JT, Terunuma H, Vonderheid EC, DeFreitas E. Human T-cell leukemia virus type I tax/rex DNA and RNA in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 1994;84:2663-71.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Jackow CM, McHam JB, Friss A, Alvear J, Reveille JR, Duvic M. HLA-DR5 and DQB1*03 class II alleles are associated with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Invest Dermatol 1996;107:373-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Hodak E, Lapidoth M, Kohn K, et al. Mycosis fungoides: HLA class II associations among Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi Jewish patients. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:974-80.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Hodak E, Klein T, Gabay B, et al. Familial mycosis fungoides: report of 6 kindreds and a study of the HLA system. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;52:393-402.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Song X, Chang S, Seminario-Vidal L, et al. Genomic and single-cell landscape reveals novel drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities of transformed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Cancer Discov 2022;12:1294-313.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Choi J, Goh G, Walradt T, et al. Genomic landscape of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Nat Genet 2015;47:1011-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Wilcox RA. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2017;92:1085-102.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Wilcox R. A new molecular paradigm in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Semin Diagn Pathol 2017;34:15-21.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Ahern K, Gilmore ES, Poligone B. Pruritus in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;67:760-8.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Demierre MF, Gan S, Jones J, Miller DR. Significant impact of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma on patients' quality of life: results of a 2005 National Cutaneous Lymphoma Foundation Survey. Cancer 2006;107:2504-11.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Kim YH, Liu HL, Mraz-Gernhard S, Varghese A, Hoppe RT. Long-term outcome of 525 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: clinical prognostic factors and risk for disease progression. Arch Dermatol 2003;139:857-66.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Bi MY, Curry JL, Christiano AM, et al. The spectrum of hair loss in patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64:53-63.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Steffen C. The man behind the eponym dermatology in historical perspective: Albert Sézary and the Sézary syndrome. Am J Dermatopathol 2006;28:357-67.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Olsen E, Vonderheid E, Pimpinelli N, et al. Revisions to the staging and classification of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a proposal of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) and the cutaneous lymphoma task force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Blood 2007;110:1713-22.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Vonderheid EC, Diamond LW, van Vloten WA, et al. Lymph node classification systems in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Evidence for the utility of the Working Formulation of Non- Hodgkin's Lymphomas for Clinical Usage. Cancer 1994;73:207-18.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Morales MM, Olsen J, Johansen P, et al. Viral infection, atopy and mycosis fungoides: a European multicentre case-control study. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:511-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Baser S, Onn A, Lin E, Morice RC, Duvic M. Pulmonary manifestations in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Cancer 2007;109:1550-5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Krejsgaard T, Odum N, Geisler C, Wasik MA, Woetmann A. Regulatory T cells and immunodeficiency in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Leukemia 2012;26:424-32.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Goyal A, O'Leary D, Goyal K, Rubin N, Janakiram M. Screening for second malignancies in mycosis fungoides: non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, lung cancer, bladder cancer and melanoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021;35:1821-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Huang KP, Weinstock MA, Clarke CA, McMillan A, Hoppe RT, Kim YH. Second lymphomas and other malignant neoplasms in patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: evidence from population-based and clinical cohorts. Arch Dermatol 2007;143:45-50.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. van Doorn R, Van Haselen CW, van Voorst Vader PC, et al. Mycosis fungoides: disease evolution and prognosis of 309 Dutch patients. Arch Dermatol 2000;136:504-10.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Pimpinelli N, Olsen EA, Santucci M, et al. Defining early mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;53:1053-63.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. van Santen S, Roach RE, van Doorn R, et al. Clinical staging and prognostic factors in folliculotropic mycosis fungoides. JAMA Dermatol 2016;152:992-1000.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Muniesa C, Estrach T, Pujol RM, et al. Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides: clinicopathological features and outcome in a series of 20 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;62:418-26.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Vonderheid EC, Bernengo MG, Burg G, et al. Update on erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: report of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46:95-106.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Hristov AC, Vonderheid EC, Borowitz MJ. Simplified flow cytometric assessment in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:944-53.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Jones D, Dang NH, Duvic M, Washington LT, Huh YO. Absence of CD26 expression is a useful marker for diagnosis of T-cell lymphoma in peripheral blood. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;115:885-92.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Ginaldi L, Matutes E, Farahat N, De Martinis M, Morilla R, Catovsky D. Differential expression of CD3 and CD7 in T-cell malignancies: a quantitative study by flow cytometry. Br J Haematol 1996;93:921-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Boonk SE, Zoutman WH, Marie-Cardine A, et al. Evaluation of immunophenotypic and molecular biomarkers for Sézary syndrome using standard operating procedures: a multicenter study of 59 patients. J Invest Dermatol 2016;136:1364-72.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Ponti R, Quaglino P, Novelli M, et al. T-cell receptor gamma gene rearrangement by multiplex polymerase chain reaction/heteroduplex analysis in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome) and benign inflammatory disease: correlation with clinical, histological and immunophenotypical findings. Br J Dermatol 2005;153:565-73.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Thurber SE, Zhang B, Kim YH, Schrijver I, Zehnder J, Kohler S. T-cell clonality analysis in biopsy specimens from two different skin sites shows high specificity in the diagnosis of patients with suggested mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;57:782-90.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Rojansky R, Fernandez-Pol S, Wang E, et al. Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas with pathogenic somatic mutations and absence of detectable clonal T-cell receptor gene rearrangement: two case reports. Diagn Pathol 2020;15:122.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  49. Sufficool KE, Lockwood CM, Abel HJ, et al. T-cell clonality assessment by next-generation sequencing improves detection sensitivity in mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;73:228-36, e2.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Rea B, Haun P, Emerson R, et al. Role of high-throughput sequencing in the diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Pathol 2018;71:814-20.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Gibbs JD, Ma S, Kim A, et al. Utility of flow cytometry and gene rearrangement analysis in tissue and blood of patients with suspected cutaneous T‑cell lymphoma. Oncol Rep 2021;45:349-58.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  52. Horna P, Shi M, Jevremovic D, Craig FE, Comfere NI, Olteanu H. Utility of TRBC1 expression in the diagnosis of peripheral blood involvement by cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Invest Dermatol 2021;141:821-9, e2.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  53. Horna P, Shi M, Olteanu H, Johansson U. Emerging role of T-cell receptor constant beta chain-1 (TRBC1) expression in the flow cytometric diagnosis of T-cell malignancies. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:1817.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Olsen EA, Whittaker S, Willemze R, et al. Primary cutaneous lymphoma: recommendations for clinical trial design and staging update from the ISCL, USCLC, and EORTC. Blood 2022;140:419-37.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Olsen EA, Whittaker S, Kim YH, et al. Clinical end points and response criteria in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a consensus statement of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas, the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium, and the Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2598-607.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  56. Agar NS, Wedgeworth E, Crichton S, et al. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome: validation of the revised International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer staging proposal. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4730-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Mourad A, Gniadecki R. Overall survival in mycosis fungoides: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest Dermatol 2020;140:495-7, e5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Charli-Joseph Y, Kashani-Sabet M, McCalmont TH, et al. Association of a proposed new staging system for folliculotropic mycosis fungoides with prognostic variables in a US cohort. JAMA Dermatol 2021;157:157-65.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Benton EC, Crichton S, Talpur R, et al. A cutaneous lymphoma international prognostic index (CLIPi) for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:2859-68.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. Scarisbrick JJ, Prince HM, Vermeer MH, et al. Cutaneous Lymphoma International Consortium Study of Outcome in Advanced Stages of Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: effect of specific prognostic markers on survival and development of a prognostic model. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:3766-73.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  61. Vergier B, de Muret A, Beylot-Barry M, et al. Transformation of mycosis fungoides: clinicopathological and prognostic features of 45 cases. French Study Group of Cutaneious Lymphomas. Blood 2000;95:2212-8.
  62. Salhany KE, Cousar JB, Greer JP, Casey TT, Fields JP, Collins RD. Transformation of cutaneous T cell lymphoma to large cell lymphoma. A clinicopathologic and immunologic study. Am J Pathol 1988;132:265-77.
    Pubmed KoreaMed
  63. Greer JP, Salhany KE, Cousar JB, et al. Clinical features associated with transformation of cerebriform T-cell lymphoma to a large cell process. Hematol Oncol 1990;8:215-27.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  64. Diamandidou E, Colome-Grimmer M, Fayad L, Duvic M, Kurzrock R. Transformation of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome: clinical characteristics and prognosis. Blood 1998;92:1150-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  65. Litvinov IV, Netchiporouk E, Cordeiro B, et al. The use of transcriptional profiling to improve personalized diagnosis and management of cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL). Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:2820-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  66. Dobos G, De Cevins C, Ly Ka So S, et al. The value of five blood markers in differentiating mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a validation cohort. Br J Dermatol 2021;185:405-11.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  67. Sandoval J, Diaz-Lagares A, Salgado R, et al. MicroRNA expression profiling and DNA methylation signature for deregulated microRNA in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Invest Dermatol 2015;135:1128-37.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  68. Ralfkiaer U, Hagedorn PH, Bangsgaard N, et al. Diagnostic microRNA profiling in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Blood 2011;118:5891-900.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  69. Narducci MG, Arcelli D, Picchio MC, et al. MicroRNA profiling reveals that miR-21, miR486 and miR-214 are upregulated and involved in cell survival in Sézary syndrome. Cell Death Dis 2011;2:e151.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  70. Ballabio E, Mitchell T, van Kester MS, et al. MicroRNA expression in Sézary syndrome: identification, function, and diagnostic potential. Blood 2010;116:1105-13.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  71. Tensen CP, Quint KD, Vermeer MH. Genetic and epigenetic insights into cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2022;139:15-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  72. Zackheim HS, Kashani-Sabet M, Amin S. Topical corticosteroids for mycosis fungoides. Experience in 79 patients. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:949-54.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  73. Demierre MF, Kim YH, Zackheim HS. Prognosis, clinical outcomes and quality of life issues in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2003;17:1485-507.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  74. Kim EJ, Guitart J, Querfeld C, et al. The PROVe study: US real-world experience with chlormethine/mechlorethamine gel in combination with other therapies for patients with mycosis fungoides cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Am J Clin Dermatol 2021;22:407-14.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  75. Breneman D, Duvic M, Kuzel T, Yocum R, Truglia J, Stevens VJ. Phase 1 and 2 trial of bexarotene gel for skin-directed treatment of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Arch Dermatol 2002;138:325-32.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  76. Huen AO, Rook AH. Toll receptor agonist therapy of skin cancer and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Curr Opin Oncol 2014;26:237-44.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  77. Shipman AR, Scarisbrick J. New treatment options for mycosis fungoides. Indian J Dermatol 2016;61:119.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  78. Rook AH, Gelfand JM, Wysocka M, et al. Topical resiquimod can induce disease regression and enhance T-cell effector functions in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2015;126:1452-61.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  79. Gathers RC, Scherschun L, Malick F, Fivenson DP, Lim HW. Narrowband UVB phototherapy for early-stage mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;47:191-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  80. Olsen EA, Hodak E, Anderson T, et al. Guidelines for phototherapy of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a consensus statement of the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016;74:27-58.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  81. Hoppe RT, Harrison C, Tavallaee M, et al. Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy as an effective modality to reduce disease burden in patients with mycosis fungoides: results of a pooled analysis from 3 phase-II clinical trials. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;72:286-92.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  82. Duvic M, Hymes K, Heald P, et al. Bexarotene is effective and safe for treatment of refractory advanced-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: multinational phase II-III trial results. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2456-71.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  83. Huber MA, Kunzi-Rapp K, Staib G, Scharffetter-Kochanek K. Management of refractory early-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides) with a combination of oral bexarotene and psoralen plus ultraviolet bath therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;50:475-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  84. Jumbou O, N'Guyen JM, Tessier MH, Legoux B, Dréno B. Long-term follow-up in 51 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome treated by interferon-alfa. Br J Dermatol 1999;140:427-31.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  85. Olsen EA, Rosen ST, Vollmer RT, et al. Interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;20:395-407.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  86. Suchin KR, Cucchiara AJ, Gottleib SL, et al. Treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with combined immunomodulatory therapy: a 14-year experience at a single institution. Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1054-60.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  87. Ventura A, Vassall A, Yurter A, et al. Novel protocol for generating physiologic immunogenic dendritic cells. J Vis Exp 2019;147:e59370.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  88. Tatsuno K, Yamazaki T, Hanlon D, et al. Extracorporeal photo-chemotherapy induces bona fide immunogenic cell death. Cell Death Dis 2019;10:578.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  89. Edelson R, Berger C, Gasparro F, et al. Treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma by extracorporeal photochemotherapy. Preliminary results. N Engl J Med 1987;316:297-303.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  90. Zic JA, Stricklin GP, Greer JP, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma treated with extra-corporeal photochemotherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;35:935-45.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  91. Sanford KW, Anderson J, Roseff S, McPherson RA. Iron deficiency anemia in patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Lab Med 2019;50:29-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  92. Prince HM, Bishton MJ, Harrison SJ. Clinical studies of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:3958-69.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  93. Duvic M, Talpur R, Ni X, et al. Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Blood 2007;109:31-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  94. Kim YH, Bagot M, Pinter-Brown L, et al. Mogamulizumab versus vorinostat in previously treated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (MAVORIC): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:1192-204.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  95. Kim EJ, Kim YH, Rook AH, et al. Clinically significant responses achieved with romidepsin across disease compartments in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2015;56:2847-54.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  96. Whittaker SJ, Demierre MF, Kim EJ, et al. Final results from a multicenter, international, pivotal study of romidepsin in refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4485-91.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  97. Martinez-Escala ME, Kuzel TM, Kaplan JB, et al. Durable responses with maintenance dose-sparing regimens of romidepsin in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. JAMA Oncol 2016;2:790-3.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  98. Piekarz RL, Frye AR, Wright JJ, et al. Cardiac studies in patients treated with depsipeptide, FK228, in a phase II trial for T-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:3762-73.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  99. Prince HM, Kim YH, Horwitz SM, et al. Brentuximab vedotin or physician's choice in CD30-positive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (ALCANZA): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial. Lancet 2017;390:555-66.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  100. Zinzani PL, Karlin L, Radford J, et al. European phase II study of mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody, in relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Haematologica 2016;101:e407-10.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  101. Khodadoust MS, Rook AH, Porcu P, et al. Pembrolizumab in relapsed and refractory mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:20-8.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  102. Dummer R, Quaglino P, Becker JC, et al. Prospective international multicenter phase II trial of intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin monochemotherapy in patients with stage IIB, IVA, or IVB advanced mycosis fungoides: final results from EORTC 21012. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:4091-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  103. Zinzani PL, Baliva G, Magagnoli M, et al. Gemcitabine treatment in pretreated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: experience in 44 patients. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2603-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  104. Lechowicz MJ, Lazarus HM, Carreras J, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014;49:1360-5.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  105. Iqbal M, Reljic T, Ayala E, et al. Efficacy of allogeneic hemato-poietic cell transplantation in cutaneous t cell lymphoma: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2020;26:76-82.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  106. Duarte RF, Canals C, Onida F, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a retrospective analysis of the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Trans-plantation. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4492-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  107. Garciaz S, Loschi M, De Masson A, et al. Brentuximab vedotin as a bridge to allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for refractory or relapsing patients with CD30 positive anaplastic or T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: a study on behalf of the SFGM-TC. Leuk Lymphoma 2019;60:2802-5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  108. Fuji S, Inoue Y, Utsunomiya A, et al. Pretransplantation anti-CCR4 antibody mogamulizumab against adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma is associated with significantly increased risks of severe and corticosteroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease, nonrelapse mortality, and overall mortality. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:3426-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Article

