Blood Res 2023; 58(1):
Published online March 31, 2023
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022218
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : Deog-Yeon Jo, M.D., Ph.D.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Korea
E-mail: deogyeon@cnu.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background
Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) has not been investigated in Korean patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm.
Methods
This study analyzed the prevalence at diagnosis and clinical features of AVWS in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), prefibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF), or overt PMF (PMF) diagnosed between January 2019 and December 2021 at Chungam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. AVWS was defined as below the lower reference limit (56%) of ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo).
Results
Sixty-four consecutive patients (36 with ET, 17 with PV, 6 with pre-PMF, and 5 with PMF; 30 men and 34 women) with a median age of 67 years (range, 18‒87 yr) were followed for a median of 25.1 months (range, 2.6‒46.4 mo). AVWS was detected in 20 (31.3%) patients at diagnosis and was most frequent in ET patients (41.4%), followed by patients with pre-PMF (33.3%) and PV (17.6%) patients. VWF:RCo was negatively correlated with the platelet count (r=0.937; P=0.002). Only one episode of minor bleeding occurred in a patient with ET and AVWS. Younger age (<50 yr) [odds ratio (OR), 7.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27‒39.48; P=0.026] and thrombocytosis (>600×109/L) (OR, 13.70; 95% CI, 1.35‒138.17; P=0.026) were independent risk factors for developing AVWS.
Conclusion
AVWS based on VWF:RCo was common in patients with ET and pre-PMF, but less common in patients with PV in the Korean population. Clinically significant bleeding is rare in these patients.
Keywords: Myeloproliferative neoplasm, Essential thrombocythemia, Polycythemia vera, Primary myelofibrosis, Acquired von Willebrand syndrome
Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph- MPNs) include essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) and overt primary myelofibrosis (PMF). These clonal hematologic disorders are characterized by thrombotic vascular events [1] and myelofibrotic and leukemic transformations [2]. In addition to thrombosis, hemorrhagic vascular events often occur in these patients, and some cases are associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) [3].
Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common genetic bleeding disorder that affects men and women equally and often manifests itself as mucosal bleeding. This can be due to quantitative (Types 1 and 3) or qualitative (Type 2) defects in the von Willebrand factor (VWF) [4]. Acquired VWD (AVWD) or AVWS can occur in many settings, such as MPN, plasma cell dyscrasia, other lymphoproliferative disorders, autoimmune disorders, and causes of increased shear forces, such as aortic stenosis or other structural heart diseases and mechanical circulatory support [5]. Depletion of VWF, particularly high molecular weight multimers, can cause mucocutaneous bleeding and arteriovenous malformations, especially in the gastrointestinal tract [5, 6]. Increased platelet count in patients with MPN is believed to be associated with AVWS. This is most frequently reported in patients with ET, but also in patients with PV [5, 7]. Due to the risk of bleeding, many physicians hesitate to prescribe low-dose aspirin in patients with extreme thrombocytosis and AVWS [8].
AVWS has rarely been addressed in Korean patients with Ph- MPN. Only one case of AVWS has been reported in a patient with PV [9]. In 2020, the Korean Society of Hematology revised the guidelines for diagnosing and managing MPN based on published evidence and the experience of an expert panel. However, AVWS was not addressed [10]. Therefore, the prevalence and clinical features of AVWS were based on reports from Western countries. The incidence of MPN is increasing in Korea [11-13], which is mainly attributable to changes in diagnostic criteria and studies on driver gene mutations, so there is a need for information on AVWS in these patients. In this prospective observational study, we analyzed the prevalence at diagnosis and clinical features of AVWS in Ph- MPN patients in a Korean population.
Patients diagnosed with ET, PV, pre-PMF, or PMF between January 2019 and December 2021 at the Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea, were enrolled in this study. At the time of diagnosis, the patients underwent tests for the following parameters: complete blood count (CBC), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), VWF factor VIII-related antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), blood chemistry, driver gene mutations and bone marrow examination. In patients with low VWF:RCo at diagnosis, VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo were followed up after initiating cytoreductive treatment at weeks 2 and 6, and then every 1–3 months. The International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia (IPSET) [14] and the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) [15] were used for the prognostic stratification of patients with ET and PMF, respectively. Hydroxyurea or anagrelide was used for cytoreduction according to standard recommendations, drug availability, and compliance. Patients with PV patients underwent regular phlebotomy, so their hematocrit was <45%. Low-dose aspirin (100 mg/day) was prescribed to prevent thrombosis, except in low- and very low-risk patients. Based on risk stratification, aspirin was not administered to patients with VWF:RCo <30% who did not require cytoreduction. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chungnam National University Hospital.
Based on previous studies on AVWS in patients with MPN [16, 17], AVWS was diagnosed when all four criteria were met: VWF:RCo <56% (lower reference limit), VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio <0.7, no personal or family history of bleeding disorders, and no history of frequent or abnormally prolonged episodes of bleeding. VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a fixed platelet aggregation assay, respectively (GC Labs, Yongin, Korea).
Splenomegaly was defined using previously described criteria [18]. Briefly, 'palpable splenomegaly' indicated that the spleen was palpable below the left costal margin, and 'volumetric splenomegaly' indicates that the volume of the spleen was greater than the mean plus three standard deviations of the reference volumes based on both age and body surface area.
The Janus kinase 2 mutation (
Thrombotic events included cerebrovascular (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and venous sinus thrombosis), coronary (any ischemic heart disease, including acute coronary syndrome), splanchnic and peripheral thrombo-embolism. Bleeding was defined based on guidelines proposed by a group of VWD experts [19]. Major bleeding included episodes that required hospital admission, surgical intervention, blood transfusion, hemoglobin drop ≥2 g/dL, bleeding involving critical areas (e.g., intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intraarticular, pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome), or recurrent bleeding that affects the ability to attend normal school, work, or social activities. Minor bleeding included episodes other than major bleeding.
Descriptive data are presented as means±standard deviations (SD), medians (range), or percentages, and were compared using Student’s t-test, the chi-square test, or Fisher exact test. Correlations between VWF:RCo and various parameters were assessed using Pearson correlation analysis. The risk factors for the development of AVWS were determined using logistic regression analysis. Statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS software (version 24.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
During the study period, 64 patients were diagnosed with MPN. All 64 consecutive patients (36 with ET, 17 with PV, 6 with pre-PMF and 5 with PMF; 30 men and 34 women) with a median age of 67 years (range, 18–87 yr) were enrolled. The patients were followed for a median of 25.1 months (range, 2.6 to 46.4 mo). Palpable splenomegaly was not observed in any of the patients. Volumetric splenomegaly was detected in all patients with pre-PMF and PMF , while it was found in 88.2% of patients with PV and 66.7% of patients with ET. WBC counts and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels of patients with pre-PMF were higher than those of patients with ET [15.9±3.3×109/L and 10.9±4.7×109/L; 2.0±0.9 and 1.3±0.4× upper normal limit (UNL), respectively; all
Table 1 Patient characteristics (N=64).
