Korean J Hematol 2011; 46(1):
Published online March 31, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2011.46.1.24
© The Korean Society of Hematology
1Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
2Genome Research Center for Hematopoietic Diseases, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.
3Department of Hematology/Oncology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Correspondence to : Correspondence to Hyeoung-Joon Kim, M.D., Ph.D. Hematology/Oncology Clinics, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 160 Ilsim-ri, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun-gun, Jellanam-do 519-809, Korea. Tel: +82-61-379-7637, Fax: +82-61-379-7628, hjoonk@jnu.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All-
Induction therapy included oral ATRA (45 mg/m2/day) and idarubicin (12 mg/m2/day, intravenous, on days 2, 4, and 6). Patients achieving complete remission (CR) received 3 courses of ATRA combined with reinforced consolidation therapy. Mutations were analyzed using GeneScan and polymerasae chain reaction assays of bone marrow samples obtained from patients at diagnosis.
Forty-five (84.9%) of 53 eligible patients achieved CR. The overall relapse rate was 8.9%, and the 3-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 84.9±4.9% and 77.5±6.0%, respectively. The
This study investigated the clinical outcome of newly diagnosed APL patients treated with ATRA/anthracycline chemotherapy. Patients carrying the
Keywords Acute promyelocytic leukemia, FLT3, Prognosis
Most patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) are now successfully treated with all-
While the survival in most APL patients treated with ATRA plus chemotherapy is excellent, relapse or failure to achieve molecular remission is observed in 20-30% patients [2]. Several pretreatment characteristics of APL patients have been identified as having prognostic value [3]. Among them, the presenting white blood cell (WBC) count has the highest impact on the patient outcome [4].
The cooperative group PETHEMA (Programa de Estudio y Tratamiento de las Hemopatías Maligna) reported a risk-adapted treatment strategy of combining ATRA and anthracycline monochemotherapy for both induction and consolidation, followed by maintenance with ATRA and low-dose methotrexate and mercaptopurine [5, 6]. With the previously used treatment regimen, the number of deaths during induction and the relapse rates were higher in patients having an elevated WBC [4]. Therefore, PETHEMA recommended risk stratification based on the WBC and platelet counts at presentation (low-risk group, presenting WBC count of ≤10×109/L and platelet count of >40×109/L; intermediate-risk group, presenting WBC of ≤10×109/L and platelets ≤40×109/L; and high-risk group: presenting WBC count of >10×109/L). Recently, the French APL 2000 and PETHEMA 99 trials showed that a cytarabine-containing regimen resulted in a better CR rate and longer survival in patients with a high WBC count at presentation [7].
The frequency of the
The
In this study, we assessed the treatment outcome of combined ATRA/anthracycline chemotherapy administered as induction and consolidation chemotherapy in APL patients and investigated a series of uniformly treated APL patients to identify the prognostic relevance of various factors present at diagnosis.
Induction therapy consisted of oral ATRA (45 mg/m2 per day in 2 divided doses), which was maintained for a median 45 days or until complete hematologic remission and idarubicin (12 mg/m2 per day) was administered as an intravenous bolus on days 2, 4, and 6. Unlike the protocol followed in previous studies [5-7], ours did not include administration of idarubicin on day 8; this was to eliminate the risk of severe myelosuppression during the treatment for remission induction. Treatment with ATRA was started as soon as APL was diagnosed on the basis of the morphological criteria. For patients in whom the diagnosis was not confirmed by genetic studies, ATRA treatment was withdrawn, and alternative chemotherapy was administered at the physician's discretion. Patients achieving CR received 3 courses of ATRA (45 mg/m2/d, days 1-15) combined with reinforced consolidation chemotherapy, which consisted of idarubicin (7 mg/m2/d for 4 d), mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2/d for 5 d), and idarubicin (12 mg/m2/d for 2 d). Risk stratification was defined using the WBC and platelet counts at presentation, as described in previous studies [5, 6, 20]. For maintenance therapy, ATRA (45 mg/m2/d, days 1-15) was administered every 3 months for 2 years. As supportive care, platelets were transfused to maintain a platelet count of >30×109/L until resolution of coagulopathy, if any. Once the coagulopathy was under control, platelets were transfused only if the patient had infectious or hemorrhagic manifestations or if the platelet count dropped to below 20×109/L. Patients with active coagulopathy were treated with fresh frozen plasma or cryoprecipitate to maintain the fibrinogen level at >1.5 mg/L and hemostatic levels of coagulation factors.
All patients were confirmed to have t(15;17) or PML-RARA fusion transcript by using conventional cytogenetic techniques or nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respectively.