Review Article

Blood Res 2023; 58(S1): S66-S82

Published online April 30, 2023 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2023023

Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.

Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome

Hyewon Lee

Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Center for Hematologic Malignancy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea

Correspondence to:Hyewon Lee, M.D., Ph.D.
Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Center for Hematologic Malignancy, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Korea
E-mail: hwlee@ncc.re.kr

Received: January 26, 2023; Revised: April 16, 2023; Accepted: April 17, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are a distinct disease entity of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with heterogenous clinical features and prognosis. MF mainly involves skin and usually shows an indolent and favorable clinical course. In patients with advanced-stage disease, extracutaneous involvement including lymph nodes, viscera, and blood, or large cell transformation may be observed. SS is a leukemic form of advanced-stage MF, characterized by generalized erythroderma. Early-stage MF can be treated with skin-directed therapy. However, patients with refractory or advanced-stage disease are associated with severe symptoms or poor prognosis, requiring systemic therapy. Recent progress in understanding the pathogenesis of MF/SS has contributed to advances in the management of these rare diseases. This review aims to describe the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment strategy of MF/SS, focusing on the recent updates in the management of these diseases.

Keywords: Mycosis fungoides, Sézary syndrome, Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, Diagnosis, Prognosis, Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Primary cutaneous lymphoma (PCL) refers to a group of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes with unique characteristics, which specifically involve the skin at diagnosis [1]. Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), the disease entity of T-cell derived PCLs, accounts for 70–85% of PCLs, whereas B-cells predominate in other NHLs [2, 3]. A consensus classification of cutaneous lymphomas was established by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005 [4] and then updated in 2018 [5]. Recently, the classification was further refined by the WHO and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) [6, 7].

CTCL is a rare disease, making up 4% of all NHLs [8]. In the United States, the incidence is 6.4–7.7 per million persons, according to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database [9, 10]. Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are the most common subtypes, together comprising two thirds of CTCLs [4]. Both MF and SS have a male predominance, with a 2:1 ratio versus females. The median age at diagnosis is 55 years, with the incidence increasing with age. However, MF/SS can occur in younger individuals and even in children [11]. While the prognostic impact of age is not clear, ethnic differences have been reported, with a higher incidence in Blacks and non-Hispanics (11.5), followed by Hispanics (7.9) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (7.1) [12, 13]. A recent study showed that MF in Black patients is associated with a female predominance, younger age, and a worse prognosis [12, 13]. The incidence of CTCL in Korea is low, with an age-adjusted rate of 1.3 per million persons in 2012, based on the Korean National Cancer Incidence Database (KNCIDB) [14]. The estimated 5-year survival rate in all registered patients, between 2008 and 2012 was 87.7%, with a trend of a worse outcome according to age.