ET (N=36) | PV (N=17) | pre-PMF (N=6) | PMF (N=5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 65 (18–84) | 72 (17–86) | 60.5 (34–87) | 77 (42–86) |
Female, N (%) | 20 (55.6) | 10 (58.8) | 3 (50.0) | 1 (20.0) |
Palpable splenomegaly, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 24 (66.7) | 15 (88.2) | 6 (100) | 5 (100) |
Laboratory findings | ||||
WBC, ×109/L | 10.9±4.7 | 14.6±4.6a) | 15.9±3.3a) | 12.9±9.0 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 0.7±0.6 | 0.6±0.3 | 0.6±0.3 | 1.4±1.2a) |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 14.0±1.4 | 17.9±2.5a) | 12.7±2.5 | 10.7±1.7a) |
Platelet, ×109/L | 870.3±314.0 | 614.2±381.3a) | 909.5±369.4 | 868.4±420.8 |
Platelet, ×109/L, N (%) | ||||
450–599 | 4 (11.1) | 2 (11.8) | 1 (16.7) | 4 (80.0) |
600–999 | 26 (72.2) | 6 (35.3) | 4 (66.7) | 0 (0.0) |
1,000–1,449 | 4 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
≥1,500 | 2 (5.6) | 2 (11.8) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.3±0.4 | 1.5±0.4 | 2.0±0.9a) | 1.9±0.3a) |
Driver gene mutation, N (%) | ||||
30 (83.3) | 17 (100) | 4 (66.7) | 3 (60.0) | |
3 (8.3) | - | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) | |
1 (2.8) | - | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
26.3±11.1 | 63.6±19.9a) | 47.6±19.4a) | 50.5±37.0a) | |
IPSET, N (%) | ||||
Low | 9 (25.0) | - | - | - |
Intermediate | 12 (33.3) | - | - | - |
High | 15 (41.7) | - | - | - |
IPSS, N (%) | ||||
Low | - | - | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Intermediate-1 | - | - | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Intemediate-2 | - | - | 1 (16.7) | 3 (60.0) |
High | - | - | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) |
Comorbidity, N (%) | ||||
Hypertension | 15 (41.7) | 13 (76.5) | 1 (16.7) | 3 (60.0) |
Diabetes mellitus | 4 (11.1) | 6 (35.3) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Chronic kidney disease | 6 (16.7) | 7 (41.2) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (40.0) |
Smoking | 7 (19.4) | 3 (17.6) | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Dyslipidemia | 5 (13.9) | 3 (17.6) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Treatments, N (%) | ||||
Cytoreductive treatment | ||||
Hydroxyurea | 23 (63.9) | 17 (88.2) | 6 (66.7) | 4 (80.0) |
Anagrelide | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Aspirin | 33 (91.7) | 17 (100) | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 6 (16.7) | 3 (17.6) | 3 (33.3) | 3 (60.0) |
FU (yr), median (range) | 1.8 (0.1–3.9) | 2.5 (1.1–3.8) | 1.3 (0.2–2.9) | 2.5 (1.3–3.1) |
a)
Abbreviations: ET, essential thrombocythemia; FU, follow-up; IPSET, International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; pre-PMF, prefibrotic/early myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency.
AVWS was detected in 20 (31.3%) of the 64 patients at the time of MPN diagnosis, and was more frequent in patients with ET (41.4%), followed by patients with pre-PMF (33.3%) and PV (17.6%). No AVWS was found in patients with PMF. AVWS with VWF:RCo <30% was found most frequently in patients with PV (17.6%), followed by patients with pre-PMF (16.7%), and ET (8.3%) (Table 2). VWF:RCo was negatively correlated with platelet count (r=-0.372;
Table 2 Prevalence of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (N=64).
ET (N=36) | PV (N=17) | pre-PMF (N=6) | PMF (N=5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
VWF:RCo <56%, N (%) | 15 (41.7) | 3 (17.6) | 2 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) |
VWF:Rco <30%, N (%) | 3 (8.3) | 3 (17.6) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) |
Abbreviations: ET, essential thrombocythemia; pre-PMF, prefibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera; VWF:Rco, von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity.
The clinical characteristics at the time of diagnosis and the clinical course of patients with AVWS were compared with patients without AVWS. Patients with ET with AVWS (N=15) were younger than those without AVWS (N=21) [56 (18–83) yr and 65 (40–84) yr;
Table 3 Clinical features of patients with essential thrombocythemia, according to von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (N=36).
≥56% (N=21) | <56% (N=15) | ≥30% (N=33) | <30% (N=3) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 65 (40–84) | 56 (18–83) | 0.035 | 65 (18–84) | 69 (56–72) | 0.560 |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 13 (61.9) | 11 (73.3) | 0.473 | 23 (69.7) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
Laboratory findings | ||||||
WBC, ×109/L | 10.5±3.2 | 11.5±6.4 | 0.527 | 11.0±4.8 | 10.0±2.5 | 0.718 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 0.7±0.4 | 0.7±0.3 | 0.971 | 0.7±0.6 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.562 |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 14.0±1.5 | 13.9±1.5 | 0.821 | 14.0±1.2 | 13.2±0.8 | 0.406 |
Platelet, ×109/L | 813.7±170.7 | 949.7±440.0 | 0.205 | 837.8±228.8 | 1,228.3±824.8 | 0.037 |
Platelet ≥600×109/L, N (%) | 18 (85.7) | 14 (93.3) | 0.473 | 29 (87.9) | 3 (100) | 0.522 |
Platelet ≥1,000×109/L, N (%) | 3 (14.3) | 3 (20.0) | 0.650 | 5 (15.2) | 1 (33.3) | 0.418 |
Platelet ≥1,500×109/L, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (13.2) | 0.085 | 1 (3.0) | 1 (33.3) | 0.028 |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.4±0.4 | 1.2±0.3 | 0.141 | 1.3±0.4 | 1.5±0.4 | 0.488 |
PT, sec | 12.1±1.0 | 11.5±0.9 | 0.057 | 11.9±0.9 | 11.0±1.6 | 0.139 |
aPTT, sec | 35.6±3.8 | 35.8±3.6 | 0.829 | 35.9±3.6 | 32.9±3.7 | 0.168 |
Driver gene mutation, N (%) | ||||||
19 (90.5) | 12 (80.0) | 0.370 | 29 (87.9) | 2 (66.7) | 0.309 | |
7 (33.3%) | 3 (20.0%) | 0.379 | 9 (27.3) | 1 (33.3) | 0.825 | |
1 (4.8) | 2 (13.3) | 0.625 | 2 (6.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.249 | |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 4 (19.0) | 2 (13.3) | 0.650 | 6 (18.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.418 |
Bleeding, N (%) | ||||||
Major bleeding | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
Minor bleeding | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.230 | 1 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.760 |
Overall | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.230 | 1 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.760 |
Normalization of VWF:RCo after cytoreduction, N (%)c) | - | 11/11 (100) | - | - | - | - |
Time to normalization of VWF:RCo (wk), median (range) | - | 8 (2–18) | - | - | - | - |
a)Data presented as mean±SD were analyzed using Student t-test for pared samples; data presented as percentages were analyzed using the Chi-square test. b)Thrombosis occurred before, at the time of, and after diagnosis. c)Platelet counts were 556.5±171.8×109/L at the time of initial normalization of VWF:RCo.
