Blood Res 2015; 50(2): 69-70
Reduced-intensity conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: looking forward to an international consensus
Monazza Chaudhry, M.D.1, and Natasha Ali, M.D.2

1Medical College, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine/Oncology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

Published online: June 25, 2015.
© The Korean Journal of Hematology. All rights reserved.

cc This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The treatment for hematological malignancies has excelled over the past decade. A vast number of hematological malignancies are now amenable to cure with hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) [1]. Older patients with comorbidities are poor candidates for standard myeloablative conditioning (MAC). While myeloablative therapy remains the standard curative conditioning regimen in the treatment of malignant disorders such as acute myeloid leukemia, its use is limited to patients in the younger age group, and to those in good physical health. Therefore, the older population is generally unsuited to this form of treatment, even though most hematological malignancies are often diagnosed at the age of 70-80 years. The advent of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) has provided these patients with a viable treatment option.

Prior to undergoing HSCT, patients are treated with a conditioning regimen. This not only decreases the tumor burden, but also maximizes the capability of the donor cells to engraft successfully by suppressing the patient's immune system. Conditioning regimens vary in the amount of agent used. These compounds are often used at highly toxic dosage levels that are required to induce an immunocompromised state through a cytoreductive effect [2]. Over the past decade, conditioning regimens have considerably evolved with the development of RIC. These regimens are composed of reduced doses of cytotoxic agents in addition to a T-cell depleting agent [3]. The most commonly used regimens include fludarabine in combination with low-dose total body irradiation, or an alkylating agent such as busulfan, cyclophosphamide, or melphalan [3]. This treatment modality relies on a graft-versus-leukemia effect and has minimal associated toxicity.

It is difficult to define RIC as it falls into an intermediate category between the MAC and the non-myeloablative regimens, since it does result in prolonged pancytopenia. Sources of donor cells include peripheral blood stem cells, bone marrow, and umbilical cord blood. Peripheral blood stem cells are more commonly used owing to the decreased engraftment time associated with their use [4]. Umbilical cord blood stem cells are a promising alternative source of stem cells with an associated 1-year survival rate of up to 40%, and a 9% incidence of grade III-IV acute graftversus-host disease (GVHD). However, studies have also reported a transplant-related mortality (TRM) rate of 39-48% associated with use of umbilical cord blood stem cells [56].

Studies assessing the influence of age on the outcomes of RIC treatment have not shown any significant association between the two. Patients in the age group >65 years have a reported non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate of 30% and 34% at 1 and 2 years respectively; whereas in the younger age group (40-54 years), the reported corresponding rates are 21% and 50% respectively [7].

A meta-analysis of results from 13 studies conducted by Zeng et al. [8] found no significant difference between MAC and RIC in terms of overall survival rate, event-free survival, and NRM. Furthermore, the incidence of GVHD was significantly lower with RIC. GVHD is an important cause of mortality associated with the MAC regimen due to the highly toxic doses of agents that are often necessary to eradicate diseased host cells from the bone marrow. The leading causes of death in patients treated with a MAC regimen are GVHD and toxicity. Thus, these findings call for extensive research on RIC regimens. The reported risk of TRM associated with MAC is 20%-60%, whereas RIC is known to be associated with higher overall survival and lower TRM at the same time [9]. A retrospective study on patients with MDS and AML treated with different conditioning regimens revealed a lower NRM in patients treated with RIC; however, there was also an increased risk of relapse in the first 12 months in these patients [10].

Although disease relapse continues to be a complication associated with both treatment regimens, RIC has a relatively higher incidence of relapse. This may be attributable to the additional host factors including, but not limited to, cytogenetics and disease status at the time of allogeneic HSCT.

The use of RIC has opened up new channels to treat malignant hematological disorders in the elderly and patients with multiple comorbidities. With reduction in GVHD, in conjunction with decreased TRM, RIC provides a treatment option for patients who were previously unsuited for standard conditioning regimens. However, the RIC regimens may vary from one center to another and therefore it is conceivable that the differences in outcomes may be related to different procedures and/or different criteria used for decision making by individual physicians. This indicates the need for further studies, particularly in developing countries, so that an international consensus on protocols and guidelines for RIC may be reached.

  1. Kanate, AS, Pasquini, MC, Hari, PN, Hamadani, M. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia: Current state in 2013 and future directions. World J Stem Cells, 2014;6;69-81.
  2. Bacigalupo, A, Ballen, K, Rizzo, D, et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2009;15;1628-1633.
  3. Reshef, R, Porter, DL. Reduced-intensity conditioned allogeneic SCT in adults with AML. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2015;50;759-769.
  4. Anasetti, C, Logan, BR, Lee, SJ, et al. Peripheral-blood stem cells versus bone marrow from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med, 2012;367;1487-1496.
  5. Barker, JN, Weisdorf, DJ, DeFor, TE, Blazar, BR, Miller, JS, Wagner, JE. Rapid and complete donor chimerism in adult recipients of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning. Blood, 2003;102;1915-1919.
  6. Rocha, V, Mohty, M, Gluckman, E, Rio, B, Array. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens before unrelated cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukaemia and other haematological malignancies. Curr Opin Oncol, 2009;21;S31-S34.
  7. McClune, BL, Weisdorf, DJ, Pedersen, TL, et al. Effect of age on outcome of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission or with myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol, 2010;28;1878-1887.
  8. Zeng, W, Huang, L, Meng, F, Liu, Z, Zhou, J, Sun, H. Reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2014;7;4357-4368.
  9. Zhang, L, Zhang, YZ. Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation in malignant lymphoma: current status. Cancer Biol Med, 2013;10;1-9.
  10. Martino, R, de Wreede, L, Fiocco, M, et al. Comparison of conditioning regimens of various intensities for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT using HLA-identical sibling donors in AML and MDS with <10% BM blasts: a report from EBMT. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2013;48;761-770.


This Article

Current Issue


Indexed/Covered by

Today : 181  /
Total : 59,082