Blood Res 2023; 58(S1):
Published online April 30, 2023
https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2023008
© The Korean Society of Hematology
Correspondence to : Eun Jung Baek, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, 153 Gyeongchun-ro, Guri 11923, Korea
E-mail: doceunjung@hanyang.ac.kr
#These authors contributed equally to this work.
*This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea; funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (NRF-2019R1A2C2090053) and by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2020).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Owing to donor-related issues, blood shortages and transfusion-related adverse reactions have become global issues of grave concern. In vitro manufactured red blood cells (RBCs) are promising substitutes for blood donation. In the United Kingdom, a clinical trial for allogeneic mini transfusion of cultured RBCs derived from primary hematopoietic stem cells has recently begun. However, current production quantities are limited and need improved before clinical use. New methods to enhance manufacturing efficiencies have been explored, including different cell sources, bioreactors, and 3-dimensional (3D) materials; however, further research is required. In this review, we discuss various cell sources for blood cell production, recent advances in bioreactor manufacturing processes, and the clinical applications of cultured blood.
Keywords Erythrocytes, Bioreactors, Erythroid cells, Cell culture techniques
Abnormal production or loss of red blood cells (RBCs) can cause life-threatening anemia and thrombocytopenia. Although blood transfusion is an essential treatment for these patients, inadequate blood supplies and transfusion-related adverse reactions pose potential challenges to the global healthcare system [1, 2].
Since the initial era of 2D culture systems for producing blood cells on a small scale in the laboratory, the use of modified culture systems has been reported. The current consensus is a 3-step method for liquid culture of erythroid cells (Table 1) [5]. Briefly, HSCs are expanded using erythropoietin (EPO), stem cell factor (SCF), and interleukin-3 (IL-3) in a base medium; Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) or StemSpan serum-free expansion medium (SFEM, Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Erythroblast expansion in the presence of SCF, EPO, and transferrin is followed by terminal differentiation, with or without EPO. While the expansion of erythroblasts requires supplementation with SCF and EPO, cells at the terminal differentiation stage gradually lose receptors for these cytokines [6]. Since the enucleated reticulocytes still have ferritin receptors; transferrin, which provides iron to erythroid cells, should be supplemented until the end of the final maturation.
Table 1 Overview of sources and culture media for the production of red blood cells.
HSC commitment | |
---|---|
Cell cultures | Erythropoiesis |
Cell sources | CB, BM, PB, hESC, hiPSC, immortalized erythroid progenitor cell lines |
Media | StemSpan, IMDM, Cell-Quina) |
Additives | EPO, TPO, SCF, IL-3, transferrin, holo-transferrin, IL-6, Flt-3, heparin, IGF-1, glucocorticoids, TGF-β agonist, PPAR-α agonist |
a)GMP-grade homemade media.
Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; CB, cord blood; EPO, erythropoietin; Flt-3, feline Mcdonough sarcoma-like tyrosine kinase 3; hESC, human embryonic stem cell; hiPSC, human induced pluripotent stem cell; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; IMDM, Isocove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium; PB, peripheral blood; PPAR-α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α; SCF, stem cell factor; IL, interleukin; TGF-β, transforming growth factor β; TPO, thrombopoietin.
Enucleation is a crucial factor because nucleated erythroblasts are less effective at transporting oxygen and are more prone to hemolysis as they pass through small capillaries. Enucleated cells also have the advantage of no DNA and the inability to divide, thus preventing the transfer of malignancy to the recipient [7].
Additional additives, such as thrombopoietin, IL-6, feline McDonough sarcoma-like tyrosine kinase 3, heparin, glucocorticoids, insulin-like growth factor-1, transforming growth factor β agonists, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonists, can be added and further modified; with or without serum or feeder layers [8-10].