Abbreviations: aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PT, prothrombin time; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency; VWF:RCo, von Willabrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity.
Table 4 Clinical features of patients with polycythemia vera according to von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (N=17).
≥30% (N=14) | <30% (N=3) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 73.5 (44–86) | 61 (55–72) | 0.377 |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 13 (92.9) | 2 (66.7) | 0.201 |
Laboratory findings | |||
WBC, ×109/L | 15.2±5.0 | 16.6±2.7 | 0.656 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 00.6±0.2 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.075 |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 17.9±2.6 | 17.7±2.6 | 0.879 |
Platelet, ×109/L | 510.0±206.7 | 1,120.7±671.7 | 0.009 |
Platelet >600×109/L, N (%) | 5 (35.7) | 3 (100) | 0.043 |
Platelet >1,000×109/L, N (%) | 1 (7.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
Platelet >1,500×109/L, N (%) | 1 (7.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.5±0.5 | 1.6±0.1 | 0.728 |
14 (100) | 3 (100) | - | |
2 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0.661 | |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 3 (21.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0.377 |
Bleeding, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
Normalization of VWF:RCo after cytoreduction, N (%)c) | - | 3 (100) | - |
a)Data presented as mean±SD were analyzed using Student t-test for pared samples; data presented as percentages were analyzed using the Chi-square test. b)Thrombosis occurred before, at the time of, and after diagnosis. c)Platelet counts were 444.0±194.6×109/L at the time of initial normalization of VWF:RCo.
Abbreviations: LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency; VWF:RCo; von Willabrand factor, ristocetin cofactor activity.
Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for AVWS in all enrolled patients with MPN. Univariate analysis showed that younger age (<50 yr) [odds ratio (OR), 4.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–17.45;
Table 5 Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors for developing acquired von Willebrand syndrome at diagnosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (N=64).
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||||
Age <50 yr | 4.29 | 1.05–17.45 | 0.042 | 7.08 | 1.27–39.48 | 0.026 | |
Male | 0.73 | 0.73–2.81 | 0.651 | - | - | - | |
ET | 3.29 | 1.02–10.62 | 0.047 | 2.94 | 0.76–11.36 | 0.117 | |
IPSET higha) | 0.28 | 0.05–1.62 | 0.155 | - | - | - | |
R-IPSET-T higha) | 0.47 | 0.03–8.60 | 0.603 | - | - | - | |
WBC >11.0×109/L | 0.89 | 0.23–3.42 | 0.864 | - | - | - | |
Monocyte >1.0×109/L | 0.30 | 0.03–3.04 | 0.310 | - | - | - | |
Platelet >600×109/L | 8.87 | 1.07–73.03 | 0.043 | 13.70 | 1.35–138.17 | 0.026 | |
Platelet >800×109/L | 1.23 | 0.45–3.79 | 0.631 | - | - | - | |
Platelet >1,000×109/L | 1.58 | 0.39–6.38 | 0.518 | - | - | - | |
LDH >1.5×UNL | 1.25 | 0.30–5.23 | 0.760 | - | - | - | |
Serum ferritin | 0.99 | 0.98–1.00 | 0.201 | - | - | - | |
Positive | 0.90 | 0.20–4.01 | 0.884 | - | - | - | |
0.67 | 0.19–2.40 | 0.535 | - | - | - | ||
0.43 | 0.08–2.22 | 0.314 | - | - | - | ||
Positive | 1.52 | 0.23–9.88 | 0.662 | - | - | - | |
Chronic kidney disease | 1.83 | 0.68–5.83 | 0.306 | - | - | - | |
Diabetes mellitus | 1.23 | 0.30–4.28 | 0.863 | - | - | - | |
Hypertension | 0.56 | 0.19–1.63 | 0.283 | - | - | - | |
Smoking | 0.60 | 0.15–2.47 | 0.479 | - | - | - | |
Dyslipidemia | 0.93 | 0.22–4.05 | 0.926 | - | - | - | |
Volumetric splenomegaly | 0.77 | 0.22–2.70 | 0.684 | - | - | - | |
Thrombosis before or at diagnosis | 0.65 | 0.10–4.14 | 0.652 | - | - | - |
a)Among ET patients.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ET, essential thrombocythemia; IPSET, International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; OR, odds ratio; R-IPSET-T, revised IPSET-thrombosis; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency.
This study investigated the frequency of low VWF activity at the time of diagnosis and its clinical relevance in 64 newly diagnosed patients with Ph- MPN. To our knowledge, this is the first study to address Ph- MPN-related AVWS in the Korean population. Ph- MPN are characterized by frequent thrombotic vascular events and, to a lesser degree, bleeding. The clinical features of thrombotic vascular events in Korean patients with Ph- MPN differ somewhat from those in Western cases regarding the time of occurrence and sites involved [1]. Therefore, it is reasonable to obtain information on VWF abnormalities in Korean patients with Ph- MPN. Many previous reports on AVWS include the results of VWF tests not only at the time of MPN diagnosis, but also during follow-up [16, 17, 20]. Cytoreductive treatment strongly affects VWF activity [21]; therefore, testing VWF after treatment initiation could lead to an erroneous prevalence rate of AVWS. The present study enrolled only newly diagnosed patients to determine the exact prevalence of AVWS. AVWS was detected in 41.7% of patients with ET and 17.6% of patients with PV, and clinically significant bleeding was rarely observed. Individuals with type O generally have lower plasma levels of VWF than those with other blood types [22]. The present study did not incorporate blood type into defining AVWS; therefore, the prevalence of AVWS may have been overestimated. Estimates of AVWS in Western studies are 20% to 70% in ET and 12% to 30% in patients with PV according to laboratory criteria, but clinically significant bleeding is much less common, at 4% to 7% in some studies, affecting less than half of those with a laboratory diagnosis [5, 7]. Therefore, the prevalence of AVWS and bleeding in Korean patients did not differ from those in cases of Western patients. AVWS has seldom been reported in patients with PMF. We also did not diagnose AVWS in any of the five patients with PMF enrolled in the study. However, our data cannot be considered conclusive due to the limited number of patients.
We found the abnormal VWF:RCo ratio normalized after starting cytoreductive treatment in all patients, although platelet count remained high. This correction of VWF:RCo after cytoreduction could be a reason why bleeding was uncommon, as most of the patients with ET and PV in this study were placed on cytoreductive treatment according to standard risk stratification. Most reports of major bleeding in patients with MPN with AVWS are based on anecdotes, mainly in patients with unrecognized AVWS [23-26]. These observations indicate that most hemorrhagic events induced by AVWS occur before or at the time of MPN diagnosis and that proper cytoreduction can minimize the risk of bleeding. Taken together, it remains to be determined whether AVWS screening should be performed in all patients with Ph- MPN at the time of diagnosis.