MF first presents in the skin, but in its advanced stage it can also involve the lymph nodes, other organs, or blood. Typical skin lesions are patches and plaques with various morphologic and pathologic findings. SS is a distinctive disease category defined by erythroderma and neoplastic T-cells typically involving the blood [4, 5]. It is regarded as a leukemic form of MF, with refractory symptoms and a poor prognosis.

Although some studies have suggested an association of MF or SS with environmental exposure to radiation and chemicals and with infections, especially Human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) [15-17], the causes of these two diseases are unclear. MF and SS are sporadic, but a few cases of familial MF/SS have been described, thus implicating genetic alterations in the development of MF/SS [18-20]. Accumulated knowledge on the cell of origin, genetic landscape, and immunologic changes has led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of MF/SS and provided new insights into potential therapeutic targets [21-24]. Here we review the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment strategy of MF and SS, focusing on the recent advances in the management of MF/SS.

CLINICAL MANIFESTATION

The majority of patients with MF suffer from persistent, slowly progressive skin lesions. The most common and exhausting symptom is pruritus, occurring in over two-thirds of MF patients and significantly affecting their quality of life [25, 26], due to its association with insomnia, anxiety, and depression. Accordingly, skin-directed treatment is main approach to the management of early-stage MF.

The skin lesions in MF are heterogenous, varying in size and shape. They initially present as localized or generalized patches, plaques, and/or papules, with possible progression to tumor formation and generalized erythroderma (Fig. 1A–C, G). Patches/plaques/papules extending over a body surface area of <10% (T1) are seen in 30%, and more generalized manifestations (T2) in 35% of MF patients. A dome-shaped solid tumor ≥1 cm in diameter develops in 20% and erythroderma in 15% of patients, especially those with advanced disease [27]. Hypo/hyperpigmentation, alopecia, erosions, bullous lesions, and dry scaling are common accompanying findings. More than 30% of MF patients suffer from alopecia, which varies in its extent from patchy to generalized and in some patients is irreversible [28].

Figure 1. Clinical manifestation and pathologic findings. Patchy (A), plaque (B), and tumor-type (C) skin lesions in a patient with advanced stage mycosis fungoides. PET scan showed FDG-uptake on large extent plaque and tumor stage lesions and axillary lymph nodes (D). Histology of plaque-type MF lesion with epidermotropic infiltration of lymphocytes, in which clonality of TCR gene rearrangement was confirmed (E). Higher resolution of E, representing grouped aggregation of large lymphocytes in the epidermis, forming early form of Pautrier’s micro-abscess (F). Generalized erythroderma in a patient with Sézary syndrome (G). Atypical lymphocyte with cerebriform nuclei, so called ‘Sézary cell’, was observed on peripheral blood smear (H).

The term Sézary syndrome originated with the 1938 publication of a landmark case series that identified lymphocytosis with typical grooved, cerebriform nuclei in patients with MF [29]. SS is a distinctive leukemic involvement of CTCL, characterized by generalized erythroderma but also sharing clinical and pathologic features with MF, as well as the same diagnostic approach and staging system [30]. However, SS is associated with more severe symptoms, a more unfavorable response to treatment, and worse survival than is MF. The skin lesions in SS are generally diffuse, rather than the progression from patches to plaques to tumors that occurs in MF. Lymphadenopathy and pruritus are frequent features of the disease.

The lymph nodes are the most common extracutaneous site and are involved in 30% of MF/SS patients [31]. Bone marrow involvement is rare, but peripheral blood involvement exclusively correlates with the extent of the skin lesions. Other extracutaneous lesions are rare but may develop in the lungs, spleen, liver, gut, and central nervous system, especially in patients with generalized erythroderma including those with SS [1, 32, 33].

MF/SS is also associated with impaired cellular/humoral immunity and an increased risk of opportunistic infections [34]. A higher risk of secondary malignancies, such as other types of lymphoma, has also been reported [35, 36].

DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH

The initial diagnostic work-up for MF should consist of a comprehensive physical exam, laboratory tests, including a complete blood cell count, routine chemistry including lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), and histologic confirmation. During the physical exam, the size, location, and degree of involved skin surface area should be recorded. To detect changes in skin lesions, standardized photographs are encouraged at baseline and at each subsequent assessment. Obtaining a representative skin biopsy is the most important step in the diagnostic work-up. Imaging studies such as computed tomography (CT) and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans are required to evaluate extracutaneous disease (Fig. 1D). A bone marrow examination is not mandatory but is highly recommended.

The diagnosis of early-stage MF is challenging because the skin manifestations and biopsy findings may be misinterpreted as nonspecific and reactive changes. Many patients will have had other dermatologic presentations, such as nonspecific dermatitis, poikiloderma, or erythroderma and symptoms for years to decades before receiving a definitive diagnosis of MF [11, 27, 37]. For those patients, the clinical course should raise suspicion of MF even if the skin biopsy is non-diagnostic. Multiple skin biopsies, each consisting of at least 4-mm punch biopsy over the most indurated area are recommended. Topical treatment should be stopped for >2 weeks before the skin biopsy. The ISCL suggested diagnostic algorithm for early MF as shown in Table 1 [38].

Table 1 . Diagnostic algorithm for early Mycosis Fungoides [38]..

CriteriaScoring system
Clinical2 points for basic criteria and two additional criteria
1 point for basic criteria and one additional criterion
Basic
Persistent and/or progressive patches/thin plaques
Additional
1. Non-sun-exposed location
2. Size/shape variation
3. Poikiloderma
Histopathologic2 points for basic criteria and two additional criteria
1 point for basic criteria and one additional criterion
Basic
Superficial lymphoid infiltrate
Additional
1. Epidermotropism without spongiosis
2. Lymphoid atypiaa)
Molecular biologic1 point for clonality
1. Clonal T cell receptor gene rearrangement
Immunopathologic1 point for one or more criteria
1. <50% CD2+, CD3+, and/or CD5+ T cells
2. <10% CD7 T cells
3. Epidermal/dermal discordance of CD2, CD3, CD5, or CD7b)

a)Lymphoid atypia is defined as cells with enlarged hyperchromatic nuclei and irregular or cerebriform nuclear contours. b)T cell antigen deficiency confined to the epidermis..

A total of 4 points is required for the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides based on any combination of points from the clinical, histopathologic, molecular biologic, and immunopathologic criteria..

The characteristic histopathologic finding in a patch/plaque MF is an epidermotropic infiltration of neoplastic T cells (Fig. 1E, F). In early-stage, small cerebriform lymphocytes are observed in epidermis along the basal layer. When the disease progresses, denser band-like infiltration occurs, sometimes forming Pautrier’s micro-abscess, which are aggregates of tumor cells in the epidermis. It is not common, but they are specific for MF/SS. In tumor-stage, dense monomorphic infiltration of neoplastic lymphocytes involves the full thickness of dermis in nodular or diffuse pattern. In advanced stage MF and SS with blood involvement, lymphocytosis with typical grooved, cerebriform nuclei, so called Sézary cells, can be observed on peripheral blood smear (Fig. 1H).

There are some clinicopathologic variants of MF. Folliculotropic MF has a tropism for the epithelium of hair follicles, which often involves face and neck. Its manifestation includes a grouped papule, cysts, comedones, localized alopecia, and pseudo-tumors. Superficial form of this variant shows favorable survival similar to classic MF, however, a deep variant is associated with aggressive disease course and poor prognosis [39, 40]. Pagetoid reticulosis is a localized form with strong epidermotropism, generally involving distal areas of extremities [5]. It is usually indolent and can be treated with local radiation. Granulomatous slack skin is another rare variant of MF, which develops redundant skin slowly but progressively, typically in axillary and inguinal area. Histopathology of this variant shows dense infiltration of lymphocytes with granulomatous features and infiltration of atypical lymphocytes into the superficial layers with a variable distribution into the epidermis [5].

In MF/SS, malignant T-cells are predominantly CD4+, with a high CD4/CD8 ratio, and the aberrant loss of other pan-T-cell antigens, including CD2, CD3, CD5, and CD7. Immunohistochemical staining of biopsy specimens and flow cytometry of the peripheral blood can be facilitate the detection of clonal T-cells allowing a presumptive diagnosis of MF/SS. For SS, in addition to the morphological evaluation, multicolor flow cytometry is useful to detect Sézary cells, which are generally CD3+, CD4+ and CD8- [41]. The aberrant loss of other T-cell antigens, including CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7 and CD26, is a common finding, similar to the neoplastic cells found in MF [42-44]. The loss of CD7 or CD26 is sensitive and highly specific for SS [45].

Clonal gene rearrangement of the T-cell receptor (TCR) can be detected by PCR-based methods in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues [46]. Its sensitivity is high, but it should be cautiously interpreted because it may not be specific for malignancy, as it is also detected in older adults and in patients with benign diseases. The presence of identical T-cell clones in multiple sites is considered as specific for MF/SS [47], but cases of MF without a detectable T-cell clone have also been reported [48]. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a highly sensitive and specific approach to assessing the clonality of T cells in MF/SS [49, 50]. It will be helpful to make a diagnosis of MF, however, NGS also cannot discriminate T-cell clonality in early-stage MF from reactive lymphocytes completely [51]. The clonality of neoplastic T-cells can also be confirmed by flow cytometric analysis for TCR-β chain variable region family members (TCR-Vβ), in addition to PCR-based analysis. An altered ratio of two segments (C1 and C3) in TCR-β chain constant region is a useful biomarker of α/β T-cell clonality [52, 53].