A major concern is the scale of production required to meet the standard adult therapeutic transfusion dose. Because more than 2×1012 RBCs are required per unit, a conventional 2D culture system requires 1,000 L of medium with a culture density of 2×106 cells/mL [11]. High-density cell culture is critical for overcoming the massive volume of media required [5]. Cells grown in suspension should be maintained at a density of >1×108 cells/mL to produce the numbers required within a minimal medium volume [12]. In addition, greater than 90% enucleation is important for better final erythrocyte yield [10]. Final erythrocytes should have adult hemoglobin and express accurate blood group antigens, such as O RhD-negative, for the universal blood type.
In this review, we discuss recent advances in the manufacturing of RBCs using various cell sources, 3D manufacturing methods, and clinical applications.
The first studies on cultured RBCs (cRBCs) focused primarily on human adult HSCs derived from CB, BM, and mobilized PB [13-15]. However, because of their limited proliferation capacity and low yield, RBCs derived from primary stem cells are difficult to use in clinical settings. An emerging model source uses the high proliferative potential of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). However, these cells show very low degrees of enucleation and very low adult hemoglobin expression. Recent studies have focused on the development of immortalized cell lines at the adult erythroblast stage.
Complex 3D culture systems have been studied to mimic the BM niche which regulates the generation of blood cells with a focus on topography, local stiffness of physical constraints, soluble factors, small molecules, and feeder layers.
Severn
Lee
It is unclear which type of bioreactor is the best for RBC production. Culturing at a high cell density is inevitable because of the large quantity of cells required in the final product for transfusion. Perfusion-based hollow-fiber bioreactors are known to increase the cell culture density. In a small scale study using a 2 mL vessel, CB-derived CD34+ cells inoculated at a density of 800,000 cells/mL expanded 100-fold and differentiated into erythroid cells over a 7 day period [19]. Additionally, Allenby
Wave-like rocking motion bioreactors, fluidized bed bioreactors [23, 24], rotating wall vessel bioreactors, and stirred tank reactors (STRs) have been proposed for the mass transfer of nutrients and oxygen to achieve greater erythroblast expansion and enucleation.
Since the effects of agitation on
The transfer of static culture to a flask-based system has been studied to scale up culture conditions. Griffiths
Sivalingam
Zhang
An STR is a cylindrical vessel with a stirrer that is widely used to culture biological agents, including enzymes, antibodies, and cells. It has been widely used in industry because of its relatively easy scale-up, uniform distribution of cells and nutrients, sufficient oxygen transfer, ease of control and monitoring of culture conditions, and compliance with current GMP requirements [31, 32].
The Thomas group [33, 34] used 15 mL Ambr bioreactors using a design of experiments (DOE) methodology. However, the final cell yield was as low as 16-fold after 25 days and 8-fold after 16 days. This group later refined the experimental design for bioreactor process development, gas transfer parameters, and media volume. However, proliferation in the STR was lower than that in static cultures, with 12-fold growth in the STR and 14-fold growth in static cultures being achieved in 25 culture days. Differentiation and enucleation, in addition to a reduction in culture time and media volume, were enhanced in STR compared to static conditions [35]. Lee
Han
Table 2 3D scaffolds and bioreactors for the production of red blood cells.