A subpopulation of patients with ET present with a platelet count ≥1,000×109/L, which is arbitrarily called extreme thrombocytosis [27]. Extreme thrombocytosis is believed to be a prerequisite for AVWS [28]. Bleeding diathesis in ET or PV is currently believed to be multifactorial in etiology [29]. AVWS in patients with ET or PV is characterized by the loss of large VWF multimers, related to their increased adsorption to platelets and thus increased proteolysis by ADAMTS13 in a platelet count-dependent manner [21, 30-32]. Therefore, the guidelines recommend using aspirin with caution in both ET and PV in the presence of extreme thrombocytosis, as it promotes the development of AVWS [29, 33]. However, AVWS can occur even when the platelet count is <1,000×109/L [16, 17, 34]. In the present study, only 16.7% of patients with ET and 11.8% of patients with PV had platelet counts ≥1,000×109/L. Therefore, many patients with AVWS had platelet counts <1,000×109/L. These data support the suggestion that evaluating the laboratory AVWS is recommended in the presence of abnormal bleeding, regardless of platelet count [29].
In a previous study, younger age, platelet count, hemoglobin level and
In conclusion, AVWS defined on VWF:RCo was common in patients with ET and pre-PMF, and less common in patients with PV in the Korean population. No major bleeding was observed in any of the patients. To determine the role of AVWS screening at the time of MPN diagnosis, further characterization of this thesis is warranted in future studies that recruit many patients.
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Blood Res 2023; 58(1): 42-50
Published online March 31, 2023 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022218
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Ik-Chan Song, Sora Kang, Myung-Won Lee, Hyewon Ryu, Hyo-Jin Lee, Hwan-Jung Yun, Deog-Yeon Jo
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
Correspondence to:Deog-Yeon Jo, M.D., Ph.D.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Korea
E-mail: deogyeon@cnu.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background
Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) has not been investigated in Korean patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm.
Methods
This study analyzed the prevalence at diagnosis and clinical features of AVWS in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), prefibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF), or overt PMF (PMF) diagnosed between January 2019 and December 2021 at Chungam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. AVWS was defined as below the lower reference limit (56%) of ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo).
Results
Sixty-four consecutive patients (36 with ET, 17 with PV, 6 with pre-PMF, and 5 with PMF; 30 men and 34 women) with a median age of 67 years (range, 18‒87 yr) were followed for a median of 25.1 months (range, 2.6‒46.4 mo). AVWS was detected in 20 (31.3%) patients at diagnosis and was most frequent in ET patients (41.4%), followed by patients with pre-PMF (33.3%) and PV (17.6%) patients. VWF:RCo was negatively correlated with the platelet count (r=0.937; P=0.002). Only one episode of minor bleeding occurred in a patient with ET and AVWS. Younger age (<50 yr) [odds ratio (OR), 7.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27‒39.48; P=0.026] and thrombocytosis (>600×109/L) (OR, 13.70; 95% CI, 1.35‒138.17; P=0.026) were independent risk factors for developing AVWS.
Conclusion
AVWS based on VWF:RCo was common in patients with ET and pre-PMF, but less common in patients with PV in the Korean population. Clinically significant bleeding is rare in these patients.
Keywords: Myeloproliferative neoplasm, Essential thrombocythemia, Polycythemia vera, Primary myelofibrosis, Acquired von Willebrand syndrome
Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph- MPNs) include essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) and overt primary myelofibrosis (PMF). These clonal hematologic disorders are characterized by thrombotic vascular events [1] and myelofibrotic and leukemic transformations [2]. In addition to thrombosis, hemorrhagic vascular events often occur in these patients, and some cases are associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) [3].
Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common genetic bleeding disorder that affects men and women equally and often manifests itself as mucosal bleeding. This can be due to quantitative (Types 1 and 3) or qualitative (Type 2) defects in the von Willebrand factor (VWF) [4]. Acquired VWD (AVWD) or AVWS can occur in many settings, such as MPN, plasma cell dyscrasia, other lymphoproliferative disorders, autoimmune disorders, and causes of increased shear forces, such as aortic stenosis or other structural heart diseases and mechanical circulatory support [5]. Depletion of VWF, particularly high molecular weight multimers, can cause mucocutaneous bleeding and arteriovenous malformations, especially in the gastrointestinal tract [5, 6]. Increased platelet count in patients with MPN is believed to be associated with AVWS. This is most frequently reported in patients with ET, but also in patients with PV [5, 7]. Due to the risk of bleeding, many physicians hesitate to prescribe low-dose aspirin in patients with extreme thrombocytosis and AVWS [8].
AVWS has rarely been addressed in Korean patients with Ph- MPN. Only one case of AVWS has been reported in a patient with PV [9]. In 2020, the Korean Society of Hematology revised the guidelines for diagnosing and managing MPN based on published evidence and the experience of an expert panel. However, AVWS was not addressed [10]. Therefore, the prevalence and clinical features of AVWS were based on reports from Western countries. The incidence of MPN is increasing in Korea [11-13], which is mainly attributable to changes in diagnostic criteria and studies on driver gene mutations, so there is a need for information on AVWS in these patients. In this prospective observational study, we analyzed the prevalence at diagnosis and clinical features of AVWS in Ph- MPN patients in a Korean population.
Patients diagnosed with ET, PV, pre-PMF, or PMF between January 2019 and December 2021 at the Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea, were enrolled in this study. At the time of diagnosis, the patients underwent tests for the following parameters: complete blood count (CBC), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), VWF factor VIII-related antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), blood chemistry, driver gene mutations and bone marrow examination. In patients with low VWF:RCo at diagnosis, VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo were followed up after initiating cytoreductive treatment at weeks 2 and 6, and then every 1–3 months. The International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia (IPSET) [14] and the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) [15] were used for the prognostic stratification of patients with ET and PMF, respectively. Hydroxyurea or anagrelide was used for cytoreduction according to standard recommendations, drug availability, and compliance. Patients with PV patients underwent regular phlebotomy, so their hematocrit was <45%. Low-dose aspirin (100 mg/day) was prescribed to prevent thrombosis, except in low- and very low-risk patients. Based on risk stratification, aspirin was not administered to patients with VWF:RCo <30% who did not require cytoreduction. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chungnam National University Hospital.
Based on previous studies on AVWS in patients with MPN [16, 17], AVWS was diagnosed when all four criteria were met: VWF:RCo <56% (lower reference limit), VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio <0.7, no personal or family history of bleeding disorders, and no history of frequent or abnormally prolonged episodes of bleeding. VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a fixed platelet aggregation assay, respectively (GC Labs, Yongin, Korea).
Splenomegaly was defined using previously described criteria [18]. Briefly, 'palpable splenomegaly' indicated that the spleen was palpable below the left costal margin, and 'volumetric splenomegaly' indicates that the volume of the spleen was greater than the mean plus three standard deviations of the reference volumes based on both age and body surface area.
The Janus kinase 2 mutation (
Thrombotic events included cerebrovascular (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and venous sinus thrombosis), coronary (any ischemic heart disease, including acute coronary syndrome), splanchnic and peripheral thrombo-embolism. Bleeding was defined based on guidelines proposed by a group of VWD experts [19]. Major bleeding included episodes that required hospital admission, surgical intervention, blood transfusion, hemoglobin drop ≥2 g/dL, bleeding involving critical areas (e.g., intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intraarticular, pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome), or recurrent bleeding that affects the ability to attend normal school, work, or social activities. Minor bleeding included episodes other than major bleeding.