In endemic areas, assays aimed at the detection of HTLV-I virus should be performed to aid in the differential diagnosis. In patients with extracutaneous lesions, such as in the lymph nodes, tissue should be obtained from those sites as well. Lymph node involvement is assessed according to the Lugano classification [54].

STAGING AND RISK ASSESSMENT

The revised tumor, node, metastasis, and blood (TNMB) staging system was established for the staging of MF/SS and includes several revisions to the original TNM staging system [30, 54, 55]. It is based on findings in the skin (T1–T4), lymph nodes (N0–N3), viscera (M0–M1), and blood (B0–B2) as shown in Table 2. A recent update by the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL), the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium (USCLC), and the EORTC includes the role of clonality testing in the determination of blood involvement and staging. Bone marrow involvement was also defined and added to the visceral staging. For clonality assessment, PCR-based detection of a TCR-γ/β gene rearrangement and NGS are recommended.

Table 2 . Mycosis Fungoides Cooperative Group TNMB classification of cutaneous T cell lymphoma [55]..

Skin (T)
T0Absence of clinically suspicious lesions
T1Patches, plaques, papules <10% BSA
T1aPatch only lesions
T1bPlaque/papule+/- patch lesions
T2Patches, plaques, papules ≥10% BSA
T2aPatch only lesions
T2bPlaque/papule+/- patch lesions
T3One or more tumors ≥1 cm diameter
T4Confluence of erythema covering ≥80% BSA
Node (N)
N0No clinically abnormal lymph nodes; biopsy not required
N1Clinically abnormal lymph nodes; pathology Dutch grade 1 or NCI LN 0-2
N1aClone negative or equivocal
N1bClone positive and identical to skin
N2Clinically abnormal lymph nodes; pathology Dutch grade 2 or NCI LN 3
N2aClone negative or equivocal
N2bClone positive and identical to skin
N3Clinically abnormal lymph nodes; pathology Dutch grade 3-4 or NCI LN 4
N3aClone negative or equivocal
N3bClone positive and identical to skin
NxClinically abnormal peripheral or central lymph node but no pathologic determination of representative lymph nodes. Other surrogate means of determining involvement may be determined by Tri-Society consensus
Visceral (M)
M0No visceral involvement
M1Visceral involvement
M1aBM only involvement; clone positive and identical to skin, clone negative or indeterminate
M1bNon-BM visceral involvement; clone positive and identical to skin, clone negative or indeterminate
MxVisceral involvement is neither confirmed nor refuted by available pathologic or imaging assessment
Blood (B)
B0No significant blood involvement: ≤5% of Sézary cells. For clinical trials, B0 may also be defined as <250/μL Sézary cells; CD4+CD26- or CD4+CD7- cells or CD4+CD26- and CD4+CD7- cells <15 % by flow cytometry
B0aClone negative or equivocal
B0bClone positive and identical to skin
B1Low blood tumor burden: does not meet the criteria of B0 or B2
B1aClone negative
B1bClone positive
B2High blood tumor burden: positive clone plus one of the following: ≥1,000/μL Sézary cells; CD4/CD8 ≥10; CD4+CD7- cells ≥40%; or CD4+CD26- cells ≥30%. For clinical trials, B2 may also be defined as >1,000/μL CD4+CD26- or CD4+CD7- cells.


As discussed above, SS is a unique form of advanced MF, defined by the presence of generalized erythroderma (T4) and of >1,000/μL Sézary cells in the peripheral blood (B2). Staging is based on the findings in the lymph nodes and/or visceral involvement and ranges from stage IVA1 to stage IVB. MF is diagnosed in patients with lymph node and/or visceral lesion but no B2 blood involvement.

Survival outcomes according to the staging system are shown in Table 3 [56]. Stage I–IIA is considered representative of early- or limited-stage disease. In these patients, overall survival (OS) is prolonged, measured in decades. In fact, the survival of patients with stage IA disease is comparable to that of the age-matched healthy population [27, 37]. Late- or advanced-stage diseases, defined as stage IIB or higher, are associated with a worse outcome; the median survival is <5 years. In patients with stage IVB disease, the median OS is 1.4 years, and 5-year survival is only 18% [56]. A recent meta-analysis reported a similar OS [57], as improvements resulting from new treatment approaches have yet to be included in survival analyses.

Table 3 . Clinical staging and prognosis of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome [56]..

Clinical stageTNMB classificationMedian OS (yr)
IAT1N0M0B0 or B135.5
IBT2N0M0B0 or B121.5
IIAT1 or T2N1 or N2M0B0 or B115.8
IIBT3N0 to N2M0B0 or B14.7
IIIAT4N0 to N2M0B04.7
IIIBT4N0 to N2M0B13.4
IVA1T1 to T4N0 to N2M0B23.8
IVA2T1 to T4N3M0B0 to B22.1
IVBT1 to T4N0 to N3M1B0 to B21.4


For a specific variant, considering its unique clinical course with relatively better prognosis, an alternative staging system for folliculotropic MF has been proposed [39, 58].

Clinical prognostic indices for early- and advanced-stage diseases have been investigated. For early-stage disease, the cutaneous lymphoma international prognostic index (CLIPi) has been widely used. Adverse prognostic factors include age (>60), sex (male), type of skin lesion (plaques or folliculotropic), and nodal stage (N1/Nx) [59]. The 10-year OS is 90.3% for low-risk disease (0–1 factors) and 48.9% for high-risk disease (3–5 factors).

For advanced-stage disease, the Cutaneous Lymphoma International Consortium (CLIC) suggested prognostic index, which included age >60 years, stage IV, elevated LDH level, and large cell transformation (LCT) as independent prognostic factors associated with worse survival outcomes [60]. The presence of large cells, which is frequently CD30+, may be seen in patient with MF/SS. LCT, increased large cell count >25% of the infiltrated lymphocytes, may occur in advanced-stage MF/SS and is associated with an adverse prognosis [61-64]. The 5-year OS is 68% in low-risk patients (0–1 factors) and 28% in high-risk patients (3–4 factors).

In addition, molecular biomarkers have been widely studied for the heterogenous MF/SS. Gene expression analysis showed 17 genes including IL2RA, CCR4, STAT5A, and TOX were associated with risk of disease progression in MF/SS and could distinguish MF from SS [65]. Later validation study showed that T-plastin and Twist are useful for the differential diagnosis of SS/MF from reactive changes and KIR3DL2 was associated with short response duration [66]. Several microRNAs, such as miR-223, miR-214, miR-486, and miR155, have been reported that their expression was prognostic, but it should be validated further [67-70]. Recent advances in technical analysis, high-throughput and more detailed analysis have been enabled; constitutive activation of oncogenic signaling pathway such as JAK-STAT signaling, altered cell cycle regulation, and epigenetic remodeling [71]. Mutations in genes involving T-cell activation, apoptosis, NF-kB signaling, and DNA repair, and frequent copy number variations in driver mutations have been demonstrated [22]. These findings enabled to understand the pathogenesis of MF/SS better and gave new insights into new therapeutic strategy as well as precise diagnosis and risk assessment. Detailed list of suggested biomarkers for MF/SS are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

TREATMENT OF MF/SS

Treatment of early-stage MF

Early-stage (IA-IIA) MF is an indolent disease that primarily involves the skin. Treatment is focused on skin-directed therapies rather than systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy, given the excellent survival outcomes of these patients. The main therapeutic goal for early-stage MF is the relief of symptoms (pruritus, pain, abnormal sensation, and cosmetic restoration). Less toxic but nonetheless effective treatments should be chosen to reduce the risk of disease progression. Thus, treatment should be determined according to disease extent, age, comorbidity, treatment availability, and safety profiles.

Skin-directed therapies include topical corticosteroids, retinoids, mechlorethamine, and imiquimod, localized radiation, total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT), and phototherapy with the latter consisting of narrow band ultraviolet B (NBUVB) and psoralen with ultraviolet A (PUVA) (Fig. 2). Systemic therapies including oral bexarotene, interferon, immunomodulating agents, monoclonal antibodies, and targeted agents, can be used in patients with refractory disease and extensive symptoms. In this setting, drugs with a better safety profile are generally preferred, such as oral bexarotene and low-dose methotrexate.

Figure 2. Therapeutic options for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome based on the stage of disease.

The most common first-line therapy is topical corticosteroids, such as clobetasol propionate. Its efficacy was established based on retrospective reports of an overall response rate (ORR) of 95% for stage IA/IB disease and minimal toxicity [72, 73]. Topical mechlorethamine (0.02% gel) was evaluated in a phase II trial for stage IA-IIA MF, in which an ORR of 58.5% and a complete response rate (CRR) of 13.8% with some contact dermatitis and irritation were reported [74].

For refractory or persistent skin lesions, bexarotene (retinoic acid, 1% gel) can be used; its ORR in prospective trials ranged from 44 to 63% [75]. Topical bexarotene and other retinoids may cause excessive skin irritation when applied over large areas and are thus appropriate only for stage IA disease.