Types | Cell source | Culture period | Fold increase in total cells | Enucleation rate | Maximal cell density | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Porous scaffold (polyHIPEs) | PB CD34+ cells | 14 days of expansion (in scaffolds), 12 days of differentiation (in spinner flasks) | 5,180- fold [(2.59±0.212) ×109 total cells] | 16.25% (post- leuko-filtration) | 1.6×106 cells/mL (in spinner flasks) | Severn |
Microcarrier (cytoline I) | Late erythroblasts differentiated CB CD34+ cells | 1–3 days after culturing in 2D plates for 13–15 days | 2,200-fold in 2D culture | 80% | 1×107 cells/mL | Lee |
Hollow fiber (BR001) | CB CD34+ cells | 7 days | 100-fold (small-scale of 2 mL or 8 mL) | 40% | 8×107 cells/mL | Housler |
Hollow fiber (3DHFR) | CB MNCs | 28 days | 4.4-fold (550-fold from the stimulated erythroid progenitors) | 23% | 2×109 cells/mL | Allenby |
Hollow fiber (BR2) | CB MNCs | 28 days | 50-fold | 50% | 2.5×109 cells/mL | Allenby |
Wave-type (CultiBag RM bioreactor) | CB CD34+ cells | 21 days | 1.73×106-fold | Not reported | 1×105 cells/mL | Timmins |
2 L glass vessels (stirred) | PB CD34+cells | 18–24 days | 104-fold | 55–95% | 1–6×105 cells/mL | Griffiths |
1.5 L flasks (stirred) | PB and CB CD34+ cells | 21 days | 105-fold | PB: ≤60% | 1–4×106 cells/mL from day14 | Kupzig |
CB: ≤38% | ||||||
500 mL spinner flasks | hiPSC | 39 days | 206–805-fold | 18.1–59.3% | 1.7×107 cells/mL | Sivalingam |
Stirred-tank Applikon BioSep perfusion bioreactor | O-negative hiPSC | 29 days | 1510.7-fold | ≤30% | 3.47×107 cells/mL | Yu |
Bottle turning device culture system | CB CD34+cells | 21 days | 2×108-fold | 50% | 2.42×106 cells/mL | Zhang |
G-Rex bioreactor | PB MNCs | 25 days | 3×107-fold | ≥90% | 5–10×106 cells/mL | Heshusius |
Stirred micro-bioreactor (Ambr) | CB CD34+ cells | 25 days | 12-fold | 80% | 1–5×106 cells/mL | Bayley |
Shake flask | PB MNCs | 10 days | 13.8-fold | Not reported | 3.06×106 cells/mL | Lee |
Stirred bioreactor (Ambr) | CB CD34+ cells | 21 days (cultured in 2D plates for 13 days) | 2.25×104-fold | 50% | 1.5×107 cells/mL | Han |
Stirred bioreactor (Single wall or AppliFlex) | PB MNCs | 22 days | 750-fold (0.5 L), 196-fold (3 L) | 30–35% | 0.7–2×106 cells/mL | Gallego-Murillo |
The first human transfusion of cRBCs was reported in 2011. HSCs were isolated from autologous mobilized PB, and 61,500±7,600-fold expansion was achieved by co-culture with mesenchymal stem cells. Subsequently, 1010 cRBCs were transfused and the half-life of the infused cells was approximately 26 days, demonstrating the safety of the cRBCs [39]. In 2022, a randomized and controlled phase I crossover trial titled RESTORE was announced to recruit at least ten healthy volunteers. Approximately 5–10 mL of lab-grown RBCs from allogeneic donors were transfused into 2 healthy individuals and no side effects have been reported. The details of current clinical trials of cultured red blood cells are shown in Table 3; ongoing studies will test the lifespan of lab-grown cells in the body and the donor’s fresh blood.
Table 3 Clinical trials of cultured red blood cells.
Types | cRBC | |
---|---|---|
Cell origin | Autologous PB stem cells | Allogeneic PB stem cells |
Infused cells | RBC | RBC |
Recipient | Healthy volunteer | Healthy volunteers |
Enrollment no. | 1 | 2 |
Identifiers | NCT00929266 | ISRCTN:42886452 |
EudraCT:2017-002178-38 | ||
Location | France | UK |
Significant progress has been made in the generation of
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Blood Res 2023; 58(S1): S46-S51
Published online April 30, 2023 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2023008
Copyright © The Korean Society of Hematology.
Soonho Kweon1#, Suyeon Kim1#, Eun Jung Baek1,2,3
1Department R&D, ArtBlood Inc., 2Department of Translational Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to:Eun Jung Baek, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, 153 Gyeongchun-ro, Guri 11923, Korea
E-mail: doceunjung@hanyang.ac.kr
#These authors contributed equally to this work.