Descriptive data are presented as means±standard deviations (SD), medians (range), or percentages, and were compared using Student’s t-test, the chi-square test, or Fisher exact test. Correlations between VWF:RCo and various parameters were assessed using Pearson correlation analysis. The risk factors for the development of AVWS were determined using logistic regression analysis. Statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS software (version 24.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
During the study period, 64 patients were diagnosed with MPN. All 64 consecutive patients (36 with ET, 17 with PV, 6 with pre-PMF and 5 with PMF; 30 men and 34 women) with a median age of 67 years (range, 18–87 yr) were enrolled. The patients were followed for a median of 25.1 months (range, 2.6 to 46.4 mo). Palpable splenomegaly was not observed in any of the patients. Volumetric splenomegaly was detected in all patients with pre-PMF and PMF , while it was found in 88.2% of patients with PV and 66.7% of patients with ET. WBC counts and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels of patients with pre-PMF were higher than those of patients with ET [15.9±3.3×109/L and 10.9±4.7×109/L; 2.0±0.9 and 1.3±0.4× upper normal limit (UNL), respectively; all
Table 1 . Patient characteristics (N=64)..
ET (N=36) | PV (N=17) | pre-PMF (N=6) | PMF (N=5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 65 (18–84) | 72 (17–86) | 60.5 (34–87) | 77 (42–86) |
Female, N (%) | 20 (55.6) | 10 (58.8) | 3 (50.0) | 1 (20.0) |
Palpable splenomegaly, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 24 (66.7) | 15 (88.2) | 6 (100) | 5 (100) |
Laboratory findings | ||||
WBC, ×109/L | 10.9±4.7 | 14.6±4.6a) | 15.9±3.3a) | 12.9±9.0 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 0.7±0.6 | 0.6±0.3 | 0.6±0.3 | 1.4±1.2a) |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 14.0±1.4 | 17.9±2.5a) | 12.7±2.5 | 10.7±1.7a) |
Platelet, ×109/L | 870.3±314.0 | 614.2±381.3a) | 909.5±369.4 | 868.4±420.8 |
Platelet, ×109/L, N (%) | ||||
450–599 | 4 (11.1) | 2 (11.8) | 1 (16.7) | 4 (80.0) |
600–999 | 26 (72.2) | 6 (35.3) | 4 (66.7) | 0 (0.0) |
1,000–1,449 | 4 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
≥1,500 | 2 (5.6) | 2 (11.8) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.3±0.4 | 1.5±0.4 | 2.0±0.9a) | 1.9±0.3a) |
Driver gene mutation, N (%) | ||||
30 (83.3) | 17 (100) | 4 (66.7) | 3 (60.0) | |
3 (8.3) | - | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) | |
1 (2.8) | - | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
26.3±11.1 | 63.6±19.9a) | 47.6±19.4a) | 50.5±37.0a) | |
IPSET, N (%) | ||||
Low | 9 (25.0) | - | - | - |
Intermediate | 12 (33.3) | - | - | - |
High | 15 (41.7) | - | - | - |
IPSS, N (%) | ||||
Low | - | - | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Intermediate-1 | - | - | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Intemediate-2 | - | - | 1 (16.7) | 3 (60.0) |
High | - | - | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) |
Comorbidity, N (%) | ||||
Hypertension | 15 (41.7) | 13 (76.5) | 1 (16.7) | 3 (60.0) |
Diabetes mellitus | 4 (11.1) | 6 (35.3) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Chronic kidney disease | 6 (16.7) | 7 (41.2) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (40.0) |
Smoking | 7 (19.4) | 3 (17.6) | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Dyslipidemia | 5 (13.9) | 3 (17.6) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Treatments, N (%) | ||||
Cytoreductive treatment | ||||
Hydroxyurea | 23 (63.9) | 17 (88.2) | 6 (66.7) | 4 (80.0) |
Anagrelide | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Aspirin | 33 (91.7) | 17 (100) | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 6 (16.7) | 3 (17.6) | 3 (33.3) | 3 (60.0) |
FU (yr), median (range) | 1.8 (0.1–3.9) | 2.5 (1.1–3.8) | 1.3 (0.2–2.9) | 2.5 (1.3–3.1) |
a)
Abbreviations: ET, essential thrombocythemia; FU, follow-up; IPSET, International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; pre-PMF, prefibrotic/early myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency..
AVWS was detected in 20 (31.3%) of the 64 patients at the time of MPN diagnosis, and was more frequent in patients with ET (41.4%), followed by patients with pre-PMF (33.3%) and PV (17.6%). No AVWS was found in patients with PMF. AVWS with VWF:RCo <30% was found most frequently in patients with PV (17.6%), followed by patients with pre-PMF (16.7%), and ET (8.3%) (Table 2). VWF:RCo was negatively correlated with platelet count (r=-0.372;
Table 2 . Prevalence of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (N=64)..
ET (N=36) | PV (N=17) | pre-PMF (N=6) | PMF (N=5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
VWF:RCo <56%, N (%) | 15 (41.7) | 3 (17.6) | 2 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) |
VWF:Rco <30%, N (%) | 3 (8.3) | 3 (17.6) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) |
Abbreviations: ET, essential thrombocythemia; pre-PMF, prefibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera; VWF:Rco, von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity..
The clinical characteristics at the time of diagnosis and the clinical course of patients with AVWS were compared with patients without AVWS. Patients with ET with AVWS (N=15) were younger than those without AVWS (N=21) [56 (18–83) yr and 65 (40–84) yr;
Table 3 . Clinical features of patients with essential thrombocythemia, according to von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (N=36)..
≥56% (N=21) | <56% (N=15) | ≥30% (N=33) | <30% (N=3) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 65 (40–84) | 56 (18–83) | 0.035 | 65 (18–84) | 69 (56–72) | 0.560 |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 13 (61.9) | 11 (73.3) | 0.473 | 23 (69.7) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
Laboratory findings | ||||||
WBC, ×109/L | 10.5±3.2 | 11.5±6.4 | 0.527 | 11.0±4.8 | 10.0±2.5 | 0.718 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 0.7±0.4 | 0.7±0.3 | 0.971 | 0.7±0.6 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.562 |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 14.0±1.5 | 13.9±1.5 | 0.821 | 14.0±1.2 | 13.2±0.8 | 0.406 |
Platelet, ×109/L | 813.7±170.7 | 949.7±440.0 | 0.205 | 837.8±228.8 | 1,228.3±824.8 | 0.037 |
Platelet ≥600×109/L, N (%) | 18 (85.7) | 14 (93.3) | 0.473 | 29 (87.9) | 3 (100) | 0.522 |
Platelet ≥1,000×109/L, N (%) | 3 (14.3) | 3 (20.0) | 0.650 | 5 (15.2) | 1 (33.3) | 0.418 |
Platelet ≥1,500×109/L, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (13.2) | 0.085 | 1 (3.0) | 1 (33.3) | 0.028 |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.4±0.4 | 1.2±0.3 | 0.141 | 1.3±0.4 | 1.5±0.4 | 0.488 |
PT, sec | 12.1±1.0 | 11.5±0.9 | 0.057 | 11.9±0.9 | 11.0±1.6 | 0.139 |
aPTT, sec | 35.6±3.8 | 35.8±3.6 | 0.829 | 35.9±3.6 | 32.9±3.7 | 0.168 |
Driver gene mutation, N (%) | ||||||
19 (90.5) | 12 (80.0) | 0.370 | 29 (87.9) | 2 (66.7) | 0.309 | |
7 (33.3%) | 3 (20.0%) | 0.379 | 9 (27.3) | 1 (33.3) | 0.825 | |
1 (4.8) | 2 (13.3) | 0.625 | 2 (6.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.249 | |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 4 (19.0) | 2 (13.3) | 0.650 | 6 (18.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.418 |
Bleeding, N (%) | ||||||
Major bleeding | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
Minor bleeding | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.230 | 1 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.760 |
Overall | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.230 | 1 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.760 |
Normalization of VWF:RCo after cytoreduction, N (%)c) | - | 11/11 (100) | - | - | - | - |
Time to normalization of VWF:RCo (wk), median (range) | - | 8 (2–18) | - | - | - | - |
a)Data presented as mean±SD were analyzed using Student t-test for pared samples; data presented as percentages were analyzed using the Chi-square test. b)Thrombosis occurred before, at the time of, and after diagnosis. c)Platelet counts were 556.5±171.8×109/L at the time of initial normalization of VWF:RCo..