Topical toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists induce the production of cytokines, such as interferons, leading to anti-tumor immunity [76]. Studies of imiquimod, a TLR7 agonist, reported an ORR of 80% and a CRR of 45% [76, 77]. Fatigue and flu-like symptoms were reported as side effects but were rare. Clinical improvement and a reduction of neoplastic cells were also demonstrated for the TLR7/8 agonist resiquimod [78].

Generally, a topical corticosteroid, mechlorethamine, or phototherapy is recommended as the initial treatment. However, for patients with very severe symptoms and generalized, thick plaques, TSEBT will likely be more effective. In patients with disease relapse or failure to respond to one skin-directed therapy, another topical therapy or a combined strategy should be considered before systemic therapy is provided.

Phototherapy (UVB or PUVA), alone or in combination with other agents, is another effective skin-directed therapy. Either UVB or PUVA is indicated in patients with stage IA-IIA MF [79], but thick plaques or folliculotropic MF may be more responsive to PUVA because of its superior skin penetration. PUVA is also the first choice in patients of color, including Asians. A consensus guideline for phototherapy was published by the USCLC [80].

For localized MF refractory to topical agents, local radiation may be considered, especially in patients with a single skin lesion. In patients with widely distributed lesions, TSEBT using low-dose radiation may be effective [81].

Treatment of advanced-stage disease

The goal of therapy in patients with advanced-stage disease is not only symptom relief and long-term disease control but also the prolongation of survival. The treatment modality should be chosen based on the goals of therapy at different time points during the disease course (Fig. 2). For long-term disease control, agents without cumulative toxicities or immunosuppression are a good choice whereas the treatment of life-threatening disease requires curative but more toxic therapies.

For patients with localized skin involvement, skin-directed therapies can be applied with or without systemic therapy. In those with extensive skin involvement or visceral involvement, systemic therapy is required. TSEBT in combination with systemic therapy is preferred for generalized diseases, however, its use in patients with erythroderma may be contraindicated because of the risk of severe desquamation [81].

Systemic therapy ranges from immunomodulatory drugs (bexarotene, interferon, and low-dose methotrexate) to targeted agents, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors (vorinostat and romidepsin), monoclonal antibodies (alemtuzumab), antibody-drug conjugates (brentuximab vedotin and mogamulizumab), immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab), and other investigational drugs. Data on commonly used systemic therapies are provided in Table 4. Most traditional agents have been used based on the results of phase II or retrospective studies; consequently, their true efficacies are often unclear. Novel agents targeting the unique biology of MF/SS have been recently introduced. Their superior efficacy over historical systemic therapies has been demonstrated in randomized phase III trials. With increasing therapeutic options, the decision regarding the optical treatment approach has become more complicated.

Table 4 . Systemic therapies for refractory or advanced-stage mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome..

ReferenceAgentsPhasePrior Txa)NOutcomesComments
Duvic et al. 2001 [82]BexaroteneII/III256ORR 45% (CRR 2%)Pancreatitis, hypertriglyceridemia, thyroid dysfunction
Zinzani et al. 2000 [103]GemcitabineII344ORR 70.5% (CRR 11.5%)Myelosuppression, elevated hepatic enzyme
Dummer et al. 2012 [102]Peg-L-doxorubicinII249ORR 40.8% (CR 6.1%)Myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity
Duvic et al. 2007 [93]VorinostatII533ORR 24.2% (CRR 0%)Fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, thrombocytopenia, abnormal echocardiogram
Whittaker et al. 2010 [96]RomidepsinII496ORR 38% (CR 5%)IB-IVA
GI disturbances, asthenic conditions, ECG changes
Prince et al. 2017 [99] (ALCANZA)Brentuximab vedotin vs. MTX or bexaroteneIII, RCT3131ORR4 50% vs. 10%CD30+ (≥10%) MF (SS excluded)
PFS 16.1 vs. 3.5 MPeripheral neuropathy in 66% (9% Gr3), discontinuation in 14%
Kim et al. 2018 [94] (MAVORIC)Mogamulizumab vs. vorinostatIII, RCT186ORR 28% vs. 5% (68% in blood)Stage IB-IVB MF/SS (LCT excluded)
Infusion related reaction, thrombocytopenia, drug eruption, discontinuation in 7%
Khodadoust et al. 2020 [101]PembrolizumabII424ORR 38% (CRR 8%)IIB-IV
Cutaneous flare reaction (without discontinuation)

a)Prior Tx means median number of lines of previous therapy..

Abbreviations: CRR, complete response rate; MTX, methotrexate; ORR, overall response rate..

For MF and SS, the response to treatment should be assessed based on overall skin, nodal, visceral, and blood responses. In early clinical trials and retrospective reports, response criteria and outcome endpoints were not uniformly defined. In 2011 and 2022, the ISCL/USCLC/EORTC published consensus recommendations for clinical end points for MF/SS (Supplementary Table 2) [54, 55].

The systemic use of bexarotene, an oral retinoid-X receptor-selective retinoic acid, was first approved by the FDA in 1999, prior to the development of the topical agent. In a multicenter phase II/III trial, patients who received 300 mg bexarotene/m2/day had an ORR 0f 45% [82]. Common toxicities included hypertriglyceridemia, pancreatitis, and hypothyroidism and were dose dependent. Treatment for >6 months without adjuvant therapy, until disease progression if the drug is well-tolerated, is recommended [83].

Interferon α-2b or γ-1b is another immunomodulatory agent used in the treatment of MF/SS. An ORR of 50–70% and a CRR of 20–30% have been reported [84, 85]. In patients with early-stage disease, interferon can be a second-line option, and in those with advanced-stage disease, including tumor-stage lesions, a first-line option. Interferon can also be successfully combined with other skin-directed therapies, such as PUVA, bexarotene, and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) [86], a type of phototherapy in which psoralen exposure precedes extracorporeal circulation. Psoralen binds to DNA after UVA radiation and leads to apoptosis of lymphocytes as well as an enhanced host immune response induced by monocyte activation and dendritic cell differentiation [87, 88]. Following a landmark report of a response in 73% of patients, ECP has become a first line treatment for advanced-stage MF and SS [89]. A favorable response around rate of 60% and a durable response of >8 years in patients with a complete response have been reported [90, 91]. The median time to response is 6 months, but the long-term use of ECP may be associated iron deficiency. ECP can also be combined with other therapies.

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have an established safety profile, and their potential efficacy has been demonstrated in phase I studies for T-cell lymphomas, including some CTCLs [92]. A phase II trial for vorinostat showed an acceptable and durable response (ORR of 30% for a median 185 days in patients with advanced-stage disease) [93]. However, in the MAVORIC trial, vorinostat was inferior to mogamulizumab [94]. Romidepsin, evaluated in phase II trials, resulted in an ORR of 38% that was durable for >1 year in advanced-stage disease [95, 96]. With maintenance at a lower dosing schedule, responders achieved a durable response of 7–34 (median 15) months [97]. For both HDAC inhibitors, QT prolongation and cardiac toxicity are potential complications and should be monitored regularly [98].

Based on the phase III ALCANZA and MAVORIC trials, both BV and mogamulizumab were approved by the FDA, for patients with relapsed or refractory disease [94, 99]. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and mogamulizumab are novel agents that have been evaluated in randomized phase III trials. In the ALCANZA trial, the efficacy and safety of BV compared with physician’s choice of therapy (methotrexate or bexarotene) were investigated [99]. The ORR4 (lasting at least 4 mo) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 50% and 16.1 months in the BV group vs. 10% and 3.5 months in the control group. After 1 year, 34.5% of patients in the BV group but 86.6% of those in the control group required next-line treatment. The efficacy of BV was observed at any level of CD30 expression and was independent of the presence of LCT. Mogamulizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody for the chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) that enhances antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and inhibits Treg-mediated immune suppression, leading to anti-tumor activity against MF/SS. In the above-mentioned MAVORIC trial, a randomized phase III study, mogamulizumab was tested for its efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory CTCL and resulted in a better ORR and PFS than achieved in patients treated with vorinostat (28% vs. 5% and 7.7 vs. 3.1 mo) [94]. A favorable response in the blood compartment, frequently involved in SS, was evidenced by an ORR of 68%. The side effects of mogamulizumab included drug eruptions, which were mostly tolerable and not a cause of drug discontinuation.

Clinical features may guide the choice of a systemic therapy in patients with specific disease phenotypes. Romidepsin or mogamulizumab may be beneficial for patients with a high blood burden. The reported response rate in the blood compartment was 54% and 68%, respectively [94-96]. The median response duration in the subgroup of mogamulizumab treated patients with a blood response was 26 months. There is as yet no evidence of the efficacy of BV in the blood compartment, such that SS patients were excluded from the ALCANZA trial. Because patients with generalized erythroderma frequently have blood involvement, a similar strategy may be followed. For lymph node involvement, romidepsin, pralatrexate and BV are effective, as shown in clinical trials that included patients with CTCL and peripheral T-cell lymphoma. In the ALCANZA study, the extracutaneous response rate at 4 months was 46% in the BV-treated group vs. 9% in the control group [99]. However, in the MAVORIC trial, the nodal response rate to mogamulizumab was 17% [94]. LCT is a significant adverse factor in MF/SS patients and should be considered in the selection of systemic therapy. Although CCR4 is commonly expressed in transformed cells, mogamulizumab failed to show activity in patients with LCT in early-phase trials [100]. Thus, in the phase III MAVORIC trial, patients with LCT were excluded [94].