Genomic DNA was extracted from cells, such as cryopreserved mononuclear cells, which were harvested from BM samples by using a QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. For
For
CR was defined as per the criteria recommended previously [21]. Relapse was defined as the reappearance of blasts after CR in peripheral blood or BM. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) end points, measured from the date of documented CR, included relapse, patient death from any cause, and alive in CR at last follow-up (censored). The overall survival (OS) end points, measured from the date of diagnosis, were death from any cause and alive at last follow-up (censored) [21].
For intergroup comparisons, Fisher's exact test (categorical data) and the Mann-Whitney
The median age of the 53 APL patients was 48 years (range, 18-75 years), with 7 patients being over 60 years. Low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, according to the risk stratification, accounted for 26.4%, 43.4%, and 30.2% of the cases, respectively (Table 1). All patients had received intensive remission-induction chemotherapy. The median follow-up period was 30.8 months (range, 0.2-73.6 months).
BM samples of 50 patients were evaluated for
Of the 53 eligible patients, 45 (84.9%) achieved CR. One patient (1.9%) showed resistance to induction chemotherapy, and the remaining 7 (13.2%) died during the induction chemotherapy. Of the 7 early deaths, 3 were due to the differentiation syndrome and 4 due to cerebral or pulmonary hemorrhage. Four (8.9%) patients had clinical relapse 7-15 months after achieving CR. The 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS and LFS were 84.9±4.9% and 77.5±6.0%, respectively (Fig. 1). Patients with the hypogranular variant subtype did not show a significant difference in the treatment outcomes.
With induction chemotherapy, the high-risk group, defined using the WBC and platelet counts at presentation, had a lower rate of remission compared to the intermediate- and low-risk groups; however, the difference was not statistically significant (81.3% vs. 82.6% vs. 92.9%, respectively;
A significant difference was noted between the remission rates achieved by induction chemotherapy in patients with and without
Multivariate analysis of the LFS revealed that the
Because the use of the induction regimen with combined ATRA and anthracycline chemotherapy resulted in high CR rates and good disease-free survival (DFS), the inclusion of cytarabine in addition to daunorubicin or idarubicin for APL patients is considered to have no impact on the treatment outcome [20]. Thus, since many years, ATRA combined with anthracycline monochemotherapy has been used as a standard treatment for APL. In this study, we assessed the clinical outcome of APL patients treated with ATRA combined with anthracycline chemotherapy.
Previous studies on the use of combined ATRA and chemotherapy without cytarabine for the treatment for newly diagnosed APL showed CR rates ranging from 81 to 95% [1, 20]; the CR rate in this study was 84.9%. Because only 1 patient showed resistance to the induction chemotherapy regimen, the inferior treatment outcome of our study seemed to result from the high rates of early death during the induction chemotherapy due to fatal bleeding or differentiation syndrome; this suggests that early awareness and management of such complications are important.
This study also demonstrated that the patients in the high-risk group, based on the WBC and platelet counts at presentation, tended to have poorer clinical outcomes, such as lower CR rates, higher relapse rates, and shorter LFS, as compared to those in the low- or intermediate-risk groups; however, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant.
In this series of APL patients, we evaluated the prevalence and clinical impact of
While the prognostic implications of the
In summary, our study examined the clinical outcome of combined ATRA and anthracycline chemotherapy in newly diagnosed APL patients. Patients with
Kaplan-Meier analysis of the APL patients.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of APL according to pretreatment risk stratification.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of APL patients with the
Table 1 Demographic data of 53 acute promyelocytic leukemia patients.
Abbreviations: FAB, French-American-British; WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; BM, bone marrow.
Table 2 Patient characteristics according to
Abbreviations: WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; BM, bone marrow.
Table 3 Treatment outcomes according to risk group and
Abbreviation: CR, complete remission.
Table 4 Multivariate analyses for leukemia-free and overall survival.
Abbreviations: LFS, leukemia-free survival; OS, overall survival; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Korean J Hematol 2011; 46(1): 24-30
Published online March 31, 2011 https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2011.46.1.24
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Seung-Dok Hong1, Yeo-Kyeoung Kim1, Hee-Nam Kim2, Se Ryeon Lee3, Jae-Sook Ahn1, Deok-Hwan Yang1, Je-Jung Lee1, Il-Kwon Lee2, Myung-Geun Shin4, and Hyeoung-Joon Kim1,2*
1Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
2Genome Research Center for Hematopoietic Diseases, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.