Abbreviations: aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PT, prothrombin time; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency; VWF:RCo, von Willabrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity..
Table 4 . Clinical features of patients with polycythemia vera according to von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (N=17)..
≥30% (N=14) | <30% (N=3) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 73.5 (44–86) | 61 (55–72) | 0.377 |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 13 (92.9) | 2 (66.7) | 0.201 |
Laboratory findings | |||
WBC, ×109/L | 15.2±5.0 | 16.6±2.7 | 0.656 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 00.6±0.2 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.075 |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 17.9±2.6 | 17.7±2.6 | 0.879 |
Platelet, ×109/L | 510.0±206.7 | 1,120.7±671.7 | 0.009 |
Platelet >600×109/L, N (%) | 5 (35.7) | 3 (100) | 0.043 |
Platelet >1,000×109/L, N (%) | 1 (7.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
Platelet >1,500×109/L, N (%) | 1 (7.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.5±0.5 | 1.6±0.1 | 0.728 |
14 (100) | 3 (100) | - | |
2 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0.661 | |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 3 (21.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0.377 |
Bleeding, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
Normalization of VWF:RCo after cytoreduction, N (%)c) | - | 3 (100) | - |
a)Data presented as mean±SD were analyzed using Student t-test for pared samples; data presented as percentages were analyzed using the Chi-square test. b)Thrombosis occurred before, at the time of, and after diagnosis. c)Platelet counts were 444.0±194.6×109/L at the time of initial normalization of VWF:RCo..
Abbreviations: LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency; VWF:RCo; von Willabrand factor, ristocetin cofactor activity..
Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for AVWS in all enrolled patients with MPN. Univariate analysis showed that younger age (<50 yr) [odds ratio (OR), 4.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–17.45;
Table 5 . Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors for developing acquired von Willebrand syndrome at diagnosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (N=64)..
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||||
Age <50 yr | 4.29 | 1.05–17.45 | 0.042 | 7.08 | 1.27–39.48 | 0.026 | |
Male | 0.73 | 0.73–2.81 | 0.651 | - | - | - | |
ET | 3.29 | 1.02–10.62 | 0.047 | 2.94 | 0.76–11.36 | 0.117 | |
IPSET higha) | 0.28 | 0.05–1.62 | 0.155 | - | - | - | |
R-IPSET-T higha) | 0.47 | 0.03–8.60 | 0.603 | - | - | - | |
WBC >11.0×109/L | 0.89 | 0.23–3.42 | 0.864 | - | - | - | |
Monocyte >1.0×109/L | 0.30 | 0.03–3.04 | 0.310 | - | - | - | |
Platelet >600×109/L | 8.87 | 1.07–73.03 | 0.043 | 13.70 | 1.35–138.17 | 0.026 | |
Platelet >800×109/L | 1.23 | 0.45–3.79 | 0.631 | - | - | - | |
Platelet >1,000×109/L | 1.58 | 0.39–6.38 | 0.518 | - | - | - | |
LDH >1.5×UNL | 1.25 | 0.30–5.23 | 0.760 | - | - | - | |
Serum ferritin | 0.99 | 0.98–1.00 | 0.201 | - | - | - | |
Positive | 0.90 | 0.20–4.01 | 0.884 | - | - | - | |
0.67 | 0.19–2.40 | 0.535 | - | - | - | ||
0.43 | 0.08–2.22 | 0.314 | - | - | - | ||
Positive | 1.52 | 0.23–9.88 | 0.662 | - | - | - | |
Chronic kidney disease | 1.83 | 0.68–5.83 | 0.306 | - | - | - | |
Diabetes mellitus | 1.23 | 0.30–4.28 | 0.863 | - | - | - | |
Hypertension | 0.56 | 0.19–1.63 | 0.283 | - | - | - | |
Smoking | 0.60 | 0.15–2.47 | 0.479 | - | - | - | |
Dyslipidemia | 0.93 | 0.22–4.05 | 0.926 | - | - | - | |
Volumetric splenomegaly | 0.77 | 0.22–2.70 | 0.684 | - | - | - | |
Thrombosis before or at diagnosis | 0.65 | 0.10–4.14 | 0.652 | - | - | - |
a)Among ET patients..
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ET, essential thrombocythemia; IPSET, International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; OR, odds ratio; R-IPSET-T, revised IPSET-thrombosis; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency..
This study investigated the frequency of low VWF activity at the time of diagnosis and its clinical relevance in 64 newly diagnosed patients with Ph- MPN. To our knowledge, this is the first study to address Ph- MPN-related AVWS in the Korean population. Ph- MPN are characterized by frequent thrombotic vascular events and, to a lesser degree, bleeding. The clinical features of thrombotic vascular events in Korean patients with Ph- MPN differ somewhat from those in Western cases regarding the time of occurrence and sites involved [1]. Therefore, it is reasonable to obtain information on VWF abnormalities in Korean patients with Ph- MPN. Many previous reports on AVWS include the results of VWF tests not only at the time of MPN diagnosis, but also during follow-up [16, 17, 20]. Cytoreductive treatment strongly affects VWF activity [21]; therefore, testing VWF after treatment initiation could lead to an erroneous prevalence rate of AVWS. The present study enrolled only newly diagnosed patients to determine the exact prevalence of AVWS. AVWS was detected in 41.7% of patients with ET and 17.6% of patients with PV, and clinically significant bleeding was rarely observed. Individuals with type O generally have lower plasma levels of VWF than those with other blood types [22]. The present study did not incorporate blood type into defining AVWS; therefore, the prevalence of AVWS may have been overestimated. Estimates of AVWS in Western studies are 20% to 70% in ET and 12% to 30% in patients with PV according to laboratory criteria, but clinically significant bleeding is much less common, at 4% to 7% in some studies, affecting less than half of those with a laboratory diagnosis [5, 7]. Therefore, the prevalence of AVWS and bleeding in Korean patients did not differ from those in cases of Western patients. AVWS has seldom been reported in patients with PMF. We also did not diagnose AVWS in any of the five patients with PMF enrolled in the study. However, our data cannot be considered conclusive due to the limited number of patients.