The feasible activity of immunomodulatory agents against MF/SS and the observation of high PD-L1 expression in some CTCLs have raised interest in immune checkpoint inhibitors. In a phase II trial of pembrolizumab [101], the ORR was 38%. However, the role of checkpoint inhibitors in the management of MF/SS has yet to be fully investigated.

For refractory and aggressive disease, cytotoxic chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin, can be considered for disease control [102, 103]. Patients with very aggressive disease and thus with a reduced survival, such as those with LCT or B2 disease, will require curative agents that provide a rapid and strong response. The treatment strategy developed for aggressive T-cell lymphomas may be effective.

Despite the introduction of novel agents, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the only curative modality in patients with advanced-stage MF/SS, although the data are thus far limited. Based on registry data, the 5-year PFS and OS were 17% and 32% with a 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 19% [104]. Similar results were reported in a systematic review and meta-analysis, in which the relapse rate was 47% and the NRM 19% [105]. Earlier transplantation in patients with CR1/CR2 or in those with relapse after a maximum of three systemic therapies were associated with a better outcome [106]; however, the optimal timing of allogeneic SCT is unclear yet. High-risk patients with an expected survival of <5 years may be a candidate for allogeneic SCT. As a bridging therapy, BV can be used without increasing pre- and post-transplant toxicities [107]. However, mogamulizumab should be considered cautiously because of its association with severe acute graft-versus-host disease as well as a report of treatment-related/non-relapse mortality in a study of other types of lymphoma [108].

CONCLUSION

MF/SS is a rare but distinct disease entity that is highly heterogenous with respect to its clinical features and prognosis. Recent progress in understanding the pathogenesis of MF/SS has contributed to advances in the diagnosis, staging, and risk assessment of MF/SS as well as to the development of novel therapies. However, with accumulating data obtained from studies of novel drugs, decisions regarding the optimal form of therapy and its timing are becoming increasingly complex. The efficacy and safety of combination therapies should be investigated further. Well-designed clinical trials are warranted and the participation of patients in those trials is encouraged.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I appreciate Dr. Weon Seo Park, Dr. Hyo Eun Shim, Dr. Jong Heon Jung, and Dr. Hyeon-Seok Eom at National Cancer Center, Korea, for providing clinicopathological photographs and their insightful comments on this article.

Authors’ Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Fig 1.

Download
Figure 1.Clinical manifestation and pathologic findings. Patchy (A), plaque (B), and tumor-type (C) skin lesions in a patient with advanced stage mycosis fungoides. PET scan showed FDG-uptake on large extent plaque and tumor stage lesions and axillary lymph nodes (D). Histology of plaque-type MF lesion with epidermotropic infiltration of lymphocytes, in which clonality of TCR gene rearrangement was confirmed (E). Higher resolution of E, representing grouped aggregation of large lymphocytes in the epidermis, forming early form of Pautrier’s micro-abscess (F). Generalized erythroderma in a patient with Sézary syndrome (G). Atypical lymphocyte with cerebriform nuclei, so called ‘Sézary cell’, was observed on peripheral blood smear (H).
Blood Research 2023; 58: S66-S82https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2023023

Fig 2.

Download
Figure 2.Therapeutic options for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome based on the stage of disease.
Blood Research 2023; 58: S66-S82https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2023023

Table 1 . Diagnostic algorithm for early Mycosis Fungoides [38]..

CriteriaScoring system
Clinical2 points for basic criteria and two additional criteria
1 point for basic criteria and one additional criterion
Basic
Persistent and/or progressive patches/thin plaques
Additional
1. Non-sun-exposed location
2. Size/shape variation
3. Poikiloderma
Histopathologic2 points for basic criteria and two additional criteria
1 point for basic criteria and one additional criterion
Basic
Superficial lymphoid infiltrate
Additional
1. Epidermotropism without spongiosis
2. Lymphoid atypiaa)
Molecular biologic1 point for clonality
1. Clonal T cell receptor gene rearrangement
Immunopathologic1 point for one or more criteria
1. <50% CD2+, CD3+, and/or CD5+ T cells
2. <10% CD7 T cells
3. Epidermal/dermal discordance of CD2, CD3, CD5, or CD7b)

a)Lymphoid atypia is defined as cells with enlarged hyperchromatic nuclei and irregular or cerebriform nuclear contours. b)T cell antigen deficiency confined to the epidermis..

A total of 4 points is required for the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides based on any combination of points from the clinical, histopathologic, molecular biologic, and immunopathologic criteria..

Table 2 . Mycosis Fungoides Cooperative Group TNMB classification of cutaneous T cell lymphoma [55]..

Skin (T)
T0Absence of clinically suspicious lesions
T1Patches, plaques, papules <10% BSA
T1aPatch only lesions
T1bPlaque/papule+/- patch lesions
T2Patches, plaques, papules ≥10% BSA
T2aPatch only lesions
T2bPlaque/papule+/- patch lesions
T3One or more tumors ≥1 cm diameter
T4Confluence of erythema covering ≥80% BSA
Node (N)
N0No clinically abnormal lymph nodes; biopsy not required
N1Clinically abnormal lymph nodes; pathology Dutch grade 1 or NCI LN 0-2
N1aClone negative or equivocal
N1bClone positive and identical to skin
N2Clinically abnormal lymph nodes; pathology Dutch grade 2 or NCI LN 3
N2aClone negative or equivocal
N2bClone positive and identical to skin
N3Clinically abnormal lymph nodes; pathology Dutch grade 3-4 or NCI LN 4
N3aClone negative or equivocal
N3bClone positive and identical to skin
NxClinically abnormal peripheral or central lymph node but no pathologic determination of representative lymph nodes. Other surrogate means of determining involvement may be determined by Tri-Society consensus
Visceral (M)
M0No visceral involvement
M1Visceral involvement
M1aBM only involvement; clone positive and identical to skin, clone negative or indeterminate
M1bNon-BM visceral involvement; clone positive and identical to skin, clone negative or indeterminate
MxVisceral involvement is neither confirmed nor refuted by available pathologic or imaging assessment
Blood (B)
B0No significant blood involvement: ≤5% of Sézary cells. For clinical trials, B0 may also be defined as <250/μL Sézary cells; CD4+CD26- or CD4+CD7- cells or CD4+CD26- and CD4+CD7- cells <15 % by flow cytometry
B0aClone negative or equivocal
B0bClone positive and identical to skin
B1Low blood tumor burden: does not meet the criteria of B0 or B2
B1aClone negative
B1bClone positive
B2High blood tumor burden: positive clone plus one of the following: ≥1,000/μL Sézary cells; CD4/CD8 ≥10; CD4+CD7- cells ≥40%; or CD4+CD26- cells ≥30%. For clinical trials, B2 may also be defined as >1,000/μL CD4+CD26- or CD4+CD7- cells.

Table 3 . Clinical staging and prognosis of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome [56]..

Clinical stageTNMB classificationMedian OS (yr)
IAT1N0M0B0 or B135.5
IBT2N0M0B0 or B121.5
IIAT1 or T2N1 or N2M0B0 or B115.8
IIBT3N0 to N2M0B0 or B14.7
IIIAT4N0 to N2M0B04.7
IIIBT4N0 to N2M0B13.4
IVA1T1 to T4N0 to N2M0B23.8
IVA2T1 to T4N3M0B0 to B22.1
IVBT1 to T4N0 to N3M1B0 to B21.4

Table 4 . Systemic therapies for refractory or advanced-stage mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome..

ReferenceAgentsPhasePrior Txa)NOutcomesComments
Duvic et al. 2001 [82]BexaroteneII/III256ORR 45% (CRR 2%)Pancreatitis, hypertriglyceridemia, thyroid dysfunction
Zinzani et al. 2000 [103]GemcitabineII344ORR 70.5% (CRR 11.5%)Myelosuppression, elevated hepatic enzyme
Dummer et al. 2012 [102]Peg-L-doxorubicinII249ORR 40.8% (CR 6.1%)Myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity
Duvic et al. 2007 [93]VorinostatII533ORR 24.2% (CRR 0%)Fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, thrombocytopenia, abnormal echocardiogram
Whittaker et al. 2010 [96]RomidepsinII496ORR 38% (CR 5%)IB-IVA
GI disturbances, asthenic conditions, ECG changes
Prince et al. 2017 [99] (ALCANZA)Brentuximab vedotin vs. MTX or bexaroteneIII, RCT3131ORR4 50% vs. 10%CD30+ (≥10%) MF (SS excluded)
PFS 16.1 vs. 3.5 MPeripheral neuropathy in 66% (9% Gr3), discontinuation in 14%
Kim et al. 2018 [94] (MAVORIC)Mogamulizumab vs. vorinostatIII, RCT186ORR 28% vs. 5% (68% in blood)Stage IB-IVB MF/SS (LCT excluded)
Infusion related reaction, thrombocytopenia, drug eruption, discontinuation in 7%
Khodadoust et al. 2020 [101]PembrolizumabII424ORR 38% (CRR 8%)IIB-IV
Cutaneous flare reaction (without discontinuation)

a)Prior Tx means median number of lines of previous therapy..