*This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea; funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (NRF-2019R1A2C2090053) and by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2020).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Owing to donor-related issues, blood shortages and transfusion-related adverse reactions have become global issues of grave concern. In vitro manufactured red blood cells (RBCs) are promising substitutes for blood donation. In the United Kingdom, a clinical trial for allogeneic mini transfusion of cultured RBCs derived from primary hematopoietic stem cells has recently begun. However, current production quantities are limited and need improved before clinical use. New methods to enhance manufacturing efficiencies have been explored, including different cell sources, bioreactors, and 3-dimensional (3D) materials; however, further research is required. In this review, we discuss various cell sources for blood cell production, recent advances in bioreactor manufacturing processes, and the clinical applications of cultured blood.
Keywords: Erythrocytes, Bioreactors, Erythroid cells, Cell culture techniques
Abnormal production or loss of red blood cells (RBCs) can cause life-threatening anemia and thrombocytopenia. Although blood transfusion is an essential treatment for these patients, inadequate blood supplies and transfusion-related adverse reactions pose potential challenges to the global healthcare system [1, 2].
Since the initial era of 2D culture systems for producing blood cells on a small scale in the laboratory, the use of modified culture systems has been reported. The current consensus is a 3-step method for liquid culture of erythroid cells (Table 1) [5]. Briefly, HSCs are expanded using erythropoietin (EPO), stem cell factor (SCF), and interleukin-3 (IL-3) in a base medium; Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) or StemSpan serum-free expansion medium (SFEM, Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Erythroblast expansion in the presence of SCF, EPO, and transferrin is followed by terminal differentiation, with or without EPO. While the expansion of erythroblasts requires supplementation with SCF and EPO, cells at the terminal differentiation stage gradually lose receptors for these cytokines [6]. Since the enucleated reticulocytes still have ferritin receptors; transferrin, which provides iron to erythroid cells, should be supplemented until the end of the final maturation.
Table 1 . Overview of sources and culture media for the production of red blood cells..
HSC commitment | |
---|---|
Cell cultures | Erythropoiesis |
Cell sources | CB, BM, PB, hESC, hiPSC, immortalized erythroid progenitor cell lines |
Media | StemSpan, IMDM, Cell-Quina) |
Additives | EPO, TPO, SCF, IL-3, transferrin, holo-transferrin, IL-6, Flt-3, heparin, IGF-1, glucocorticoids, TGF-β agonist, PPAR-α agonist |
a)GMP-grade homemade media..
Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; CB, cord blood; EPO, erythropoietin; Flt-3, feline Mcdonough sarcoma-like tyrosine kinase 3; hESC, human embryonic stem cell; hiPSC, human induced pluripotent stem cell; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; IMDM, Isocove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium; PB, peripheral blood; PPAR-α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α; SCF, stem cell factor; IL, interleukin; TGF-β, transforming growth factor β; TPO, thrombopoietin..
Enucleation is a crucial factor because nucleated erythroblasts are less effective at transporting oxygen and are more prone to hemolysis as they pass through small capillaries. Enucleated cells also have the advantage of no DNA and the inability to divide, thus preventing the transfer of malignancy to the recipient [7].
Additional additives, such as thrombopoietin, IL-6, feline McDonough sarcoma-like tyrosine kinase 3, heparin, glucocorticoids, insulin-like growth factor-1, transforming growth factor β agonists, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonists, can be added and further modified; with or without serum or feeder layers [8-10].
A major concern is the scale of production required to meet the standard adult therapeutic transfusion dose. Because more than 2×1012 RBCs are required per unit, a conventional 2D culture system requires 1,000 L of medium with a culture density of 2×106 cells/mL [11]. High-density cell culture is critical for overcoming the massive volume of media required [5]. Cells grown in suspension should be maintained at a density of >1×108 cells/mL to produce the numbers required within a minimal medium volume [12]. In addition, greater than 90% enucleation is important for better final erythrocyte yield [10]. Final erythrocytes should have adult hemoglobin and express accurate blood group antigens, such as O RhD-negative, for the universal blood type.