We found the abnormal VWF:RCo ratio normalized after starting cytoreductive treatment in all patients, although platelet count remained high. This correction of VWF:RCo after cytoreduction could be a reason why bleeding was uncommon, as most of the patients with ET and PV in this study were placed on cytoreductive treatment according to standard risk stratification. Most reports of major bleeding in patients with MPN with AVWS are based on anecdotes, mainly in patients with unrecognized AVWS [23-26]. These observations indicate that most hemorrhagic events induced by AVWS occur before or at the time of MPN diagnosis and that proper cytoreduction can minimize the risk of bleeding. Taken together, it remains to be determined whether AVWS screening should be performed in all patients with Ph- MPN at the time of diagnosis.
A subpopulation of patients with ET present with a platelet count ≥1,000×109/L, which is arbitrarily called extreme thrombocytosis [27]. Extreme thrombocytosis is believed to be a prerequisite for AVWS [28]. Bleeding diathesis in ET or PV is currently believed to be multifactorial in etiology [29]. AVWS in patients with ET or PV is characterized by the loss of large VWF multimers, related to their increased adsorption to platelets and thus increased proteolysis by ADAMTS13 in a platelet count-dependent manner [21, 30-32]. Therefore, the guidelines recommend using aspirin with caution in both ET and PV in the presence of extreme thrombocytosis, as it promotes the development of AVWS [29, 33]. However, AVWS can occur even when the platelet count is <1,000×109/L [16, 17, 34]. In the present study, only 16.7% of patients with ET and 11.8% of patients with PV had platelet counts ≥1,000×109/L. Therefore, many patients with AVWS had platelet counts <1,000×109/L. These data support the suggestion that evaluating the laboratory AVWS is recommended in the presence of abnormal bleeding, regardless of platelet count [29].
In a previous study, younger age, platelet count, hemoglobin level and
In conclusion, AVWS defined on VWF:RCo was common in patients with ET and pre-PMF, and less common in patients with PV in the Korean population. No major bleeding was observed in any of the patients. To determine the role of AVWS screening at the time of MPN diagnosis, further characterization of this thesis is warranted in future studies that recruit many patients.
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Table 1 . Patient characteristics (N=64)..
ET (N=36) | PV (N=17) | pre-PMF (N=6) | PMF (N=5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 65 (18–84) | 72 (17–86) | 60.5 (34–87) | 77 (42–86) |
Female, N (%) | 20 (55.6) | 10 (58.8) | 3 (50.0) | 1 (20.0) |
Palpable splenomegaly, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 24 (66.7) | 15 (88.2) | 6 (100) | 5 (100) |
Laboratory findings | ||||
WBC, ×109/L | 10.9±4.7 | 14.6±4.6a) | 15.9±3.3a) | 12.9±9.0 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 0.7±0.6 | 0.6±0.3 | 0.6±0.3 | 1.4±1.2a) |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 14.0±1.4 | 17.9±2.5a) | 12.7±2.5 | 10.7±1.7a) |
Platelet, ×109/L | 870.3±314.0 | 614.2±381.3a) | 909.5±369.4 | 868.4±420.8 |
Platelet, ×109/L, N (%) | ||||
450–599 | 4 (11.1) | 2 (11.8) | 1 (16.7) | 4 (80.0) |
600–999 | 26 (72.2) | 6 (35.3) | 4 (66.7) | 0 (0.0) |
1,000–1,449 | 4 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
≥1,500 | 2 (5.6) | 2 (11.8) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.3±0.4 | 1.5±0.4 | 2.0±0.9a) | 1.9±0.3a) |
Driver gene mutation, N (%) | ||||
30 (83.3) | 17 (100) | 4 (66.7) | 3 (60.0) | |
3 (8.3) | - | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) | |
1 (2.8) | - | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
26.3±11.1 | 63.6±19.9a) | 47.6±19.4a) | 50.5±37.0a) | |
IPSET, N (%) | ||||
Low | 9 (25.0) | - | - | - |
Intermediate | 12 (33.3) | - | - | - |
High | 15 (41.7) | - | - | - |
IPSS, N (%) | ||||
Low | - | - | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Intermediate-1 | - | - | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Intemediate-2 | - | - | 1 (16.7) | 3 (60.0) |
High | - | - | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) |
Comorbidity, N (%) | ||||
Hypertension | 15 (41.7) | 13 (76.5) | 1 (16.7) | 3 (60.0) |
Diabetes mellitus | 4 (11.1) | 6 (35.3) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Chronic kidney disease | 6 (16.7) | 7 (41.2) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (40.0) |
Smoking | 7 (19.4) | 3 (17.6) | 2 (33.3) | 1 (20.0) |
Dyslipidemia | 5 (13.9) | 3 (17.6) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Treatments, N (%) | ||||
Cytoreductive treatment | ||||
Hydroxyurea | 23 (63.9) | 17 (88.2) | 6 (66.7) | 4 (80.0) |
Anagrelide | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) |
Aspirin | 33 (91.7) | 17 (100) | 6 (100) | 6 (100) |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 6 (16.7) | 3 (17.6) | 3 (33.3) | 3 (60.0) |
FU (yr), median (range) | 1.8 (0.1–3.9) | 2.5 (1.1–3.8) | 1.3 (0.2–2.9) | 2.5 (1.3–3.1) |
a)
Abbreviations: ET, essential thrombocythemia; FU, follow-up; IPSET, International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; pre-PMF, prefibrotic/early myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency..
Table 2 . Prevalence of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (N=64)..
ET (N=36) | PV (N=17) | pre-PMF (N=6) | PMF (N=5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
VWF:RCo <56%, N (%) | 15 (41.7) | 3 (17.6) | 2 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) |
VWF:Rco <30%, N (%) | 3 (8.3) | 3 (17.6) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) |
Abbreviations: ET, essential thrombocythemia; pre-PMF, prefibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera; VWF:Rco, von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity..
Table 3 . Clinical features of patients with essential thrombocythemia, according to von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (N=36)..