Abbreviations: CRR, complete response rate; MTX, methotrexate; ORR, overall response rate..

References

  1. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood 2016;127:2375-90.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Jawed SI, Myskowski PL, Horwitz S, Moskowitz A, Querfeld C. Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome): part I. Diagnosis: clinical and histopathologic features and new molecular and biologic markers. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;70:205, e1-16; quiz 221-2.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Korgavkar K, Xiong M, Weinstock M. Changing incidence trends of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. JAMA Dermatol 2013;149:1295-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Willemze R, Jaffe ES, Burg G, et al. WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood 2005;105:3768-85.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Willemze R, Cerroni L, Kempf W, et al. The 2018 update of the WHO-EORTC classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas. Blood 2019;133:1703-14.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Alaggio R, Amador C, Anagnostopoulos I, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: lymphoid neoplasms. Leukemia 2022;36:1720-48.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Campo E, Jaffe ES, Cook JR, et al. The International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms: a report from the Clinical Advisory Committee. Blood 2022;140:1229-53.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Sant M, Allemani C, Tereanu C, et al. Incidence of hematologic malignancies in Europe by morphologic subtype: results of the HAEMACARE project. Blood 2010;116:3724-34.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Criscione VD, Weinstock MA. Incidence of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in the United States, 1973-2002. Arch Dermatol 2007;143:854-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Bradford PT, Devesa SS, Anderson WF, Toro JR. Cutaneous lymphoma incidence patterns in the United States: a population- based study of 3884 cases. Blood 2009;113:5064-73.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Jung JM, Lim DJ, Won CH, Chang SE, Lee MW, Lee WJ. Mycosis fungoides in children and adolescents: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol 2021;157:431-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Johnson WT, Kartan S, Sokol K, Nikbakht N, Porcu P. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of black patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a subgroup analysis of the phase III MAVORIC trial. Leuk Lymphoma 2021;62:1877-83.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Geller S, Lebowitz E, Pulitzer MP, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in African American and black patients with mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome: retrospective analysis of 157 patients from a referral cancer center. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;83:430-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Lee H, Park HJ, Park EH, et al. Nationwide statistical analysis of lymphoid malignancies in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 2018;50:222-38.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Whittemore AS, Holly EA, Lee IM, et al. Mycosis fungoides in relation to environmental exposures and immune response: a case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:1560-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Hall WW, Liu CR, Schneewind O, et al. Deleted HTLV-I provirus in blood and cutaneous lesions of patients with mycosis fungoides. Science 1991;253:317-20.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Ghosh SK, Abrams JT, Terunuma H, Vonderheid EC, DeFreitas E. Human T-cell leukemia virus type I tax/rex DNA and RNA in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 1994;84:2663-71.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Jackow CM, McHam JB, Friss A, Alvear J, Reveille JR, Duvic M. HLA-DR5 and DQB1*03 class II alleles are associated with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Invest Dermatol 1996;107:373-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Hodak E, Lapidoth M, Kohn K, et al. Mycosis fungoides: HLA class II associations among Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi Jewish patients. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:974-80.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Hodak E, Klein T, Gabay B, et al. Familial mycosis fungoides: report of 6 kindreds and a study of the HLA system. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;52:393-402.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Song X, Chang S, Seminario-Vidal L, et al. Genomic and single-cell landscape reveals novel drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities of transformed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Cancer Discov 2022;12:1294-313.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Choi J, Goh G, Walradt T, et al. Genomic landscape of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Nat Genet 2015;47:1011-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Wilcox RA. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2017;92:1085-102.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Wilcox R. A new molecular paradigm in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Semin Diagn Pathol 2017;34:15-21.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Ahern K, Gilmore ES, Poligone B. Pruritus in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;67:760-8.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Demierre MF, Gan S, Jones J, Miller DR. Significant impact of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma on patients' quality of life: results of a 2005 National Cutaneous Lymphoma Foundation Survey. Cancer 2006;107:2504-11.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Kim YH, Liu HL, Mraz-Gernhard S, Varghese A, Hoppe RT. Long-term outcome of 525 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: clinical prognostic factors and risk for disease progression. Arch Dermatol 2003;139:857-66.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Bi MY, Curry JL, Christiano AM, et al. The spectrum of hair loss in patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64:53-63.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Steffen C. The man behind the eponym dermatology in historical perspective: Albert Sézary and the Sézary syndrome. Am J Dermatopathol 2006;28:357-67.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Olsen E, Vonderheid E, Pimpinelli N, et al. Revisions to the staging and classification of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a proposal of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) and the cutaneous lymphoma task force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Blood 2007;110:1713-22.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Vonderheid EC, Diamond LW, van Vloten WA, et al. Lymph node classification systems in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Evidence for the utility of the Working Formulation of Non- Hodgkin's Lymphomas for Clinical Usage. Cancer 1994;73:207-18.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Morales MM, Olsen J, Johansen P, et al. Viral infection, atopy and mycosis fungoides: a European multicentre case-control study. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:511-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Baser S, Onn A, Lin E, Morice RC, Duvic M. Pulmonary manifestations in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Cancer 2007;109:1550-5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Krejsgaard T, Odum N, Geisler C, Wasik MA, Woetmann A. Regulatory T cells and immunodeficiency in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Leukemia 2012;26:424-32.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Goyal A, O'Leary D, Goyal K, Rubin N, Janakiram M. Screening for second malignancies in mycosis fungoides: non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, lung cancer, bladder cancer and melanoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021;35:1821-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Huang KP, Weinstock MA, Clarke CA, McMillan A, Hoppe RT, Kim YH. Second lymphomas and other malignant neoplasms in patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: evidence from population-based and clinical cohorts. Arch Dermatol 2007;143:45-50.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. van Doorn R, Van Haselen CW, van Voorst Vader PC, et al. Mycosis fungoides: disease evolution and prognosis of 309 Dutch patients. Arch Dermatol 2000;136:504-10.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Pimpinelli N, Olsen EA, Santucci M, et al. Defining early mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;53:1053-63.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. van Santen S, Roach RE, van Doorn R, et al. Clinical staging and prognostic factors in folliculotropic mycosis fungoides. JAMA Dermatol 2016;152:992-1000.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Muniesa C, Estrach T, Pujol RM, et al. Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides: clinicopathological features and outcome in a series of 20 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;62:418-26.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Vonderheid EC, Bernengo MG, Burg G, et al. Update on erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: report of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46:95-106.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Hristov AC, Vonderheid EC, Borowitz MJ. Simplified flow cytometric assessment in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:944-53.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Jones D, Dang NH, Duvic M, Washington LT, Huh YO. Absence of CD26 expression is a useful marker for diagnosis of T-cell lymphoma in peripheral blood. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;115:885-92.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Ginaldi L, Matutes E, Farahat N, De Martinis M, Morilla R, Catovsky D. Differential expression of CD3 and CD7 in T-cell malignancies: a quantitative study by flow cytometry. Br J Haematol 1996;93:921-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Boonk SE, Zoutman WH, Marie-Cardine A, et al. Evaluation of immunophenotypic and molecular biomarkers for Sézary syndrome using standard operating procedures: a multicenter study of 59 patients. J Invest Dermatol 2016;136:1364-72.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Ponti R, Quaglino P, Novelli M, et al. T-cell receptor gamma gene rearrangement by multiplex polymerase chain reaction/heteroduplex analysis in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome) and benign inflammatory disease: correlation with clinical, histological and immunophenotypical findings. Br J Dermatol 2005;153:565-73.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Thurber SE, Zhang B, Kim YH, Schrijver I, Zehnder J, Kohler S. T-cell clonality analysis in biopsy specimens from two different skin sites shows high specificity in the diagnosis of patients with suggested mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;57:782-90.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Rojansky R, Fernandez-Pol S, Wang E, et al. Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas with pathogenic somatic mutations and absence of detectable clonal T-cell receptor gene rearrangement: two case reports. Diagn Pathol 2020;15:122.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  49. Sufficool KE, Lockwood CM, Abel HJ, et al. T-cell clonality assessment by next-generation sequencing improves detection sensitivity in mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;73:228-36, e2.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Rea B, Haun P, Emerson R, et al. Role of high-throughput sequencing in the diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Pathol 2018;71:814-20.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Gibbs JD, Ma S, Kim A, et al. Utility of flow cytometry and gene rearrangement analysis in tissue and blood of patients with suspected cutaneous T‑cell lymphoma. Oncol Rep 2021;45:349-58.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  52. Horna P, Shi M, Jevremovic D, Craig FE, Comfere NI, Olteanu H. Utility of TRBC1 expression in the diagnosis of peripheral blood involvement by cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Invest Dermatol 2021;141:821-9, e2.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  53. Horna P, Shi M, Olteanu H, Johansson U. Emerging role of T-cell receptor constant beta chain-1 (TRBC1) expression in the flow cytometric diagnosis of T-cell malignancies. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:1817.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Olsen EA, Whittaker S, Willemze R, et al. Primary cutaneous lymphoma: recommendations for clinical trial design and staging update from the ISCL, USCLC, and EORTC. Blood 2022;140:419-37.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Olsen EA, Whittaker S, Kim YH, et al. Clinical end points and response criteria in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a consensus statement of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas, the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium, and the Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2598-607.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  56. Agar NS, Wedgeworth E, Crichton S, et al. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome: validation of the revised International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer staging proposal. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4730-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Mourad A, Gniadecki R. Overall survival in mycosis fungoides: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest Dermatol 2020;140:495-7, e5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Charli-Joseph Y, Kashani-Sabet M, McCalmont TH, et al. Association of a proposed new staging system for folliculotropic mycosis fungoides with prognostic variables in a US cohort. JAMA Dermatol 2021;157:157-65.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Benton EC, Crichton S, Talpur R, et al. A cutaneous lymphoma international prognostic index (CLIPi) for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:2859-68.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. Scarisbrick JJ, Prince HM, Vermeer MH, et al. Cutaneous Lymphoma International Consortium Study of Outcome in Advanced Stages of Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: effect of specific prognostic markers on survival and development of a prognostic model. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:3766-73.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  61. Vergier B, de Muret A, Beylot-Barry M, et al. Transformation of mycosis fungoides: clinicopathological and prognostic features of 45 cases. French Study Group of Cutaneious Lymphomas. Blood 2000;95:2212-8.