3Department of Hematology/Oncology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Correspondence to: Correspondence to Hyeoung-Joon Kim, M.D., Ph.D. Hematology/Oncology Clinics, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 160 Ilsim-ri, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun-gun, Jellanam-do 519-809, Korea. Tel: +82-61-379-7637, Fax: +82-61-379-7628, hjoonk@jnu.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All-
Induction therapy included oral ATRA (45 mg/m2/day) and idarubicin (12 mg/m2/day, intravenous, on days 2, 4, and 6). Patients achieving complete remission (CR) received 3 courses of ATRA combined with reinforced consolidation therapy. Mutations were analyzed using GeneScan and polymerasae chain reaction assays of bone marrow samples obtained from patients at diagnosis.
Forty-five (84.9%) of 53 eligible patients achieved CR. The overall relapse rate was 8.9%, and the 3-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 84.9±4.9% and 77.5±6.0%, respectively. The
This study investigated the clinical outcome of newly diagnosed APL patients treated with ATRA/anthracycline chemotherapy. Patients carrying the
Keywords: Acute promyelocytic leukemia, FLT3, Prognosis
Most patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) are now successfully treated with all-
While the survival in most APL patients treated with ATRA plus chemotherapy is excellent, relapse or failure to achieve molecular remission is observed in 20-30% patients [2]. Several pretreatment characteristics of APL patients have been identified as having prognostic value [3]. Among them, the presenting white blood cell (WBC) count has the highest impact on the patient outcome [4].
The cooperative group PETHEMA (Programa de Estudio y Tratamiento de las Hemopatías Maligna) reported a risk-adapted treatment strategy of combining ATRA and anthracycline monochemotherapy for both induction and consolidation, followed by maintenance with ATRA and low-dose methotrexate and mercaptopurine [5, 6]. With the previously used treatment regimen, the number of deaths during induction and the relapse rates were higher in patients having an elevated WBC [4]. Therefore, PETHEMA recommended risk stratification based on the WBC and platelet counts at presentation (low-risk group, presenting WBC count of ≤10×109/L and platelet count of >40×109/L; intermediate-risk group, presenting WBC of ≤10×109/L and platelets ≤40×109/L; and high-risk group: presenting WBC count of >10×109/L). Recently, the French APL 2000 and PETHEMA 99 trials showed that a cytarabine-containing regimen resulted in a better CR rate and longer survival in patients with a high WBC count at presentation [7].
The frequency of the
The
In this study, we assessed the treatment outcome of combined ATRA/anthracycline chemotherapy administered as induction and consolidation chemotherapy in APL patients and investigated a series of uniformly treated APL patients to identify the prognostic relevance of various factors present at diagnosis.
Induction therapy consisted of oral ATRA (45 mg/m2 per day in 2 divided doses), which was maintained for a median 45 days or until complete hematologic remission and idarubicin (12 mg/m2 per day) was administered as an intravenous bolus on days 2, 4, and 6. Unlike the protocol followed in previous studies [5-7], ours did not include administration of idarubicin on day 8; this was to eliminate the risk of severe myelosuppression during the treatment for remission induction. Treatment with ATRA was started as soon as APL was diagnosed on the basis of the morphological criteria. For patients in whom the diagnosis was not confirmed by genetic studies, ATRA treatment was withdrawn, and alternative chemotherapy was administered at the physician's discretion. Patients achieving CR received 3 courses of ATRA (45 mg/m2/d, days 1-15) combined with reinforced consolidation chemotherapy, which consisted of idarubicin (7 mg/m2/d for 4 d), mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2/d for 5 d), and idarubicin (12 mg/m2/d for 2 d). Risk stratification was defined using the WBC and platelet counts at presentation, as described in previous studies [5, 6, 20]. For maintenance therapy, ATRA (45 mg/m2/d, days 1-15) was administered every 3 months for 2 years. As supportive care, platelets were transfused to maintain a platelet count of >30×109/L until resolution of coagulopathy, if any. Once the coagulopathy was under control, platelets were transfused only if the patient had infectious or hemorrhagic manifestations or if the platelet count dropped to below 20×109/L. Patients with active coagulopathy were treated with fresh frozen plasma or cryoprecipitate to maintain the fibrinogen level at >1.5 mg/L and hemostatic levels of coagulation factors.
All patients were confirmed to have t(15;17) or PML-RARA fusion transcript by using conventional cytogenetic techniques or nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respectively.