≥56% (N=21) | <56% (N=15) | ≥30% (N=33) | <30% (N=3) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 65 (40–84) | 56 (18–83) | 0.035 | 65 (18–84) | 69 (56–72) | 0.560 |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 13 (61.9) | 11 (73.3) | 0.473 | 23 (69.7) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
Laboratory findings | ||||||
WBC, ×109/L | 10.5±3.2 | 11.5±6.4 | 0.527 | 11.0±4.8 | 10.0±2.5 | 0.718 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 0.7±0.4 | 0.7±0.3 | 0.971 | 0.7±0.6 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.562 |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 14.0±1.5 | 13.9±1.5 | 0.821 | 14.0±1.2 | 13.2±0.8 | 0.406 |
Platelet, ×109/L | 813.7±170.7 | 949.7±440.0 | 0.205 | 837.8±228.8 | 1,228.3±824.8 | 0.037 |
Platelet ≥600×109/L, N (%) | 18 (85.7) | 14 (93.3) | 0.473 | 29 (87.9) | 3 (100) | 0.522 |
Platelet ≥1,000×109/L, N (%) | 3 (14.3) | 3 (20.0) | 0.650 | 5 (15.2) | 1 (33.3) | 0.418 |
Platelet ≥1,500×109/L, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (13.2) | 0.085 | 1 (3.0) | 1 (33.3) | 0.028 |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.4±0.4 | 1.2±0.3 | 0.141 | 1.3±0.4 | 1.5±0.4 | 0.488 |
PT, sec | 12.1±1.0 | 11.5±0.9 | 0.057 | 11.9±0.9 | 11.0±1.6 | 0.139 |
aPTT, sec | 35.6±3.8 | 35.8±3.6 | 0.829 | 35.9±3.6 | 32.9±3.7 | 0.168 |
Driver gene mutation, N (%) | ||||||
19 (90.5) | 12 (80.0) | 0.370 | 29 (87.9) | 2 (66.7) | 0.309 | |
7 (33.3%) | 3 (20.0%) | 0.379 | 9 (27.3) | 1 (33.3) | 0.825 | |
1 (4.8) | 2 (13.3) | 0.625 | 2 (6.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.249 | |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 4 (19.0) | 2 (13.3) | 0.650 | 6 (18.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.418 |
Bleeding, N (%) | ||||||
Major bleeding | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
Minor bleeding | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.230 | 1 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.760 |
Overall | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0.230 | 1 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.760 |
Normalization of VWF:RCo after cytoreduction, N (%)c) | - | 11/11 (100) | - | - | - | - |
Time to normalization of VWF:RCo (wk), median (range) | - | 8 (2–18) | - | - | - | - |
a)Data presented as mean±SD were analyzed using Student t-test for pared samples; data presented as percentages were analyzed using the Chi-square test. b)Thrombosis occurred before, at the time of, and after diagnosis. c)Platelet counts were 556.5±171.8×109/L at the time of initial normalization of VWF:RCo..
Abbreviations: aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PT, prothrombin time; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency; VWF:RCo, von Willabrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity..
Table 4 . Clinical features of patients with polycythemia vera according to von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (N=17)..
≥30% (N=14) | <30% (N=3) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Age (yr), median (range) | 73.5 (44–86) | 61 (55–72) | 0.377 |
Volumetric splenomegaly, N (%) | 13 (92.9) | 2 (66.7) | 0.201 |
Laboratory findings | |||
WBC, ×109/L | 15.2±5.0 | 16.6±2.7 | 0.656 |
Monocyte, ×109/L | 00.6±0.2 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.075 |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 17.9±2.6 | 17.7±2.6 | 0.879 |
Platelet, ×109/L | 510.0±206.7 | 1,120.7±671.7 | 0.009 |
Platelet >600×109/L, N (%) | 5 (35.7) | 3 (100) | 0.043 |
Platelet >1,000×109/L, N (%) | 1 (7.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
Platelet >1,500×109/L, N (%) | 1 (7.1) | 1 (33.3) | 0.201 |
LDH, ×UNL | 1.5±0.5 | 1.6±0.1 | 0.728 |
14 (100) | 3 (100) | - | |
2 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0.661 | |
Thrombosis, N (%)b) | 3 (21.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0.377 |
Bleeding, N (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
Normalization of VWF:RCo after cytoreduction, N (%)c) | - | 3 (100) | - |
a)Data presented as mean±SD were analyzed using Student t-test for pared samples; data presented as percentages were analyzed using the Chi-square test. b)Thrombosis occurred before, at the time of, and after diagnosis. c)Platelet counts were 444.0±194.6×109/L at the time of initial normalization of VWF:RCo..
Abbreviations: LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency; VWF:RCo; von Willabrand factor, ristocetin cofactor activity..
Table 5 . Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors for developing acquired von Willebrand syndrome at diagnosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (N=64)..
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||||
Age <50 yr | 4.29 | 1.05–17.45 | 0.042 | 7.08 | 1.27–39.48 | 0.026 | |
Male | 0.73 | 0.73–2.81 | 0.651 | - | - | - | |
ET | 3.29 | 1.02–10.62 | 0.047 | 2.94 | 0.76–11.36 | 0.117 | |
IPSET higha) | 0.28 | 0.05–1.62 | 0.155 | - | - | - | |
R-IPSET-T higha) | 0.47 | 0.03–8.60 | 0.603 | - | - | - | |
WBC >11.0×109/L | 0.89 | 0.23–3.42 | 0.864 | - | - | - | |
Monocyte >1.0×109/L | 0.30 | 0.03–3.04 | 0.310 | - | - | - | |
Platelet >600×109/L | 8.87 | 1.07–73.03 | 0.043 | 13.70 | 1.35–138.17 | 0.026 | |
Platelet >800×109/L | 1.23 | 0.45–3.79 | 0.631 | - | - | - | |
Platelet >1,000×109/L | 1.58 | 0.39–6.38 | 0.518 | - | - | - | |
LDH >1.5×UNL | 1.25 | 0.30–5.23 | 0.760 | - | - | - | |
Serum ferritin | 0.99 | 0.98–1.00 | 0.201 | - | - | - | |
Positive | 0.90 | 0.20–4.01 | 0.884 | - | - | - | |
0.67 | 0.19–2.40 | 0.535 | - | - | - | ||
0.43 | 0.08–2.22 | 0.314 | - | - | - | ||
Positive | 1.52 | 0.23–9.88 | 0.662 | - | - | - | |
Chronic kidney disease | 1.83 | 0.68–5.83 | 0.306 | - | - | - | |
Diabetes mellitus | 1.23 | 0.30–4.28 | 0.863 | - | - | - | |
Hypertension | 0.56 | 0.19–1.63 | 0.283 | - | - | - | |
Smoking | 0.60 | 0.15–2.47 | 0.479 | - | - | - | |
Dyslipidemia | 0.93 | 0.22–4.05 | 0.926 | - | - | - | |
Volumetric splenomegaly | 0.77 | 0.22–2.70 | 0.684 | - | - | - | |
Thrombosis before or at diagnosis | 0.65 | 0.10–4.14 | 0.652 | - | - | - |
a)Among ET patients..
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ET, essential thrombocythemia; IPSET, International Prognostic Score for Essential Thrombocythemia; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; OR, odds ratio; R-IPSET-T, revised IPSET-thrombosis; UNL, upper normal limit; VAF, variant allele frequency..
Ik-Chan Song, Sang Hoon Yeon, Myung-Won Lee, Hyewon Ryu, Hyo-Jin Lee, Hwan-Jung Yun, Seon Young Kim, Deog-Yeon Jo
Blood Res 2022; 57(1): 59-68Myeong-Won Lee, Hyewon Ryu, Yoon-Seok Choi, Ik-Chan Song, Hyo-Jin Lee, Hwan-Jung Yun, Byung Joo Sun, Jin-Ok Jeong, Deog-Yeon Jo
Blood Res 2020; 55(2): 77-84Seug Yun Yoon, Jong-Ho Won
Blood Res 2023; 58(S1): S83-S89