  62. Salhany KE, Cousar JB, Greer JP, Casey TT, Fields JP, Collins RD. Transformation of cutaneous T cell lymphoma to large cell lymphoma. A clinicopathologic and immunologic study. Am J Pathol 1988;132:265-77.
    Pubmed KoreaMed
  63. Greer JP, Salhany KE, Cousar JB, et al. Clinical features associated with transformation of cerebriform T-cell lymphoma to a large cell process. Hematol Oncol 1990;8:215-27.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  64. Diamandidou E, Colome-Grimmer M, Fayad L, Duvic M, Kurzrock R. Transformation of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome: clinical characteristics and prognosis. Blood 1998;92:1150-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  65. Litvinov IV, Netchiporouk E, Cordeiro B, et al. The use of transcriptional profiling to improve personalized diagnosis and management of cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL). Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:2820-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  66. Dobos G, De Cevins C, Ly Ka So S, et al. The value of five blood markers in differentiating mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a validation cohort. Br J Dermatol 2021;185:405-11.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  67. Sandoval J, Diaz-Lagares A, Salgado R, et al. MicroRNA expression profiling and DNA methylation signature for deregulated microRNA in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Invest Dermatol 2015;135:1128-37.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  68. Ralfkiaer U, Hagedorn PH, Bangsgaard N, et al. Diagnostic microRNA profiling in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Blood 2011;118:5891-900.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  69. Narducci MG, Arcelli D, Picchio MC, et al. MicroRNA profiling reveals that miR-21, miR486 and miR-214 are upregulated and involved in cell survival in Sézary syndrome. Cell Death Dis 2011;2:e151.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  70. Ballabio E, Mitchell T, van Kester MS, et al. MicroRNA expression in Sézary syndrome: identification, function, and diagnostic potential. Blood 2010;116:1105-13.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  71. Tensen CP, Quint KD, Vermeer MH. Genetic and epigenetic insights into cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2022;139:15-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  72. Zackheim HS, Kashani-Sabet M, Amin S. Topical corticosteroids for mycosis fungoides. Experience in 79 patients. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:949-54.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  73. Demierre MF, Kim YH, Zackheim HS. Prognosis, clinical outcomes and quality of life issues in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2003;17:1485-507.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  74. Kim EJ, Guitart J, Querfeld C, et al. The PROVe study: US real-world experience with chlormethine/mechlorethamine gel in combination with other therapies for patients with mycosis fungoides cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Am J Clin Dermatol 2021;22:407-14.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  75. Breneman D, Duvic M, Kuzel T, Yocum R, Truglia J, Stevens VJ. Phase 1 and 2 trial of bexarotene gel for skin-directed treatment of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Arch Dermatol 2002;138:325-32.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  76. Huen AO, Rook AH. Toll receptor agonist therapy of skin cancer and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Curr Opin Oncol 2014;26:237-44.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  77. Shipman AR, Scarisbrick J. New treatment options for mycosis fungoides. Indian J Dermatol 2016;61:119.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  78. Rook AH, Gelfand JM, Wysocka M, et al. Topical resiquimod can induce disease regression and enhance T-cell effector functions in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2015;126:1452-61.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  79. Gathers RC, Scherschun L, Malick F, Fivenson DP, Lim HW. Narrowband UVB phototherapy for early-stage mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;47:191-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  80. Olsen EA, Hodak E, Anderson T, et al. Guidelines for phototherapy of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a consensus statement of the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016;74:27-58.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  81. Hoppe RT, Harrison C, Tavallaee M, et al. Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy as an effective modality to reduce disease burden in patients with mycosis fungoides: results of a pooled analysis from 3 phase-II clinical trials. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;72:286-92.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  82. Duvic M, Hymes K, Heald P, et al. Bexarotene is effective and safe for treatment of refractory advanced-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: multinational phase II-III trial results. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2456-71.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  83. Huber MA, Kunzi-Rapp K, Staib G, Scharffetter-Kochanek K. Management of refractory early-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides) with a combination of oral bexarotene and psoralen plus ultraviolet bath therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;50:475-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  84. Jumbou O, N'Guyen JM, Tessier MH, Legoux B, Dréno B. Long-term follow-up in 51 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome treated by interferon-alfa. Br J Dermatol 1999;140:427-31.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  85. Olsen EA, Rosen ST, Vollmer RT, et al. Interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;20:395-407.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  86. Suchin KR, Cucchiara AJ, Gottleib SL, et al. Treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with combined immunomodulatory therapy: a 14-year experience at a single institution. Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1054-60.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  87. Ventura A, Vassall A, Yurter A, et al. Novel protocol for generating physiologic immunogenic dendritic cells. J Vis Exp 2019;147:e59370.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  88. Tatsuno K, Yamazaki T, Hanlon D, et al. Extracorporeal photo-chemotherapy induces bona fide immunogenic cell death. Cell Death Dis 2019;10:578.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  89. Edelson R, Berger C, Gasparro F, et al. Treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma by extracorporeal photochemotherapy. Preliminary results. N Engl J Med 1987;316:297-303.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  90. Zic JA, Stricklin GP, Greer JP, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma treated with extra-corporeal photochemotherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;35:935-45.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  91. Sanford KW, Anderson J, Roseff S, McPherson RA. Iron deficiency anemia in patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Lab Med 2019;50:29-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  92. Prince HM, Bishton MJ, Harrison SJ. Clinical studies of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:3958-69.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  93. Duvic M, Talpur R, Ni X, et al. Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Blood 2007;109:31-9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  94. Kim YH, Bagot M, Pinter-Brown L, et al. Mogamulizumab versus vorinostat in previously treated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (MAVORIC): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:1192-204.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  95. Kim EJ, Kim YH, Rook AH, et al. Clinically significant responses achieved with romidepsin across disease compartments in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2015;56:2847-54.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  96. Whittaker SJ, Demierre MF, Kim EJ, et al. Final results from a multicenter, international, pivotal study of romidepsin in refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4485-91.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  97. Martinez-Escala ME, Kuzel TM, Kaplan JB, et al. Durable responses with maintenance dose-sparing regimens of romidepsin in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. JAMA Oncol 2016;2:790-3.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  98. Piekarz RL, Frye AR, Wright JJ, et al. Cardiac studies in patients treated with depsipeptide, FK228, in a phase II trial for T-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:3762-73.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  99. Prince HM, Kim YH, Horwitz SM, et al. Brentuximab vedotin or physician's choice in CD30-positive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (ALCANZA): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial. Lancet 2017;390:555-66.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  100. Zinzani PL, Karlin L, Radford J, et al. European phase II study of mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody, in relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Haematologica 2016;101:e407-10.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  101. Khodadoust MS, Rook AH, Porcu P, et al. Pembrolizumab in relapsed and refractory mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:20-8.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  102. Dummer R, Quaglino P, Becker JC, et al. Prospective international multicenter phase II trial of intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin monochemotherapy in patients with stage IIB, IVA, or IVB advanced mycosis fungoides: final results from EORTC 21012. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:4091-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  103. Zinzani PL, Baliva G, Magagnoli M, et al. Gemcitabine treatment in pretreated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: experience in 44 patients. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2603-6.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  104. Lechowicz MJ, Lazarus HM, Carreras J, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014;49:1360-5.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  105. Iqbal M, Reljic T, Ayala E, et al. Efficacy of allogeneic hemato-poietic cell transplantation in cutaneous t cell lymphoma: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2020;26:76-82.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  106. Duarte RF, Canals C, Onida F, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a retrospective analysis of the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Trans-plantation. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4492-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  107. Garciaz S, Loschi M, De Masson A, et al. Brentuximab vedotin as a bridge to allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for refractory or relapsing patients with CD30 positive anaplastic or T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: a study on behalf of the SFGM-TC. Leuk Lymphoma 2019;60:2802-5.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  108. Fuji S, Inoue Y, Utsunomiya A, et al. Pretransplantation anti-CCR4 antibody mogamulizumab against adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma is associated with significantly increased risks of severe and corticosteroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease, nonrelapse mortality, and overall mortality. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:3426-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
Blood Res
Volume 59 2024
Current Issue Archives

Supplementary File

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in BR

Blood Research

pISSN 2287-979X
eISSN 2288-0011
qr-code Download