In this review, we discuss recent advances in the manufacturing of RBCs using various cell sources, 3D manufacturing methods, and clinical applications.
The first studies on cultured RBCs (cRBCs) focused primarily on human adult HSCs derived from CB, BM, and mobilized PB [13-15]. However, because of their limited proliferation capacity and low yield, RBCs derived from primary stem cells are difficult to use in clinical settings. An emerging model source uses the high proliferative potential of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). However, these cells show very low degrees of enucleation and very low adult hemoglobin expression. Recent studies have focused on the development of immortalized cell lines at the adult erythroblast stage.
Complex 3D culture systems have been studied to mimic the BM niche which regulates the generation of blood cells with a focus on topography, local stiffness of physical constraints, soluble factors, small molecules, and feeder layers.
Severn
Lee
It is unclear which type of bioreactor is the best for RBC production. Culturing at a high cell density is inevitable because of the large quantity of cells required in the final product for transfusion. Perfusion-based hollow-fiber bioreactors are known to increase the cell culture density. In a small scale study using a 2 mL vessel, CB-derived CD34+ cells inoculated at a density of 800,000 cells/mL expanded 100-fold and differentiated into erythroid cells over a 7 day period [19]. Additionally, Allenby
Wave-like rocking motion bioreactors, fluidized bed bioreactors [23, 24], rotating wall vessel bioreactors, and stirred tank reactors (STRs) have been proposed for the mass transfer of nutrients and oxygen to achieve greater erythroblast expansion and enucleation.
Since the effects of agitation on
The transfer of static culture to a flask-based system has been studied to scale up culture conditions. Griffiths
Sivalingam
Zhang
An STR is a cylindrical vessel with a stirrer that is widely used to culture biological agents, including enzymes, antibodies, and cells. It has been widely used in industry because of its relatively easy scale-up, uniform distribution of cells and nutrients, sufficient oxygen transfer, ease of control and monitoring of culture conditions, and compliance with current GMP requirements [31, 32].
The Thomas group [33, 34] used 15 mL Ambr bioreactors using a design of experiments (DOE) methodology. However, the final cell yield was as low as 16-fold after 25 days and 8-fold after 16 days. This group later refined the experimental design for bioreactor process development, gas transfer parameters, and media volume. However, proliferation in the STR was lower than that in static cultures, with 12-fold growth in the STR and 14-fold growth in static cultures being achieved in 25 culture days. Differentiation and enucleation, in addition to a reduction in culture time and media volume, were enhanced in STR compared to static conditions [35]. Lee
Han
Table 2 . 3D scaffolds and bioreactors for the production of red blood cells..