Genomic DNA was extracted from cells, such as cryopreserved mononuclear cells, which were harvested from BM samples by using a QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. For
For
CR was defined as per the criteria recommended previously [21]. Relapse was defined as the reappearance of blasts after CR in peripheral blood or BM. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) end points, measured from the date of documented CR, included relapse, patient death from any cause, and alive in CR at last follow-up (censored). The overall survival (OS) end points, measured from the date of diagnosis, were death from any cause and alive at last follow-up (censored) [21].
For intergroup comparisons, Fisher's exact test (categorical data) and the Mann-Whitney
The median age of the 53 APL patients was 48 years (range, 18-75 years), with 7 patients being over 60 years. Low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, according to the risk stratification, accounted for 26.4%, 43.4%, and 30.2% of the cases, respectively (Table 1). All patients had received intensive remission-induction chemotherapy. The median follow-up period was 30.8 months (range, 0.2-73.6 months).
BM samples of 50 patients were evaluated for
Of the 53 eligible patients, 45 (84.9%) achieved CR. One patient (1.9%) showed resistance to induction chemotherapy, and the remaining 7 (13.2%) died during the induction chemotherapy. Of the 7 early deaths, 3 were due to the differentiation syndrome and 4 due to cerebral or pulmonary hemorrhage. Four (8.9%) patients had clinical relapse 7-15 months after achieving CR. The 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS and LFS were 84.9±4.9% and 77.5±6.0%, respectively (Fig. 1). Patients with the hypogranular variant subtype did not show a significant difference in the treatment outcomes.
With induction chemotherapy, the high-risk group, defined using the WBC and platelet counts at presentation, had a lower rate of remission compared to the intermediate- and low-risk groups; however, the difference was not statistically significant (81.3% vs. 82.6% vs. 92.9%, respectively;
A significant difference was noted between the remission rates achieved by induction chemotherapy in patients with and without
Multivariate analysis of the LFS revealed that the
Because the use of the induction regimen with combined ATRA and anthracycline chemotherapy resulted in high CR rates and good disease-free survival (DFS), the inclusion of cytarabine in addition to daunorubicin or idarubicin for APL patients is considered to have no impact on the treatment outcome [20]. Thus, since many years, ATRA combined with anthracycline monochemotherapy has been used as a standard treatment for APL. In this study, we assessed the clinical outcome of APL patients treated with ATRA combined with anthracycline chemotherapy.
Previous studies on the use of combined ATRA and chemotherapy without cytarabine for the treatment for newly diagnosed APL showed CR rates ranging from 81 to 95% [1, 20]; the CR rate in this study was 84.9%. Because only 1 patient showed resistance to the induction chemotherapy regimen, the inferior treatment outcome of our study seemed to result from the high rates of early death during the induction chemotherapy due to fatal bleeding or differentiation syndrome; this suggests that early awareness and management of such complications are important.
This study also demonstrated that the patients in the high-risk group, based on the WBC and platelet counts at presentation, tended to have poorer clinical outcomes, such as lower CR rates, higher relapse rates, and shorter LFS, as compared to those in the low- or intermediate-risk groups; however, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant.
In this series of APL patients, we evaluated the prevalence and clinical impact of
While the prognostic implications of the
In summary, our study examined the clinical outcome of combined ATRA and anthracycline chemotherapy in newly diagnosed APL patients. Patients with
Kaplan-Meier analysis of the APL patients.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of APL according to pretreatment risk stratification.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of APL patients with the
Table 1 . Demographic data of 53 acute promyelocytic leukemia patients..
Abbreviations: FAB, French-American-British; WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; BM, bone marrow..
Table 2 . Patient characteristics according to
Abbreviations: WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; BM, bone marrow..
Table 3 . Treatment outcomes according to risk group and
Abbreviation: CR, complete remission..
Table 4 . Multivariate analyses for leukemia-free and overall survival..
Abbreviations: LFS, leukemia-free survival; OS, overall survival; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval..
Young‑Uk Cho
Blood Res 2024; 59():Naree Warnnissorn, Nonglak Kanitsap, Pimjai Niparuck, Paisarn Boonsakan, Prapasri Kulalert, Wasithep Limvorapitak, Lantarima Bhoopat, Supawee Saengboon, Chinnawut Suriyonplengsaeng, Pichika Chantrathammachart, Teeraya Puavilai and Suporn Chuncharunee
Blood Res 2024; 59():Xiaobo Liu, Yanliang Bai, Ying Liu, Weiya Li, Yabin Cui, Jinhui Xu, Xingjun Xiao, Xiaona Niu, Kai Sun
Blood Res 2023; 58(4): 187-193
Kaplan-Meier analysis of the APL patients.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of APL according to pretreatment risk stratification.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of APL patients with the