Types | Cell source | Culture period | Fold increase in total cells | Enucleation rate | Maximal cell density | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Porous scaffold (polyHIPEs) | PB CD34+ cells | 14 days of expansion (in scaffolds), 12 days of differentiation (in spinner flasks) | 5,180- fold [(2.59±0.212) ×109 total cells] | 16.25% (post- leuko-filtration) | 1.6×106 cells/mL (in spinner flasks) | Severn |
Microcarrier (cytoline I) | Late erythroblasts differentiated CB CD34+ cells | 1–3 days after culturing in 2D plates for 13–15 days | 2,200-fold in 2D culture | 80% | 1×107 cells/mL | Lee |
Hollow fiber (BR001) | CB CD34+ cells | 7 days | 100-fold (small-scale of 2 mL or 8 mL) | 40% | 8×107 cells/mL | Housler |
Hollow fiber (3DHFR) | CB MNCs | 28 days | 4.4-fold (550-fold from the stimulated erythroid progenitors) | 23% | 2×109 cells/mL | Allenby |
Hollow fiber (BR2) | CB MNCs | 28 days | 50-fold | 50% | 2.5×109 cells/mL | Allenby |
Wave-type (CultiBag RM bioreactor) | CB CD34+ cells | 21 days | 1.73×106-fold | Not reported | 1×105 cells/mL | Timmins |
2 L glass vessels (stirred) | PB CD34+cells | 18–24 days | 104-fold | 55–95% | 1–6×105 cells/mL | Griffiths |
1.5 L flasks (stirred) | PB and CB CD34+ cells | 21 days | 105-fold | PB: ≤60% | 1–4×106 cells/mL from day14 | Kupzig |
CB: ≤38% | ||||||
500 mL spinner flasks | hiPSC | 39 days | 206–805-fold | 18.1–59.3% | 1.7×107 cells/mL | Sivalingam |
Stirred-tank Applikon BioSep perfusion bioreactor | O-negative hiPSC | 29 days | 1510.7-fold | ≤30% | 3.47×107 cells/mL | Yu |
Bottle turning device culture system | CB CD34+cells | 21 days | 2×108-fold | 50% | 2.42×106 cells/mL | Zhang |
G-Rex bioreactor | PB MNCs | 25 days | 3×107-fold | ≥90% | 5–10×106 cells/mL | Heshusius |
Stirred micro-bioreactor (Ambr) | CB CD34+ cells | 25 days | 12-fold | 80% | 1–5×106 cells/mL | Bayley |
Shake flask | PB MNCs | 10 days | 13.8-fold | Not reported | 3.06×106 cells/mL | Lee |
Stirred bioreactor (Ambr) | CB CD34+ cells | 21 days (cultured in 2D plates for 13 days) | 2.25×104-fold | 50% | 1.5×107 cells/mL | Han |
Stirred bioreactor (Single wall or AppliFlex) | PB MNCs | 22 days | 750-fold (0.5 L), 196-fold (3 L) | 30–35% | 0.7–2×106 cells/mL | Gallego-Murillo |
The first human transfusion of cRBCs was reported in 2011. HSCs were isolated from autologous mobilized PB, and 61,500±7,600-fold expansion was achieved by co-culture with mesenchymal stem cells. Subsequently, 1010 cRBCs were transfused and the half-life of the infused cells was approximately 26 days, demonstrating the safety of the cRBCs [39]. In 2022, a randomized and controlled phase I crossover trial titled RESTORE was announced to recruit at least ten healthy volunteers. Approximately 5–10 mL of lab-grown RBCs from allogeneic donors were transfused into 2 healthy individuals and no side effects have been reported. The details of current clinical trials of cultured red blood cells are shown in Table 3; ongoing studies will test the lifespan of lab-grown cells in the body and the donor’s fresh blood.
Table 3 . Clinical trials of cultured red blood cells..
Types | cRBC | |
---|---|---|
Cell origin | Autologous PB stem cells | Allogeneic PB stem cells |
Infused cells | RBC | RBC |
Recipient | Healthy volunteer | Healthy volunteers |
Enrollment no. | 1 | 2 |
Identifiers | NCT00929266 | ISRCTN:42886452 |
EudraCT:2017-002178-38 | ||
Location | France | UK |
Significant progress has been made in the generation of
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Table 1 . Overview of sources and culture media for the production of red blood cells..
HSC commitment | |
---|---|
Cell cultures | Erythropoiesis |
Cell sources | CB, BM, PB, hESC, hiPSC, immortalized erythroid progenitor cell lines |
Media | StemSpan, IMDM, Cell-Quina) |
Additives | EPO, TPO, SCF, IL-3, transferrin, holo-transferrin, IL-6, Flt-3, heparin, IGF-1, glucocorticoids, TGF-β agonist, PPAR-α agonist |
a)GMP-grade homemade media..
Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; CB, cord blood; EPO, erythropoietin; Flt-3, feline Mcdonough sarcoma-like tyrosine kinase 3; hESC, human embryonic stem cell; hiPSC, human induced pluripotent stem cell; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; IMDM, Isocove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium; PB, peripheral blood; PPAR-α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α; SCF, stem cell factor; IL, interleukin; TGF-β, transforming growth factor β; TPO, thrombopoietin..
Table 2 . 3D scaffolds and bioreactors for the production of red blood cells..
Types | Cell source | Culture period | Fold increase in total cells | Enucleation rate | Maximal cell density | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Porous scaffold (polyHIPEs) | PB CD34+ cells | 14 days of expansion (in scaffolds), 12 days of differentiation (in spinner flasks) | 5,180- fold [(2.59±0.212) ×109 total cells] | 16.25% (post- leuko-filtration) | 1.6×106 cells/mL (in spinner flasks) | Severn |
Microcarrier (cytoline I) | Late erythroblasts differentiated CB CD34+ cells | 1–3 days after culturing in 2D plates for 13–15 days | 2,200-fold in 2D culture | 80% | 1×107 cells/mL | Lee |
Hollow fiber (BR001) | CB CD34+ cells | 7 days | 100-fold (small-scale of 2 mL or 8 mL) | 40% | 8×107 cells/mL | Housler |
Hollow fiber (3DHFR) | CB MNCs | 28 days | 4.4-fold (550-fold from the stimulated erythroid progenitors) | 23% | 2×109 cells/mL | Allenby |
Hollow fiber (BR2) | CB MNCs | 28 days | 50-fold | 50% | 2.5×109 cells/mL | Allenby |
Wave-type (CultiBag RM bioreactor) | CB CD34+ cells | 21 days | 1.73×106-fold | Not reported | 1×105 cells/mL | Timmins |
2 L glass vessels (stirred) | PB CD34+cells | 18–24 days | 104-fold | 55–95% | 1–6×105 cells/mL | Griffiths |
1.5 L flasks (stirred) | PB and CB CD34+ cells | 21 days | 105-fold | PB: ≤60% | 1–4×106 cells/mL from day14 | Kupzig |
CB: ≤38% | ||||||
500 mL spinner flasks | hiPSC | 39 days | 206–805-fold | 18.1–59.3% | 1.7×107 cells/mL | Sivalingam |
Stirred-tank Applikon BioSep perfusion bioreactor | O-negative hiPSC | 29 days | 1510.7-fold | ≤30% | 3.47×107 cells/mL | Yu |
Bottle turning device culture system | CB CD34+cells | 21 days | 2×108-fold | 50% | 2.42×106 cells/mL | Zhang |
G-Rex bioreactor | PB MNCs | 25 days | 3×107-fold | ≥90% | 5–10×106 cells/mL | Heshusius |
Stirred micro-bioreactor (Ambr) | CB CD34+ cells | 25 days | 12-fold | 80% | 1–5×106 cells/mL | Bayley |
Shake flask | PB MNCs | 10 days | 13.8-fold | Not reported | 3.06×106 cells/mL | Lee |
Stirred bioreactor (Ambr) | CB CD34+ cells | 21 days (cultured in 2D plates for 13 days) | 2.25×104-fold | 50% | 1.5×107 cells/mL | Han |
Stirred bioreactor (Single wall or AppliFlex) | PB MNCs | 22 days | 750-fold (0.5 L), 196-fold (3 L) | 30–35% | 0.7–2×106 cells/mL | Gallego-Murillo |
Table 3 . Clinical trials of cultured red blood cells..
Types | cRBC | |
---|---|---|
Cell origin | Autologous PB stem cells | Allogeneic PB stem cells |
Infused cells | RBC | RBC |
Recipient | Healthy volunteer | Healthy volunteers |
Enrollment no. | 1 | 2 |
Identifiers | NCT00929266 | ISRCTN:42886452 |
EudraCT:2017-002178-38 | ||
Location | France | UK |